没有合适的资源?快使用搜索试试~ 我知道了~
2017年美国大学生数学建模竞赛O奖论文A-55280.pdf
1.该资源内容由用户上传,如若侵权请联系客服进行举报
2.虚拟产品一经售出概不退款(资源遇到问题,请及时私信上传者)
2.虚拟产品一经售出概不退款(资源遇到问题,请及时私信上传者)
版权申诉
0 下载量 79 浏览量
2024-03-17
21:46:48
上传
评论
收藏 639KB PDF 举报
温馨提示
试读
26页
美国大学生数学竞赛获奖论文,历届,单项文件,内容丰富,大学生数学,数学竞赛,参考资料,极具参考价值
资源推荐
资源详情
资源评论
For office use only
T1
T2
T3
T4
Team Control Number
55280
Problem Chosen
A
For office use only
F1
F2
F3
F4
2017
MCM/ICM
Summary Sheet
iMoDs: A Treatment to the Kariba Dam
Summary
Located on the Zambezi River, the Kariba Dam holds back the world’s largest reser-
voir. After so many years, despite efforts to slow its structural problems, the Kariba Dam
is in great danger.
To address this situation, our paper provides a detailed analysis of one option, re-
moving the Kariba Dam and replacing it with a series of ten to twenty smaller dams
along the river. We propose a model iMoDS(Integrated Model of Dams in Series) to fully
analyze different aspects, such as the number, placement, and height of the new dams. In
the meantime, we can set the total water management capabilities as same as the existing
dam, providing protection and water management options for Lake Kariba.
We first analyze the water flow using Manning formula which helps us to analyze a
single dam. After that, we simulate a dam in real life with 3ds MAX, show the simplified
dam model on it and derive its storage capacity and building cost.
iMoDS model consists of three main submodels, Risk Cost Model, Power Supply
Ability Model, and Series Safety Model. For explanation, there is a figure which connects
all related parts together.
Risk Cost Model aims at every single dam. It implements risk analysis, using accept-
able risk ratio, P
f
. Thus, it can make a good balance between cost and safety.
Power Supply Ability Model also aims at every single dam, the sum of which mea-
sures the benefits our dam system can produce.
Series Safety Model measures how safe the whole system is, based on an ideal distri-
bution of dams along a river.
Then we use AHP to analyze these three submodels and propose iMoDS.
To get enough data, we surveyed the literature and other sources. Using genetic
algorithm to determine the number and placement, we further solve each dam’s height.
Another section of our paper discusses strategies for addressing several situations,
including the balance between safety and costs, protection for Lake Kariba, guidances
for emergency water flow situations and extreme water flows.
In the end, we make sensitivity analysis and discuss strengths and weaknesses.
Keywords: dam series; water flow; risk analysis; integrated model; dam control strategy
Team # 55280 Page 1 of 25
iMoDs: A Treatment to the Kariba Dam
January 23, 2017
Contents
1 Introduction 3
1.1 Problem Background . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
1.2 Our Work . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2 Assumptions 4
3 Nomenclature 4
4 Statement of our Model 4
4.1 Behavior of Water Flow . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
4.2 Analysis of A Single Dam . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
4.3 iMoDS: Integrated Model of Dams in Series . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
4.3.1 Prerequisites . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
4.3.2 Risk Cost Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
4.3.3 Series Safety Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
4.3.4 Power Supply Ability Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
4.3.5 Integration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
4.3.6 Ranking Submodels with AHP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
5 Implementation 12
5.1 Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
5.2 Number and placement of the new dams . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
5.2.1 Whole Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
5.2.2 Determining the number and placement by genetic algorithm . . . 13
5.2.3 Determining the height of each dam . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
6 Strategies 16
6.1 A Balance Between Safety and Costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
Team # 55280 Page 2 of 25
6.2 Protection for Lake Kariba . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
6.3 Guidance for Emergency Water Flow Situations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
6.4 Guidance for Extreme Water Flows . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
7 Model Analysis 19
7.1 Sensitivity Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
7.1.1 Impact of Planned Working Years N for a Dam . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
7.1.2 Impact of Extreme Condition ratio α . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
7.2 Strengths and Weaknesses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
7.2.1 Strengths . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
7.2.2 Weaknesses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
8 Conclusion 20
Brief Assessment Report 21
Option 1: Repairing the existing Kariba Dam . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
Option 2: Rebuilding the existing Kariba Dam . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
Option 3: Removing the Kariba Dam and replacing it with a series of ten to
twenty smaller dams along the Zambezi River . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
Appendices 24
Appendix A Implemented Genetic Algorithm 24
Appendix B Fitness Function 24
Team # 55280 Page 3 of 25
1 Introduction
1.1 Problem Background
Over fifty years ago, a giant was born on the Zambezi river, along the border be-
tween Zimbabwe and Zambia. It provides the two countries with a huge amount of
hydropower. The world’s largest reservoir is held by it. This giant was named as Kariba
Dam.
