没有合适的资源?快使用搜索试试~ 我知道了~
温馨提示
摘要引力的显着特征之一是不同于其他相互作用,它是不存在与时空坐标的选择无关的局部可观测量的。 该性质在量子域中至关重要,因为与不同观察者相关的希尔伯特空间的结构可能完全不同。 霍金辐射和Unruh效应等有趣现象都源于此功能。 如在这些示例中一样,在事件视界的存在下,由于这种对观察者的依赖性而引起的量子效应最为明显,在这种情况下仍然有许多问题需要澄清。 在本文中,我们对Schwarzschild黑洞视界附近的无质量标量场的量子希尔伯特空间的观察者依赖性进行了全面而明确的研究,无论是在永恒(两侧)情况下还是在二维情况下, 由物质崩溃产生的物理(单面)情况。 具体来说,我们比较并关联了三种类型的观察者的希尔伯特空间,即(i)自由下落的观察者,(ii)在地平线之外保持固定的适当距离的观察者,以及(iii)在观察者内部的自然观察者 从外部看,地平线仍在继续。 我们获得的具体结果对与量子等效原理有关的黑洞互补性和相关的防火墙现象,每种类型的观察者看到的自由度数以及“热型”光谱都有许多重要的意义。 以纯状态实现的粒子数量。
资源推荐
资源详情
资源评论
Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2019, 023B01 (60 pages)
DOI: 10.1093/ptep/pty146
On the observer dependence of the Hilbert space
near the horizon of black holes
Kanato Goto
1,∗
and Yoichi Kazama
1,2,3
1
Institute of Physics, University of Tokyo, Komaba, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 153-8902 Japan
2
Research Center for Mathematical Physics, Rikkyo University, Toshima-ku, Tokyo 171-8501 Japan
3
Quantum Hadron Physics Laboratory, RIKEN Nishina Center, Wako 351-0198, Japan
∗
E-mail: kgoto@hep1.c.u-tokyo.ac.jp
Received July 23, 2018; Revised December 12, 2018; Accepted December 14, 2018; Published February 11, 2019
...................................................................................................................
One of the pronounced characteristics of gravity, distinct from other interactions, is that there
are no local observables which are independent of the choice of the spacetime coordinates. This
property acquires crucial importance in the quantum domain in that the structure of the Hilbert
space pertinent to different observers can be drastically different. Such intriguing phenomena as
Hawking radiation and the Unruh effect are all rooted in this feature. As in these examples, the
quantum effect due to such observer dependence is most conspicuous in the presence of an event
horizon and there are still many questions to be clarified in such a situation. In this paper we
perform a comprehensive and explicit study of the observer dependence of the quantum Hilbert
space of a massless scalar field in the vicinity of the horizon of Schwarzschild black holes in
four dimensions, both in the eternal (two-sided) case and in the physical (one-sided) case created
by collapsing matter. Specifically, we compare and relate the Hilbert spaces of three types of
observers, namely (i) the freely falling observer, (ii) the observer who stays at a fixed proper
distance outside of the horizon, and (iii) the natural observer inside of the horizon analytically
continued from outside. The concrete results we obtain have a number of important implications
on black hole complementarity pertinent to the quantum equivalence principle and the related
firewall phenomenon, on the number of degrees of freedom seen by each type of observer, and
on the “thermal-type” spectrum of particles realized in a pure state.
...................................................................................................................
Subject Index B22, B39
1. Introduction
A quantum black hole is a fascinating but as yet an abstruse object. Recent endeavors to identify
it in a suitable class of conformal field theories (CFTs) in the AdS/CFT context [1–3][4–7]orby
an ingenious model such as the one proposed by Sachdev, Ye, and Kitaev [8–10] have seen only
a glimpse of it, to say the most. Unfortunately, string theory, at the present stage of development,
does not seem to give us a useful clue either. This difficulty is naturally expected since an object
whose profile fluctuates by quantum self-interaction would be hard to capture. We must continue
our struggle to find an effective means to characterize it more precisely.
Although the quantization of a black hole itself is still a formidable task, some analyses of quantum
effects around a (semi-)classical black hole have been performed since a long time ago, and they
have already uncovered various intriguing phenomena. Among them are the celebrated Hawking
radiation [11][12–14] and the closely related Unruh effect [15–17]. These effects revealed the non-
trivial features of the quantization in curved spacetimes, in particular in those with event horizons.
