没有合适的资源?快使用搜索试试~ 我知道了~
Research, development, and improvement in education
需积分: 8 0 下载量 108 浏览量
2021-06-29
22:10:59
上传
评论
收藏 558KB PDF 举报
温馨提示
Research, development, and improvement in education RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT I N EDUCATION’ RICHARD E. SCHUTZ Southwest Regional Laboratmy for Educalional Research and Developmat There are unprecedented problems facing school personnel today. As Francis Keppel (1966) has pointed out, the quantitative expansion of an ever-increasing pupil population has been steadily evolving for almost a century. There are estab- lished precedents for attacking the current quantitative
资源推荐
资源详情
资源评论
RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT IN EDUCATION’
RICHARD
E.
SCHUTZ
Southwest
Regional
Laboratmy
for
Educalional
Research
and
Developmat
There are unprecedented problems facing school personnel today. As Francis
Keppel
(1966)
has pointed out, the quantitative expansion of an ever-increasing
pupil population has been steadily evolving for almost a century. There are estab-
lished precedents for attacking the current quantitative problems. However, the
new pressure is qualitative in nature. Keppel sees this emphasis on quality as the
“necessary revolution” in American education. The nation’s schools have always
been (‘good’’ by definition. The necessary revolution goes beyond describing
or
justifying current quality.
It
involves an empirical demonstration of educational
improvement.
One need not retreat into the mystical aura with which educators have tradi-
tionally surrounded the term “improvement.” Improvement in education can be
gauged along the same dimensions used to assess improvement in other sectors of
life; utility, reliability of effect, time, and cost. Educational improvement is
at-
tained by enhancing performance on any one or more of these dimensions without
concomitant decrements in the remaining dimensions.
I
do not mean to imply that educators have opposed or even resisted improve-
ment; they have simply placed it in the same category as the flag and mother. Much
greater effort has been devoted to studying educational improvement than to
demonstrating it. This study has led to the development of many myths for educa-
tional “change.”
I
should like to enumerate a few of these myths, which are fre-
quently referred to euphemistically as “models.”
MYTHICAL MODELS
OF
CHANGE
The
alchemist
myth is one to which educational researchers have contributed
significantly. This involves the “translation of research into classroom practice.’’
The more rapidly we admit that educational research as currently defined has no
more direct relationship to educational practice than base metals have to gold, the
better off the researcher and school man will both be. The extrapolation of research
findings into school applications is
not
an easy and direct process which happens
naturally, without effort. We currently lack “translation” procedures.
The
great man
theory is another myth to which school administrators have
contributed.
It
implies that there is an isomorphic relationship between adminis-
trative policy and classroom practice. My very brief administrative experience has
been sufficient to convince me that the gap between administrative policy and opera-
tions
is
at least equal to that between the research report and operations.
The
copycat
model
I
attribute primarily to various private institutions.
Several foundations appear to have adopted a policy of investing in school programs
which are labled “research” to take advantage
of
the positive connotations of the
term but which have been pre-judged as “desirable” before the investment. The
programs are given visability with the expectation that they will be imitated else
where.
If
such imitation has occurred in the past, its effect has not been obvious.
The
total
destruction
myth may be attributed to the outspoken critics of the
’Paper delivered at the Annual Meeting
of
the California Educational Research Association,
Los
Angeles, California, March,
1967.
304
RICHARD
E.
SCHUTZ
educational establishment. This is
a
“throw the rascals out” model.
I
have already
indicated that the profession faces many pressing problems. However, my experience
with both the liberal arts and private industrial communities-the most frequently
nominated successors-leads me to believe that they are
no
better equipped to
handle the problems than is the current educational establishment.
The
nome
nouvelle
or
new name myth
I
bequeath to recent curriculum inno-
vators.
It
is unfair to throw all the ‘(curriculum improvement” groups into the
same pot, but the new-name stew is liberally seasoned even when one gives a number
of groups the benefit of
a
doubt. Simply relabeling the components of traditional
instruction represents dubious educational improvement.
