没有合适的资源?快使用搜索试试~ 我知道了~
2023年美赛特等奖论文-A-2300336-解密.pdf
1.该资源内容由用户上传,如若侵权请联系客服进行举报
2.虚拟产品一经售出概不退款(资源遇到问题,请及时私信上传者)
2.虚拟产品一经售出概不退款(资源遇到问题,请及时私信上传者)
版权申诉
0 下载量 82 浏览量
2024-05-06
22:06:28
上传
评论
收藏 7.06MB PDF 举报
温馨提示
试读
25页
大学生,数学建模,美国大学生数学建模竞赛,MCM/ICM,2023年美赛特等奖O奖论文
资源推荐
资源详情
资源评论
Problem Chosen
A
2023
MCM/ICM
Summary Sheet
Team Control Number
2300336
Community Succession Simulation: Surviving Drought
Summary
The species richness of plant communities has a significant influence on their ability to withstand
drought. From an ecological niche perspective, we simulate plant community succession under
drought conditions and analyze the effects of various factors.
First, we develop the Plant Community Succession Model based on niche theory to simulate
community succession under drought conditions. The model applies changes in niche width as
the indicator to simulate community succession and utilizes competition matrix to describe in-
teractions between species, including competition and facilitation. Then, the Niche Width Model
is established, comprehensively considering the effects of reproduction, mortality, and uncer-
tainties. Among them, reproduction depends on the degree of drought, niche width, interspecific
relationships, and environmental capacity, while mortality depends on the degree of drought and
the niche width. Uncertainties are measured with Gaussian white noise.
A niche width differential equation model is built based on the Beverton-Holt and the Lotka-
Volterra equations. To account for various irregular weather cycles, we utilize random variables
obeying normal distribution to simulate the extent and duration of drought. As a case study, we
simulate the evolution of a three-species community and draw the conclusion that the total niche
width of the community increases, suggesting long-term survival.
To investigate the influence of species number on community dynamics, we utilize the Plant
Community Evolution Model to simulate communities containing one to four species separately.
The results demonstrate that three species are necessary for the community to benefit. Additionally,
as the number of species increases, the drought resistance improves and then stabilizes.
Based on the competition matrix, we set up three distinct communities and discuss their drought
resistance through simulations. It can be concluded that facilitation-dominated relationships en-
hance drought resistance and increase the community’s survival time. Moreover, we vary the
frequency and intensity of drought and then conclude that species extinction is more likely to occur
during severe droughts.
Pollution and habitat shrinkage affect plant communities’ niche width and competitive rela-
tionships. Therefore, we adjust the niche width and competition matrix accordingly. The results
indicate that pollution and habitat shrinkage may cause the extinction of certain species.
Finally, based on the impact of various factors, we recommend some measures to ensure
the long-term viability of a plant community. Additionally, we also analyze the significance of
protecting vulnerable communities for the overall health of ecosystems.
Keywords: Community succession; Drought resistance; Niche width; Population interactions;
Beverton-Holt equation
Contents
1 Introduction 2
1.1 Background . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
1.2 Restatement of the Problem . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
1.3 Our Work . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
2 Notations and Assumptions 4
2.1 Notations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
2.2 Assumptions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
3 Plant Community Evolution Model 5
3.1 Model Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
3.2 Initial Conditions and Niche Characteristics of Species . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
3.3 Rules of Plant Community Evolution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
3.3.1 Effects of Species Reproduction on Niche Width . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
3.3.2 Effects of Species Mortality on Niche Width . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
3.4 Irregular Weather Cycles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
3.5 Simulation of Plant Community Evolution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
3.5.1 Plant Species and Initial Parameters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
3.5.2 Irregular Weather Simulation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
3.5.3 Simulation Results of Species Evolution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
4 Application of Plant Community Evolution Model 15
4.1 Effect of the Number of Species on the Community . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
4.1.1 The Minimal Number of Species for the Community to Benefit . . . . . . . 15
4.1.2 The Effect of Increasing Species Number on Community . . . . . . . . . . 17
4.2 Impact of the Types of Species on Community Evolution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
4.3 The Effects of the Severity of Drought . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
4.4 The impact of Pollution and Habitat Reduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
4.5 Measures that Allow a Plant Community to Live Longer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
5 Sensitivity Analysis 21
5.1 Sensitivity to Unpredictable Factors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
5.2 Sensitivity to Drought Coefficient . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
6 Strengths and Weaknesses 23
6.1 Strengths . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
6.2 Weaknesses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
7 Conclusion 23
Referrence 24
Team # 2300336 Page 2 of 24
1 Introduction
1.1 Background
Plants of different species possess varying susceptibilities and abilities to resist drought[1]. Ex-
tensive observations have indicated that the species richness of plant communities significantly
impacts their ability to adapt to water scarcity over the long term[2]. Communities containing a
larger number of species tend to exhibit higher resistance to drought stress in subsequent genera-
tions, whereas those with fewer species exhibit lower resistance. Thus, analyzing the association
between drought adaptability and the number of species in plant communities is critical for their
survival over extended periods.