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Physical Society of Japan.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/),
which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Funded by SCOAP
3
PTEP 2019, 023B01 K. Goto and Y. Kazama
At the same time, they brought out new puzzles of deep nature, such as the problem of information
loss, the final fate of an evaporating black hole, and so on.
More recently, a further unexpected quantum effect in the black hole environment was argued to
occur, namely that a freely falling observer encounters excitations of high-energy quanta, termed
a “firewall,” as he/she crosses the event horizon of a black hole [18,19][20]. This is clearly at
odds with the equivalence principle, which is one of the foundations of classical general relativity.
An enormous number of papers have appeared since then, both for and against the assertion.
1
The
various arguments presented have all been rather indirect, however, making use of the properties
of the entanglement entropy, application of the no-cloning theorem, use of information-theoretic
arguments, etc.
At the bottom of these phenomena lies the strong dependence of the quantization on the frame of
observers, which is one of the most characteristic features of quantum gravity. This is particularly
crucial when the spacetime of interest contains event horizons as seen by some observers, and leads
to the notion of black hole complementarity [21].
The main aim of the present work is to investigate this observer dependence in some physically
important situations as explicitly as possible to gain some firm and direct understanding of the
phenomena rooted in this feature. For this purpose, we shall study the quantization of a massless
scalar field in the vicinity of the horizon of the Schwarzschild black hole in four dimensions as
perfomed by three typical observers. They are (i) the freely falling observer crossing the horizon,
(ii) the stationary observer hovering at a fixed proper distance outside the horizon (i.e. one under
constant acceleration), and (iii) the natural analytically continued observer inside the horizon.
Such an investigation, we believe, will be important for at least two reasons. One is that we will
deal directly with the states of the scalar fields as seen by different observers and will not rely on
any indirect arguments alluded to above. This makes the interpretation of the outcome of our study
quite transparent (up to certain approximations that we must make for computation). Another role
of our investigation is that the concrete result we obtain should serve as the properties of quantum
fields in the background of a black hole, which should be compared, in the semi-classical regime, to
the results to be obtained by other means of investigation, notably and hopefully by the AdS/CFT
duality.
2
For some progress, and intriguing proposals in the related directions, see Refs. [22–29].
This is important since, as far as we are aware, there has not been a serious attempt to understand
how the observer dependence is described in the context of AdS/CFT duality.
We will perform our study both for the case of a two-sided eternal Schwarzschild black hole and for
that of a one-sided physical black hole modeled by a simple Vaidya metric produced by collapsing
matter or radiation at the speed of light
3
[30–32]. What makes such an investigation feasible explicitly
is the well-known fact that near the horizon of the Schwarzschild black hole (roughly within the
Schwarzschild radius from the horizon; see Sect. 3.1 for a more precise estimate) there exists a
coordinate frame in which the metric takes the form of the flat four-dimensional Minkowski spacetime
M
1,3
. Thus, one can make use of the knowledge of the quantization in the flat space for observers
1
It is practically impossible to list all such papers on this subject. We refer the reader to those citing the
basic papers, Refs. [18,19].
2
As far as the vicinity of the horizon is concerned, the Schwarzschild black hole and the AdS black hole
have the same structure.
3
Actually, we shall make an infinitesimal regularization to make the trajectory of the matter slightly timelike
in order to avoid a certain singularity.
2/60
PTEP 2019, 023B01 K. Goto and Y. Kazama
corresponding to the various Rindler frames. As this will serve as the platform upon which we
develop our picture and computational methods for the black hole cases, we will give, in Sect. 2, a
review of this knowledge together with some further new information about the relations between
the quantizations by the three aforementioned observers.
In making use of this flat space approximation to the near-horizon region of a black hole, an impor-
tant care must be taken, however. Although the scalar field and its canonical conjugate momentum
are locally well-approximated by those in the flat space for the region of our interest, and hence
the canonical quantization can be performed without any problem, as we try to extract the physical
modes that create and annihilate the quantum states, such local knowledge is not enough in general.
This is because the notion of a quantum state requires the global information of the wave function.
