没有合适的资源?快使用搜索试试~ 我知道了~
资源推荐
资源详情
资源评论
1
内 容 提 要
随着信息时代的出现,企业面临的内外部环境发生了巨大的变化,企业要
想在竞争中生存和兴旺发展,就必须利用其战略和能力所派生的业绩评价系统。
因而,以财务衡量为主的、面向企业内部的、注重战术性反馈的传统业绩衡量
系统已经不再适用,对原有的业绩评价体系进行改革就成为一种必然。90 年代,
在长期不断演变的基础上,西方企业业绩评价系统发生了巨大的变化,突破了
单纯运用财务指标评价业绩的传统作法,并且将企业业绩评价与公司战略理论
结合,形成了平衡计分卡。平衡计分卡是由哈佛商学院教授罗伯特·S·卡普兰和
复兴全球战略集团总裁大卫·P·诺顿于 1992 年提出的。它是以企业的远景和战
略为目标,衡量企业未来的驱动因素。这些目标和衡量方法从四个方面来考察
企业的业绩:财务方面、客户方面、内部经营过程方面以及学习和成长方面。
在我国,企业业绩评价方法相对较为传统,企业普遍以财务指标作为业绩
评价的主要手段,而忽视将企业的经营战略以及企业利润驱动因素与业绩评价
相结合,不能适应企业面临的日益激烈的竞争局面,因此,我国企业业绩评价
方法亟需改进。平衡计分卡作为一种以信息为基础、将企业战略目标与企业业
绩驱动因素相结合的战略管理系统,对我国企业的业绩评价系统的改进有着特
殊的现实意义,引入平衡计分卡成为一种趋势。然而,尽管平衡计分卡具有诸
多其他业绩评价系统无法比拟的优势,也在国外取得了巨大的成功,不过由于
我国和西方的情况差异较大:一是西方国家长期以来严格、规范、科学的企业
管理实践;二是管理理论的不断创新和发展。所以,平衡计分卡是否能在我国
企业成功实施,就成了一个值得关注的话题。正是基于此,本文旨在研究平衡
计分卡在我国现阶段的可行性。
文章共分为五个部分:第一部分对我国企业经营业绩评价现状进行了分析,
指出其中存在的主要问题;第二部分简要介绍了平衡计分卡,包括平衡计分卡
的基本原理、平衡作用和因果关系;第三部分阐述了平衡计分卡在国内外的应
用以及易出现的问题;第四部分为文章的核心,分析了平衡计分卡在我国应用
的可行性。通过分析我国企业应用平衡计分卡的困难和障碍以及我国企业应用
平衡计分卡应具备的条件从而得出相关结论;第五部分针对我国企业应用平衡
计分卡提出了自己的几点建议。
关键词:平衡计分卡 业绩评价 关键业绩指标 战略 可行性
ABSTRACT
1
ABSTRACT
In today’s information era, the internal and external surroundings of the
company have undergone great changes. If a company wants to survive and prosper,
it must use the performance evaluation system derived from its strategies and
capabilities. Therefore, the traditional performance evaluation system is not
applicable any more because it’s mainly financial evaluation, targets the internal
aspect of the company and emphasizes on the strategic feedback. As a result, to
reform the traditional system has become a necessity.
In 1990s, based on the long-time and continuous evolvements, great changes
have taken place in the traditional evaluation system in the Western companies.
They started not to use financial indices alone. Besides, the performance evaluation
and the strategic theories of the company are integrated and “Balanced Scorecard
(BSC)” came into being. BSC was invented in 1992 by Prof. Robert ·S· Kaplan
of Harvard Business School and Mr. David Norton, CEO of Renaissance Solutions.
BSC targets on the vision and the strategies of the company and it measures the
future driving factors of the company. The targets and the measuring methods
evaluate the company’s performance from four perspectives: financial, customer,
internal business process and learning & growth.
In China, the evaluation methods of the company’s performance are
comparatively traditional and usually companies use financial indices as the major
methods, neglecting the integration of business strategies and the driving factors for
profit into the performance evaluation. Therefore, the companies are not capable of
facing the increasingly fierce competition. BSC is an information-based strategic
management system which integrates the strategic goals and the performance
driving factors.
In theory, BSC is especially significant in terms of improving the performance
evaluation system of Chinese companies and the introduction of BSC has become a
tendency. However, although BSC has incomparable advantages over other
performance evaluation systems and has been very successful in other countries,
ABSTRACT
2
whether BSC can be successfully implemented in China remains an issue of
attention because China and the western world are very much different. The
differences are: first, Western countries have years of strict, standardized and
scientific business management practice; second, management theories continue to
innovate and develop. It is also because of this that the thesis is aimed at studying
the feasibility of BSC in the current situation in China.
There are five parts in this thesis: first, analyzing the current evaluation status
of business performance of Chinese companies and pointing out the major existing
problems; second, a brief introduction of BSC, including the fundamentals, the
balancing role and the consequence of BSC; thirdly, the application of BSC in China
and abroad and the problems easily emerged; fourthly, the analysis of feasibility of
BSC in China, which is also the core part of the thesis. In this part, the conclusion is
drawn based on the difficulties and obstacles Chinese companies might encounter
and the necessary qualifications the companies should have in order to apply BSC in
Chinese companies; fifthly, proposals for how to apply BSC in Chinese companies.
Key Words: Balanced Scorecard, Performance Evaluation, Key Performance
Indicator, Strategy, Feasibility
目 录
1
目 录
一、我国企业经营业绩评价现状简析∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙1
(一)业绩评价以财务为主,忽视非财务指标的作用∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙1
(二)业绩评价体系不能准确评估企业价值 ∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙2
(三)业绩评价未能和企业战略相结合 ∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙3
(四)业绩评价系统选择上存在着误区 ∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙3
二、平衡计分卡简介∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙4
(一)平衡计分卡的基本原理∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙4
(二)平衡计分卡的平衡作用∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙7
(三)平衡计分卡的因果关系∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙9
三、平衡计分卡在国内外的应用以及易出现的问题∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙11
(一)平衡计分卡在国内外的应用 ∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙11
(二)平衡计分卡应用过程中易出现的问题 ∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙13
四、平衡计分卡在我国应用的可行性分析∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙16
(一)我国企业应用平衡计分卡的困难与障碍分析 ∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙16
(二)我国企业应用平衡计分卡应具备的条件∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙19
(三)关于关键业绩指标(Key Performance Indicator, KPI)的设置∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙20
(四)平衡计分卡的缺陷∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙23
(五)结论 ∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙24
五、我国企业应用平衡计分卡的几点建议∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙26
(一)切勿照抄照搬其他企业的模式∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙26
(二)树立业绩评价指标体系应随企业环境变化而变化的观念∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙26
(三)要重视企业信息系统的构建 ∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙27
目 录
2
(四)正确对待实施成本和获得收益之间的关系∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙27
(五)实施应与激励制度相结合∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙28
参考文献∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙29
后 记∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙31
剩余37页未读,继续阅读
资源评论
m0_63646843
- 粉丝: 0
- 资源: 8万+
下载权益
C知道特权
VIP文章
课程特权
开通VIP
上传资源 快速赚钱
- 我的内容管理 展开
- 我的资源 快来上传第一个资源
- 我的收益 登录查看自己的收益
- 我的积分 登录查看自己的积分
- 我的C币 登录后查看C币余额
- 我的收藏
- 我的下载
- 下载帮助
安全验证
文档复制为VIP权益,开通VIP直接复制
信息提交成功