没有合适的资源?快使用搜索试试~ 我知道了~
JP 摩根-全球-石油与天然气行业-Q1石油市场季报:美国利用其能源例外主义-315-38页.pdf
需积分: 0 0 下载量 174 浏览量
2023-07-26
11:46:03
上传
评论
收藏 1.18MB PDF 举报
温馨提示
试读
38页
JP 摩根-全球-石油与天然气行业-Q1石油市场季报:美国利用其能源例外主义-315-38页.pdf
资源推荐
资源详情
资源评论
Global Commodities Research
15 March 2019
Oil Market Quarterly 1Q19
US leverages its energy exceptionalism
Global Commodities Research
Abhishek G Deshpande
AC
(1-212) 834-3102
JPMorgan Chase Bank NA
Thomas Anthonj
(44-20) 7742-7850
J.P. Morgan Securities plc
Arindam Sandilya
(65) 6882-7759
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Singapore
Branch
Prateek Kedia
(91-22) 6157-3317
prateek.kedia@jpmchase.com
J.P. Morgan India Private Limited
See page 36 for analyst certification and important disclosures.
J.P. Morgan does and seeks to do business with companies covered in its research reports. As a result, investors should be aw
are that the
firm may have a conflict of interest that could affect the objectivity of this report. Investors should consider this report as only a
single factor in
making their investment decision.
www.jpmorganmarkets.com
As risky assets focused on macro concerns, oil markets have largely
overlooked supply-side tightness in 1Q19 that has helped global oil markets
to rebalance since the end of 2018. With a potential for a US-China trade
talk resolution emerging, oil prices should finally break out of the narrow
trading range and should be supported in the very near-term due to policy-
driven supply-side tightness. The recovery is likely to fade towards the end of
2019 unless OPEC+ continues to over-comply and demand growth holds up.
In 2019, we revised down total oil products demand growth marginally by
58kbd to 1.03mbd whereas total supply growth has been revised down by
0.74mbd to 0.3mbd y/y due to OPEC+ cuts and Canadian curtailments as
assumed in our central balances. This is supportive for oil prices in 1H19. In
2H19 we are somewhat skeptical of the direction oil prices could take at this
stage given the strong price elasticity of supply and sustainability of OPEC+
cuts if oil prices or non-OPEC production were to rise unabated. At this
stage, in order to take a direction/view, we would rather give benefit of the
doubt to OPEC+ managing supply in order to avoid a surplus. Hence, we
think OPEC+ cuts will need to be extended not just to the end of 2019 but
also into 2020 if they want to avoid another oil price crash.
Given the support is very strongly pivoted on continued OPEC+ cuts (and
over-compliance), US foreign policy could very much influence those cuts as
neither US nor OPEC wants oil prices to rally too high at this stage of global
economic expansion. Talks of US SPR release and NOPEC bill could gain
traction if oil prices were to rise significantly from current levels. Hence, our
risk bias is negative relative to our base case scenario especially in 2H19 when
US supply growth returns.
Oil technical: The rally off the December 2018 lows remains intact for the
time being, but coming closer to the target zone for the first leg up (A-wave)
of the broader countertrend rally, usually a 50% retracement of the
preceding sell-off, we expect the up-momentum to fade in preparation of
the B-wave sell-off, which could potentially retrace 76.4% of the ongoing
wave A up.
Oil derivatives: Oil volatility has fully normalized from the multi-sigma
spike in 4Q18 when unexpected waivers on Iranian sanctions roiled
markets. Vols now screen fair vs. medium-term fundamental drivers. Oil
volatility should remain contained this year due to continued OPEC+
management of prices around $70/bbl on Brent. The lack of overvaluation
in implied volatility prevents an aggressive short vol stance; however,
cautious structuring via -M6/+M12 calendar spreads offers better risk-
reward. Bullish oil views are well-expressed via Jun’19 call spreads that
have cheapened sharply in vol, and line up timeline-wise with the Iranian
sanctions waiver deadline, an expected ramp up in Russian production
compliance ahead of the April OPEC+ meeting, and the end of the refinery
maintenance season.
