没有合适的资源?快使用搜索试试~ 我知道了~
20200627_吕漫妮_论文展示1
需积分: 0 0 下载量 104 浏览量
2022-08-03
18:49:26
上传
评论
收藏 1.11MB PDF 举报
温馨提示
试读
8页
1. Introduction 1. Moreira and Muir's (2017) spanning regression tests suggest t
资源详情
资源评论
资源推荐
On the performance of volatility-managed portfolios
Scott Cederburg, Michael S. O'Doherty, , Feifei Wang, Xuemin (Sterling) Yan
Journal of Financial Economics, forthcoming
The volatility-managed portfolios is characterized by conservative positions in the underlying
factors when volatility was recently high and more aggressively levered positions following periods
of low volatility.
1. Introduction
Background:
Recent studies document strong empirical performance for volatility-managed versions of a wide
range of popular trading strategies. The findings have important implications for investors.
Motivation:
1. Moreira and Muir's (2017) spanning regression tests suggest that volatility-scaled portfolios are
potentially more valuable when used in combination with their original counterparts.
2. Although a volatility-managed portfolio constructed directly is straightforward to construct in
real time, the combined investment strategy (scaled and unscaled portfolios) is not.
Whether real-time investors are able to capture the economic gains implied by the spanning
regressions?
Main Work and Conclusions:
We assess whether volatility management is systematically advantageous for investors and place
specific emphasis on real-time implementation, and the same time.
1. We find no statistical or economic evidence that volatility-managed portfolios systematically earn
higher Sharpe ratios.
2. The trading strategies implied by the spanning regressions are not implementable in real time.
3. We provide evidence that this “underperform” result is driven by substantial structural instability
in the underlying spanning regressions for these strategies.
Innovations and Meaning:
Our findings suggest that the in-sample alphas and utility gains do not readily translate into
enhanced portfolio outcomes for investors, offering a complementary viewpoint.
2. Data
2.1. Data description
Database: CRSP, Compustat and IBES
Factors:
a. 9 equity factors: market (MKT), size (SMB), value (HML) factors, momentum factor (MOM),
profitability (RMW) and investment (CMA) factors, profitability (ROE) and investment (IA) factors
and betting-against-beta factor (BAB)
b. 94 anomaly variables reported in Hou et al. (2015) and McLean and Ponti (2016)
Note: For each anomaly, we construct a value-weighted portfolio that takes a long (short) position
in the decile of stock.
2.2. Construction of volatility-managed portfolios
蟹蛛
- 粉丝: 26
- 资源: 323
上传资源 快速赚钱
- 我的内容管理 展开
- 我的资源 快来上传第一个资源
- 我的收益 登录查看自己的收益
- 我的积分 登录查看自己的积分
- 我的C币 登录后查看C币余额
- 我的收藏
- 我的下载
- 下载帮助
安全验证
文档复制为VIP权益,开通VIP直接复制
信息提交成功
评论0