没有合适的资源?快使用搜索试试~ 我知道了~
温馨提示
众所周知,经典可积σ模型是1回路RG方程或“ Ricci流”的解决方案,仅运行少量耦合。 在一些最简单的可积分变形示例中,我们发现,为了在2个(或更高)环路上保留此属性,经典的σ模型应通过量子反条件进行校正。 该模式类似于与规范的WZW理论相关的有效σ模型的模式。 我们将详细考虑S2(“香肠模型”)和H2的η变形以及与SO(1,2)/ SO(2)辅集密切相关的λ变形的示例。 我们还指出,为了使非阿贝尔对偶性与超出1环级的RG流进行通联,还需要类似的反条件。
资源推荐
资源详情
资源评论
Available online at www.sciencedirect.com
ScienceDirect
Nuclear Physics B 949 (2019) 114798
www.elsevier.com/locate/nuclphysb
Integrable 2d sigma models: Quantum corrections to
geometry from RG flow
Ben Hoare
a
, Nat Levine
b,∗
, Arkady A. Tseytlin
b,1
a
ETH Institut für Theoretische Physik, ETH Zürich, Wolfgang-Pauli-Strasse 27, 8093 Zürich, Switzerland
b
Blackett Laboratory, Imperial College, London SW7 2AZ, UK
Received 22
July 2019; accepted 9 October 2019
Available
online 11 October 2019
Editor: Stephan
Stieberger
Abstract
Classically
integrable σ -models are known to be solutions of the 1-loop RG equations, or “Ricci flow”,
with only a few couplings running. In some of the simplest examples of integrable deformations we find
that in order to preserve this property at 2 (and higher) loops the classical σ -model should be corrected
by quantum counterterms. The pattern is similar to that of effective σ-models associated to gauged WZW
theories. We consider in detail the examples of the η-deformation of S
2
(“sausage model”) and H
2
, as
well as the closely related λ-deformation of the SO(1, 2)/SO(2) coset. We also point out that similar
counterterms are required in order for non-abelian duality to commute with RG flow beyond the 1-loop
order.
© 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Funded by SCOAP
3
.
*
Corresponding author.
E-mail
addresses: bhoare@ethz.ch (B. Hoare), n.levine17@imperial.ac.uk (N. Levine), tseytlin@imperial.ac.uk
(A.A. Tseytlin).
1
Also at the Institute of Theoretical and Mathematical Physics, MSU and Lebedev Institute, Moscow.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2019.114798
0550-3213/© 2019
The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Funded by SCOAP
3
.
2 B. Hoare et al. / Nuclear Physics B 949 (2019) 114798
1. Introduction
The bosonic 2d σ -model
2
S =
1
4π
d
2
zG
mn
(x) ∂
a
x
m
∂
a
x
n
(1.1)
is a theory with an infinite number of couplings (as can be seen, e.g., by Taylor expanding
G
mn
(x) = δ
mn
+
r
g
mn;k
1
···k
r
x
k
1
···x
k
r
) that run with RG scale according to the “generalized
Ricci flow” equation [1,2]
d
dt
G
mn
=β
mn
+∇
(m
ξ
n)
, (1.2)
β
mn
=R
mn
+
1
2
R
mp q r
R
n
pqr
+... . (1.3)
Here ξ
n
(t) corresponds RG scale dependent diffeomorphisms, or equivalently field redefinitions
of x
n
.
In certain special cases, the RG flow may be consistently restricted to a finite subset of cou-
plings. These σ -models may be called renormalizable in the usual sense. In the simplest case of
homogeneous spaces, for example group or symmetric spaces, with non-abelian global symme-
try, there is just one running coupling related to the curv
ature radius. More non-trivial examples
include models related by T-duality, for which the global symmetry becomes partly hidden. Start-
ing, e.g., with the σ -model on S
2
(of radius
√
h) and T-dualising along the isometry direction φ
one finds a dual metric
ds
2
=h(dθ
2
+sin
2
θdφ
2
) →
ds
2
=h(dθ
2
+
1
sin
2
θ
d
˜
φ
2
) (1.4)
that no longer has a global SO(3) symmetry. Instead, this symmetry is hidden as a consequence
of integrability [3] and the dual metric still solves the 1-loop RG equations with only one coupling
h(t).
More generally
, it is now widely believed that renormalizability, or invariance under the RG
flow, is closely linked with the integrability of a σ -model [4–6] (for some recent examples
see, e.g., [7–10]). One motivation for this, implicit in [4,5], is that a σ -model corresponding
to a gi
ven a quantum integrable S-matrix with a finite number of parameters should also be
parametrized by only a finite number of couplings. Another is that the conservation of infinitely
many hidden symmetry charges should be enough to reduce the infinite-dimensional RG flow to
a finite-dimensional subspace.
While there are no kno
wn counterexamples to the conjecture that classically integrable
σ -models should be invariant under RG flow, in most examples this has only been checked at
the leading 1-loop order in (1.2), (1.3), and there is no general proof.
