没有合适的资源?快使用搜索试试~ 我知道了~
超声弹性成像测量正常大鼠肝脏的粘弹性:与振荡流变法比较
0 下载量 201 浏览量
2021-02-25
16:42:33
上传
评论
收藏 768KB PDF 举报
温馨提示
背景:超声弹性成像已被广泛用于测量肝硬度。 然而,超声弹性成像技术获得的肝粘弹性的准确性尚未得到很好的确立。目的:评估超声弹性成像技术测量肝脏粘弹性的准确性,并与常规流变方法进行比较。 此外,要确定这两种方法的结合是否可以描绘出宽频率范围内的肝脏流变行为。方法:使用超声在100至400 Hz频率范围内的肝脏中测量切波的相速度弹性波成像方法的剪切波分散超声振动法(SDUV),而复杂的剪切模量是通过流变法在1至30 Hz的频率范围内获得的。 三种流变模型,Maxwell,Voigt和Zener,适合于从两种不同方法以及两种方法的组合获得的测量数据。结果:SDUV测量的弹性与流变法的吻合性很好。 但是,通过SDUV测量的粘度与流变法的粘度显着不同。结论:结果表明,色散数据的高频成分在确定色散模式或粘性值方面比低频更重要成分。 已经发现,Maxwell模型不如Voigt和Zener模型适合描述肝脏的流变行为。
资源推荐
资源详情
资源评论
UNCORRECTED PROOF
Biorheology 00 (20xx) 1–15 1
DOI 10.3233/BIR-16091
IOS Press
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
42 42
43 43
44 44
45 45
46 46
Viscoelastic properties of normal rat liver
measured by ultrasound elastography:
Comparison with oscillatory rheometry
Haoming Lin
a,b,c,∗
, Yuanyuan Shen
a,b,c,∗
,XinChen
a,b,c,∗∗
,YingZhu
a
, Yi Zheng
d
,
Xinyu Zhang
a,b,c
, Yanrong Guo
a
,TianfuWang
a,b,c
and Siping Chen
a,b,c
a
School of Biomedical Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China
b
National-Regional Key Technology Engineering Laboratory for Medical Ultrasound, Shenzhen,
China
c
Guangdong Key Laboratory for Biomedical Measurements and Ultrasound Imaging, Shenzhen, China
d
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, St. Cloud State University, St. Cloud, MN,
56301, USA
Received 1 January 2016
Accepted 31 October 2016
Abstract.
BACKGROUND: Ultrasound elastography has been widely used to measure liver stiffness. However, the accuracy of liver
viscoelasticity obtained by ultrasound elastography has not been well established.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the accuracy of ultrasound elastography for measuring liver viscoelasticity and compare to conven-
tional rheometry methods. In addition, to determine if combining these two methods could delineate the rheological behavior
of liver over a wide range of frequencies.
METHODS: The phase velocities of shear waves were measured in livers over a frequency range from 100 to 400 Hz using
the ultrasound elastography method of shearwave dispersion ultrasound vibrometry (SDUV), while the complex shear moduli
were obtained by rheometry over a frequency range of 1 to 30 Hz. Three rheological models, Maxwell, Voigt, and Zener, were
fit to the measured data obtained from the two separate methods and from the combination of the two methods.
RESULTS: The elasticity measured by SDUV was in good agreement with that of rheometry. However, the viscosity measured
by SDUV was significantly different from that of rheometry.
CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that the high frequency components of the dispersive data play a much more important
role in determining the dispersive pattern or the viscous value than the low frequency components. It was found that the Maxwell
model is not as appropriate as the Voigt and Zener models for describing the rheological behavior of liver.
Keywords: Viscoelasticity, liver, elastography, rheometry, dispersion, shearwave dispersion ultrasound vibrometry
*
These authors contributed equally.
**
Address for correspondence: Xin Chen, School of Biomedical Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China.
Fax: +86-755-86671920; E-mail: chenxin@szu.edu.cn.
