没有合适的资源?快使用搜索试试~ 我知道了~
与标准爱因斯坦理论相比,拉斯托尔引力理论显示出与物理观测结果一致的显着特征。 最近,关于拉斯塔尔引力和广义相对论的等效性存在争论。 受此公开问题的启发,在本工作中,我们试图通过分析基于Rastall的宇宙学模型在背景以及摄动水平上的演变,为这场辩论提供一些启示。 利用动力学系统技术,我们发现,在后期,无论选择Rastall参数如何,模型的动力学都类似于ΛCDM模型。 但是,在摄动水平上,我们发现增长指数的演变在很大程度上取决于Rastall的参数,并且显示出与ΛCDM模型的显着偏差。
资源推荐
资源详情
资源评论
Physics Letters B 797 (2019) 134796
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Physics Letters B
www.elsevier.com/locate/physletb
Linear growth index of matter perturbations in Rastall gravity
Wompherdeiki Khyllep
a,b
, Jibitesh Dutta
c,d,∗
a
Department of Mathematics, North-Eastern Hill University, Shillong, Meghalaya 793022, India
b
Department of Mathematics, St. Anthony’s College, Shillong, Meghalaya 793001, India
c
Mathematics Division, Department of Basic Sciences and Social Sciences, North-Eastern Hill University, Shillong, Meghalaya 793022, India
d
Visiting Associate, Inter University Centre for Astronomy and Astrophysics, Pune 411 007, India
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history:
Received
15 March 2019
Received
in revised form 19 June 2019
Accepted
19 July 2019
Available
online 24 July 2019
Editor: M.
Trodden
Rastall gravity theory shows notable features consistent with physical observations in comparison to the
standard Einstein theory. Recently, there has been a debate about the equivalence of Rastall gravity and
general relativity. Motivated by this open issue, in the present work, we attempt to shed some light on
this debate by analyzing the evolution of the Rastall based cosmological model at the background as
well as perturbation level. Employing the dynamical system techniques, we found that at late times, the
dynamics of the model resembles the CDM model at the background level irrespective of the choice of
Rastall’s parameter. However, at the perturbation level, we found that the evolution of the growth index
heavily depends on the Rastall’s parameter and displays a significant deviation from the CDM model.
© 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Funded by SCOAP
3
.
1. Introduction
The inability of the standard theory of gravity to describe var-
ious
observational evidence has led to the need for extending the
theory of general relativity (GR). The structure of extended theories
of gravity provides a useful approach to alleviate the fundamental
problems such as dark matter (DM) and dark energy (DE) associ-
ated
with the standard model of GR [1–3].
One
of the extended theories of gravity was proposed by Rastall
in 1972 [4,5]. In his theory, Rastall assumed the violation of the
conservation of energy-momentum tensor in curved spacetime
without dropping the Bianchi identities. As the usual particle cre-
ation
phenomenon violates the energy-momentum conservation
law, therefore, this theory can also be regarded as a classical for-
mulation
of a particle creation process [6–9]. Rastall gravity is
one of the most promising non-conservative modified theory of
gravity supporting various cosmological and astrophysical observa-
tions.
Recently, it got a lot of attention in the physics community
[10–14]. For instance, this theory fits well with observational data
related to the age of the Universe, Hubble parameter and helium
nucleosynthesis [15,16]. Further, this theory can possibly circum-
vent
the entropy and age problems of standard cosmology [17].
From Mach’s principle perspective, this theory is more ‘Machian’
than the standard theory of GR [18].
*
Corresponding author.
E-mail
addresses: sjwomkhyllep@gmail.com (W. Khyllep), jibitesh@nehu.ac.in
(J. Dutta).
It has been claimed by Visser in [19] that the theory of Rastall
gravity is completely equivalent to GR and further supported by
[20]from a thermodynamical perspective. However, this result
has been recently denied by [21,22]leaving an open debate that
whether this theory is a modified gravity theory or it is equiva-
lent
to GR with an additional modified matter content. Earlier, the
non-equivalence of Rastall gravity from GR has also been pointed
by Smalley in Ref. [23].
