没有合适的资源?快使用搜索试试~ 我知道了~
温馨提示
![preview](https://dl-preview.csdnimg.cn/12386190/0001-16c13e6be2d9c0053de69031df7f09c1_thumbnail.jpeg)
![preview-icon](https://csdnimg.cn/release/downloadcmsfe/public/img/scale.ab9e0183.png)
试读
22页
我们研究了Q1q2Q¯3q¯4(Q = c,b,q = u,d,s)四夸克态的质量分裂,其夸克分量之间存在色磁相互作用。 假设X(4140)是最低的JPC = 1 ++ csc的四夸克,我们估计了其他四夸克态的质量。 从获得的质量和反映有效夸克相互作用的确定度量中,我们发现了以下几种奇异状态的赋值:(1)X(3860)和新近观测到的Zc(4100)似乎都是0 ++cncñn四夸克; (2)Zc(4200)可能是一个1 +-cnc´n四夸克; (3)Zc(3900),X(3940)和X(4160)不太可能是紧凑的四夸克; (4)Zc(4020)不太可能是紧凑的四夸克,但似乎Zb(10650)与JPC = 1 +-的隐藏字符对应; (5)Zc(4250)可以是四夸克的候选者,但目前无法分配量子数。 我们希望进一步的研究可以检查此处给出的预测和任务。
资源推荐
资源详情
资源评论
![pdf](https://img-home.csdnimg.cn/images/20210720083512.png)
![pdf](https://img-home.csdnimg.cn/images/20210720083512.png)
![pdf](https://img-home.csdnimg.cn/images/20210720083512.png)
![pdf](https://img-home.csdnimg.cn/images/20210720083512.png)
![pdf](https://img-home.csdnimg.cn/images/20210720083512.png)
![pdf](https://img-home.csdnimg.cn/images/20210720083512.png)
![pdf](https://img-home.csdnimg.cn/images/20210720083512.png)
![pdf](https://img-home.csdnimg.cn/images/20210720083512.png)
![pdf](https://img-home.csdnimg.cn/images/20210720083512.png)
![pdf](https://img-home.csdnimg.cn/images/20210720083512.png)
![pdf](https://img-home.csdnimg.cn/images/20210720083512.png)
![pdf](https://img-home.csdnimg.cn/images/20210720083512.png)
![pdf](https://img-home.csdnimg.cn/images/20210720083512.png)
![pdf](https://img-home.csdnimg.cn/images/20210720083512.png)
![pdf](https://img-home.csdnimg.cn/images/20210720083512.png)
![pdf](https://img-home.csdnimg.cn/images/20210720083512.png)
![pdf](https://img-home.csdnimg.cn/images/20210720083512.png)
![pdf](https://img-home.csdnimg.cn/images/20210720083512.png)
![thumb](https://img-home.csdnimg.cn/images/20210720083646.png)
![pdf](https://img-home.csdnimg.cn/images/20210720083512.png)
![zip](https://img-home.csdnimg.cn/images/20210720083736.png)
![rar](https://img-home.csdnimg.cn/images/20210720083606.png)
![zip](https://img-home.csdnimg.cn/images/20210720083736.png)
![zip](https://img-home.csdnimg.cn/images/20210720083736.png)
![](https://csdnimg.cn/release/download_crawler_static/12386190/bg1.jpg)
Systematic studies of charmonium-, bottomonium-,
and B
c
-like tetraquark states
Jing Wu
†
School of Science, Shandong Jianzhu University, Jinan 250101, China
Xiang Liu
‡
School of Physical Science and Technology, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China
and Research Center for Hadron and CSR Physics, Lanzhou University
and Institute of Modern Physics of CAS, Lanzhou 730000, China
Yan-Rui Liu
*
School of Physics, Shandong University, Jinan 250100, China
Shi-Lin Zhu
§
School of Physics and State Key Laboratory of Nuclear Physics and Technology, Peking University,
Beijing 100871, China
and Collaborative Innovation Center of Quantum Matter, Beijing 100871, China
and Center of High Energy Physics, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
(Received 20 October 2018; published 28 January 2019)
We study the mass splittings of Q
1
q
2
¯
Q
3
¯
q
4
(Q ¼ c, b, q ¼ u, d, s) tetraquark states with chromo-
magnetic interactions between their quark components. Assuming that Xð4140Þ is the lowest J
PC
¼
1
þþ
cs
¯
c
¯
s tetraquark, we estimate the masses of the other tetraquark states. From the obtained masses and
defined measure reflecting effective quark interactions, we find the following assignments for several
exotic states: (1) both Xð3860Þ and the newly observed Z
c
ð4100Þ seem to be 0
þþ
cn
¯
c
¯
n tetraquarks;
(2) Z
c
ð4200Þ is probably a 1
þ−
cn
¯
c
¯
n tetraquark; (3) Z
c
ð3900Þ, Xð3940Þ, and Xð4160Þ are unlikely
compact tetraquarks; (4) Z
c
ð4020Þ is unlikely a compact tetraquark, but seems the hidden-charm
correspondence of Z
b
ð10650Þ with J
PC
¼ 1
þ−
; and (5) Z
c
ð4250Þ can be a tetraquark candidate but
the quantum numbers cannot be assigned at present. We hope further studies may check the predictions and
assignments given here.
