没有合适的资源?快使用搜索试试~ 我知道了~
资源推荐
资源详情
资源评论
JHEP05(2017)147
Published for SISSA by Springer
Received: April 13, 2017
Accepted: May 17, 2017
Published: May 29, 2017
More on microstate geometries of 4d black holes
M. Bianchi,
a
J.F. Morales,
b
L. Pieri
a,c
and N. Zinnato
a
a
Universit`a di Roma Tor Vergata and I.N.F.N, Dipartimento di Fisica,
Via della Ricerca Scientifica, I-00133 Rome, Italy
b
I.N.F.N. — Sezione di Roma 2 and Universit`a di Roma Tor Vergata, Dipartimento di Fisica,
Via della Ricerca Scientifica, I-00133 Roma, Italy
c
Center for Research in String Theory, School of Physics and Astronomy,
Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, London, E1 4NS, U.K.
E-mail: bianchi@roma2.infn.it, morales@roma2.infn.it,
lorenzo.pieri@roma2.infn.it, natale.zinnato@gmail.com
Abstract: We construct explicit examples of microstate geometries of four-dimensional
black holes that lift to smooth horizon-free geometries in five dimensions. Solutions consist
of half-BPS D-brane atoms distributed in R
3
. Charges and positions of the D-brane centers
are constrained by the bubble equations and boundary conditions ensuring the regularity
of the metric and the match with the black hole geometry. In the case of three centers, we
find that the moduli spaces of solutions includes disjoint one-dimensional components of
(generically) finite volume.
Keywords: Black Holes in String Theory, D-branes
ArXiv ePrint: 1701.05520
Open Access,
c
The Authors.
Article funded by SCOAP
3
.
doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2017)147
JHEP05(2017)147
Contents
1 Introduction 1
2 Black holes from intersecting D3-branes 3
2.1 The asymptotic geometry 5
2.1.1 Orthogonal branes 7
2.1.2 Branes at angles 7
3 Microstate geometries 8
3.1 The eleven dimensional lift 8
3.2 The bubble equations 9
4 Fuzzballs of orthogonally intersecting branes 11
4.1 Three centers 12
4.1.1 Scaling solutions 12
4.1.2 Non-scaling solutions 13
5 Fuzzballs of branes at angles 14
5.1 Three centers 15
6 Conclusions 16
A The ten dimensional solution and its 4d reduction 16
A.1 The ten dimensional solution 17
A.2 The four dimensional model 18
A.3 The basic solutions 20
A.3.1 L solutions 20
A.3.2 K solutions 20
A.3.3 M solutions 20
A.4 Sub-family of solutions 21
A.4.1 No scalars: IWP solution 21
A.4.2 One complex scalar: SWIP solutions 23
A.4.3 Two complex scalars 23
1 Introduction
Black holes are classical solutions of Einstein’s equations with curvature singularities hidden
behind event horizons. According to the “no-hair theorem”, the solutions are unique in four
dimensions, once the mass, charge and angular momentum are specified. At the classical
level black holes are absolutely black and have zero statistical entropy S = log(1) = 0. In
– 1 –
JHEP05(2017)147
a quantum theory however a black hole radiates as a black body with a finite temperature
and an entropy given by one quarter of the area of its event horizon. To explain the
microscopic origin of this entropy remains a primary task for any serious contender to a
quantum theory of gravity.
In string theory, black holes can be realised in terms of D-branes intersecting in the
internal space. The micro-states can be represented (and counted) in terms of excitations
of the open strings connecting the building brane bits. Alternatively, one may think of
the geometry generated by the excited brane state as the gravity representation of the
micro-state. Since the micro-state geometry describes a pure state with zero entropy, it
should have no horizon. This line of ideas motivates the “fuzzball” proposal that associates
to every black hole micro-state a regular and horizon-free solution of classical gravity. The
solutions, known as “fuzzballs” or “micro-state geometries”, share with the would-be black
hole the mass, charges and angular momentum but differ from it in the interior [1–9].
The black hole horizon and its entropy arise from a coarse graining superposition of the
micro-state geometries.
In the last years, a large class of four and five dimensional black hole micro-state
geometries have been produced [10–20]. The micro-state geometries are typically coded
in smooth, horizon-less geometries with no closed time-like curves (CTC’s) in five or six
dimensions. This is the best one can achieve, since no-go theorems in four dimensions
exclude the existence of non-singular asymptotically flat soliton solutions.
1
This is not the
case in five or higher dimensions where the existence of Chern-Simons interactions and
spatial sections with non-trivial topologies circumvent the no-go result [23]. From a four-
dimensional perspective, the finiteness of the higher dimensional Riemann tensor (and its
derivatives) results into a finite effective action with curvature divergences compensated
by the singular behaviour of the scalars and gauge fields.