The
whiz
kid
myth has arisen from a few vocal representatives of graduate
education. Brilliant young people are vitally needed
in
education; however, such
personnel are in short supply in every profession. Other professions have progressed
with significantly
fewer
capable people than are currently employed in professional
education.
The
bizarre happenings
myth
I
attribute to ‘(creativity” enthusiasts who equate
uniqueness and novelty with improvement. Unfortunately,
it
is
easier to be unique
than to be useful. Some exponents of creative education appear unmindful that
uniqueness without a solid rational base is simply deviant behavior.
The
bull
is
it
myth
I
dedicate to those who have been pushing the agriculture
extension station model as a vehicle for producing educational change.
I
find the
analogy inappropriate. There are
so
many differences between the agricultural
community and the educational establishment that extrapolations of the analogy
appear hazardous and expensive.
So
much for myths. The thesis of this paper is that there are
no
shortcuts to
solving the qualitative problems of educational improvement.
The most efficient
route to progress
is
via the same scientific path that has led to improvement in other
areas of life. But, you say, “This is what we have been doing.
Our research god’s
in
his
heav’n and all’s right with the world.” Wrong! Although most educators
give lip service to the value of “research” they use the term more frequently
as
a
weapon
or
a
medal than
as
a tool. When it comes to enjoying the yield
of
scientific
research-the prediction, control, and explanation of phenomena-in
no
corner
of the educational world
is
one able to receive much satisfaction.
POTENTIAL PARADIQMS
So
what do we do? There are several possibilities.
We can take
a
“stop the
music” approach; we can conclude that the behaviorist-empiricist approach labeled
‘(research” is worthless and adopt what might be called a
comprehensive-existential-
ist
position-anything
I
don’t agree with is bad.
I
am amazed that sectors
of
the
educational community seem to have gravitated to this position.
It
may be un-
assailable logically but is completely vulnerable practically. In other areas scientific
advances have rapidly by-passed persons holding such views.
At the other extreme, one may take
a
“turn up the volume” position. Research
is
fine; the problem is simply that
it
is not readily accessible. The ERIC system-
ERIC stands
for
Education Research Information Center-under development
by the
U.
S.
Office of Education is designed to help ameliorate
such
8
situation.
ERIC
is
a
microfiche-microfilm-system from which documents can be obtained
剩余6页未读,继续阅读
资源评论
weixin_38700779
- 粉丝: 11
- 资源: 924
上传资源 快速赚钱
- 我的内容管理 展开
- 我的资源 快来上传第一个资源
- 我的收益 登录查看自己的收益
- 我的积分 登录查看自己的积分
- 我的C币 登录后查看C币余额
- 我的收藏
- 我的下载
- 下载帮助
最新资源
- 材料损坏检测6-YOLO(v5至v9)、COCO、CreateML、Darknet、Paligemma、TFRecord、VOC数据集合集.rar
- 雷卡_KTV_s_q.apk
- HengCe-18900-2024-2030全球与中国二手半导体设备市场现状及未来发展趋势-样本.docx
- Infinite Scroll View 2.0
- 杂物检测63-YOLO(v5至v8)、COCO、CreateML、VOC数据集合集.rar
- HengCe-18900-2024-2030全球与中国氢燃料电池气体扩散层市场现状及未来发展趋势-样本.docx
- 机器狗的发展历史,介绍
- 木材钢管检测17-YOLO(v5至v9)、COCO、CreateML、Darknet、Paligemma、TFRecord、VOC数据集合集.rar
- 回文判断(C语言)(不必理会)
- 无人机检测24-YOLO(v5至v9)、COCO、CreateML、Darknet、Paligemma、TFRecord、VOC数据集合集.rar
资源上传下载、课程学习等过程中有任何疑问或建议,欢迎提出宝贵意见哦~我们会及时处理!
点击此处反馈
安全验证
文档复制为VIP权益,开通VIP直接复制
信息提交成功