没有合适的资源?快使用搜索试试~ 我知道了~
温馨提示
静态QCD势的扰动计算具有u = 3/2 renormalon不确定性。 在pNRQCD中执行的多极扩展中,已知LO处的不确定性已被NLO处的超软校正抵消。 为了研究此正常态消除后剩余的净贡献,我们提出了将超软校正划分为正常态不确定性和独立于正常态部分的公式。 我们关注于非常短的距离ΛQCDr≲0.1,并基于在大β0近似中的扰动评估研究超软校正。 我们还提出了一种方法来检查局部胶子凝结水,这是对静态QCD势的第一个非扰动效应,而不会出现u = 2 renormalon的情况。
资源推荐
资源详情
资源评论
Physics Letters B 783 (2018) 350–356
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Physics Letters B
www.elsevier.com/locate/physletb
Renormalon free part of an ultrasoft correction to the static QCD
potential
Hiromasa Takaura
Department of Physics, Tohoku University, Sendai, 980–8578, Japan
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history:
Received
21 December 2017
Received
in revised form 19 May 2018
Accepted
9 July 2018
Available
online 12 July 2018
Editor:
J. Hisano
Keywords:
QCD
Summation
of perturbation theory
Perturbative calculations of the static QCD potential have the u = 3/2 renormalon uncertainty. In the
multipole expansion performed within pNRQCD, this uncertainty at LO is known to get canceled against
the ultrasoft correction at NLO. To investigate the net contribution remaining after this renormalon
cancellation, we propose a formulation to separate the ultrasoft correction into renormalon uncertainties
and a renormalon independent part. We focus on very short distances
QCD
r 0.1and investigate the
ultrasoft correction based on its perturbative evaluation in the large-β
0
approximation. We also propose
a method to examine the local gluon condensate, which appears as the first nonperturbative effect to the
static QCD potential, without suffering from the u = 2 renormalon.
© 2018 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Funded by SCOAP
3
.
1. Introduction
The static QCD potential plays an important role to investigate
the QCD dynamics. It has been investigated extensively by using
perturbation theory, effective field theory and lattice simulations.
In perturbative evaluations, perturbative coefficients are ex-
pected
to show factorial behaviors at large orders. Such divergent
behaviors, in particular those related to a positive renormalon, in-
duce
ambiguity to the resummation of the perturbative series [1].
For the static QCD potential, renormalons are located at positive
half integers in the Borel u-plane. The first renormalon at u =1/2
causes
an uncertainty to the r-independent constant of the poten-
tial.
This renormalon is known to get canceled in the total energy
(i.e. the sum of the QCD potential and twice the pole mass) within
usual perturbation theory once the pole mass is expressed as a
perturbative series in terms of the MS mass.
In considering cancellation of the other renormalons, it is useful
to adopt the effective field theory (EFT) known as potential non-
relativistic
QCD (pNRQCD) [2]. The renormalons are expected to get
canceled ultimately in the multipole expansion performed in this
EFT. The leading order (LO) term of this expansion is the singlet
potential V
S
(r), which behaves as O(1/r) and can be evaluated in
perturbation theory. The renormalons for V
S
are located at positive
half integers as mentioned above, and the leading r-dependent un-
E-mail address: t_hiromasa@tuhep.phys.tohoku.ac.jp.
certainty is caused by the u =3/2renormalon. The next-to-leading
order (NLO) term in the multipole expansion, which we denote by
δE
US
, represents the dynamics at the ultrasoft scale ∼ α
s
(r
−1
)/r
and
its explicit r-dependence is O(r
2
). In Ref. [2], it was pointed
out within the leading-logarithmic approximation that the u = 3/2
renormalon
exists in δE
US
and it cancels against the u = 3/2renor-
malon
of V
S
. In Ref. [3], the perturbative evaluation of δE
US
in
the large-β
0
approximation was completed, and again, the u = 3/2
renormalon
cancellation was confirmed.
Although
the u = 3/2renormalon cancellation has been estab-
lished,
it has not been clarified what remains in the NLO calcula-
tion,
V
S
+δE
US
, as a consequence of this renormalon cancellation.
In particular, the net contribution to δE
US
remaining after this can-
cellation
has not been made clear. In this Letter, we investigate the
net contribution to δE
US
, which is not affected by the renormalon
cancellation. The distances considered here are
QCD
r 0.1, where
δE
US
as well as V
S
can be evaluated perturbatively since the ul-
trasoft
scale satisfies α
s
(r
−1
)/r
QCD
. In this range, the leading
nonperturbative correction is given through the local gluon con-
densate.
