没有合适的资源?快使用搜索试试~ 我知道了~
我们提出引力微透镜,作为检验Eric Verlinde [1]最近提出的新兴引力理论的一种方法。 我们考虑两种极限情况:最大各向异性压力的暗质量(情况I)和各向同性压力的暗质量(情况II)。 我们对行星近日点前进的分析表明,只有案例I产生了可行的理论。 在这种情况下,可以用质量为M⁎且赤角Δ=(2GH0M⁎)/(3c3)的点状全局单极子的质量模型模拟质量为M⁎的恒星外的度量,其中H0为哈勃率 和G牛顿常数。 该缺陷角可用于检验该理论,因为光在由αD≈-πΔ/ 2给出的恒星周围呈现出额外的弯曲。 该角度与距恒星的距离无关,并且会相等地影响轻和大质量粒子。 效果太小,无法在今天进行测量,但是应该在下一代高分辨率望远镜的范围内。 最后,我们注意到,围绕恒星或黑洞绕轨道运行的行星的周星变的前进(每周期等于πΔ)也可以用于检验该理论。
资源推荐
资源详情
资源评论
Physics Letters B 769 (2017) 281–288
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Physics Letters B
www.elsevier.com/locate/physletb
Gravitational microlensing in Verlinde’s emergent gravity
Lei-Hua Liu
∗
, Tomislav Prokopec
Institute for Theoretical Physics, Spinoza Institute and the Center for Extreme Matter and Emergent Phenomena (EMME), Utrecht University,
Buys
Ballot Building, Princetonplein 5, 3584 CC Utrecht, The Netherlands
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history:
Received
6 December 2016
Received
in revised form 29 March 2017
Accepted
29 March 2017
Available
online 31 March 2017
Editor:
M. Trodden
We propose gravitational microlensing as a way of testing the emergent gravity theory recently proposed
by Eric Verlinde [1]. We consider two limiting cases: the dark mass of maximally anisotropic pressures
(Case I) and of isotropic pressures (Case II). Our analysis of perihelion advancement of a planet shows
that only Case I yields a viable theory. In this case the metric outside a star of mass M
∗
can be modeled
by that of a point-like global monopole whose mass is M
∗
and a deficit angle =
(2GH
0
M
∗
)/(3c
3
),
where H
0
is the Hubble rate and G the Newton constant. This deficit angle can be used to test the theory
since light exhibits additional bending around stars given by, α
D
≈−π/2. This angle is independent on
the distance from the star and it affects equally light and massive particles. The effect is too small to be
measurable today, but should be within reach of the next generation of high resolution telescopes. Finally
we note that the advancement of periastron of a planet orbiting around a star or black hole, which equals
π per period, can be also used to test the theory.
© 2017 Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Funded by SCOAP
3
.
1. Global monopole metric
In a recent paper Eric Verlinde [1] has proposed a novel emer-
gent
gravity theory. The most important claim of the theory is that
dark matter has no particle origin but instead it is an emergent
manifestation in modified gravity. Assuming spherical symmetry
Verlinde obtains,
r
0
GM
D
(r
)
2
r
2
dr
=
cH
0
M
B
(r)r
6
, (1)
where H
0
= 2.36 × 10
−18
s
−1
√
/3is the current Hub-
ble
parameter, is the cosmological constant (whose value is
determined by the current dark energy density), G = 6.674 ×
10
−11
m
3
/(kg s
2
) is the Newton’s constant, c ≈3 ×10
8
m/sis the
speed of light, M
B
(r) (M
D
(r)) is the baryonic mass (dark mass)
inside a sphere of radius r.
Eq. (1) implies that for a star of uniform density ρ
∗
, M
∗
=
4π
3
r
3
ρ
∗
, inside the star,
M
D
(r) =
2cH
0
M
∗
r
5
3GR
3
∗
∝r
5/2
, r < R
∗
, (2)
*
Corresponding author.
E-mail
addresses: L.Liu1@uu.nl (L.-H. Liu), t.prokopec@uu.nl (T. Prokopec).
where R
∗
denotes star’s radius. On the other hand, outside the star,
M
D
∝r, and we have,
M
D
(r) =
cH
0
M
∗
6G
×r , r ≥ R
∗
. (3)
The main goal of this paper is to construct the metric tensor
that consistently incorporates (1) within the Verlinde’s emergent
gravity theory and to investigate how that metric can be used to
test the theory. The fundamental assumption we make is that the
theory admits metric formulation that can be obtained by solv-
ing
suitably modified Einstein’s equations (23). In the Appendix we
perform a detailed analysis of such a theory. Unfortunately, we do
not have all of the information needed to fully specify the metric.
