PRISMA-2020-checklist.pdf
154 浏览量
2024-04-29
19:42:25
上传
评论
收藏 80KB PDF 举报
PRISMA 2020 Checklist
Section and
Topic
Item
#
Checklist item
Location
where item
is reported
TITLE
Title
1
Identify the report as a systematic review.
ABSTRACT
Abstract
2
See the PRISMA 2020 for Abstracts checklist.
INTRODUCTION
Rationale
3
Describe the rationale for the review in the context of existing knowledge.
Objectives
4
Provide an explicit statement of the objective(s) or question(s) the review addresses.
METHODS
Eligibility criteria
5
Specify the inclusion and exclusion criteria for the review and how studies were grouped for the syntheses.
Information
sources
6
Specify all databases, registers, websites, organisations, reference lists and other sources searched or consulted to identify studies. Specify the
date when each source was last searched or consulted.
Search strategy
7
Present the full search strategies for all databases, registers and websites, including any filters and limits used.
Selection process
8
Specify the methods used to decide whether a study met the inclusion criteria of the review, including how many reviewers screened each record
and each report retrieved, whether they worked independently, and if applicable, details of automation tools used in the process.
Data collection
process
9
Specify the methods used to collect data from reports, including how many reviewers collected data from each report, whether they worked
independently, any processes for obtaining or confirming data from study investigators, and if applicable, details of automation tools used in the
process.
Data items
10a
List and define all outcomes for which data were sought. Specify whether all results that were compatible with each outcome domain in each
study were sought (e.g. for all measures, time points, analyses), and if not, the methods used to decide which results to collect.
10b
List and define all other variables for which data were sought (e.g. participant and intervention characteristics, funding sources). Describe any
assumptions made about any missing or unclear information.
Study risk of bias
assessment
11
Specify the methods used to assess risk of bias in the included studies, including details of the tool(s) used, how many reviewers assessed each
study and whether they worked independently, and if applicable, details of automation tools used in the process.
Effect measures
12
Specify for each outcome the effect measure(s) (e.g. risk ratio, mean difference) used in the synthesis or presentation of results.
Synthesis
methods
13a
Describe the processes used to decide which studies were eligible for each synthesis (e.g. tabulating the study intervention characteristics and
comparing against the planned groups for each synthesis (item #5)).
13b
Describe any methods required to prepare the data for presentation or synthesis, such as handling of missing summary statistics, or data
conversions.
13c
Describe any methods used to tabulate or visually display results of individual studies and syntheses.
13d
Describe any methods used to synthesize results and provide a rationale for the choice(s). If meta-analysis was performed, describe the
model(s), method(s) to identify the presence and extent of statistical heterogeneity, and software package(s) used.
13e
Describe any methods used to explore possible causes of heterogeneity among study results (e.g. subgroup analysis, meta-regression).
13f
Describe any sensitivity analyses conducted to assess robustness of the synthesized results.
Reporting bias
assessment
14
Describe any methods used to assess risk of bias due to missing results in a synthesis (arising from reporting biases).
Certainty
assessment
15
Describe any methods used to assess certainty (or confidence) in the body of evidence for an outcome.
资源评论