Figure 1: Kariba Dam
Kariba Dam is a double curvature concrete arch dam with 128 metres (420 ft) tall
and 579 metres (1,900 ft) long. It was designed to have six spillway gates, which have a
discharge capacity of 9500m
3
/s. Total storage, or overall water management capabilities,
is up to 180.6km
3
. [1].
Kariba was designed as a single prupose hydropower project, but as it turned out
both fishery and tourism bacame important benifits [1]. Since it was built, this dam is
more a landmark than an actual dam for tourists. This area provides them with wa-
ter sports and sufficient wildlife resources. Not to mention the fact that Kariba water
helps develop the industry of agriculture and fishing. Every coin has two sides. Despite
these economical benefits, there are other great environmental impacts, like population
displacement and resettlement, and drowned vegetation. [2]
However, such a great construction is in great danger and dire need of maintenance.
Kariba is threatned by severe droughts, which has lowered the reservoir’s volume to
twelve percent of the capacity. What makes the situation more complicated is that if we
refill the reservoir, then the dam is very likely to collapse. Due to unexpected floods and
climate changes, the dam seems to be greatly dangerous.
1.2 Our Work
To address this situation, we have three different options: repairing, rebuilding, or
removing the existing Kariba Dam and replacing it with a series of ten to twenty smaller
Team # 55280 Page 4 of 25
dams along the Zambezi River.
In this paper, we focus on the last option and provide a detailed analysis of it. We
propose an integrated model of dams in series. This model not only recommends the
number and placement of the dams along the Zambezi River, but also make a balacne
between safety and costs. Our system have the same overall water management capa-
bilities as the existing Kariba Dam while providing greater levels protection and water
management options for Lake Kariba.
In Section.2, we state several basic assumptions. Section.3 contains the nomenclature
used in model statement. Section.4 provides sufficient details about our model. Section.5
carrys out experiment and analysis about our proposed model. Section.6 provides de-
tailed strategies dealing with several conditions. At last, we further study our model in
Section.7 and make some conclusions in Section.8.
2 Assumptions
Our model makes the following assumptions:
1. In the phase of modeling, we don’t consider extreme conditions on the river, like
waterfalls, water cutoff seasons. Because these conditions require extremely big
data. They are even unnecessary for in real life dams have dynamic strategies to
handle them. We will discuss emergency water flow situations in another Section.
2. Other existing dams are ignored. They are not as big as Kariba Dam. Few data
about other dams on the river are accessible, especially thier effects on runoff of
the river and slope of its hydraulic grade line. This assumption is flexible because
it only affects the input data of the river, but not our model.
3. We simplifies the water flow into an open-channel flow. Open-channel flow has a
free surface. Based on this assumption, we are able to estimate the average velocity
of the river’s water flow.
3 Nomenclature
In this paper we use the nomenclature in Table.1 to descibe our model. Other symbols
that are used only once will be described later.
4 Statement of our Model
In this section, we will discuss all details about our model. This model takes several
fields into consideration, ranging from liquid flow theory to economy. To begin with, we
first investigate the behavior of water flow. Then we provide our integrated model of
dams in series. This model makes a great balance between safety and costs.
剩余25页未读,继续阅读
资源评论
阿拉伯梳子
- 粉丝: 1654
- 资源: 5735
上传资源 快速赚钱
- 我的内容管理 展开
- 我的资源 快来上传第一个资源
- 我的收益 登录查看自己的收益
- 我的积分 登录查看自己的积分
- 我的C币 登录后查看C币余额
- 我的收藏
- 我的下载
- 下载帮助
安全验证
文档复制为VIP权益,开通VIP直接复制
信息提交成功