没有合适的资源?快使用搜索试试~ 我知道了~
资源推荐
资源详情
资源评论
Eur. Phys. J. C (2014) 74:3010
DOI 10.1140/epjc/s10052-014-3010-4
Regular Article - Theoretical Physics
Rare decay π
0
→ e
+
e
−
: on corrections beyond the leading order
Tomáš Husek
a
, Karol Kampf
b
,Jiˇrí Novotný
c
Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Institute of Particle and Nuclear Physics, Charles University, V Holešoviˇckách 2, Praha 8, Czech Republic
Received: 29 May 2014 / Accepted: 25 July 2014 / Published online: 20 August 2014
© The Author(s) 2014. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com
Abstract The preceding experimental and theoretical
results on the rare decay π
0
→ e
+
e
−
are briefly summarized.
Already computed two-loop QED corrections are reviewed
and the bremsstrahlung contribution beyond the soft-photon
approximation is analytically calculated. The possible fur-
ther contribution of QCD loop corrections is estimated using
the leading logarithm approximation. The complete result
can be used to fit the value of the contact interaction cou-
pling χ
(r)
to the recent KTeV experiment with the result
χ
(r)
(M
ρ
) = 4.5 ± 1.0.
1 Motivation
Experimental measurements of the rare decay of a neutral
pseudoscalar meson to a lepton pair and comparison with
theoretical predictions offer an interesting way to study low-
energy (long-distance) dynamics in the Standard Model (SM)
[1–3]. Systematical theoretical treatment of the process dates
back to 1959, when the first prediction of the decay rate was
published by Drell [4]. While the possible contributions of the
weak sector of the SM are small enough to be neglected, the
leading order QED contribution is described by two virtual
photon exchange triangle diagram. That is why t he double
off-shell pion transition form factor F
π
0
γ
∗
γ
∗
, which is not
known from the first principles, plays an essential role.
Because of this one-loop structure for the leading order,
the process is very rare and suppressed in t he comparison to
two-photon decay (π
0
→ γγ) by a factor of 2(αm
e
/M
π
0
)
2
due to the approximate helicity conservation of the inter-
action and thus may be sensitive to possible effects of the
physics beyond the SM (the expected branching ratio from
the pure SM calculation is about 10
−7
).
a
e-mail: husek@ipnp.mff.cuni.cz
b
e-mail: karol.kampf@mff.cuni.cz
c
e-mail: jiri.novotny@mff.cuni.cz
Recently, this decay has attracted the attention of theorists
again in connection with a new precise branching ratio mea-
surement. The KTeV-E799-II experiment at Fermilab [5] has
observed π
0
→ e
+
e
−
events (altogether 794 candidates),
where K
L
→ 3π
0
decay was used as a source of neutral
pions. The KTeV result is
(π
0
→ e
+
e
−
, x > 0.95)
(π
0
→ e
+
e
−
γ, x > 0.232)
= (1.685 ± 0.064 ± 0.027) × 10
−4
. (1)
Here we have introduced the Dalitz variable
x ≡
( p + q)
2
M
2
=
(P − k)
2
M
2
= 1 −
2E
k
M
, (2)
where p, q, and k are four-momenta of electron, positron, and
photon, respectively, P = ( p+q +k) is the four-momentum
of neutral pion π
0
with a mass M and E
k
is the energy of the
real outgoing photon in the pion CMS. The lower bound of
the Dalitz variable x is used to suppress the contribution of
the Dalitz decay π
0
→ e
+
e
−
γ , which naturally arises with
lower x.
By means of extrapolating the Dalitz branching ratio in
(1) to the full range of x, the branching ratio of the neutral
pion decay into an electron–positron pair was determined to
be equal to
B(π
0
→ e
+
e
−
(γ ), x > 0.95)
= (6.44 ± 0.25 ± 0.22) × 10
−8
. (3)
Here the first error is from data statistics alone and the second
is the total systematic error. For the matter of interest, current
PDG average value (6.46 ±0.33) ×10
−8
[6] is mainly based
on this new result.
The KTeV Collaboration used the result (3) for further
calculations. They used the early calculation of Bergström [7 ]
to extrapolate the full radiative tail beyond x > 0.95 and to
scale the result back up by the overall radiative corrections of
123
3010 Page 2 of 11 Eur. Phys. J. C (2014) 74:3010
3.4 % to get the lowest order rate (with the final state radiation
removed) for π
0
→ e
+
e
−
process. The final result is
B
no-rad
KTeV
(π
0
→ e
+
e
−
) = (7.48 ± 0.29 ± 0.25) × 10
−8
.
(4)
Subsequent comparison with theoretical predictions of the
SM was made in [1,2] using pion transition form-factor data
from CELLO [8] and CLEO [9] experiments. Finally, it has
been found that according to the SM the result should be
B
no-rad
SM
(π
0
→ e
+
e
−
) = (6.23 ± 0.09) × 10
−8
. (5)
This can be interpreted as a 3.3 σ discrepancy between
the theory and the experiment. Of course, the discrep-
ancy initiated further theoretical investigation of its possible
sources [10,11]. Aside from the attempts to find the corre-
sponding mechanism within the physics beyond the SM, also
the possible revision of the SM predictions has been taken
into account. Many corrections of this kind have been already
made, but so far with no such a significant influence on the
final result.