[research-article] p. 1/15
0006-355X/16/$35.00 © 2016 – IOS Press and the authors. All rights reserved
UNCORRECTED PROOF
2 H. Lin et al. / Viscoelastic properties of normal rat liver measured by ultrasound elastography
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
42 42
43 43
44 44
45 45
46 46
1. Introduction
Elastography is an emerging branch of medical imaging for noninvasively quantifying the biomechan-
ical properties of soft biological tissues [1]. A number of elastography techniques, primarily based on
a variety of imaging modalities such as ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and optical co-
herence tomography (OCT), have been developed over the past two decades [1]. Because ultrasound has
unique advantages such as being noninvasive, applicable to real time imaging and ease of accessibil-
ity, elastography based on this modality has attracted considerable attention. A diversity of ultrasound
elastography methods have been proposed, including quasi-static elastography [2], transient elastogra-
phy (TE) [3], sonoelastography [4], acoustic radiation force impulse imaging (ARFI) [5], shear wave
elasticity imaging (SWEI) [6], supersonic shear imaging (SSI) [7], harmonic motion imaging [8], shear
wave induced resonance elastography (SWIRE) [9], vibro-elastography [10] and shearwave dispersion
ultrasound vibrometry (SDUV) [11]. Some of these have been integrated into commercial ultrasound
systems and have been widely applied in clinical applications [12,13].
Elastography has been applied to measure the mechanical properties of various human tissues and or-
gans, including muscle, breast, brain, liver, etc. [12,14]. Assessment of liver status is one of the most suc-
cessful applications of elastography and is becoming a common application in clinical practice [15,16].
Studies using ultrasound elastography demonstrated that the mechanical properties of liver have signif-
icant correlations with diseases such as fibrosis [17–19] and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD)
[20,21]. Most studies applying elastography to liver assessment used a linear elastic model that contains
only elasticity. However, living liver contains fluid and, thus, naturally exhibits both elastic and viscous
(i.e. rheological) behavior. Hence, a viscoelastic description of the mechanical behavior of liver is more
accurate and physically correct than a linear elastic one. Furthermore, the viscosity, as well as the elas-
ticity, can provide useful information about liver status [21]. Several ultrasound elastography methods
have been developed to measure the viscoelastic properties of soft tissues [8,11,22,23], and a few of them
were applied to the assessment of liver [18,19,21]. These methods have usually been applied in a multi-
frequency approach to measure the dispersive shear-wave properties. Some representative frequencies
were 95–380 Hz [18], 60–600 Hz [19], and 100–400 Hz [21],
The ultrasound elastography methods that measure the viscoelastic properties of tissues usually in-
volve fitting the dispersive shear-wave velocity and attenuation coefficients to a rheological model [24].
Several models, including Voigt [18], Maxwell [25], and Zener [26]
models have been applied to the as-
sessment of liver properties. However, most of the studies assumed a specific model in advance and did
not investigate the issue of model selection. A few preliminary studies, however, investigated different
rheological models for liver characterization. For instance, ultrasound elastography was used to measure
the propagation velocity of shear waves in porcine liver and evaluated the performance of three models,
Voigt, Maxwell, and Zener, in fitting the measured shear wave velocity [25,27]. Nevertheless, insofar as
we are aware, no general agreement has been reached as to which model is the most appropriate for the
application of ultrasound elastography to liver.
Conventional methods for investigating the biomechanical properties of soft tissue include rheological
tests such as dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) and oscillatory rheometry. Some studies have com-
pared elastography techniques with these conventional methods for assessing the viscoelastic properties
of biological tissue. For example, Chatelin et al. [28] measured the shear modulus of liver by both tran-
sient elastography (TE) (50 Hz) and dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) (0.1–4 Hz) and studied the
influence of the test conditions on the liver viscoelastic properties. Klatt et al. [29] investigated bovine
liver specimens by oscillatory rheometry and multi-frequency magnetic resonance elastography (MRE)
[research-article] p. 2/15
UNCORRECTED PROOF
H. Lin et al. / Viscoelastic properties of normal rat liver measured by ultrasound elastography 3
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
42 42
43 43
44 44
45 45
46 46
in a common frequency range between 25.0 and 62.5 Hz and validates MRE as a method for investi-
gating the rheology of liver tissue. Bernal et al. [30] used SSI (20–400 Hz) to measure the viscoelastic
properties of blood clots and carried out classical rheometry experiments (0.25–25 Hz) on the same
blood samples taken within the first few seconds of coagulation. A similar work was conducted earlier
by Schmitt et al. to characterize blood clot viscoelasticity by dynamic ultrasound elastography [31].
