没有合适的资源?快使用搜索试试~ 我知道了~
2023年美赛特等奖论文-A-2303950-解密.pdf
1.该资源内容由用户上传,如若侵权请联系客服进行举报
2.虚拟产品一经售出概不退款(资源遇到问题,请及时私信上传者)
2.虚拟产品一经售出概不退款(资源遇到问题,请及时私信上传者)
版权申诉
0 下载量 18 浏览量
2024-05-06
22:06:18
上传
评论
收藏 2.15MB PDF 举报
温馨提示
试读
25页
大学生,数学建模,美国大学生数学建模竞赛,MCM/ICM,2023年美赛特等奖O奖论文
资源推荐
资源详情
资源评论
A Methodology to Simulate Drought-Stricken Plant Communities
Summary
The study of plant communities in arid areas is an indispensable part of environmental
protection. In these regions, annual plants are important components of vegetation, by virtue
of their unique characteristics. This paper presents a method of simulation for the growth,
competition, and facilitation of annual plants, which can be applied to various circumstances.
To begin with, we establish the Growth Model of annual plants. At first, we determine
the relationship between soil water content and the natural growth rate in Logistic Model. Then,
we build the differential equation of soil water content, based on the stochastic rainfall model.
Finally, we establish the law of annual plant reproduction. To estimate the statistical parameters
in the stochastic rainfall model, we use Normal Equation to get the optimal parameters
according to Least Square Method.
Based on the Growth Model, we establish the Competition Model of various plants to
simulate their root competition. For the competition coefficient in Lotka-Volterra Model, we
innovatively determine its relationship with root growth and water-utilizing capacity of plants.
Considering the structure of root system, we estimate the parameters in the model reasonably.
Based on the Competition Model, we further establish the Facilitation Model of shrub
plants to herbaceous plants. Given the water-lifting action of shrub plants, we modify the water
absorption rate in the Competition Model. So far, our models have been elaborated and the
parameters have been estimated properly.
After that, we use the fourth order Runge-Kutta algorithm to give numerical solutions
to the differential equations. And the problems in the Requirement have been solved as follows:
⚫ Based on the results from our TOPSIS model, at least eight plant species are required
to provide overall benefits for the community. As the number of plant species grows, the
scale of the community will decrease, while the community will embrace better stability.
⚫ By improving the water absorption efficiency of herbaceous plants, shrubs can reduce
the interspecific competition, make the average biomass of different herbaceous plants
close to each other, and improve the stability of biodiversity.
⚫ Under more severe drought conditions provided in Section 5.4, the scale of the
community will be decreased by over 67% and the fluctuation of the evolution will be
enlarged by over 36%. But these indexes still follow the similar trend in Section 5.2 as
the number of species grows regardless of different weather cycles.
⚫ The effects of two typical types of pollutants are compared. The results show that
pollutants such as acid rain are more dangerous because it can decrease the scale by 14.6%
and increase the fluctuation by 14.4% at the same time. Also, the diminishment of habitat
by 50% will cause the system to lose 22.9% of its scale but reduce 8.7% of its fluctuation.
⚫ Based on our model and analysis, our strategies are expressed from two main aspects:
the Preservation and Modification of the ecosystem.
Finally, the sensitivity and stability of the model are fully analyzed.
Keywords: Growth Model; Competition model; Facilitation model; 4th Runge-Kutta; TOPSIS
Problem Chosen
A
2023
MCM/ICM
Summary Sheet
Team Control Number
2303950
Team # 2303950 Page 2 of 25
Content
1 Introduction ...................................................................................................... 3
1.1 Background ...................................................................................................................... 3
1.2 Restatement of the Problem ............................................................................................. 3
1.3 Our Work .......................................................................................................................... 4
2 Assumptions and Justifications ....................................................................... 4
3 Notations ........................................................................................................... 5
4 Model Establishment ....................................................................................... 6
4.1 The Growth Model of One Species in Drought Circumstances....................................... 6
4.2 The Competition Model of Multiple Species ................................................................... 9
4.3 The Facilitation Model of Shrub Plants to Herbaceous Plants ...................................... 12
4.4 Reasonable Estimation of Essential Parameters ............................................................ 13
5 Model Computed and Results Analysis ....................................................... 15
5.1 Model Computed Algorithm .......................................................................................... 15
5.2 Evaluation of the Benefit for a Multi-Plants Community .............................................. 16
5.3 The Effect of Different Types of Species in the Community ......................................... 17
5.4 The Effect of Fluctuant Frequency of Drought .............................................................. 18
5.5 The Impact of Other Factors on Plant Community ........................................................ 19
5.6 Measures Needed for Long-Term Viability ................................................................... 20
6 Sensitivity Analysis and Stability Analysis .................................................. 21
6.1 Sensitivity Analysis ........................................................................................................ 21
6.2 Stability Analysis ........................................................................................................... 22
7 Strengths and Weaknesses ............................................................................. 24
7.1 Strengths ........................................................................................................................ 24
7.2 Weaknesses .................................................................................................................... 24
References .......................................................................................................... 25
Team # 2303950 Page 3 of 25
1 Introduction
1.1 Background
Arid environments are characterized by limited and variable rainfall that supplies
resources in pulses. And grasslands, mostly covered by herbages and shrubs, are quite sensitive
to the shortage of water. Plenty of observations reveal that the number of different species has
essential effects on how a plant community adapts to droughts which may take place at
changeable frequencies and wide range of severity. To be specific, plants are better adapted to
drought conditions in communities with several species, rather than in those with only one
species. Therefore, this phenomenon, which is a consequence of localized biodiversity, is of
great research value.