J.P. Morgan Oil Price Forecast (Brent)
$/bbl
Source: J.P. Morgan Commodities Research
J.P. Morgan Oil Price Forecast (WTI)
$/bbl
Source: J.P. Morgan Commodities Research
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
1Q19 2Q19 3Q19 4Q19 1Q20 2Q20 3Q20 4Q20
Central Scenario Forward Curve
High Case Scenario Low Case Scenario
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
1Q19 2Q19 3Q19 4Q19 1Q20 2Q20 3Q20 4Q20
Central Scenario Forward Curve
High Case Scenario Low Case Scenario
2
Global
Commodities Research
Commodities Quarterly 2Q18
15 March 2019
Abhishek G Deshpande
(1-212) 834-3102
Thomas Anthonj
(44-20) 7742-7850
Arindam Sandilya
(65) 6882-7759
Prateek Kedia
(91-22) 6157-3317
Oil Market Outlook – OPEC+
cuts required for rest of 2019
& 2020
The end of 2018 called into question the health of
global economic growth as risky assets sold off on the
back of global slowdown risks. Since we last
published our 4Q18 oil quarterly, J.P. Morgan has
revised global GDP growth for 2018 and 2019 down
by 10bps to 3.2% y/y and 20 bps to 2.8% y/y,
respectively, but kept the 2020 GDP growth rate
unchanged at 2.8% y/y.
While the macro concerns linger, there are some signs
of a potential stabilization in economic growth
slowdown as noted in the FRI and the EASI indices of
J.P. Morgan. Also, the second derivative for
Manufacturing PMI has slowed (less negative) and
Industrial Production (IP) is expected to improve as
early as 2Q19 as noted by J.P. Morgan economists.
We revise oil products demand growth marginally
lower in 2019 to 1.03 mbd (-58kbd vs previous
estimates). The heavy lifting done by the US in
driving oil products demand last year should wane,
taking global oil demand growth lower with it. The
demand growth is expected to soften further to 0.9
mbd in 2020. Any positive outcome from US-China
trade talks could suggest some revisions to the upside.
Supply will dominate the year with OPEC+ cuts at
loggerheads with US foreign policy right before the
next OPEC+ meeting in Vienna on 17-18 April.
2019 could be once again a year of two halves for oil
markets with 1H19 supported by supply-side
tightness that could easily fade by 2H19 as non-OPEC
supply growth continues to outweigh OPEC+’s
efforts.
Any short-term gain is likely to lose steam in 2020 as
US supply growth and foreign policies will challenge
the sustainability of higher oil prices.
Trade recommendations: Stay tactically long NYMEX
WTI June 2019 and short NYMEX WTI December
2019 spread trade. Stay long NYMEX WTI June 2019
and short ICE Brent June 2019 trade.
Oil outlook summary: OPEC+ cuts
required for rest of 2019 & 2020
Oil prices experienced a precipitous sell-off in 4Q18,
declining by 42% between Oct 03 and Dec 24. Whilst the
concern around a global macro slowdown was the key
trigger, weakness in the physical market—mainly policy
driven and taking OECD total oil inventories above the
five-year average at the end of last year—further
exacerbated the move lower in price. US total liquids
supply rose by 2.2mbd in 2018, a historic high and greater
than its previous high of 1.7mbd observed in 2014. Thus
far, the first half of 2019 appears to be on track for a re-
balancing of the supply and demand after OPEC+
announced additional supply cuts in Dec’18. This allows us
to keep a supportive argument for oil prices.
Oil prices (Brent) are up 25% YTD and oil is one of the
strongest performing asset classes so far in 2019. Oil
markets are strongly being influenced by the supply side as
we make limited changes to our 2019 demand growth
forecasts. In 2019, we expect total oil products demand
growth of 1.03mbd whereas total supply growth has been
revised down by 0.74mbd to 0.3mbd y/y due to OPEC+ cuts
and Canadian curtailments as assumed in our central
balances. As OPEC+ cuts begin to bite and non-OPEC
supply tightens in 1H19, due to Canadian curtailments, a
temporary US production growth slowdown, and
maintenance in some of the key global oil fields (Kashagan
particularly), we expect 2Q19 to have a theoretical tightness
of over 1.2mbd in global balances. This is in stark contrast
to our 4Q18 preliminary data showing weakness of 1.5mbd.