In Ref. [11]it has been shown that Rastall cosmology is equiv-
alent
to the CDM at both background and linear perturbation
level except that DE cluster for the former model. The growth of
matter perturbations provides an efficient approach to predict the
matter distribution of the Universe and also to discriminate vari-
ous
gravitational theories [24,25]. One of the simple observational
tools used to study the growth history of a model is the so-called
growth index of matter perturbations (denoted by γ ) [26]. The ac-
curate
estimation of the growth index is one of the basic tasks
from the cosmological point of view as it can be used as a tool
to test the validity of GR on extragalactic scales. It is a usual pro-
cedure
that for each cosmological model, one requires to analyze
its background evolution and the growth index of matter pertur-
bations.
This task helps one to get an overall effect of the model
at the cosmological and astrophysical level. For instance, those DE
models based on GR, the value of the constant growth index can
be reduced to that of the CDM model (i.e. γ =
6
11
) irrespective
of the choice of model parameters. However, in the case of modi-
fied
gravity based models, the value shows a significant deviation
from
6
11
. Recently, there are various works in the literature where
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2019.134796
0370-2693/
© 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Funded by
SCOAP
3
.
2 W. Khyllep, J. Dutta / Physics Letters B 797 (2019) 134796
an analytical form of the growth index for different models are ob-
tained
which include the scalar field DE [27–29], DGP[30,31], f (R)
gravity [32–34], Finsler-Randers [35], time-varying vacuum models
[36], clustered DE [37], holographic DE [38] and f (T ) gravity [39].
At
the level of linear perturbation, it has been obtained that
the evolution equation of the growth of matter perturbations for
Rastall based cosmological model coincides with that of the CDM
model. Additionally, in the case of Rastall model, DE perturbations
cluster even if it is in the vacuum energy form [11]. This might
have a strong impact on the value of the growth index, leading
to interesting cosmological signatures of the model which can be
tested with growth rate data. It is therefore interesting to analyze
the growth index of the Rastall model in order to shed some light
on the said debate.
With
this motivation the aim of the paper is two-fold. First,
we analyze the dynamics of the Rastall model at the background
level using the dynamical system techniques. The dynamical sys-
tem
analysis is performed in Sec. 3 to qualitatively extract the
evolution described by the basic cosmological equations presented
in Sec. 2. Secondly, we investigate the behavior of this model at
the linear perturbation level in Sec. 4. For this we shall derive the
growth index of the Rastall model and then compare with that
of the CDM in subsections 4.1 and 4.2. Finally, the conclusion is
given in Sec. 5.
2. Basic cosmological equations of Rastall gravity
In this section, we briefly introduce the basic cosmological
equations of Rastall theory of gravity. In many gravitational theo-
ries,
the source of energy-momentum is determined by a vanishing
divergence tensor, minimally coupled to the geometry. However, in
this theory, the usual conservation law of the energy-momentum
tensor is not satisfied, instead, it is assumed to satisfy the follow-
ing
relation [4,5]
T
μν
;μ
=
λ
8π G
R
;ν
, (1)
where semi-colon denotes the covariant derivative, G is the New-
ton’s
gravitational constant, T
μν
is the energy-momentum tensor
and R is the Ricci scalar. Here, λ is the coupling constant which
measure the exchange of energy between geometry and matter
field. When λ = 0, one obtains ausual conservation law in GR. The
modified Einstein’s field equations in Rastall gravity framework are
given by
G
μν
= 8π G
T
μν
−
˜
γ − 1
2
g
μν
T
,
(2)
T
μν
;μ
=
˜
γ − 1
2
T
;ν
, (3)
where T is the trace of the energy-momentum tensor and
˜
γ is the
Rastall’s parameter which is related to λ as
˜
γ =
1 + 6λ
1 + 4λ
.
(4)
Clearly,
˜
γ = 1 corresponds to the GR case.
We
now consider a two perfect fluid system consisting of a
pressureless matter with corresponding energy density ρ
m
and an
exotic component with energy density ρ
x
which accounts for ac-
celeration
of the universe and whose equation of state (EoS) is
w
x
. It is worth mentioning here that an extra exotic fluid ρ
x
be-
having
as a source of DE is required similar to the GR case [11].