Figure 1: A Plant Community in Arid Environment
1.2 Restatement of the Problem
Considering the background information and limiting conditions identified in the problem
statement, we are supposed to address the following issues:
⚫ Build a mathematical model to describe drought adaptability with regard to the number of
species in a plant community. Notably, we need to predict what changes will take place
when a plant community is exposed to variable weather cycles. And our model should
account for interactions between different species in this process.
⚫ Find out the minimal number of species necessary for a plant community to benefit from
localized biodiversity. And forecast what will happen when the number of species
increases. What is more, we should analyze the sensitivity of the model by changing the
types of species in the plant community.
Team # 2303950 Page 4 of 25
⚫ Discuss whether the number of species have the same impact on the overall population if
the occurrence of droughts has fluctuant frequency and greater variation. Meanwhile, we
should also take other factors such as pollution and habitat reduction into consideration.
⚫ Illustrate what measures should be taken to ensure the long-term viability of a plant
community. Conclude the impacts of this phenomenon on the larger environment.
1.3 Our Work
In this paper, we establish three mathematical models progressively and address six
problems, which are listed below:
Figure 2: Models and Problems
2 Assumptions and Justifications
To simplify the problems, we make the following assumptions, each of which is justified.
⚫ Assumption 1: The research object of this paper is mainly summer-type annual plants,
whose life cycle is from spring to autumn. The biomass of these plants will be converted
into the biomass of seed banks in winter.
→
Justification: According to [1], annual plants have the characteristics of fast growth,
strong reproductive ability and short life cycle. These plants are an important part of
vegetation in arid areas, with high research value.
⚫ Assumption 2: Rainfall is completed instantaneously in arid areas, and there is no
additional water supply between two rains.
→
Justification: The duration of each rainfall in arid areas is far shorter than the time-
scale in years which we want to study. At the same time, the vast majority of arid areas are
short of surface water resources, such as rivers and lakes. So, we can consider that the
only way for water supply is rainfall.
⚫ Assumption 3: Water evaporation is directly proportional to the total water amount in the
soil in arid areas.
Team # 2303950 Page 5 of 25
→
Justification: The evaporation effect of water in arid areas is significant throughout the
year. In addition, the soil in arid areas is usually loose. Therefore, the water in the soil is
exposed to air uniformly, so we can infer that the water evaporation is proportional to the
total water amount.
⚫ Assumption 4: Annual plants have a regular period of flowering and fruiting, and the
duration of flowering is short.
→
Justification: Annual plants have fixed life cycle and regular flowering period. Due to
the influence of arid environment, the flowering period of plants is generally short, often
within several days. This span is also far shorter than the time-scale in years which we
want to study.
⚫ Assumption 5: The average biomass (or average mass) of plants is directly proportional
to the volume of the root system.
→
Justification: It can be seen that a plant needs more resources if its biomass is larger.
And the main limitation of plants is the shortage of water in arid areas. Considering that
the root system is the main way for plants to absorb water, it is plausible to assume that
the average biomass of plants is directly proportional to the volume covered by roots.
⚫ Assumption 6: In the experimental area, the plants distribute evenly.
→
Justification: In order to reduce the competition for resources, the plants tend to
distribute evenly all over the area.
⚫ Assumption 7: In the process of plant growth (between germination and flowering), the
death of the whole plant is not considered.
→
Justification: In our model, environmental restricts and interspecific competitions are
considered to have an impact on the average biomass of the plants. We ignore the
possibility that the above factors may lead to the death of the whole plant.
3 Notations
The primary notations used in this paper are listed in Table 1.
Table 1: Notations used in this paper
Symbol Definition Unit
inherent growth rate
the average biomass of species
the maximum average biomass of species within environmental limit
resource availability (soil water content)
the rate of resource uptake per unit biomass
the conversion efficiency from water to biomass increment
the loss rate of plants per unit time
to what extent water absorption rate changes with resource availability
the upper limit of water absorption rage
controls the variation trend of the uptake curve
the biomass of seed bank of species
剩余24页未读,继续阅读
资源评论
阿拉伯梳子
- 粉丝: 1573
- 资源: 5735
上传资源 快速赚钱
- 我的内容管理 展开
- 我的资源 快来上传第一个资源
- 我的收益 登录查看自己的收益
- 我的积分 登录查看自己的积分
- 我的C币 登录后查看C币余额
- 我的收藏
- 我的下载
- 下载帮助
安全验证
文档复制为VIP权益,开通VIP直接复制
信息提交成功