Technically, this is reflected in the fact that the orthogonality relation needed for the extraction of
the mode is expressed by an integral over the entire spacelike surface at equal time, and depending
on the region of interest such a surface may not be totally contained within the region where the flat
space approximation is valid.
One such problem, which, however, can be easily dealt with, stems from the simple fact that
the approximation by the four-dimensional flat space includes that of the spherical surface of the
horizon by a tangential plane around a point. Clearly, since the physical modes of the scalar field
should better be classified by the angular momentum, not by the linear momentum, we shall use
R
1,1
× S
2
instead of M
1,3
as the more accurately approximated spacetime, where R
1,1
stands for
a portion of two-dimensional flat spacetime realized near the horizon and
S
2
is the sphere at the
Schwarzschild radius. Various formulas reviewed and/or developed in Sect. 2 for M
1,3
can be readily
transplanted to this case by replacing the plane waves by spherical harmonics.
The problem pointed out above of the extraction of the modes within the flat region is much
more non-trivial in the near-horizon region of
R
1,1
, since the flat region which extends to infinity
is only along the direction of the light cone. The problem with this situation is that the use of the
trajectory along the light cone leads to the quantization of a chiral boson, which is known to be
notoriously complicated. In addition, such a trajectory is not connected by a Lorentz transformation
to the trajectory of a general observer, which is timelike. This problem is particularly severe when
we deal with the one-sided black hole produced by a massless shock wave, the effect of which will
be treated by the imposition of an effective Dirichlet boundary condition on the scalar field along the
trajectory of the shock wave. To solve this problem, we have made a careful regularization of taking
the trajectory of the shock wave to be slightly timelike.
4
Then we are able to treat the quantization
for the observers freely falling with arbitrary velocity by making a suitable Lorentz transformation.
Such a proper anaysis has not been performed in the literature and this allowed us to obtain firm
results for the question of major interest.
Although we cannot summarize here all the results on how the different observers see their quanta
and how they are related, let us list two that are of obvious interest:
◦
Under the assumption that the metric of the interior of a physical Schwarzschild black hole, in
particular one large enough so that the curvature at the horizon is very small, can be described
by a Vaidya-type solution, our results indicate that the equivalence principle still holds quantum
mechanically near the horizon of the black hole, and the freely falling observer finds no surprise
as he/she goes through the horizon.
4
Evidently this corresponds to the case of slightly massive falling matter, which is physically reasonable.
3/60
PTEP 2019, 023B01 K. Goto and Y. Kazama
◦
For a physical (one-sided) black hole, the vacuum
5
|
ˆ
0
−
for the freely falling observer is a pure
state which is not the same as the usual Minkowski vacuum |0
M
. Nevertheless, the expectation
value of the number operator for the observer in the frame of the right Rindler wedge in
|
ˆ
0
−
has an Unruh-like distribution, which contains a “thermal” factor together with another
portion depending on the assumed interaction between the scalar field and the collapsing matter,
effectively expressed as a boundary condition. This is in contrast to the case of the two-sided
eternal black hole, where tracing out of the modes of the left Rindler wedge must be performed
and the resultant mixed state density matrix produces the usual purely thermal form of the Unruh
distribution. The effect for the physical black hole occuring in the pure state described above is
essentially of the same origin as the Hawking radiation seen by the asymptotic observer, who
is a Rindler observer.
6
The plan of the rest of the paper is as follows: In Sect. 2, we begin by describing the quantization
of a massless scalar field in four-dimensional flat Minkowski space from the point of view of various
observers, and provide explicit relations between them. Although this section is mostly a review,
we also derive some useful relations that have not been discussed in the literature. This includes
the construction of the explicit unitary transformation between the Minkowski mode operators and
those of the future Rindler wedge, and how the Poincaré algebra is realized in various wedges. Next,
in Sect. 3, this knowledge about the quantization in flat spacetime will be utilized to discuss how
the scalar field is quantized by various observers in the vicinity of the event horizon of a two-sided
Schwarzschild black hole, which by a suitable choice of coordinates can be approximated by part
of
R
1,1
× S
2
. In Sect. 4, we study the similar problem in the case of a Vaidya model of the physical
one-sided black hole that is produced by a collapse of matter with infinitesimal mass, introduced as
a regularization. The effect of this collapse is treated as an effective boundary condition on the scalar
field along a slightly timelike trajectory of such a shock wave. Even though we focus on the flat region
near the horizon, the quantum states, which depend on the global situation, show different properties
as compared with the two-sided case studied in Sect. 3. In Sect. 5, we disucss the implications
of the results obtained in the previous sections on some important questions, such as the quantum
equivalence principle, the firewall phenomenon, and the Unruh effect near the horizon. Finally, in
Sect. 6, after summarizing the results, we re-emphasize that the effect of the observer dependence
of quantization is one of the most crucial characteristics of any theory of quantum gravity, and it
should be seriously investigated, in particular, in the framework of the AdS/CFT approach. Several
appendices are provided to give further useful details of the formulas and calculations discussed in
the main text.