Additionally, as refiners return from seasonal maintenance
globally, we should see the physical crude market tighten.
In 2H19 we are somewhat skeptical of the direction oil
prices could take at this stage given the strong price
elasticity of supply and sustainability of OPEC+ cuts if oil
prices or non-OPEC production were to rise unabated. At
this stage, in order to take a direction/view, we would rather
give benefit of the doubt to OPEC+ managing supply in
order to avoid a surplus after being caught off-guard by US
policies involving Iran. Hence, we think OPEC+ cuts will
need to be extended not just to the end of 2019 but also
into 2020 if they want to avoid another oil price crash.
3
Global
Commodities Research
Commodities Quarterly 2Q18
15 March 2019
Abhishek G Deshpande
(1-212) 834-3102
Thomas Anthonj
(44-20) 7742-7850
Arindam Sandilya
(65) 6882-7759
Prateek Kedia
(91-22) 6157-3317
prateek.kedia@jpmchase.com
Exhibit 1: Oil rebounds on supply-side corrections: from free fall of
4Q18 to 25% jump in 1Q19
YTD 2019 returns by asset class (%)
Source: J.P. Morgan Commodities Research
International Maritime Organization’s (IMO2020) low
sulphur cap which comes into effect on 1 Jan 2020 would
further reduce demand for OPEC crude. Thus, it would be
ill-timed to get their sour grades into the market when there
is low demand for that specific grade of crude. After an
initial slowdown in 1H19, US supply growth should return
once pipeline constraints are resolved. Based on our current
price outlook and IMO 2020, there will be an increasing
incentive for the US to complete new wells and bring the
overhang of drilled but uncompleted wells (DUC) back into
the market.
We have marked-to-market our 1Q19 oil price forecasts
leaving the rest of 2019 and 2020 unchanged. While the
modal view based on a multivariate regression analysis of
oil suggests oil price should trade in the $60-65/bbl range
for Brent, we believe that does not fairly reflect the growing
geopolitical risks (Iran and Venezuela sanctions) in the oil
markets that directly impact the supply part of the balance
and the desire for OPEC+ (mainly Saudi Arabia) to
maintain oil prices (Brent) closer to $70/bbl. Also, when
we take a univariate regression model based on the supply
and demand balance, it clearly suggests oil prices should be
closer to $70/bbl. As we have mentioned several times in
our weekly reports, once we have a decision on US-China
trade talks, oil markets are likely to re-focus their attention
on the oil supply and demand balance (see Oil Market
Weekly, Jan 11). Hence, we maintain our bullish view from
current levels in the very near-term on the back of
unchanged demand growth but continued supply-side
corrections and risks. We have left 2020 oil prices
unchanged.