A black hole with finite area in four dimensions can be realised in several different
frames. Popular choices include bound states of D1-D5-KK-p, of D0-D2-D4-D6 branes [24–
30] or of intersecting D3-branes, wrapping three cycles in T
2
× T
2
× T
2
[31–33]. After
reduction down to four dimensions, the solution can be viewed as a supersymmetric vac-
uum of an N = 2 truncation of N = 8 supergravity involving the gravity multiplet and
three vector multiplets characterizing the complex structures of the internal torus. In a
microscopic world-sheet description of the D3-brane system [32, 33], the harmonic func-
tions characterising the gravity solution are sourced by disk diagrams with a boundary
ending on a single, two or four different branes [32, 34, 35]. Higher multipole modes are
generated by extra insertions of untwisted open string fields on the disk boundaries. The
micro-state multiplicities can be computed by counting open strings in the D1-D5-p-KK
system or vacua in the quantum mechanics associated to the D0-D2-D4-D6 realisation of
the black hole [36, 37].
The aim of this paper is to construct explicit examples of micro-state geometries of
four- dimensional BPS black holes. We follow the Bena-Warner ansatz [11, 23, 26] and
look for regular five-dimensional geometries generated by distributions of half-BPS D-
1
Regular solutions with AdS asymptotics have been recently found in [21, 22].
– 2 –
JHEP05(2017)147
brane atoms in R
3
. The regularity of the five dimensional geometry is coded in the so
called bubble equations that we generalise to account for the case of branes at angles.
Boundary conditions at infinity further restrict the choices leading generically to a moduli
space that consists of disjoint components. There are two classes of solutions. Scaling
solutions are configurations that can be rigidly scaled (see [25, 38–40] for some results).
The other class includes solutions where the distances between the centers are bounded by
the charges.
We will consider micro-state geometries with both zero and non-zero angular momen-
tum. The existence of supersymmetric solutions with non-zero angular momentum may
look surprising, since single-center BPS black holes in four dimensions cannot carry angular
momentum, because rotations of a black hole horizon are not compatible with supersymme-
try. In our case, like for the multi center BPS black holes with non zero angular momentum
considered in [41], the angular momentum is generated by the cross product of electric and
magnetic fields of charges separated in R
3
. In the spirit of the fuzzball proposal, micro-
states with non-zero angular momentum can be viewed as members of a canonical ensemble
description of the black hole. The statistical average exposes zero angular momentum, even
though each micro-state can carry some.
2
The plan of the paper is as follows. In section 2 we present the BPS solutions de-
scribing systems of intersecting D3-branes on T
6
from the four dimensional perspective.
We consider both cases of orthogonal and of intersecting D3-branes at angles. The Bena-
Warner ansatz is introduced in section 3. The ansatz is generalised to accomodate for
non-orthogonally intersecting D3-branes. In section 4 and 5 solutions to the bubble equa-
tions and to the boundary conditions are found for the 3-center case with orthogonal or
D3-branes intersecting at angles. A preliminary discussion of the counting of the number
of micro-states with fixed charges is presented in the Conclusions. In appendix A we derive
the four dimensional solution from dimensional reduction of the intersecting D3-branes
solution in ten dimensional type IIB supergravity.
2 Black holes from intersecting D3-branes
In this paper we consider a family of BPS solutions describing systems of intersecting D3-
branes on T
6
from the four dimensional perspective. We refer the reader to the appendix
for details on the ten dimensional solution and its reduction down to four dimensions. The
four dimensional solution has been first explicitly derived in [26] in the D0-D2-D4-D6 type
IIA frame and lifted to a system of M5 branes in M-theory. Here, for convenience, we
consider the very symmetric formulation in terms of D3-branes, but the results can be
easily translated into the type IIA and M-theory frame.
The four-dimensional geometries can be viewed as solutions of an N = 2 truncation
of N = 8 supergravity involving the gravity multiplet and three vector multiplets. The
scalars U
I
in the vector multiplets, usually referred as STU, parametrise the complex
structures of the three internal T
2
’s and span the moduli space M
ST U
= [SL(2, R)/U(1)]
3
⊂
2
We thank Iosif Bena for clarifications on this point.
– 3 –
JHEP05(2017)147
E
7(+7)
/SU(8) = M
N =8
. Setting 16πG = 1, the lagrangian can be written as
L =
√
g
4
R
4
−
3
X
I=1
∂
µ
U
I
∂
µ
¯
U
I
2 ( Im U
I
)
2
−
1
4
F
a
I
ab
F
b
−
1
4
F
a
R
ab
e
F
b
!