A reasonable assumption is that the modified stress energy tensor
is diagonal, T
μ
ν
=diag[−ρ, P
r
, P
θ
, P
ϕ
], see (24). In the weak grav-
itational
field regime (which is of our principal concern here) that
should be justified. This leaves us with four unknown functions:
energy density ρ (which we can determine from (1)) and three un-
known
pressures: P
r
, P
θ
, P
ϕ
. For spherically symmetric mass dis-
tribution
the two angular pressures must be equal, P
θ
= P
ϕ
≡ P
⊥
.
The remaining pressures are unknown, but are nevertheless tightly
constrained by the TOV equation (41), however not enough to be
completely specifiable. Rather than attempting to extend Verlin-
de’s
theory to obtain a relationship between the energy density
and pressures, here we consider two simple and plausible Ansätze:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2017.03.061
0370-2693/
© 2017 Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Funded by SCOAP
3
.
282 L.-H. Liu, T. Prokopec / Physics Letters B 769 (2017) 281–288
Case I: Field-like dark mass: P
⊥
=0;
Case
II: Particle-like dark mass: P
⊥
= P
r
≡ P .
In
addition, in Case II, we assume that inside a star (where except
at very small radii baryonic contribution dominates) baryonic mat-
ter
is non-relativistic, and hence P
B
ρ
B
, implying also P ρ.
The
extensive analysis in the Appendix (cf. Eqs. (39), (50) and
(67)) shows that the metric tensor is of the form,
ds
2
=−
1 − −
1 − w
2
H
2
0
r
2
c
2
−
2GM
∗
c
2
r
r
r
H
(1+w
)
c
2
dt
2
+
dr
2
1 − −
H
2
0
r
2
c
2
−
2GM
∗
c
2
r
+r
2
d
2
2
, (4)
where d
2
2
= dθ
2
+ sin
2
(θ)dϕ
2
is the metric of the two-dimensi-
onal
unit sphere (θ ∈[0, π], ϕ ∈[0, 2π)), w
= P /ρ =−1is the
equation of state parameter for Case I (P
r
= P , P
⊥
=0) and w
=0
for
Case II (P
r
= P = P
⊥
). This then implies that outside the star
for Case I the metric can be written as that of a point-like global
monopole on de Sitter background,
1
and is the deficit solid an-
gle
defined by,
=
2GH
0
M
∗
3c
3
. (5)
That in (5) indeed represents a deficit solid angle that cannot be
removed by a coordinate transformation can be shown as follows.
Observe firstly that the volume (surface area) of a two sphere of
radius r is (S
2
(r)) =4πr
2
, which defines the coordinate r (these
coordinates are similar to those used in the Schwarzschild metric).
Now, one can try to remove by the following coordinate trans-
formations,
˜
r =
r
√
1 −
,
˜
t =(1 −)
1
2
[1+(1+w
)]
×t ,
(
1 −)d
2
2
=d
˜
2
2
(6)
after which seems to disappear from the metric (4). Indeed, the
equivalent metric is,
ds
2
=−
1 −
1 − w
2
H
2
0
˜
r
2
c
2
−
2G
˜
M
∗
c
2
˜
r
˜
r
r
H
(1+w
)
c
2
d
˜
t
2
+
d
˜
r
2
1 −
H
2
0
r
2
c
2
−
2G
˜
M
∗
c
2
r
+
˜
r
2
d
˜
2
2
, (7)
where
˜
M
∗
=
M
∗
(1 −)
3/2
. (8)
However, does not entirely disappear since in the new coordi-
nates,
d
˜
2
2
=d
˜
θ
2
+sin
2
˜
θ
√
1 −
d
˜
ϕ
2
(9)
1
Global monopoles are topological solutions of classical equations of motion of
a scalar field theory with 3real scalar fields,
= (
1
,
2
,
3
)
T
whose Lagrangian
is O (3) symmetric and whose potential exhibits a spontaneous symmetry break-
ing,
V (
) =(λ/4)(
T
·
−
2
0
)
2
. One can show that in this case the solution with
topological charge 1 [2] will backreact on the metric such to induce a solid deficit
angle, =8π G
2
0
(c =1), see e.g. [3,4]. From the gravitational point of view com-
pact
star-like dense objects (black hole mimickers) built out of topologically charged
scalar matter [5] resemble ordinary stars in Verlinde’s theory.