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.99.014037
I. INTRODUCTION
A hot topic in hadron physics study is to identify multi-
quark states from the observed exotic structures. Through
explorations on their masses, productions, and decay proper-
ties, we may understand the problem how the strong
interaction forces nonobservable quarks and gluons to
form observable hadrons. Before 2003, the situation in
understanding hadron structures was simple because the
quark model gave a successful and satisfactory description
for hadron spectra [1], although there exist a few hadrons
difficult to understand. In 2003, experimentalists opened the
Pandora’s box for exotic states through the observation of
Xð3872Þ [2]. Since then, more and more unexpected XYZ
states were observed and the situation for hadron physics
study became complicated [3–12]. To understand a little more
of the above mentioned problem, the discussions in this work
aim at basic features of ground charmonium-like, bottomo-
nium-like, and B
c
-like tetraquark states with ev en P-parities.
As the first exotic charmonium-like state above the D
¯
D
threshold, the Xð3872Þ motivated heated discussions on its
nature [5,10]. Its J
PC
are determined to be 1
þþ
but the mass
is tens of MeV lower than the quark model prediction if it is
a charmonium. Since the meson is extremely close to the
D
0
¯
D
0
threshold, it is widely regarded as a loosely bound
D
¯
D
molecule. Discussions in the tetraquark picture and
*
Corresponding author.
yrliu@sdu.edu.cn
†
wujing18@sdjzu.edu.cn
‡
xiangliu@lzu.edu.cn
§
zhusl@pku.edu.cn
Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.
Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to
the author(s) and the published article’s title, journal citation,
and DOI. Funded by SCOAP
3
.
PHYSICAL REVIEW D 99, 014037 (2019)
2470-0010=2019=99(1)=014037(22) 014037-1 Published by the American Physical Society
![](https://csdnimg.cn/release/download_crawler_static/12386190/bg2.jpg)
hybrid picture are also performed. However, without a c
¯
c
core, it is difficult to understand the measured ratios
BðXð3872Þ → Ψ ð2SÞγÞ∶BðXð3872Þ → J=ΨγÞ¼2.46
0.64 0.29 by LHCb [13]. The Xð3872Þ seems to be a
charmonium affected significantly by the D
¯
D
threshold
[14,15]. Anyway, one cannot identify this exotic meson as a
pure tetraquark state.
To identify multiquark states, we may look for structures
according to several ideas. The easiest approach is to study
structures with explicitly exotic quantum numbers, e.g.,
charged charmonium-like or bottomonium-like states. The
quark content of the charged hidden-charm or hidden-
bottom mesons should be at least four if their nonresonance
interpretations are excluded. Up to now, experiments have
observed several charged structures, Z
c
ð4430Þ [16–18],
Z
c
ð4050Þ [19], Z
c
ð4250Þ [19], Z
c
ð3900Þ [20–24],
Z
c
ð3885Þ [25–27], Z
c
ð4020Þ [28,29], Z
c
ð4025Þ [30,31],
and so on. Very recently, LHCb found the evidence for a
charged charmonium-like resonance Z
−
c
ð4100Þin the decay
B
0
→ Z
−
c
ð4100ÞK
þ
→ η
c
π
−
K
þ
[32]. The measured mass
and width are 4096 20
þ18
−22
MeV and 152 58
þ60
−35
MeV,
respectively. Its possible quantum numbers are J
P
¼ 0
þ
or 1
−
. They are certainly four-quark state candidates.
