没有合适的资源?快使用搜索试试~ 我知道了~
我们认为,庞加莱规范重力(PGG)的起源可能与自发地违反了所涉及的时空对称性以及规范场作为矢量戈德斯通玻色子的出现有关。 从本质上讲,我们从矢量和费米子场的任意理论开始,这些场在平坦的Minkowski空间中仅具有全局时空对称性,例如洛伦兹和平移不变性。 假定涉及的两个向量场多重态分别属于起始全局Lorentz对称性的伴随表示(Aμij)和向量(eμi)表示。 我们建议这些原型向量场是协变约束的,AμijAijμ=±MA2和eμieiμ=±Me2,这导致自发地违反了伴随的全局对称性(MA,e是其假定的违反尺度)。 然后得出结论,与这些保留长度的约束条件相容的唯一可能的理论被证明是轨距不变的PGG,而相应的无质量(伪)金石模式自然地收集在四分体和自旋连接的新兴轨距场中。 在最小理论情况下曲率线性的情况下,我们不可避免地会遇到爱因斯坦-卡坦理论。 还考虑了具有传播自旋连接和四重模的扩展理论,并简要讨论了它们与标准模型的可能统一。
资源推荐
资源详情
资源评论
Physics Letters B 769 (2017) 377–384
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Physics Letters B
www.elsevier.com/locate/physletb
On the origin of Poincaré gauge gravity
J.L. Chkareuli
a,b,∗
a
Center for Elementary Particle Physics, Ilia State University, 0162 Tbilisi, Georgia
b
Andronikashvili Institute of Physics, 0177 Tbilisi, Georgia
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history:
Received
8 March 2017
Accepted
6 April 2017
Available
online 10 April 2017
Editor:
M. Cveti
ˇ
c
Keywords:
Gravitation
Alternative
gravity theories
Gauge
theories
Spontaneous
symmetry breaking
Sigma
models
Grand
unified models
We argue that the origin of Poincaré gauge gravity (PGG) may be related to spontaneous violation of
underlying spacetime symmetries involved and appearance of gauge fields as vector Goldstone bosons.
In essence, we start with an arbitrary theory of some vector and fermion fields which possesses only
global spacetime symmetries, such as Lorentz and translational invariance, in flat Minkowski space. The
two vector field multiplets involved are assumed to belong, respectively, to the adjoint (A
ij
μ
) and vector
(e
i
μ
) representations of the starting global Lorentz symmetry. We propose that these prototype vector
fields are covariantly constrained, A
ij
μ
A
μ
ij
=±M
2
A
and e
i
μ
e
μ
i
=±M
2
e
, that causes a spontaneous violation
of the accompanying global symmetries (M
A,e
are their presumed violation scales). It then follows that
the only possible theory compatible with these length-preserving constraints is turned out to be the
gauge invariant PGG, while the corresponding massless (pseudo)Goldstone modes are naturally collected
in the emergent gauge fields of tetrads and spin-connections. In a minimal theory case being linear in a
curvature we unavoidably come to the Einstein–Cartan theory. The extended theories with propagating
spin-connection and tetrad modes are also considered and their possible unification with the Standard
Model is briefly discussed.
© 2017 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Funded by SCOAP
3
.
1. Introduction
One can think that Poincaré gauge gravity (PGG) [1,2] (see also
[3] and references therein) with the underlying vector fields of
tetrads and spin-connections is perhaps the best theory candi-
date
for gravitation to be unified with the other three elementary
forces of nature. PGG looks in essence as a gauge field theory in
flat Minkowski space which successfully mimics curved space ge-
ometry
when making the transition to the base world space in
terms of general affine connections and metric. Remarkably, there
is some clear analogy between a local frame in PGG and a local
internal symmetry space in conventional quantum field theories.
As a result, the vector fields of the spin-connections gauging the
local frame Lorentz group SO(1, 3)
LF
appear in PGG much as pho-
tons
and gluons appear in the Standard Model. We propose that
such an analogy may follow from their common origin related
to spontaneous breaking of underlying spacetime symmetries in-
volved
(such as relativistic invariance etc.) with all gauge fields
appearing as massless Nambu–Goldstone bosons [4]. This rather
*
Correspondence to: Center for Elementary Particle Physics, Ilia State University,
0162 Tbilisi, Georgia.
E-mail
address: j.chkareuli@iliauni.edu.ge.
old idea [5] has gained a further development [6–8] in recent
years.
