没有合适的资源?快使用搜索试试~ 我知道了~
温馨提示
正如以前所做的那样,我们通常取决于标量场来研究未知的耦合函数F(φ),以及扭转和曲率函数f(T)和f(R)。 在f(R)情况下,它来自量子相关性和其他来源。 现在,如果除了在f(T)引力上下文中的这一术语之外,我们通过另一个取决于标量场及其导数的术语来增强作用呢? 在本文中,我们在f(T)重力的一般共同作用中添加了一个前所未有的术语,以使得在这个新术语中,未知的扭转函数与标量场及其导数的未知函数结合在一起。 我们详细解释了为什么可以附加这样的术语。 通过Noether对称方法,我们考虑其行为和效果。 我们证明它不会产生异常,而是可以成功运行,并且对场方程精确解的数值分析与所有最重要的观测数据(尤其是后期加速扩展)一致。 因此,可以将此新项添加到f(T)重力的引力作用中。
资源推荐
资源详情
资源评论
Eur. Phys. J. C (2017) 77:510
DOI 10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-5050-z
Regular Article - Theoretical Physics
Studying the intervention of an unusual term in f (T) gravity via
the Noether symmetry approach
On a new term for f (T) gravity actions
Behzad Tajahmad
a
Faculty of Physics, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran
Received: 9 January 2017 / Accepted: 7 July 2017 / Published online: 1 August 2017
© The Author(s) 2017. This article is an open access publication
Abstract As has been done before, we study an unknown
coupling function, i.e. F(ϕ), together with a function of
torsion and also curvature, i.e. f (T ) and f (R), generally
depending upon a scalar field. In the f (R) case, it comes
from quantum correlations and other sources. Now, what if
beside this term in f (T ) gravity context, we enhance the
action through another term which depends upon both scalar
field and its derivatives? In this paper, we have added such an
unprecedented term in the generic common action of f (T )
gravity such that in this new term, an unknown function of
torsion has coupled with an unknown function of both scalar
field and its derivatives. We explain in detail why we can
append such a term. By the Noether symmetry approach, we
consider its behavior and effect. We show that it does not
produce an anomaly, but rather it works successfully, and
numerical analysis of the exact solutions of field equations
coincides with all most important observational data, par-
ticularly late-time-accelerated expansion. So, this new term
may be added to the gravitational actions of f (T ) gravity.
1 Introduction
Various astronomical and cosmological observations of the
last decade, including CMB studies [1], supernovae [2,3] and
large scale structure [4], have provided a picture of the uni-
verse with accelerating expansion. This profound mystery
leads us to the prospect that either about 70% of the uni-
verse is made up of a substance known as dark energy[5],
about which we have almost no knowledge at all, or that
General Relativity (GR) is modified at cosmological scales
[6–8]. A simple candidate for the dark energy is the cos-
mological constant with the equation of state (EoS) param-
eter ω =−1. However, the cosmological constant model is
a
e-mail: behzadtajahmad@yahoo.com
subject to the fine-tuning and coincidence problems [9]. In
order to solve these problems, various dynamical dark energy
models have been proposed: quintessence [10,11], phan-
tom [12,13] and quintom [14–16]. Because the quintessence
type of matter could not give the possibility that ω<−1,
extended paradigms (i.e. phantom and quintom) were pro-
posed [17]. Beside this unknown-nature dark energy, a sec-
ond way, concerning various gravitational modification the-
ories like f (R), f (T ) and scalar-tensor theories, has been
addressed. One of the modifications of the matter part of
the Einstein–Hilbert action is f (T ) gravity as an extension
of teleparallel gravity. Teleparallel Gravity (TG), demonstra-
bly equivalent to general relativity, was initially introduced
by Einstein for the sake of unifying gravity and electromag-
netism. In TG we use the Weitzenböck connection instead
of the Levi-Civita connection, so we have torsion in lieu of
curvature only. The field equations in this theory are second-
order differential equations, while for the generalized f (R)
theory they are of fourth order, thus it is simpler to analyze
and elaborate the cosmic evolution [18].
The actions of this context are likely to contain several
scalar fields, but it is normally assumed that only one of
these fields remains dynamical for a long period. We always
see the coupling function of f (R) and also f (T ) in the form
of a function; that is, F(ϕ) f (R) or F(ϕ) f (T ), depending
upon the scalar field only. The motivation for the nonmini-
mal coupling, F(ϕ)R in which F(ϕ) =
1
2
1
8π G
− ξϕ
2
,in
the gravitational Lagrangian comes from many directions.
However, this explicit nonminimal coupling was originally
introduced in the context of classical radiation problems [19],
and also it is required by renormalizability in curved space-
time [20]. For different values of ξ , we have the following
table (Table 1).