Exhibit 2: J.P. Morgan Oil Price Forecast (Brent)
$/bbl
Source: J.P. Morgan Commodities Research Note: Fwd. prices as of Mar 11
Exhibit 3: J.P. Morgan Oil Price Forecast (WTI)
$/bbl
Source: J.P. Morgan Commodities Research Note: Fwd. prices as of Mar 11
-2
-1
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
9
10
10
10
10
11
11
11
12
14
14
15
16
17
25
25
-5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30
MSCI India ($)
USD trade-wtd
Euro linkers
Italian BTPs
USD 3M cash
US Treasuries
GBI Global
JGBs
German Bunds
Euro HG credit
US linkers
Spanish Bonos
EM FX (ELMI)
Gold
Euro HY credit
FTSE
US HY credit
MSCI Mexico ($)
MSCI S. Africa ($)
Topix
Australia equities (ASX 200)
Copper
MSCI EMU
MSCI EM (in $)
MSCI Korea ($)
MSCI World
Commodities
MSCI Russia ($)
S&P500
MSCI Brazil ($)
Nasdaq
MSCI Turkey ($)
MSCI China ($)
Russell 2000
Brent
WTI
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
1Q19 2Q19 3Q19 4Q19 1Q20 2Q20 3Q20 4Q20
Central Scenario Forward Curve
High Case Scenario Low Case Scenario
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
1Q19 2Q19 3Q19 4Q19 1Q20 2Q20 3Q20 4Q20
Central Scenario Forward Curve
High Case Scenario Low Case Scenario
4
Global
Commodities Research
Commodities Quarterly 2Q18
15 March 2019
Abhishek G Deshpande
(1-212) 834-3102
Thomas Anthonj
(44-20) 7742-7850
Arindam Sandilya
(65) 6882-7759
Prateek Kedia
(91-22) 6157-3317
Exhibit 4: Brent fair price estimation
$/bbl
Source: J.P. Morgan Commodities Research, GAI = JPM Global Anxiety Index, S-D: Supply-
Demand balance
Risks to our central scenario: Given the support is very
strongly pivoted on continued OPEC+ cuts (and over-
compliance), US foreign policy could very much influence
those cuts as neither US nor OPEC wants oil prices to rally
too high at this stage of global economic expansion. US
exceptionalism in energy has given the largest oil producer
leverage in foreign policy like never before and it seems
determined in using it. OPEC+ (mainly Saudi Arabia) could
manage US policy and expectations via compliance rather
than outright breaking the OPEC+ accord that it has worked
so hard to build over the last two years; however, messaging
is likely to be very important as it has the potential to push
prices down on sentiment quickly. Talks of US SPR release
and NOPEC bill could gain traction if oil prices were to rise
significantly from current levels as that would put pressure
on US administration to act especially ahead of the US
Presidential elections in 2020. On the Brent front, a no-deal
Brexit could increase uncertainty around the free trade
agreement with South Korea and thereby put pressure on
Forties and Dated Brent in the very near-term. Hence, our
risk bias is negative relative to our base case scenario
especially in 2H19 when OPEC+ cuts come to an end as per
the Dec’18 agreement and when US supply growth should
return on the back of higher oil prices and reduced
takeaway constraints. We are cognizant that positive US-
China trade talks should be supportive demand but that is
limited relative to the sustainable support seen during
synchronized growth at the end of 2017 and early 2018 in
oil demand. If OPEC+ was to not extend supply cuts or if
US supply were to increase well above our expected growth
for 2019, it could very quickly offset the limited impact to
oil demand from successful US-China trade talks, in our
view. Investors have been skeptical of increasing their
positioning in oil despite the markets currently in re-
balancing mode due to supply-side corrections. Their
appetite for oil would further reduce should signs of
tightness in physical markets disappear towards the end of
2019 or early 2020.
Risk of NOPEC Bill: On 07 Feb 2018 the US House of
Representatives’ Judiciary Committee approved a bill to
amend the Sherman Antitrust Act that would make oil
producing and exporting cartels illegal. The bill, H.R.948,
was introduced on 04 Feb by Rep. Steve Chabot. The bill
has gained traction in the last six months just when OPEC
and Russia continue to make joint efforts to scale back
production in order to balance the markets but in doing so
they also help support oil prices. US politicians have tried
several times in the past to pass the NOPEC bill but the
White House has opposed it so far. In the latest meetings in
Houston around the IHS CERAWeek conference, there
were further discussions between energy stakeholders
around the risk of NOPEC bill progressing further to
become law eventually. The Energy Secretary was quoted
by Bloomberg saying “OPEC was appropriately concerned”
about the potential legislation. We think the progression of
NOPEC would be partially fueled by oil prices and their
trajectory. But, equally, even if it were to become a law, the
fact that US has become the largest producer of crude and
condensates in the world should mean that using it
appropriately would be very important and perhaps limited.
US producers and their oil-based income lubricate various
state economies (directly and indirectly) within US. So, a
low oil price environment is not necessarily the obvious
option. It nevertheless is leverage along with its booming
oil production that would allow them to drive oil-based
policies in the medium term. For US and its oil industry, the
message is clear: “strike while the iron is hot”.