Further, we assume that the matter component satisfies the usual
conservation law. Therefore, the modified Einstein’s field equations
(2)-(3) become
G
μν
= 8π G
T
m
μν
+ T
x
μν
−
˜
γ − 1
2
g
μν
(T
m
+ T
x
)
, (5)
T
μν
;μ
=
˜
γ − 1
2
(T
;ν
x
+ T
;ν
m
), T
μν
m;μ
= 0 , (6)
where index m denotes the matter component and x denotes the
DE component.
At
large scale, various observational data favor a homogeneous
and isotropic universe which can be described by a spatially flat
Friedmann-Lemaitre-Robertson-Walker (FLRW) metric given by
ds
2
= g
μν
dx
μ
dx
ν
,(μ, ν = 0, 1, 2, 3) (7)
with g
μν
=diag (1, −a
2
(t), −a
2
(t) r
2
, −a
2
(t) r
2
sin
2
θ). Here, a(t) is
a scale factor and t denotes the cosmological time. The above Ein-
stein
field equations (5), (6)with respect to the metric (7)can be
written as
H
2
=
4π G
3
ρ
x
(3 −
˜
γ − 3(1 −
˜
γ )w
x
)
+(
3 −
˜
γ )ρ
m
,
(8)
˙
H + H
2
=
4π G
3
ρ
x
(3(
˜
γ − 2)w
x
−
˜
γ ) −
˜
γρ
m
,
(9)
˙
ρ
x
+ 3H(1 + w
x
)ρ
x
=
˜
γ − 1
2
(
1 − 3w
x
)
˙
ρ
x
+
˙
ρ
m
,
(10)
˙
ρ
m
+ 3Hρ
m
= 0 , (11)
where H =
˙
a
a
is the Hubble parameter and the overdot denotes
derivative with respect to t. On solving Eqs. (10) and (11), one can
obtain the evolution equation of ρ
m
and ρ
x
as [13]
ρ
x
= ρ
d0
a
−
6(1+w
x
)
2+(1−
˜
γ )(1−3w
x
)
+
(
1 −
˜
γ )ρ
m0
a
−3
2w
x
+ (
˜
γ − 1)(1 − 3w
x
)
,
(12)
ρ
m
= ρ
m0
a
−3
, (13)
where ρ
d0
is given by
ρ
d0
= ρ
x0
+
˜
γ − 1
2w
x
+ (
˜
γ − 1)(1 − 3w
x
)
ρ
m0
. (14)
Eq. (12)shows that the energy density of an exotic fluid consists
of two components and one of them behaves as DM. In the above
equations ρ
m0
, ρ
x0
and ρ
d0
denote the present value of energy
densities of matter, of an exotic fluid and of a DE component of
an exotic fluid respectively. With the aid of (12), (13) and (14), the
Friedmann equation (8)can be written as
E
2
(a) =
A
2
m0
+
B
2
x0
a
−
6(1+w
x
)
B
+
A
2
m0
a
−3
+
3−
˜
γ
2
m0
a
−3
, (15)
where A
=
B(
˜
γ − 1)
2(w
x
+ 1) − B
, B = 2 − (
˜
γ − 1)(1 − 3w
x
).
In the above equation, E(a) =
H(a)
H
0
,
m0
=
8π Gρ
m0
3H
2
0
,
x0
=
8π Gρ
x0
3H
2
0
and H
0
is the present value of the Hubble parameter. Note that the
expression within the square bracket of Eq. (15) denotes the en-
ergy
contribution from an exotic fluid with one of its components
behaving as DM. The term outside the square bracket denotes the
contribution solely from a pressureless matter fluid. As expected,
for
˜
γ = 1, the above equation reduces to the corresponding GR
case given by
剩余6页未读,继续阅读
资源评论
weixin_38612095
- 粉丝: 10
- 资源: 921
上传资源 快速赚钱
- 我的内容管理 展开
- 我的资源 快来上传第一个资源
- 我的收益 登录查看自己的收益
- 我的积分 登录查看自己的积分
- 我的C币 登录后查看C币余额
- 我的收藏
- 我的下载
- 下载帮助
最新资源
资源上传下载、课程学习等过程中有任何疑问或建议,欢迎提出宝贵意见哦~我们会及时处理!
点击此处反馈
安全验证
文档复制为VIP权益,开通VIP直接复制
信息提交成功