However, it is not easy to justify whether they are compact
tetraquarks or meson-meson molecules. In this paper, we
will try to understand whether parts of these charged states
are compact tetraquarks or just molecules.
It is also possible to identify a multiquark state from
its high mass that a conventional hadron cannot have.
The observed P
c
ð4380Þ and P
c
ð4450Þ by the LHC
Collaboration [33] are two such states. They look like
excited nucleons but can be identified as pentaquark states
because an orbital or radial excitation energy larger than
3 GeV for light quarks is an unnatural interpr etation for
the high masses while the creation of a c
¯
c pair can
naturally explain. Ref. [34] predicted the existence of
hidden-charm p entaquarks with this idea. Similarly, one
may identify other high mass states looking like conven-
tional hadrons as multiquark states if experiments could
observe them. However, one still cannot easily distinguish
compact tetraquarks from molecules except the QQ
¯
Q
¯
q
case [35–37] in this possibility.
If experiments could observe an exotic structure that the
molecule picture is not applicable, it is possible to identify
it as a compact tetraquark. In Refs. [38,39], the D0
Collaboration claimed an exotic B
0
s
π
state and named it
Xð5568Þ. This meson contains four different flavors. From
its low mass (∼200 MeV lower than the B
¯
K threshold), the
Xð5568Þ is unlikely a molecule. If it really exists, it might
be a compact tetraquark. Unfortunately, the LHCb [40],
CMS [41], CDF [42], and ATLAS [43] Collaborations did
not confirm this state. The identification of compact
tetraquarks along this idea has not been achieved yet.
We have one more possibility to identify compact
multiquarks through number of states. The exotic structure
Xð4140Þ was first observed by the CDF Collaboration [44]
in the invariant mass distribution of J=ψϕ. In the latter
measurements with the same channel by various collabo-
rations [45–49], LHCb confirmed the Xð4140Þ, determined
its quantum numbers to be J
PC
¼ 1
þþ
, established another
1
þþ
state Xð4274Þ, and observed two more 0
þþ
structures
Xð4500Þ and Xð4700Þ. The existence of two 1
þþ
states
does not support the molecule interpretations for them [49].
On the other hand, the cs
¯
c
¯
s tetraquark configuration can
account for such an observation [50]. This picture also
favors the assignment for the Belle Xð4350Þ [51] as their
0
þþ
tetraquark partner [52]. In this paper, we identify the
Xð4140Þ as the lowest 1
þþ
cs
¯
c
¯
s tetraquark state and use its
mass as an input to estimate the masses of other charmo-
nium-, bottomonium-, and B
c
-like tetraquark states.
This paper is organized as follows. After the introductory
Sec. I, we present the theoretical formalism in Sec. II by
showing necessary wave functions and Hamiltonian matri-
ces. In Sec. III, we determine model parameters, present
strategy for the estimation of tetraquark masses, list
numerical results, analyze possible assignments for the
observed exotic mesons, and predict possible tetraquarks.
The last section is for discussions and summary.
II. FORMALISM
In this article, we use the notation Q
1
q
2
¯
Q
3
¯
q
4
(Q ¼ c, b;
q ¼ n, s; n ¼ u, d) to generally denote the considered
system. If the system is truly neutral, Q
1
¼ Q
3
¼ Q, q
2
¼
q
4
¼ q and the notation becomes Qq
¯
Q
¯
q. From the SUð3Þ
f
symmetry, the tetraquarks belong to 8
f
and 1
f
representa-
tions. Since the flavor symmetry is broken, the isoscalar
states would mix with some angle. In principle, the
resulting flavor wave functions of the physical I ¼ 0 states
contain both Q
1
n
¯
Q
3
¯
n and Q
1
s
¯
Q
3
¯
s parts. At present, we
just consider the ideal mixing case, i.e., Q
1
n
¯
Q
3
¯
n and
Q
1
s
¯
Q
3
¯
s do not mix.