PMI and oil price: is that a story to tell?
In the past PMI would have been a good variable for
consideration in oil prices as supply-side changes were
managed via OPEC. We still did a quick regression
analysis along with other variables around global PMI to
assess the relationship. Our models suggest that the fair
price of Brent at present level of the global PMI (50.6) is
~$50.5/bbl. We estimate that price tends to be in a -1 to
+1.5 standard deviation range around the trend. Prices rose
above trend as risks elevated before the Iranian sanctions
and then returned to trend in Dec’18 after a massive sell-off
over economic woes. Presently, prices remain close to the
upper end of the band, while we expect a continued rise in
supply to prompt mean reversion back towards the trend.
Our various models suggest $60-65/bbl to be a natural floor
for Brent prices.
Base d on Predicted Brent Dec'18 Deviation
Univariate Model
GDP 77.0 57.7 -19.3
PMI 55.3 57.7 2.4
S&P 59.7 57.7 -2.0
S&P Energy 41.8 57.7 15.9
S-D 59.9 57.7 -2.2
OECD Inventories 70.9 57.7 -13.2
EIA Outages 74.1 57.7 -16.4
GAI 74.4 57.7 -16.7
Multivariate Model
S&P, OECD Inv & DXY 61.2 57.7 -3.5
S-D, S&P & DXY 56.8 57.7 0.9
S&P, OECD Inv & DXY + GAI 61.0 57.7 -3.3
S-D, S&P, DXY +GAI 58.7 57.7 -1.0
Oil Price Estimation
5
Global
Commodities Research
Commodities Quarterly 2Q18
15 March 2019
Abhishek G Deshpande
(1-212) 834-3102
Thomas Anthonj
(44-20) 7742-7850
Arindam Sandilya
(65) 6882-7759
Prateek Kedia
(91-22) 6157-3317
prateek.kedia@jpmchase.com
Exhibit 5: Brent price based on Global PMI
$/bbl
Source: J.P. Morgan Commodities Research
Global macro
The end of 2018 called into question the health of global
economic growth as risky assets sold off on the back of
global slowdown risks. Since we last published our 4Q18
oil quarterly, J.P. Morgan has revised global GDP growth
for 2018 and 2019 down by 10bps to 3.2% y/y and 20 bps
to 2.8% y/y, respectively (see Exhibit 8) but kept the 2020
GDP growth rate unchanged at 2.8% y/y. Global growth in
2020 is expected to remain stable due to relatively firm
growth in US and Emerging Market (EM) economies
(especially India) despite a drag from the Euro Area
economies.
The 2019 GDP growth forecast for Developed Markets
(DM) was revised down by 40bps to 1.7% y/y. The sharpest
regional revision came from a 70bps decline in the 2019
Euro Area GDP growth estimate due to a slowdown in
Germany, France and Italy. Japan too was revised down by
70bps in 2019.
At the same time, the 2019 GDP growth forecast for EM
was revised down by 10bps to 4.4% y/y relative to our last
quarterly on the back of disruption caused by the US-China
trade conflict. Global manufacturing activity as indicated by
the PMI reflects weakness in global activity as global PMI
slipped to 50.6 in Feb’19 vs 52 in Nov’18. Despite strong
prints from the US and India, overall sentiment advocates
caution as Chinese PMI has remained in contractionary
territory for three months in a row. The industrial
production (IP) data turned out to be much lower than
anticipated but the IP growth (%y/y) is expected to bottom
out in 1Q19 (see Exhibit 7).
While the macro concerns linger, there are some signs of a
potential stabilization in economic growth slowdown as
noted in the FRI and the EASI indices of J.P. Morgan. Also,
the second derivative for Manufacturing PMI has slowed
and IP is expected to improve as early as 2Q19 as noted by
our economists. Whilst it is too early to say if we can expect
a turnaround, our economists expect a potential stabilization
by mid-year (see Global Data Watch, Kasman et al, Mar 1)
as recent economic data rekindles hope of a turnaround in
the global economy with benign inflation boosting
consumption. Global CPI inflation is on track to fall to a
1.2% ar in 1Q19, materially boosting household purchasing
power. Moreover, a dovish tone from the Fed and
accommodative policies of ECB and other central banks
open up room for a push for higher inflation.