2. Quantization of a scalar field in the Rindler wedges and the degenerate Kasner
universes
We begin by describing the quantization of a massless
7
scalar field in the four-dimensional Minkowski
space from the standpoint of uniformly accelerated Rindler observers for the right and the left wedges
W
R
and W
L
, and their appropriate analytic continuations for the future and the past wedges W
F
and
W
P
, which can be identified as degenerate Kasner universes. In Fig. 1, we draw the trajectories of
the corresponding observers and the equal-time slices in each wedge.
5
The vacuum referred to here will be explained in Sect. 4.2.3.
6
For related work, though in a different setting, see Ref. [33].
7
The massive case can be treated in an entirely similar manner.
4/60
PTEP 2019, 023B01 K. Goto and Y. Kazama
Fig. 1. Trajectories and equal-time slices of the Rindler observers in various wedges. The boundaries of the
wedges W
R
,W
F
,W
L
, and W
P
are shown by dotted lines. The blue arrowed lines represent the trajectories of a
particle, while the red line is a typical time slice at t
R
= t
L
for W
R
and W
L
.
The subject of quantization by Rindler observers has a long history [17,34–36] and hence the
content of this section is largely a review.
8
However, part of our exposition supplements the descrip-
tion in the existing literature by providing some clarifying details and new relations. The results of
this section will serve as the foundation upon which to discuss the observer-dependent quantization
around the horizon of Schwarzschild black holes, both eternal (two-sided) and physical (one-sided),
as will be performed in Sect. 3.
2.1. Relation between Minkowski and Rindler coordinates
Before getting to the quantization of a scalar field, we need to describe the relationship between the
Minkowski coordinates and the Rindler coordinates in various wedges.
The d-dimensional Minkowski metric is described in the usual Cartesian coordinate as
ds
2
=−(dt
M
)
2
+ (dx
1
)
2
+
d−1
i=2
(dx
i
)
2
. (2.1)
Since we will be mostly concerned with the first two coordinates, and the roles of the rest of the
d − 2 coordinates are essentially the same, hereafter we will deal with the four-dimensional case,
i.e. d = 4.
As for the Rindler coordinates, we begin with the one in the right wedge W
R
shown in Fig. 1.As
is well known, it is related to the coordinates of the observer who is acclerated in the positive x
1
direction with a uniform acceleration. The trajectory of the observer in the (t
M
, x
1
) Minkowski plane
with a value of acceleration κ(>0) is given by
(x
1
)
2
− (t
M
)
2
= (1/κ)
2
= z
2
R
. (2.2)
Here, the symbol z
R
is introduced as a variable, meaning that different values of z
R
describe different
trajectories. Thus the Rindler coordinate system is spanned by the proper time τ
R
of the observer
8
For a review article closely related to this section, see Ref. [37].
5/60
剩余59页未读,继续阅读
资源评论
weixin_38641366
- 粉丝: 4
- 资源: 893
上传资源 快速赚钱
- 我的内容管理 展开
- 我的资源 快来上传第一个资源
- 我的收益 登录查看自己的收益
- 我的积分 登录查看自己的积分
- 我的C币 登录后查看C币余额
- 我的收藏
- 我的下载
- 下载帮助
最新资源
资源上传下载、课程学习等过程中有任何疑问或建议,欢迎提出宝贵意见哦~我们会及时处理!
点击此处反馈
安全验证
文档复制为VIP权益,开通VIP直接复制
信息提交成功