2 Leading order
According to the Lorentz symmetry the on-shell invariant
matrix element of the π
0
→ e
+
e
−
process can be generally
written in terms of just one pseudoscalar form factor
iM(π
0
→ e
+
e
−
) = u( p, m)γ
5
v(q, m)P(p
2
, q
2
, P
2
) (6)
and, as a consequence, the total decay rate is given by
(π
0
→ e
+
e
−
) =
M
8π
1 − ν
2
P(m
2
, m
2
, M
2
)
2
, (7)
where m stands for electron mass and ν ≡ 2m/M. The lead-
ing order in the QED expansion is depicted as the left hand
side of the graphical equation in Fig. 1. Here the shaded
blob corresponds to the off-shell pion transition form factor
F
π
0
γ
∗
γ
∗
(l
2
,(P − l)
2
) where l is the loop momentum. This
form factor serves as an effective UV cut-off due to its 1/l
2
asymptotics governed by OPE (see e.g. [12]) and the loop
integral over d
4
l is therefore convergent. It is convenient to
pick up explicitly the non-analytic contribution of the two-
photon intermediate state (the imaginary part
1
is determined
uniquely up to the normalization given by the on-shell value
of F
π
0
γ
∗
γ
∗
(0, 0) ≡ F
π
0
γγ
) and express the form factor in
the following way (cf. [13]):
1
Imaginary part of this contribution is given by Cutkosky rules cutting
the two virtual photon lines in the Fig. 1.
+
=
χ
Fig. 1 Leading order contribution in the QED expansion and its repre-
sentation in terms of the leading order of the chiral perturbation theory
P
LO
(m
2
, m
2
, M
2
)
= α
2
mF
π
0
γγ
1
√
1−ν
2
Li
2
(z) − Li
2
1
z
+iπ log(−z)
+2α
2
mF
π
0
γγ
3
2
log
m
2
μ
2
−
5
2
+ χ
M
2
μ
2
,
m
2
μ
2
.
(8)
Here, Li
2
is the dilogarithm,
z =−
1 −
√
1 − ν
2
1 +
√
1 − ν
2
, (9)
and μ represents the intrinsic scale connected with the form
factor
2
F
π
0
γ
∗
γ
∗
. The function χ(P
2
/μ
2
, m
2
/μ
2
) represents
the remainder which collects the contributions of higher
intermediate states and is real and analytic
3
for P
2
/μ
2
< 1.
The leading order terms in the chiral expansion of the
form factor P
LO
are depicted as the right hand side of the
graphical equation in Fig. 1.Theπ
0
γγ vertex in the loop
graph is local and corresponds to the leading order term of
the chiral expansion of the form factor F
π
0
γ
∗
γ
∗
. Therefore
the loop integration is no more UV finite and a countert-
erm (represented by the tree graph in Fig. 1) is necessary.
The sum of these two terms can be written in the form (8),
where the transition form factor F
π
0
γγ
and the remainder
χ(P
2
/μ
2
, m
2
/μ
2
) are replaced by their leading orders in
the chiral expansion,
F
LO
π
0
γγ
=
1
4π
2
F
,χ
LO
(P
2
/μ
2
, m
2
/μ
2
) = χ
(r)
(μ), (10)
where χ
(r)
(μ) is the finite part of the above mentioned coun-
terterm renormalized at scale μ. The graphical equation in
Fig. 1 can be understood as the matching condition for
χ
(r)
(μ) at the leading order in the chiral expansion. It enables
one to determine χ
(r)
(μ) once the form factor F
π
0
γ
∗
γ
∗
is
known. The latter can be theoretically modeled e.g. by the
2
It means the scale at which the loop integral is effectively cut off.
The term
3
2
log(m
2
/μ
2
) represents the leading dependence of the form
factor P on this scale.
3
Note that the higher intermediate states, which appear when also the
blob in Fig. 1 is cut, start for P
2
∼ μ
2
.
123
剩余10页未读,继续阅读
资源评论
weixin_38502722
- 粉丝: 5
- 资源: 926
上传资源 快速赚钱
- 我的内容管理 展开
- 我的资源 快来上传第一个资源
- 我的收益 登录查看自己的收益
- 我的积分 登录查看自己的积分
- 我的C币 登录后查看C币余额
- 我的收藏
- 我的下载
- 下载帮助
最新资源
- 基于SpringBoot+Vue的在线课程管理系统(后端代码)
- MindInsight为MindSpore提供了简单易用的调优调试能力 用于模型优化的可视化仪表板
- 野火霸道开发板485原工程
- 国产化自主可控的人工智能开源平台 平台面向人工智能研究中的数据处理、算法开发、模型训练、算力管理和推理应用等各个流程的技术难点
- 基于Springboot+Vue的江西红色旅游景点宣传网站(后端代码)
- 基于Springboot+Vue的江西红色旅游景点宣传网站(管理端代码)
- Screenshot_20241116_111214.jpg
- 普通话考试操作教程完整版
- 基于Springboot+Vue的江西红色旅游景点宣传网站(网页端代码)
- C语言基本语法入门练习题.zip
资源上传下载、课程学习等过程中有任何疑问或建议,欢迎提出宝贵意见哦~我们会及时处理!
点击此处反馈
安全验证
文档复制为VIP权益,开通VIP直接复制
信息提交成功