The effective Hamiltonian in the adopted chromomag-
netic interaction (CMI) model reads,
H ¼
X
i
m
i
þ H
CM
¼
X
i
m
i
−
X
i<j
C
ij
˜
λ
i
·
˜
λ
j
σ
i
· σ
j
; ð1Þ
where
˜
λ
i
¼ λ
i
ð−λ
i
Þ for quarks (antiquarks). The involved
parameters are only effective coupling constants C
ij
and effective masses m
i
containing various effects. This
Hamiltonian is reduced from a realistic model, which can
be found in Refs. [53,54]. Then the formula for the mass
estimation is
M ¼
X
i¼1
m
i
þhH
CM
i: ð2Þ
In calculating the last term, we use the diquark-antidiquark
bases to express the wave functions for the S-wave
WU, LIU, LIU, and ZHU PHYS. REV. D 99, 014037 (2019)
014037-2
![](https://csdnimg.cn/release/download_crawler_static/12386190/bg3.jpg)
Q
1
q
2
¯
Q
3
¯
q
4
systems whose P-parities are always positive.
Here, the notation “diquark” just means two quarks and
does not mean a compact substructure. If one uses the
meson-meson bases, the same eigenvalues after diagonal-
ization will be obtained. In the present case, the Pauli
principle has no restriction on the total wave functions, but
one should notice the possible C-parity once a state is truly
neutral. The involved color (spin) wave functions ϕ
1;2
(χ
1;2;…;6
) are
ϕ
1
¼j
¯
3
c
; 3
c
; 1
c
i; ϕ
2
¼j6
c
;
¯
6
c
; 1
c
i;
χ
1
¼j1
S
; 1
S
; 2
S
i; χ
2
¼j1
S
; 1
S
; 1
S
i; χ
3
¼j1
S
; 1
S
; 0
S
i;
χ
4
¼j1
S
; 0
S
; 1
S
i; χ
5
¼j0
S
; 1
S
; 1
S
i; χ
6
¼j0
S
; 0
S
; 0
S
i;
ð3Þ
where the color representations (spins) in order in ϕ
i
(χ
j
)
are for diquark, antidiquark, and system, respectively. We
define the total wave function as
ϕ
i
χ
j
≡ ðQ
1
q
2
¯
Q
3
¯
q
4
Þ ⊗ ϕ
i
⊗ χ
j
: ð4Þ
Compared with the cs
¯
c
¯
s case where a C-parity can be
given, the CMI matrices in the present cases are the
generalized ones in Ref. [52]. Now we have
hH
CM
i
J
P
¼2
þ
¼
4
3
ð2τ þ αÞ 2
ffiffiffi
2
p
ν
2
3
ð5α − 2τÞ
; ð5Þ
hH
CM
i
J
P
¼0
þ
¼
0
B
B
B
B
B
@
8
3
ðτ − αÞ 4
ffiffiffi
2
p
ν −
4
ffiffi
3
p
ν 2
ffiffiffi
6
p
α
−
4
3
ðτ þ5αÞ 2
ffiffiffi
6
p
α −
10
ffiffi
3
p
ν
−8τ 0
4τ
1
C
C
C
C
C
A
;
ð6Þ
and
hH
CM
i
J
P
¼1
þ
¼
0
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
@
4
3
ð2τ − αÞ
4
ffiffi
2
p
3
β −
4
ffiffi
2
p
3
μ 2
ffiffiffi
2
p
ν −4μ 4β
8
3
ð2θ − τÞ
4
3
ν −4μ 0 −2
ffiffiffi
2
p
α
−
8
3
ðτ þ2θÞ 4β −2
ffiffiffi
2
p
α 0
−
2
3
ð2τ þ 5αÞ
10
ffiffi
2
p
3
β −
10
ffiffi
2
p
3
μ
4
3
ðτ − 2θÞ
10
3
ν
4
3
ðτ þ2θÞ
1
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
A
; ð7Þ
where the defined variables are
τ ¼ C
12
þ C
34
; θ ¼ C
12
− C
34
;
α ¼ C
13
þ C
24
þ C
14
þ C
23
;
β ¼ C
13
− C
24
− C
14
þ C
23
;
μ ¼ C
13
− C
24
þ C
14
− C
23
;
ν ¼ C
13
þ C
24
− C
14
− C
23
ð8Þ
and the corresponding base vectors for the matrices are ðϕ
1
χ
1
; ϕ
2
χ
2
Þ
T
, ðϕ
1
χ
3
; ϕ
2
χ
3
; ϕ
1
χ
6
; ϕ
2
χ
6
Þ
T
, and ðϕ
1
χ
2
; ϕ
1
χ
4
;
ϕ
1
χ
5
; ϕ
2
χ
2
; ϕ
2
χ
4
; ϕ
2
χ
5
Þ
T
, respectively. When the considered state is truly neutral, the matrices for the cases J
PC
¼ 2
þþ
and
0
þþ
are the same as above, but that for the case J
PC
¼ 1
þþ
is
hH
CM
i¼
−
4
3
ð4C
Qq
− C
Q
¯
Q
− C
q
¯
q
þ 2C
Q
¯
q
Þ −2
ffiffiffi
2
p
ðC
Q
¯
Q
þ C
q
¯
q
þ 2C
Q
¯
q
Þ
2
3
ð4C
Qq
þ 5C
Q
¯
Q
þ 5C
q
¯
q
− 10C
Q
¯
q
Þ
!