Fig. 1 . Light deflection around a star of mass M
∗
= M. The closest distance to the
center of the star is d. The deflection angle α can be calculated by integrating (12)
along
the path of light from the source S to the observer O .
and
˜
ϕ and
˜
θ
take values in the intervals,
˜
θ ∈[
0, π
√
1 − ],
˜
ϕ ∈[0, 2π
√
1 −). (10)
It is an easy exercise to calculate the surface area of the two di-
mensional
sphere of radius
˜
r in these new coordinates,
(S
2
(
˜
r)) =4π(1 −)
˜
r
2
. (11)
From this result it is obvious that the sphere contains a solid an-
gle
deficit of, δ =−4π, completing the proof. In the following
section we discuss the physical significance of this result.
2. Gravitational lensing
In this section we consider the lensing in a metric given by (4)
and (7).
The usual weak (linearized) lensing formula for the deflec-
tion
angle (in radians),
α =−
1
c
2
∇
⊥
φ(
x) +ψ(
x)
d, (12)
where is the path along the light geodesic (from the source to
the observer, see Fig. 1), ∇
⊥
is the gradient operator in the plane
orthogonal to the propagation of light and φ and ψ are the two
gravitational potentials (corresponding to the g
00
and g
rr
metric
perturbations). Outside the star these potentials can be read off
from (4),
φ(r) =−
GM
∗
r
−
1 − w
2
H
2
0
2
r
2
+
c
2
(1 + w
)
2
ln
r
r
H
−
c
2
2
,
ψ(
r) =−
GM
∗
r
−
H
2
0
2
r
2
−
c
2
2
. (13)
The lensing formula (12) can be used for the first three parts of
the potential (the one induced by the star mass, by the Universe’s
expansion and the logarithmic piece), but it cannot be used for the
constant contribution, φ
D
=−c
2
/2, from the dark mass simply
because, ∇
⊥
φ
D
= 0(how to calculate light deflection due to φ
D
is discussed below). For that reason it is better to use the second
form of the metric (7), in which case the gravitational potential is,
˜
φ =−
G
˜
M
∗
˜
r
−
1 − w
2
H
2
0
2
˜
r
2
+
c
2
(1 + w
)
2
ln
˜
r
r
H
,
˜
ψ =−
G
˜
M
∗
˜
r
−
H
2
0
2
˜
r
2
(14)
Inserting this into (12) gives for the lensing angle,
剩余7页未读,继续阅读
资源评论
weixin_38710198
- 粉丝: 6
- 资源: 912
上传资源 快速赚钱
- 我的内容管理 展开
- 我的资源 快来上传第一个资源
- 我的收益 登录查看自己的收益
- 我的积分 登录查看自己的积分
- 我的C币 登录后查看C币余额
- 我的收藏
- 我的下载
- 下载帮助
最新资源
- 油猴(tampermonkey)插件
- python语言douban爬虫程序代码QZQ.txt
- Python语言PPTMB爬虫程序代码QZQ.txt
- Python中利用VPython库实现3D圣诞树的动态可视化
- UDP RTL8211E wireshark能抓到数据,网口调试助手需要打开wireshark才能收到数据
- SwitchyOmega插件
- 绿色经济转型中的创新思维与实践-清华大学CIDEG推出《绿色创新理论与实践》线上课程
- java项目,毕业设计-广场舞团系统
- 企业云上数据安全-华为和信通院-2024
- 使用Python在控制台中打印圣诞树的简易方法
- java项目,毕业设计-就业信息管理系统
- C# WPF-IP扫描工具WPF.zip
- Comsol热-流-固四场耦合增透瓦斯抽采,包括动态渗透率、孔隙率变化模型,涉及pde模块等四个物理场,由于内容可复制源文件
- 国内主要厂商AI大模型一览:技术特性与API调用概览
- Python编程实现控制台圣诞树打印方法
- 桌上型简易脉冲热压机sw16可编辑全套技术开发资料100%好用.zip
资源上传下载、课程学习等过程中有任何疑问或建议,欢迎提出宝贵意见哦~我们会及时处理!
点击此处反馈
安全验证
文档复制为VIP权益,开通VIP直接复制
信息提交成功