Here
we will follow the recently introduced emergence conjec-
ture
[9,10] according to which an origin of any gauge symmetry
is basically related to some covariant constraint(s) which, for one
reason or another, is put on a vector field system possessing only
some global internal symmetry. As a matter of fact, the simplest
holonomic constraint of this type for vector field (or vector field
multiplet) A
μ
may be the “length-fixing” condition
C(A) = A
μ
A
μ
− n
2
M
2
= 0, n
2
≡ n
μ
n
μ
=±1(1)
where n
μ
is a properly oriented unit Lorentz vector, while M is
some high mass scale. We will see that gauge invariance appears
unavoidable in the proposed theory, if the equations of motion in-
volved
should have enough freedom to allow a constraint like (1)
to
be fulfilled and preserved over time. Namely, gauge invariance
in such theories has to appear in essence as a response of an in-
teracting
field system to putting the covariant constraint (1) on its
dynamics, provided that we allow parameters in the corresponding
Lagrangian density to be adjusted so as to ensure self-consistency
without losing too many degrees of freedom. Otherwise, a given
field system could get unphysical in a sense that a superfluous
reduction in the number of degrees of freedom would make it
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2017.04.012
0370-2693/
© 2017 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Funded by
SCOAP
3
.
378 J.L. Chkareuli / Physics Letters B 769 (2017) 377–384
impossible to set the required initial conditions in an appropriate
Cauchy problem. Furthermore, in quantum theory, to choose self-
consistent
equal-time commutation relations would also become
impossible [11].
To
see how technically a global internal symmetry may be
converted into a local one, let us consider the question of con-
sistency
of the constraint for vector field (1) with its equations
of motion. We propose some arbitrary relativistically invariant La-
grangian
L(A, ψ) which only possesses a global Abelian U (1) sym-
metry,
and, apart from the vector field A
μ
, contains the charged
fermion ψ . In the presence of the constraint (1), it follows that the
equations of motion can no longer be independent. This means
that there should be some relationship between all the vector and
matter field Eulerians (E
A
, E
ψ
, ...) involved.
1
Such a relationship
can quite generally be formulated as a functional – but by local-
ity
just a function – of the Eulerians, F (E
A
, E
ψ
), being put equal
to zero at each spacetime point with the configuration space re-
stricted
by the constraint C (A) = 0,
F (C = 0; E
A
, E
ψ
) = 0(2)
for the one matter fermion case proposed.
Let
us consider a “Taylor expansion” of the function F ex-
pressed
through various combinations of the fields involved, their
combinations with the Eulerians, as well as the derivatives acting
on them. We basically consider the terms with the lowest mass
dimension 4, corresponding to the Lorentz invariant expressions
∂
μ
(E
A
)
μ
, A
μ
(E
A
)
μ
, E
ψ
ψ, ψ E
ψ
(3)
to eventually have an emergent gauge theory at a renormalizable
level.
All the other terms in the expansion contain field combina-
tions
with higher mass dimensions (presumably related to some
Planck mass order scale) and therefore can be neglected.
Now,
together with the constraint (1), which has to be pre-
served
under the time development given by the equations of
motion,
(E
A
)
μ
= 0(4)
one has in fact the five equations for the 4-component vector field
A
μ
. This means that not all of the vector field Eulerian compo-
nents
can be independent. Therefore, there must be a relationship
of the form given in the emergence equation (2). When being ex-
pressed
as a linear combination of the Lorentz invariant terms (3),
this equation leads to the identity between the vector and matter
field Eulerians of the following type
∂
μ
(E
A
)
μ
= itE
ψ
ψ − itψ E
ψ
(5)
(where t is some constant) which is in fact identically vanished
when the equations of motion are satisfied. This identity imme-
diately
signals about invariance of the basic Lagrangian L( A, ψ)
under vector and fermion field local U (1) transformations whose
infinitesimal form is given by
δ A
μ
= ∂
μ
ω,δψ= it ωψ. (6)
Conversely, the identity (5) follows from the invariance of the
physical Lagrangian L(A, ψ) under the transformations (6). In-
deed,
both direct and converse assertions are particular cases of
Noether’s second theorem [12].
So,
we have shown how the constraint (1) enforces the choice
of the parameters in the starting Lagrangian L( A, ψ), so as to
1
Hereafter, the notation E
A
stands for the vector field Eulerian determined by
the corresponding Lagrangian L(A, ψ) (E
A
)
μ
≡ ∂L/∂ A
μ
− ∂
ν
[∂ L/∂(∂
ν
A
μ
)]. We use
similar notations for other field Eulerians as well.
convert its global U (1) charge symmetry into a local one, thus
demonstrating an emergence of gauge symmetry (6) that allows
the emerged Lagrangian to be completely determined. For a the-
ory
with renormalizable couplings, it is in fact the conventional
QED Lagrangian supplemented by the constraint (1) imposed on
the vector field A
μ
. Interestingly, this type of the QED theory with
the constrained vector potential was considered by Nambu [13]
quite
a long ago.