ð9Þ
and that for the case J
PC
¼ 1
þ−
is
SYSTEMATIC STUDIES OF CHARMONIUM-, … PHYS. REV. D 99, 014037 (2019)
014037-3
![](https://csdnimg.cn/release/download_crawler_static/12386190/bg4.jpg)
hH
CM
i¼
0
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
@
4
3
4C
Qq
− 2C
Q
¯
q
−C
Q
¯
Q
− C
q
¯
q
2
ffiffiffi
2
p
C
Q
¯
Q
þ C
q¯q
−2C
Q¯q
8
3
ðC
Q
¯
Q
− C
q¯q
Þ −4
ffiffiffi
2
p
ðC
Q
¯
Q
− C
q¯q
Þ
−
2
3
4C
Qq
þ 10C
Q
¯
q
þ5C
Q
¯
Q
þ 5C
q
¯
q
−4
ffiffiffi
2
p
ðC
Q
¯
Q
− C
q
¯
q
Þ
20
3
ðC
Q
¯
Q
− C
q
¯
q
Þ
−
4
3
4C
Qq
− 2C
Q
¯
q
þC
Q
¯
Q
þ C
q
¯
q
2
ffiffiffi
2
p
C
Q
¯
Q
þ C
q¯q
þ2C
Q¯q
2
3
4C
Qq
þ 10C
Q
¯
q
−5C
Q
¯
Q
− 5C
q
¯
q
1
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
A
: ð10Þ
Their corresponding base vectors are ðϕ
1
χ
e
; ϕ
2
χ
e
Þ
T
and
ðϕ
1
χ
2
; ϕ
2
χ
2
; ϕ
1
χ
o
; ϕ
2
χ
o
Þ
T
, respectively. Here ϕ
i
χ
e
(ϕ
i
χ
o
)
represents C-even (C-odd) wave function. The forms of
such wave functions are similar to those obtained in
Ref. [52]. Since we also consider the color structure
j6
c
;
¯
6
c
; 1
c
i for the tetraquarks, the above Eqs. (5)–(10)
can be actually thought of as generalizations of those for
j
¯
3
c
; 3
c
; 1
c
i tetraquarks given in Ref. [55].
III. NUMERICAL ANALYSIS
A. Parameters and estimation strategy
The parameters in the CMI model are effective masses of
the quarks and coupling strengths between quark compo-
nents. We need 14 coupling strengths in the present study:
C
cn
, C
cs
, C
bn
, C
bs
, C
c¯n
, C
c¯s
, C
b¯n
, C
b¯s
, C
c¯c
, C
b
¯
b
, C
c
¯
b
, C
n¯n
,
C
s
¯
s
, and C
n
¯
s
. Most of them can be extracted from the
measured masses [56] of the low-lying conventional
hadrons (see Table I), but the determination of C
s¯s
and C
c
¯
b
needs approximations. We here assume C
s
¯
s
¼
C
ss
C
n
¯
n
=C
nn
¼ 10.5 MeV and adopt C
c
¯
b
¼ 3.3 MeV
extracted fr om M
B
c
− M
B
c
¼ 70 MeV [1].Partsof
spectroscopic coupling parameters have been derived in
Ref. [55]. The values of our coupling parameters are
consistent with those in that paper, see discussions in
Refs. [52,57]. The effective quark masses we extracted are
m
n
¼ 361.7 MeV, m
s
¼ 54 0.3 MeV, m
c
¼ 1724.6 MeV,
and m
b
¼ 505 2.8 MeV, which are close to those obtained
in Ref. [58].
When one substitutes these parameters into the mass
formula (2), the tetraquark masses may be estimated.