The aim of the present paper is to address what happens be
yond the leading 1-loop order in
some of the simplest non-trivial examples of integrable σ -models with 2d target spaces without
non-abelian global symmetry. We shall see that the classical σ -model metric should generally
be deformed in order to remain a solution of the higher
-loop RG equation (1.1) with the same
number of running couplings. This order-by-order deformation of the metric may be interpreted
as a result of adding local “counterterms” required to preserve the integrability at the quantum
2
Here we ignore the B-field coupling for simplicity and absorb the loop-counting parameter
¯
h = α
into the target
space metric G
mn
.
B. Hoare et al. / Nuclear Physics B 949 (2019) 114798 3
level (i.e. to satisfy “Ward identities” for hidden symmetries). Indeed, in cases with a UV fixed
point and a known underlying quantum S-matrix, the deformed σ -model may be reconstructable
from a dual massive model (cf. [5,11]).
One e
xample where such a deformation is expected is the model defined by
ds
2
in (1.4), which
is T-dual to the σ -model on S
2
. Given the metric ds
2
= h[dx
i
dx
i
+ M(x)dy
2
] the standard
T-duality rule
˜
M = M
−1
is known to be modified at the 2-loop level [12](see also [13–15])
˜
M = M
−1
1 +
1
2
h
−1
∂
i
log M ∂
i
log M
, (1.5)
from which one can straightforwardly determine the corresponding quantum correction to the
dual metric in (1.4).
3
Another known example of such quantum corrections is provided by the special integrable
σ -models corresponding to gauged WZW models. These models are scale invariant, i.e. fixed-
point solutions of the RG equation (1.2). The conformal invariance of the underlying quan-
tum gWZW theory allows one to find an exact form of the σ -model metric (and B-field)
[16–20].
4
The simplest example is provided by the exact counterpart [16]of the familiar classical
SL(2, R)/U(1) gWZW metric [24,25]
ds
2
=k(dr
2
+tanh
2
rdy
2
) → ds
2
=(k − 2)
dr
2
+
coth
2
r −
2
k
−1
dy
2
. (1.6)
As was checked directly in [26], the leading k
−1
correction in (1.6)is precisely the one required
to solve the 2-loop scale invariance equation implied by (1.2), (1.3)(see also [27]for a 4-loop
test of (1.6)).
5
The quantum deformation of the effective σ -model metric associated with gWZW models is
also essential for quantum integrability of generalized sine-Gordon models [28]. In particular,
as was shown in [29]the finite counterterm required to be added to the action of the complex
sine-Gordon model L = k
(∂x)
2
+ tan
2
x(∂y)
2
− m
2
sin
2
x
to ensure factorization of the cor-
responding S-matrix at the 1-loop level [30,31]is precisely the same as the k
−1
term in the
SU(2)/U (1) analog of the exact metric in (1.6).
One wa
y to understand the origin of the quantum correction in (1.6)is to note that integrating
out the 2d gauge field A
a
in the gWZW model leads to a non-trivial determinant that can be
computed exactly [12,32](see also [33])
6
[dA]e
i
d
2
z
√
gMA
a
A
a
=exp
i
4π
d
2
x
√
g
−
1
2
∂
a
log M∂
a
log M −
1
2
R
(2)
log M
. (1.7)
3
In (1.4)we have x = θ and M = sin
2
θ so that (1.5) implies csc
2
θ →csc
2
θ(1 + 2h
−1
cot
2
θ +O(h
−2
)).
4
This is true in a particular scheme in which the “tachyon” equation is not modified (for a discussion and examples
see [21–23]). Here the level k plays the role of the inverse coupling (and loop-counting parameter) h used above.
5
In this Weyl invariant case the vector ξ
n
can be written as 2∂
n
where the exact dilaton field is given by e
−2
=
sinh 2r
coth
2
r −
2
k
1/2
.
6
Here the integral is understood to be over 2d scalars u, v defined by A
+
= ∂
+
u, A
−
= ∂
−
v and having measures
M = M(x(z)). For generality we assumed a curved 2d background with curvature R
(2)
(ignoring trivial M -independent
factor in (1.7)). Note that in the discussion of the abelian T-duality transformation at the path integral level in [34]the
∂
a
log M∂
a
log M term was missed but, in fact, it cancels against similar contribution coming from another determi-
nant
involved [32]so that the end result at the leading order is just the dilaton shift found in [34]. The analog of the
∂
a
log M∂
a
log M term survives, however, in the case of non-abelian duality (see below).
剩余16页未读,继续阅读
资源评论
weixin_38657457
- 粉丝: 9
- 资源: 971
上传资源 快速赚钱
- 我的内容管理 展开
- 我的资源 快来上传第一个资源
- 我的收益 登录查看自己的收益
- 我的积分 登录查看自己的积分
- 我的C币 登录后查看C币余额
- 我的收藏
- 我的下载
- 下载帮助
最新资源
资源上传下载、课程学习等过程中有任何疑问或建议,欢迎提出宝贵意见哦~我们会及时处理!
点击此处反馈
安全验证
文档复制为VIP权益,开通VIP直接复制
信息提交成功