Our Chinese economists expect economic momentum to
bottom out in a few months due to favorable credit reports
recently which suggests policy easing is likely to support
growth. Although February new credit growth dropped after
the spike in January due to seasonal effects, the combined
January-February 2019 credit still hit a record-high at
Rmb5.3 trillion, Rmb1.07 trillion higher than the first two
months combined in 2018 (or 25% higher) (see China
Research, Liao, Zhu, et.al, Mar 11). Our Chinese
economists also expect higher real estate construction
activity in 2019 which is usually supportive for diesel
demand in our view. Moreover, the manufacturing PMIs in
China also suggest an uptick in new orders and decline in
finished goods inventory in Feb’19. At the same time, if we
were to have a positive outcome on US-China trade talks in
the coming months, then that could be another impetus to
growth in 2019 from current levels. A positive dialogue
between US & China on trade along with a continued
dovish tone from central banks should help support EM
currencies. This is ultimately supportive for oil demand
relative to current growth levels.
Exhibit 6: Manufacturing PMI
Source: Government and industry sources, J.P. Morgan Commodities Research
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Mar-16 Jul-16 Nov-16 Mar-17 Jul-17 Nov-17 Mar-18 Jul-18 Nov-18
Predicted Predicted - 1SD Actual Predicted + 1.5 SD
Country May-18 Jun-18 Jul-18 Aug-18 Sep-18 Oct-18 Nov-18 Dec-18 Jan-19 Feb-19
Canada
56.2 57.1 56.9 56.8 54.8 53.9 54.9 53.6 53.0 52.6
Mexico
51.0 52.1 52.1 50.7 51.7 50.7 49.7 49.7 50.9 52.6
US
56.4 55.4 55.3 54.7 55.6 55.7 55.3 53.8 54.9 53.0
China
51.1 51.0 50.8 50.6 50.0 50.1 50.2 49.7 48.3 49.9
India
51.2 53.1 52.3 51.7 52.2 53.1 54.0 53.2 53.9 54.3
Japan
52.8 53.0 52.3 52.5 52.5 52.9 52.2 52.6 50.3 48.9
Australia
57.5 57.4 52.0 56.7 59.0 58.3 51.3 49.5 52.5 54.0
Brazil
50.7 49.8 50.5 51.1 50.9 51.1 52.7 52.6 52.7 53.4
S. Africa
49.4 48.0 49.9 45.2 44.5 42.4 49.5 50.7 49.9 46.2
France
54.4 52.5 53.3 53.5 52.5 51.2 50.8 49.7 51.2 51.5
Germany
56.9 55.9 56.9 55.9 53.7 52.2 51.8 51.5 49.7 47.6
UK 54.2 54.2 53.9 53.0 53.8 51.1 53.6 54.2 52.8 52.0
Greece 54.2 53.5 53.5 53.9 53.6 53.1 54.0 53.8 53.7 54.2
Euro Area 55.5 54.9 55.1 54.6 53.2 52.0 51.8 51.4 50.5 49.3
Russia
49.8 49.5 48.1 48.9 50.0 51.3 52.6 51.7 50.9 50.1
Turkey
46.4 46.8 49.0 46.4 42.7 44.3 44.7 44.2 44.2 46.4
Global
53.1 53.0 52.8 52.6 52.2 52.1 52.0 51.5 50.7 50.6
剩余37页未读,继续阅读
资源评论
2201_75761617
- 粉丝: 20
- 资源: 7339
上传资源 快速赚钱
- 我的内容管理 展开
- 我的资源 快来上传第一个资源
- 我的收益 登录查看自己的收益
- 我的积分 登录查看自己的积分
- 我的C币 登录后查看C币余额
- 我的收藏
- 我的下载
- 下载帮助
安全验证
文档复制为VIP权益,开通VIP直接复制
信息提交成功