However, if we check the numerical values for the masses
of the conventional hadrons with this formula and the above
parameters, deviations from experimental results are found
TABLE I. Chromomagnetic interactions for various hadrons and obtained effective coupling constants in units of
MeV.
Hadron hH
CM
i Hadron hH
CM
i C
ij
N −8C
nn
Δ 8C
nn
C
nn
¼ 18.4
Σ
8
3
C
nn
−
32
3
C
ns
Σ
8
3
C
nn
þ
16
3
C
ns
C
ns
¼ 12.4
Ξ
0 8
3
ðC
ss
− 4C
ns
Þ
Ξ
0 8
3
ðC
ss
þ C
ns
Þ
Ω 8C
ss
C
ss
¼ 6.5
Λ −8C
nn
π −16C
n
¯
n
ρ
16
3
C
n
¯
n
C
n
¯
n
¼ 29.8
K −16C
n
¯
s
K
16
3
C
n
¯
s
C
n
¯
s
¼ 18.7
D −16C
c
¯
n
D
16
3
C
c
¯
n
C
c
¯
n
¼ 6.7
D
s
−16C
c
¯
s
D
s
16
3
C
c
¯
s
C
c
¯
s
¼ 6.7
B −16C
b
¯
n
B
16
3
C
b
¯
n
C
b
¯
n
¼ 2.1
B
s
−16C
b
¯
s
B
16
3
C
b
¯
s
C
b
¯
s
¼ 2.3
η
c
−16C
c
¯
c
J=ψ
16
3
C
c
¯
c
C
c
¯
c
¼ 5.3
η
b
−16C
b
¯
b
ϒ
16
3
C
b
¯
b
C
b
¯
b
¼ 2.9
Σ
c
8
3
C
nn
−
32
3
C
cn
Σ
c
8
3
C
nn
þ
16
3
C
cn
C
cn
¼ 4.0
Ξ
0
c
8
3
C
ns
−
16
3
C
cn
−
16
3
C
cs
Ξ
c
8
3
C
ns
þ
8
3
C
cn
þ
8
3
C
cs
C
cs
¼ 4.5
Σ
b
8
3
C
nn
−
32
3
C
bn
Σ
b
8
3
C
nn
þ
16
3
C
bn
C
bn
¼ 1.3
Ξ
0
b
8
3
C
ns
−
16
3
C
bn
−
16
3
C
bs
Ξ
b
8
3
C
ns
þ
8
3
C
bn
þ
8
3
C
bs
C
bs
¼ 1.2
WU, LIU, LIU, and ZHU PHYS. REV. D 99, 014037 (2019)
014037-4
![](https://csdnimg.cn/release/download_crawler_static/12386190/bg5.jpg)
(see Table IVof Ref. [54]). Usually, the obtained masses are
larger than the measured values, which indicates that the
attractions between quark components are not sufficiently
considered in the simple model. The application of this
formula to multiquark states should also lead to higher
masses than those they should be. On the theoretical side,
such values can be treated as upper limits of the tetraquark
masses.
The reason for the overestimated masses is because of
the adopted assumption that the above extracted parameters
are applicable to every system. In principle, each system
has its own values of parameters. From the reduction
procedure for the model Hamiltonian and the fact that
the spacial wave functions are not the same for different
systems, this assumption certainly induces uncertainties.
The uncertainties in coupling strengths affect the mass
splittings between the considered tetraquark states and the
effects should not be large. On the other hand, the
uncertainties in the effective quark masses affect the mass
shifts of the states, which may be significant. To reduce the
uncertainties in mass estimation, we adopt another method
by introducing a reference system and modifying the mass
formula to be
M ¼ðM
ref
− hH
CM
i
ref
ÞþhH
CM
i: ð11Þ
Here, M
ref
and hH
CM
i
ref
are the physical mass of the
reference system and the corresponding CMI eigenvalue,
respectively. For M
ref
, one may use the mass of a reference
multiquark state or use the threshold of a reference hadron-
hadron system whose quark content is the same as the
considered multiquark states. With this method, the prob-
lem of using extracted quark masses from conventional
hadrons in multiquark systems [50] is evaded and part of
missed attractions between quark components is phenom-
enologically compensated. In previous studies [36,52,54,
57,59–62], we mainly adopted hadron-hadron thresholds.
One finds that the estimated multiquark masses with this
method are always lower than those with Eq. (2). Since the
number of thresholds may be more than 1, there is a
question which threshold leads to more reasonable masses.