1
In order to examine the local gluon condensate, the per-
turbative
part, i.e. V
S
+δE
US
, should be clearly known in advance.
Although the currently available order of perturbative expansion
is far from the (expected) relevant order to the u = 3/2renor-
1
The appearance of this nonperturbative effect has been first considered in
Refs. [4–6], and can be understood in a systematic expansion of pNRQCD [2].
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2018.07.014
0370-2693/
© 2018 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Funded by
SCOAP
3
.
H. Takaura / Physics Letters B 783 (2018) 350–356 351
Fig. 1. Diagrams for the singlet potential (left) and δ E
US
(right) in the large-β
0
approximation.
malon,
2
this Letter aims at promoting theoretical understanding of
the static QCD potential without suffering from renormalons.
To
investigate the net NLO correction, we propose a formu-
lation
to separate δ E
US
into its renormalon uncertainties and a
renormalon free part. In perturbative evaluations, the large-β
0
ap-
proximation
is used. For the LO term V
S
, a renormalon separation
has been performed in Ref. [7]. In this Letter, we will see that the
u = 3/2renormalon uncertainty of V
S
separated out in Ref. [7]is
canceled against that of δ E
US
identified here. As a result, a the-
oretical
expression after the u = 3/2renormalon cancellation is
obtained by the sum of the renormalon free parts of V
S
and δE
US
.
3
Each is presented in an analytic form in this Letter.
4
Once the renormalon separation of δ E
US
is performed, it is
straightforward to cope with the residual renormalon at u =2. This
renormalon in δ E
US
(found explicitly in Ref. [3]) is consistent with
the fact that the local gluon condensate appears as the first non-
perturbative
effect. The u = 2renormalon induces an O(
4
QCD
r
3
)
error to V
S
+ δE
US
, which is the same magnitude as the term of
the local gluon condensate. Hence, the u = 2renormalon is an
obstacle in examining the local gluon condensate even after the
u = 3/2renormalon is removed. We circumvent this problem by
including the u = 2renormalon uncertainty of δE
US
in the local
gluon condensate, which results in the cancellation of the u = 2
renormalon
in the local gluon condensate. This renormalon can-
cellation
is explicitly confirmed in this Letter using the large-β
0
approximation. As a result, one can obtain the expansion in r up
to the order including the local gluon condensate such that each
term does not have the u = 3/2 and u = 2renormalons. Such a re-
sult
can be used to extract the local gluon condensate numerically,
for instance, by comparing lattice simulations with the calculation
presented here.
Our
formulation to extract a renormalon free part of δE
US
is
an extension of Refs. [8,9], which propose the method to extract a
renormalon free part in the leading term in operator product ex-
pansion
(see Ref. [10]as a related work). The characteristics of our
formulation is to introduce explicit cutoff scales, which are com-
patible
with the concept of the EFT.
5
This clarifies intuitively how
renormalon uncertainties appear and also vanish when combined
with contributions of different energy scales. In particular, we will
see how a renormalon free part is identified in connection with
the cutoff scales.
2
For the singlet potential V
S
, the relevant perturbation order to the u = 3/2
renormalon
is roughly estimated as n
∗
=
6π
β
0
α
s
(r
−1
)
∼ 20, while the exact series is
currently known up to O(α
4
s
).
3
The u = 1/2renormalon uncertainty in V
S
is just omitted as it changes only
the r-independent constant.
4
The analytical result for V
S
that is free from renormalons has been given in
Ref. [7].
5
The cutoff scale dependence vanishes in the final results.
2. Extraction of renormalon free part
In the multipole expansion performed within pNRQCD, the
static QCD potential is represented as [2]
V
QCD
(r) = V
S
(r) +δE
US
(r) +... , (1)
δE
US
(r)
=−
i
4
πα
s
N
c
T
F
∞
0
dt e
−iV (r)t
r ·
E
a
(t)ϕ
adj
(t, 0)
ab
r ·
E
b
(0), (2)
where the dots denote higher order corrections in r; V (r) =
V
O
(r) −V
S
(r) denotes the difference between the octet and singlet
potentials, which specifies the ultrasoft scale;
E
a
is the ultrasoft
chromoelectric field. See Ref. [2]for details. In the following, we
evaluate V
S
and δE
US
in perturbation theory especially using the
large-β
0
approximation [11,12]. The corresponding diagrams are
shown in Fig. 1.