However, the values of ξ in renormalizable theories
depend upon the class of theory [56,57]. A nonzero ξ is
generated by first loop corrections even if it is absent in
123
510 Page 2 of 9 Eur. Phys. J. C (2017) 77 :510
Table 1 Special values of the dimensionless coupling constant, (ξ), in the nonminimal coupling and their names
Amounts of ξξ= 1/6 ξ = 0 ξ1 (General case) ξ = 0
Named: coupling Conformal Minimal Strong (Standard) nonminimal
the classical action [21,22]. A nonminimal coupling term
is expected at high curvatures [23], and it has been argued
that classicalization of the universe in quantum cosmology
indeed requires ξ = 0. Moreover, the nonminimal coupling
can solve potential problems of primordial nucleosynthesis
[24] and the absence of pathologies in the propagation of ϕ-
waves seems to require conformal coupling for all nongrav-
itational scalar fields [25]. Any attempt to formulate quan-
tum field theory on a curved spacetime necessarily leads to
modifying the Hilbert–Einstein action. This means adding
terms containing nonlinear invariants of the curvature tensor
or nonminimal couplings between matter and the curvature
originating in the perturbative expansion [26,27].
Now, let us take the incomplete action
S =
d
4
x
√
−g
[
F(ϕ)R +···
]
into account. Eliminating the accelerating term under integra-
tion by parts, the corresponding point-like Lagrangian reads
L = 6a ˙a
2
F − 6KaF + 6a
2
˙aF
˙ϕ +···, (1)
where K = 0, ±1. Here we assume the signs (+ - - -) for the
FRW metric components. On the other hand, in f (T ) gravity,
pursuant to the torsion form, we have no accelerating term,
so in this case, we do not have the last term in (1) in which
the derivative of the scalar field couples with the scale factor
and its derivative. Maybe it is worth to note what happens
when we insert a term as U
ϕ, ϕ
,μ
ϕ
,μ
g(T ) in the actions
of f (T ) gravity. As mentioned in the first paragraph of the
introduction, the “Teleparallel” case is equivalent to General
Relativity (TEGR). Altogether, in many cases, the authors
construct the actions of f (T ) gravity by replacing the torsion
instead of curvature (for example, see [41,59]). However,
when the nonminimal coupling is switched on, the resulting
theory exhibits different behavior. Hence, the last term in (1)
is the inspiration for adding such a term. The main purpose
of the present work is to answer the aforementioned question
by having recourse to the Noether symmetry approach.
Symmetries play a substantial role in theoretical physics.
It can safely be said that Noether symmetries are a power-
ful implement both to select models at a fundamental level
and to find exact solutions for specific Lagrangians. In the
literature, applications of the Noether symmetry in general-
ized theories of gravity have been abundantly studied (for
example see [28–50]). Beside this useful approach, another
lucrative approach, the Beyond Noether Symmetry approach
(B.N.S. approach), has recently been presented as an inno-
vation [51]. The B.N.S. approach may carry more conserved
currents than the Noether symmetry approach. Furthermore,
sometimes the Noether symmetry approach fails to achieve
the purpose. In such cases, utilizing the B.N.S. approach is the
first option. Also, with this new procedure, solving an ordi-
nary differential equation system, comprising field equations
and conserved currents, is a paved road.
The Noether theorem states that, for a given Lagrangian
L, defined on the tangent space of configurations, TQ ≡
{q
i
, ˙q
i
}, if the Lie derivative of the Lagrangian L, dragged
along a vector field X,
X = α
i
(q)
∂
∂q
i
+˙α
i
(q)
∂
∂ ˙q
i
, (2)
where a dot means a derivative with respect to t, vanishes
[52],
L
X
L = X
μ
L
μ
= α
i
(q)
∂ L
∂q
i
+˙α
i
(q)
∂ L
∂ ˙q
i
= 0, (3)
then X is a symmetry for the dynamics and it generates the
following conserved quantity (constant of motion):
0
= α
i
∂ L
∂ ˙q
i
. (4)
Alternatively, utilizing the Cartan one-form
θ
L
≡
∂ L
∂ ˙q
i
dq
i
(5)
and defining the inner derivative
i
X
θ
L
=θ
L
, X (6)
we get
i
X
θ
L
=
0
, (7)
provided that (3) holds. Equation (7) is coordinate inde-
pendent. Using a point transformation, the vector field X is
rewritten as
˜
X =
i
X
dQ
k
∂
∂ Q
k
+
d
dQ
k
i
X
dQ
k
∂
∂
˙
Q
k
. (8)
If X is a symmetry, so is
˜
X (i.e.
˜
XL = 0), and a point trans-
formation is chosen such that
i
X
dQ
1
= 1, i
X
dQ
i
= 0 (i = 1). (9)
123
剩余8页未读,继续阅读
资源评论
weixin_38704830
- 粉丝: 2
- 资源: 949
上传资源 快速赚钱
- 我的内容管理 展开
- 我的资源 快来上传第一个资源
- 我的收益 登录查看自己的收益
- 我的积分 登录查看自己的积分
- 我的C币 登录后查看C币余额
- 我的收藏
- 我的下载
- 下载帮助
最新资源
资源上传下载、课程学习等过程中有任何疑问或建议,欢迎提出宝贵意见哦~我们会及时处理!
点击此处反馈
安全验证
文档复制为VIP权益,开通VIP直接复制
信息提交成功