Figure 1: World drought situation from NIDIS
1.2 Restatement of the Problem
• Develop a model to predict the evolution of plant communities under various irregular weather
cycles and consider the interactions between species.
• Determine the minimum number of species required for the community to benefit and the
impact of increased species numbers on the community.
• Analyze the effect of species type on community evolution
• Discuss the impact of the greater or less frequency and width of drought.
• Analyze the impact of other factors such as pollution and habitat reduction on the model
• According to the model, determine what should be done to ensure the long-term viability of
a plant community and the impacts on the larger environment.
1.3 Our Work
To sum up the full article, we
Team # 2300336 Page 3 of 24
• develop an ecological niche model considering uncertain weather cycles to simulate plant
community evolution. The model accounts for species interactions and successional pro-
cesses based on inter-species competition, and establishes competition matrices to describe
population interactions within the community.
• use the model to determine the minimum number of species required for a community to
benefit from increased species numbers. The model considers the ecological niche width of
each population under uncertain drought conditions, using differential equations based on
the Beverton-Holt and Lotka-Volterra equations.
• analyze the impact of different species types on community evolution. The model shows
that populations of different types have different interactions, and mutualism may lead to
greater drought resistance. However, competition predominance during severe and prolonged
droughts may cause population extinction, reducing species richness and community stability.
• study the effects of various drought cycles on community evolution using the model. The
analysis reveals that frequent and longer droughts may have negative impacts on populations,
while less frequent droughts may make populations more adaptable to drought environments.
• discuss the impact of other factors, such as pollution and habitat reduction, on community
evolution. The model sets pollution and habitat reduction coefficients to affect ecological
niche width and species interactions, thereby influencing community succession. Pollution
and habitat reduction increase competition, allowing more competitive populations to occupy
resources, but may lead to species extinction and affect community stability.
• propose measures to ensure the long-term viability of plant communities and their impacts
on the larger environment. Increasing the number of species in a community may improve
drought adaptability, but must be balanced with avoiding competition, ensuring mutualism,
and reducing environmental pollution and habitat reduction to ensure community stability
and long-term viability.
Figure 2: The flow chart of our work
Team # 2300336 Page 4 of 24
2 Notations and Assumptions
2.1 Notations
Symbols Description
C Competition matrix of species
L Niche width of species
Γ Species’ sensitivity to drought
l
i
(t) Niche width of the i-th species at time t
b
i
(t) Increase in niche width of the i-th species due to its reproduction
d
i
(t) fraction of niche width of the i-th species reduced by death
σ
i
(t) Gaussian white noise for unpredictability
K(t) Niche width of a community at time t
g
i
Growth rate of the i-th species under no competition condition
dr Drought coefficient that describes the extent of the drought
f(dr) Drought response function that impact death rate
t
IN R
Time interval until the next drought
t
d
Duration of the drought
2.2 Assumptions
To simplify the problem and make it convenient for us to simulate real-life conditions, we make the
following basic assumptions, each of which is properly justified.
• Assumption 1: The number of species in the plant community will not increase.
Justification: We assume a closed system where no new species are introduced or can
colonize the plant community.
• Assumption 2: Species don’t mutate but the population and the resources it controls change
over time.
Justification: The timescale of the study is relatively short, and genetic changes and muta-
tions that could lead to ecological changes are assumed to be negligible.
• Assumption 3: The competitive or mutually-beneficial relationship between species in a
community remains the same.
Justification: The interactions between species in a community are complex and can change
over time due to a variety of factors. This is to simplify the model and focus on the effects of
drought on the community structure.
• Assumption 4: The drought sensitivity coefficient of each species in the community is fixed
and does not change with time and space.
Justification: To make the models simple and easy to understand, niche parameters for
剩余24页未读,继续阅读
资源评论
阿拉伯梳子
- 粉丝: 1560
- 资源: 5735
上传资源 快速赚钱
- 我的内容管理 展开
- 我的资源 快来上传第一个资源
- 我的收益 登录查看自己的收益
- 我的积分 登录查看自己的积分
- 我的C币 登录后查看C币余额
- 我的收藏
- 我的下载
- 下载帮助
安全验证
文档复制为VIP权益,开通VIP直接复制
信息提交成功