Let
us first sketch what we will do in the following. We in-
troduce
cutoff scales μ
1
and μ
2
to divide the energy region:
QCD
μ
2
V μ
1
r
−1
. We define V
S
as a soft quantity by
restricting the gluon momentum to be higher than μ
1
. Similarly,
we define δE
US
as an ultrasoft quantity by requiring the relevant
momentum p to be μ
2
< p < μ
1
. Accordingly, we perform the
multipole expansion as
V
QCD
(r) = V
S
(r;μ
1
) +δE
US
(r;μ
1
, μ
2
) +... . (3)
For the singlet potential V
S
(r; μ
1
), we follow the separation per-
formed
in Ref. [7]
6
:
V
S
(r;μ
1
) = V
RF
S
(r) +C
2
(μ
1
)r
2
+O
r
3
,
(4)
where V
RF
S
is a renormalon free part and has a Coulomb+lin-
ear
form. The leading cutoff dependence in V
S
(r, μ
1
), C
2
(μ
1
)r
2
∼
μ
3
1
r
2
, is caused by the u = 3/2renormalon. In this Letter, we show
that δE
US
(r; μ
1
, μ
2
) can be decomposed as
δE
US
(r;μ
1
, μ
2
) ∼δ E
RF
US
(r) −C
2
(μ
1
)r
2
+O
μ
4
2
r
3
,
(5)
where δE
RF
US
(r) is independent of μ
1
and μ
2
and is free from renor-
malons.
As a result, in the multipole expansion (3), we have
V
QCD
(r) = V
RF
S
(r) +δE
RF
US
(r) +O
r
3
.
(6)
In this way, we can obtain a net contribution up to NLO, where
each term does not have renormalon ambiguity.
6
In Eq. (4), we omit the r-independent constant related to the u = 1/2renor-
malon.
剩余6页未读,继续阅读
资源评论
weixin_38570459
- 粉丝: 3
- 资源: 931
上传资源 快速赚钱
- 我的内容管理 展开
- 我的资源 快来上传第一个资源
- 我的收益 登录查看自己的收益
- 我的积分 登录查看自己的积分
- 我的C币 登录后查看C币余额
- 我的收藏
- 我的下载
- 下载帮助
最新资源
- hustoj-重庆大学python题库答案
- annual-report-builder-年度报告
- 两相交错并联buck boost变器仿真 采用4mos结构,模型内包含开环,电压单环,电压电流双闭环三种控制方式,里面有注解每种控制模式怎么连接手动开关 输出波形好,电压纹波小 三种方式中,双环控
- Matlab遗传算法车间调度问题 源码+详细注释(方便学习) 问题描述:已知各工件的加工时间,优化目标是如何确定工件的加工顺序以及每阶段工件在机器上的分配情况,使得最大完工时间极小化
- Util-大炮打蚊子c++
- Task-113-出租车计价
- 西门子1200恒压供水程序+PID+触摸屏程序 1.此程序样 例为 一拖三恒压供水程序样例,采用S7-1200PLC和KTP1000PN触摸屏 人机执行PID控制变频器实现恒压供水. 可供学习
- xjtuer-eat-report-年度报告
- Matlab车辆配送路径规划问题 各类vrp代码 带时间窗的路径规划问题 遗传算法 蚁群算法 模拟 火算法 混合粒子群算法解决 tsp cvrp dvrp cdvrp vrptw问题 tsp:旅行
- 风储联合,双馈风电机组四机两区域 三机九节点 惯量 转子动能控制 桨距角控制 减载控制调频 结合储能调频〔目前为直流电容〕也可加入电池化学储能 风机混和储能一次二次调频时域模型〔电容+电池调频,由于
- Comsol计算手性介质 特殊本构关系构建,内置表达式的推导与修改
- 多线程qt5 c++ 工业自动化上位机源代码 Qt5之工业应用 一套完整工程,链接PLC,工业无人值守自动扫码使用,无线扫码枪SR1000的使用,使用qt5.14,用qtcreator加载工程后
- MATLAB机器人运动学正逆解、动力学建模仿真与轨迹规划,雅克比矩阵求解 多项式函数插值 抛物线插值轨迹规划
- 无感FOC电机三相控制高速吹风筒方案 FU6812L+FD2504S 电压AC220V 功率80W 最高转速20万RPM 方案优势:响应快、效率高、噪声低、成本低 控制方式:三相电机无感FOC 闭环方
- 三菱FX3U-485ADP-MB通讯程序 硬件:FX33SAPLC,FX3U-485ADP-MB通信扩展模块,三菱E700变频器,fx3u-cnv-bd 通过modbus rtu通讯方式 ,可以实
- 基于LMS的回音消除自适应滤波 代码百分百可运行
资源上传下载、课程学习等过程中有任何疑问或建议,欢迎提出宝贵意见哦~我们会及时处理!
点击此处反馈
安全验证
文档复制为VIP权益,开通VIP直接复制
信息提交成功