The studies mentioned above showed that elasticity measured by elastography was in good agreement
with that measured by rheological tests. However, few studies have tried to validate the viscosity ob-
tained by elastography. Specifically, elastography and rheological tests usually use different frequency
bands that typically range from 100 to 600 Hz for elastography and 0 to 50 Hz for rheometry. This raises
the question of the effect of frequency on the viscoelastic results as measured by the two methods. More
importantly, with complementary frequency ranges, would the two methods provide mutual information
about the rheological behavior of the tissue, and better characterize its elastic and viscous components,
compared with a single method? Addressing these questions could considerably advance the develop-
ment and application of ultrasound elastography and, consequently, contribute to better understanding
of the rheological behavior of the tissue.
The present study used an ultrasound elastography method called shearwave dispersion ultrasound
vibrometry (SDUV) and classic rheometry test to measure the shear viscoelastic modulus of rat liver.
Because the frequency ranges of the two methods were different, we could not directly compare the
results of the two methods. Instead, the dispersive data from the two methods were combined to assess
the viscoelastic properties of liver in a reasonable way. The goal was twofold. First, we aimed to demon-
strate the validity of SDUV for quantitatively measuring liver viscoelasticity by correlating it with the
conventional rheometric techniques. Second, we combined the dispersive data from both methods to
explore the rheological behavior of liver over a broader frequency range.
2. Methods
2.1. Theory
Rheological tests measure the dynamic mechanical behavior of biological tissues. A sinusoidal shear
strain ε(t) = ε
0
e
iωt
is imposed on the tissue to induce a sinusoidal shear stress σ(t) = σ
0
e
i(ωt+δ)
.The
ratio of stress to strain is represented as the complex shear modulus [32]:
G(ω) =
σ
0
e
i(ωt+δ)
ε
0
e
iωt
=
σ
0
ε
0
(cos δ + i sin δ) = G
(ω) + iG
(ω), (1)
where ε
0
is the shear strain amplitude, σ
0
is the shear stress amplitude, ω is the angular frequency, δ is
the phased-shifted angle, and G
and G
are the storage modulus and loss modulus, respectively. The
complex modulus can be related to elasticity and viscosity by different rheological models. In this study,
we used the following rheological models (Fig. 1), which consist of different combinations of a spring
and a dashpot.
The relationship between the complex modulus and the viscoelastic parameters are as follows [33]:
G(ω) = G
+ iG
=
⎧
⎪
⎪
⎨
⎪
⎪
⎩
μη
2
ω
2
μ
2
+ω
2
η
2
+ i
μ
2
ηω
μ
2
+ω
2
η
2
Maxwell,
μ + iηω Vo i g t ,
μ
1
μ
2
2
+ω
2
η
2
(μ
1
+μ
2
)
μ
2
2
+ω
2
η
2
+ i
μ
2
2
ηω
μ
2
2
+ω
2
η
2
Zener,
(2)
[research-article] p. 3/15
剩余14页未读,继续阅读
资源评论
weixin_38702726
- 粉丝: 10
- 资源: 930
上传资源 快速赚钱
- 我的内容管理 展开
- 我的资源 快来上传第一个资源
- 我的收益 登录查看自己的收益
- 我的积分 登录查看自己的积分
- 我的C币 登录后查看C币余额
- 我的收藏
- 我的下载
- 下载帮助
最新资源
- (源码)基于Arduino和Firebase的智能家庭管理系统NodeSmartHome.zip
- (源码)基于C++的East Zone DSTADSO Robotics Challenge 2019机器人控制系统.zip
- (源码)基于Arduino平台的焊接站控制系统.zip
- (源码)基于ESPboy系统的TZXDuino WiFi项目.zip
- (源码)基于Java的剧场账单管理系统.zip
- (源码)基于Java Swing的船只资料管理系统.zip
- (源码)基于Python框架的模拟购物系统.zip
- (源码)基于C++的图书管理系统.zip
- (源码)基于Arduino的简易温度显示系统.zip
- (源码)基于Arduino的智能电动轮椅系统.zip
资源上传下载、课程学习等过程中有任何疑问或建议,欢迎提出宝贵意见哦~我们会及时处理!
点击此处反馈
安全验证
文档复制为VIP权益,开通VIP直接复制
信息提交成功