E. Rindrasih et al.
10.4236/jssm.2019.122006 95 Journal of Service Science
The following section discusses the conceptual framework on disasters in a
complex systems understanding of tourism and related spillover effects. Section
3 explains the methodology of the research. Section 4 presents the results of the
research, which include an inventory of the large-scale disaster events in Indo-
nesia from 1998 to 2016 and a discussion of the impacts of these disaster events
on the performance of the tourism industry, the spillover effects and the gov-
ernment’s responses. Section 5 discusses the findings. Finally, Section 6 presents
the conclusions and a recommendation for further research.
2. Literature Review: Complex System and Spillover Effect
2.1. Disasters in a Complex Systems Understanding of Tourism
Since tourism is often affected by external events beyond the control of individ-
uals or destinations, many scholars consider tourism an open system. However,
the majority of tourism crisis management frameworks consist of an orderly, li-
near sequence of steps. Therefore, the impact of crises has not been subject to an
in-depth examination that starts by acknowledging the tourism industry as a
complex system [2] [13] [14]. A simple, linear relationship and causal chain have
limited ability to explain complex phenomena in physical and social sciences
(including tourism), whereas a systems thinking approach can be applied to un-
derstand the complexity of tourism [15].
A complex systems understanding of tourism has been claimed to be a bet-
ter approach to answering questions about the components, the type of inte-
raction and the type of system [16]. This view is also discernible in later stu-
dies (e.g. Baggio [17]; Haugland
et al.
[18]), where authors agree that each
tourist destination has different types of systems, actors, characteristics and
behaviours. Thus, in understanding the relationship between tourism destina-
tions and disaster events, a complex systems understanding could be seen as
apposite to describe the social, economic and environmental dynamics of the
tourism industry.
In the literature, the words “crisis” and “disaster” have been often used inter-
changeably. Faulkner [3] defines a crisis as a self-inflicted event caused by prob-
lems, such as inept management structures and practices or a failure to adapt to
changes. A disaster has a different meaning: it refers to a situation in which an
enterprise (or a group of enterprises) is confronted with sudden unpredictable
and catastrophic changes over which it has little control [3].
Many authors have attempted to understand crises by examining their cha-
racteristics, lifecycles, anatomies, complexities and natures. Beeton [19] defines
crises based on the level of severity, while Coombs [20] defines the range of cris-
es in organizations based on scale, namely small-scale organizational issues (e.g.
staff illness), malevolence and large-scale issues (e.g. earthquakes, floods, terror-
ist incidents and fires). Parson [21] suggests three types of crises based on the
nature of their occurrence: immediate crises, where there is little or no warning
and organizations are unable to research the problem or prepare a plan before
评论0
最新资源