Let
us make it clearer what does the constraint (1) mean in
the gauge invariant QED framework. This constraint is in fact very
similar to the constraint appearing in the nonlinear σ -model for
pions [14]. It means, in essence, that the vector field A
μ
devel-
ops
some constant background value,
A
μ
=
n
μ
M, and the Lorentz
symmetry SO(1, 3) formally breaks down to SO(3) or SO(1, 2) for
the time-like (n
2
= 1) or space-like (n
2
=−1) case, respectively.
As a result, the corresponding vector Goldstone mode is produced
which may be associated with a photon. Nonetheless, despite an
evident similarity with the nonlinear σ -model for pions, which
really breaks the corresponding chiral SU(2) × SU(2) symmetry
in hadron physics, the QED theory with the supplementary vector
field constraint (1) involved leaves the physical Lorentz invariance
intact. Actually, as was shown in the tree [13] and one-loop [15]
approximations,
there is no physical Lorentz violation in the QED
supplemented by the covariant constraint (1). Later this result was
also confirmed for many other gauge theories with the supple-
mentary
vector field constraints, particularly, in the non-Abelian
[16] and supersymmetric theories [10]. So, we conclude with a
remark that in contrast to a spontaneous violation of internal sym-
metries,
a spontaneous Lorentz invariance violation (SLIV) caused by
the length-preserving vector field constraint does not necessarily
imply a physical breakdown of Lorentz invariance. Actually, gauge
invariance in QED and other gauge theories always leads to a to-
tal
conversion of SLIV into gauge degrees of freedom of massless
vector Goldstone bosons.
In
the Section 2 we turn to the construction of an emergent
PGG theory. We start with an arbitrary theory of some vector and
fermion fields which possesses only global spacetime symmetries,
such as Lorentz and translational invariance, in flat Minkowski
space M
4
. The two vector field multiplets involved are proposed to
belong, respectively, to the adjoint ( A
ij
μ
) and vector (e
i
μ
) represen-
tations
of the starting global Lorentz symmetry. We show that if
these prototype vector fields are covariantly constrained then the
only possible theory compatible with these constraints is turned
out to be the standard PGG. In minimal theory case being linear
in curvature we unavoidably come to the Einstein–Cartan theory
that is thoroughly presented in the Section 3. The extended theo-
ries
with propagating spin-connection and tetrad modes and their
possible unification with the Standard Model is briefly discussed in
the final Section 4, where we also conclude.
2. Towards an emergent Poincaré gravity
Conventionally, we have in PGG the world space (WS) symme-
try
ISO(1, 3)
WS
, which includes translations and the orbital part
of Lorentz transformations, and a local frame (LF) Lorentz sym-
metry
SO(1, 3)
LF
, which only includes the spin part of Lorentz
transformations acting on representation indices. Remarkably, this
duality is in an automatic accordance with the Einstein equiva-
lence
principle which, therefore, need not to be specially pos-
tulated
in PGG as is in the standard GR. We begin with the
entirely global spacetime symmetries, both ISO(1, 3)
WS
and
SO(1, 3)
LF
, and our starting objects are the two vector field mul-
tiplets
which are 4-vectors of ISO(1, 3)
WS
and belong, respec-
tively,
to the adjoint (A
ij
μ
) and vector (e
i
μ
) representations of the
剩余7页未读,继续阅读
资源评论
weixin_38518638
- 粉丝: 3
- 资源: 932
上传资源 快速赚钱
- 我的内容管理 展开
- 我的资源 快来上传第一个资源
- 我的收益 登录查看自己的收益
- 我的积分 登录查看自己的积分
- 我的C币 登录后查看C币余额
- 我的收藏
- 我的下载
- 下载帮助
最新资源
- argumentError(解决方案).md
- simpleError(解决方案).md
- RangeError(解决方案).md
- 使用 Pandas 处理 Excel 数据:分割与展开列操作
- traits-6.3.2-cp311-cp311-win_amd64.whl.rar
- traits-6.3.2-cp311-cp311-win32.whl.rar
- traits-6.3.2-pp38-pypy38_pp73-win_amd64.whl.rar
- transformations-2019.1.1-cp34-cp34m-win_amd64.whl.rar
- traitsui-6.1.3-py2-none-any.whl.rar
- traitsui-7.3.1-py3-none-any.whl.rar
- transformations-2019.4.22-cp27-cp27m-win_amd64.whl.rar
- transformations-2019.4.22-cp27-cp27m-win32.whl.rar
- transformations-2019.1.1-cp34-cp34m-win32.whl.rar
- transformations-2020.1.1-cp36-cp36m-win_amd64.whl.rar
- transformations-2019.4.22-cp35-cp35m-win32.whl.rar
- transformations-2019.4.22-cp35-cp35m-win_amd64.whl.rar
资源上传下载、课程学习等过程中有任何疑问或建议,欢迎提出宝贵意见哦~我们会及时处理!
点击此处反馈
安全验证
文档复制为VIP权益,开通VIP直接复制
信息提交成功