As a multibody system, the size of a tetraquark state should
be larger than that of a conventional hadron and the
distance between two quark components in tetraquarks
may be larger than that in a conventional meson. The
resulting effect is that the attraction between quark com-
ponents should be weaker. Thus, although we cannot give a
definite answer, probably the meson-meson threshold
leading to higher masses gives more reasonable tetraquark
masses. In the present study, besides the possible hadron-
hadron thresholds, we may additionally turn to Xð4140Þ
by assuming it as the ground cs
¯
c
¯
s tetraquark state with
J
PC
¼ 1
þþ
. It seems that using Xð4140Þ as an input is a
better approach than the adoption of meson-meson thresh-
olds. In Ref. [52], we have performed the exploration for
the cs
¯
c
¯
s states with this input and gotten higher masses
than with the D
s
¯
D
s
threshold. This observation probably
indicates that the highest masses estimated with various
hadron-hadron thresholds are still lower than the tetraquark
masses. The discrepancy may be understood with the
additional kinetic energy [63]. From the comparison for
results in the current model [59] and in a dynamical study
[64], the calculated masses of heavy-full tetraquark states
are truly higher than the highest masses estimated with
meson-meson thresholds but lower than the theoretical
upper limits. In the following discussions, we use this
feature as a criterion for reasonable tetraquark masses. The
reasonability of the results may be tested in future studies.
B. Effective interactions and supplemental
results for the cs
¯
c
¯
s system
In Ref. [59], we have discussed the effects on the
tetraquark masses due to change of coupling parameters
and argued the stability of QQ
¯
Q
¯
Q states by using the
effective color-spin interactions in the case that the mixing
of different color-spin structures is considered. In Ref. [57],
we further introduced a dimensionless measure to reflect
the effective color-spin interaction between the ith quark
component and the jth quark component,
K
ij
¼
ΔM
ΔC
ij
→
∂M
∂C
ij
: ð12Þ
With such measures, one may rewrite the multiquark
masses as
M ¼ M
0
þ
X
i<j
K
ij
C
ij
: ð13Þ
When K
ij
is a negative (positive) number, the effective
interaction between the ith and jth quark components is
attractive (repulsive). If K
12
and K
34
are negative but K
13
,
K
14
, K
23
, and K
24
are positive, the tetraquark state
Q
1
q
2
¯
Q
3
¯
q
4
is probably more stable than other cases. If
only K
12
or K
34
is negative, the state is probably less stable
than the mentioned case but more stable than other cases.
In the following parts, we qualitatively discuss the stability
of tetraquarks with such effective interactions.
In ours previous work [52], we considered the spectrum
of cs
¯
c
¯
s states. Here, we do not repeat the results given
there, but present the supplemental results about effective
interactions. The obtained K
ij
’s of Eq. (13) are listed in
Table II. The order of states for each case of J
PC
is the same
as the order of masses from high to low. From the results,
the highest 2
þþ
, the highest 1
þþ
, and the second highest
0
þþ
states are probably more stable than other states.
Although the Xð4274Þ as another 1
þþ
cs
¯
c
¯
s state is higher
than the Xð4140Þ, its width can be narrower than that of
Xð4140Þ. This feature is not contradicted with the recent
LHCb measurement [49].
SYSTEMATIC STUDIES OF CHARMONIUM-, … PHYS. REV. D 99, 014037 (2019)
014037-5
剩余21页未读,继续阅读
资源评论
![avatar-default](https://csdnimg.cn/release/downloadcmsfe/public/img/lazyLogo2.1882d7f4.png)
![avatar](https://profile-avatar.csdnimg.cn/default.jpg!1)
weixin_38716081
- 粉丝: 3
- 资源: 944
上传资源 快速赚钱
我的内容管理 展开
我的资源 快来上传第一个资源
我的收益
登录查看自己的收益我的积分 登录查看自己的积分
我的C币 登录后查看C币余额
我的收藏
我的下载
下载帮助
![voice](https://csdnimg.cn/release/downloadcmsfe/public/img/voice.245cc511.png)
![center-task](https://csdnimg.cn/release/downloadcmsfe/public/img/center-task.c2eda91a.png)
安全验证
文档复制为VIP权益,开通VIP直接复制
![dialog-icon](https://csdnimg.cn/release/downloadcmsfe/public/img/green-success.6a4acb44.png)