(2.1)
where F
a
= dA
a
,
e
F
a
= ∗
4
F
a
with a = 0, 1, 2, 3, including the graviphoton, and
U
I
= (σ + is, τ + it, ν + iu) (2.2)
are the three complex scalars in the vector multiplets. In these variables the gauge kinetic
functions read
I
ab
= stu
1 +
σ
2
s
2
+
τ
2
t
2
+
ν
2
u
2
−
σ
s
2
−
τ
t
2
−
ν
u
2
−
σ
s
2
1
s
2
0 0
−
τ
t
2
0
1
t
2
0
−
ν
u
2
0 0
1
u
2
R
ab
=
2στν −τν −νσ −στ
−τν 0 ν τ
−νσ ν 0 σ
−στ τ σ 0
(2.3)
The solutions will be written in terms of eight harmonic functions
{V, L
I
, K
I
, M} (2.4)
on R
3
. It is convenient to introduce the combinations
Z
I
= L
I
+
|ε
IJK
|
2
K
J
K
K
V
,
µ =
M
2
+
L
I
K
I
2V
+
|ε
IJK
|
6
K
I
K
J
K
K
V
2
. (2.5)
Here
IJK
characterise the triple intersections among the three T
2
I
2-cycles in T
6
.
The solutions can then be written as
ds
2
= −e
2U
(dt + w)
2
+ e
−2U
d|x|
2
A
a
= (A
0
, A
I
) = w
a
+ a
a
(dt + w)
U
I
= −b
I
+ i
V e
2U
Z
I
−1
(2.6)
with
b
I
=
K
I
V
−
µ
Z
I
a
0
= − µV
2
e
4U
a
I
= V e
4U
−
Z
1
Z
2
Z
3
Z
I
+ K
I
µ
∗
3
dw
a
= − dK
a
K
a
=
−V, K
I
∗
3
dw =
1
2
V dM − MdV + K
I
dL
I
− L
I
dK
I
(2.7)
and
e
−4U
= I
4
(V, L
I
, K
I
, M) ≡ Z
1
Z
2
Z
3
V − µ
2
V
2
(2.8)
= L
1
L
2
L
3
V − K
1
K
2
K
3
M +
3
X
I>J
K
I
K
J
L
I
L
J
2
−
MV
2
3
X
I=1
K
I
L
I
−
M
2
V
2
4
−
3
X
I=1
(K
I
)
2
L
2
I
4
has the same structure as the quartic U-duality invariant I
4
.
– 4 –
剩余26页未读,继续阅读
资源评论
weixin_38516956
- 粉丝: 6
- 资源: 973
上传资源 快速赚钱
- 我的内容管理 展开
- 我的资源 快来上传第一个资源
- 我的收益 登录查看自己的收益
- 我的积分 登录查看自己的积分
- 我的C币 登录后查看C币余额
- 我的收藏
- 我的下载
- 下载帮助
最新资源
- Quectel-Linux-Android-QMI-WWAN-Driver-V1.2.9.zip
- 已测最新版可运营彩虹易支付源码+保姆级搭建教程
- Catia 线束 培训课件PDF
- 基于A* 算法的无人机三维路径规划算法,MATLAB编程实现
- 【PID和LQR主动悬架模型对比】 分别建立了PID控制和LQR控制的的主动悬架模型,比较两种控制器的控制效果 以悬架主动力为控制目标,输入为B级随机路面,输出为车身垂向加速度、俯仰角
- Quectel-Android-RIL-Driver-V3.6.45-master-Release-ndk-20240702-14-00.zip
- 一维光子晶体态密度案例
- 小程序项目-基于微信小程序的学习资料销售平台(包括源码,数据库,教程).zip
- 小程序项目-基于微信小程序的学生购电小程序(包括源码,数据库,教程).zip
- 小程序项目-基于微信小程序的学生选课系统(包括源码,数据库,教程).zip
- 小程序项目-基于微信小程序的药店管理系统(包括源码,数据库,教程).zip
- 小程序项目-基于微信小程序的医院预约挂号系统小程序(包括源码,数据库,教程).zip
- 小程序项目-基于微信小程序的医院核酸检测预约挂号(包括源码,数据库,教程).zip
- 级联H桥并网 10KV 每相12个H桥,单个H桥直流电压为850V,采用电流闭环控制 为了测试系统控制性能效果,在1s时,控制输出电流从2000A下降到1500A,控制效果好,电流电压无超调,网侧
- 小程序项目-基于微信小程序的疫情核酸预约小程序(包括源码,数据库,教程).zip
- 小程序项目-基于微信小程序的英语学习激励系统(包括源码,数据库,教程).zip
资源上传下载、课程学习等过程中有任何疑问或建议,欢迎提出宝贵意见哦~我们会及时处理!
点击此处反馈
安全验证
文档复制为VIP权益,开通VIP直接复制
信息提交成功