没有合适的资源?快使用搜索试试~ 我知道了~
资源推荐
资源详情
资源评论
© 2014 Cisco and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. This document is Cisco Public Information. Page 1 of 25
White Paper
802.11ac: The Fifth
Generation of Wi-Fi
Technical White Paper
March 2014
© 2014 Cisco and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. This document is Cisco Public Information. Page 2 of 25
Contents
1. Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................................. 3
2. What Is 802.11ac? ................................................................................................................................................ 4
2.1 Drivers for 802.11ac ................................................................................................................................. 4
2.2 How Does 802.11ac Go So Fast? ................................................................................................................. 5
2.3 How Do We Make 802.11ac Robust? ........................................................................................................... 7
2.3.1 Technology Overview ........................................................................................................................... 7
2.3.2 Differences Between 802.11ac and 802.11n ........................................................................................ 8
2.3.3 Standards-Based Beamforming ........................................................................................................... 9
2.3.4 RTS/CTS with Bandwidth Indication .................................................................................................. 10
2.3.5 All A-MPDUs ........................................................................................................................................ 12
2.3.6 Channelization and 80+80 MHz .......................................................................................................... 12
2.3.7 Rate at Range ...................................................................................................................................... 16
2.3.8 Regulatory Considerations ................................................................................................................. 16
2.3.9 MU-MIMO .............................................................................................................................................. 17
2.3.10 802.11ac Project Authorization Request ......................................................................................... 18
3. When Is 802.11ac Happening? ......................................................................................................................... 19
4. How Does 802.11ac Affect Me? ........................................................................................................................ 19
4.1 Compatibility ............................................................................................................................................... 19
4.2 When to Upgrade to 802.11ac? .................................................................................................................. 20
4.3 Radio Resource Management and WIPS Effects ..................................................................................... 21
5. Summary ............................................................................................................................................................ 21
Appendix: What Is 802.11n? ................................................................................................................................. 21
© 2014 Cisco and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. This document is Cisco Public Information. Page 3 of 25
1. Executive Summary
802.11ac, the emerging standard from the IEEE, is like the movie The Godfather Part II. It takes something great
and makes it even better. 802.11ac is a faster and more scalable version of 802.11n. It couples the freedom of
wireless with the capabilities of Gigabit Ethernet.
Wireless LAN sites will see significant improvements in the number of clients supported by an access point (AP), a
better experience for each client, and more available bandwidth for a higher number of parallel video streams.
Even when the network is not fully loaded, users see a benefit: their file downloads and email sync happen at
low-lag gigabit speeds. Also, device battery life is extended, since the device’s Wi-Fi interface can wake up,
exchange data with its AP, and then revert to dozing that much more quickly.
802.11ac achieves its raw speed increase by pushing on three different dimensions:
●
More channel bonding, increased from a maximum of 40 MHz with 802.11n up to 80 or even 160 MHz (for
speed increases of 117 or 333 percent, respectively).
●
Denser modulation, now using 256 quadrature amplitude modulation (QAM), up from 64QAM in 802.11n
(for a 33 percent speed burst at shorter, yet still usable, ranges).
●
More multiple input, multiple output (MIMO). Whereas 802.11n stopped at four spatial streams, 802.11ac
goes all the way to eight (for another 100 percent speed increase).
The design constraints and economics that kept 802.11n products at one, two, or three spatial streams haven’t
changed much for 802.11ac, so we can expect the same kind of product availability, with first-wave 802.11ac
products built around 80 MHz and delivering up to 433 Mbps (low end), 867 Mbps (mid-tier), or 1300 Mbps (high
end) at the physical layer. Second-wave products may promise still more channel bonding and spatial streams,
with plausible product configurations operating at up to 3.47 Gbps.
802.11ac is a 5-GHz-only technology, so dual-band APs and clients will continue to use 802.11n at 2.4 GHz.
However, 802.11ac clients operate in the less crowded 5-GHz band.
Second-wave products could also come with a new technology, multiuser MIMO (MU-MIMO). Whereas 802.11n is
like an Ethernet hub that can transfer only a single frame at a time to all its ports, MU-MIMO allows an AP to send
multiple frames to multiple clients at the same time over the same frequency spectrum. That’s right: with multiple
antennas and smarts, an AP can behave like a wireless switch. There are technical constraints, and so MU-MIMO
is particularly well suited to bring-your-own-device (BYOD) situations in which devices such as smartphones and
tablets have only a single antenna.
802.11ac-enabled products are the culmination of efforts at the IEEE and Wi-Fi Alliance pipelines. IEEE 802.11ac
delivered an approved Draft 2.0 amendment in January 2012 and a refined Draft 3.0 in May 2012, with final
ratification occurring at the end of 2013.In parallel, the Wi-Fi Alliance adopted an early but very stable and mature
IEEE draft, namely Draft 3.0, and used that as the baseline for an interoperability certification of first-wave products
in mid-2013. Later, and more in line with the ratification date of 802.11ac (that is, after December 2013), the Wi-Fi
Alliance is expected to refresh its 802.11ac certification to include testing of the more advanced 802.11ac features.
This second-wave certification could include features such as channel bonding up to 160 MHz, four spatial
streams, and MU-MIMO. Overall, this arrangement closely follows how 802.11n was rolled out. As of February
2014, the launch date for Wave 2 certification is yet to be determined.
© 2014 Cisco and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. This document is Cisco Public Information. Page 4 of 25
Enterprise networks considering an investment in infrastructure Wi-Fi have two excellent choices: (1) buy 802.11n
APs, since they deliver a remarkable level of performance, they are available today, and 802.11n is widely
deployed in client products, or (2) wait for 802.11ac APs and their state-of-the-art performance. A third option
avoids the wait: invest in a modular 802.11n AP such as the Cisco
®
Aironet
®
3600 Series Access Point, which is
readily field-upgradable to 802.11ac, or the Cisco Aironet 3700 Series Access Point, which supports an integrated
802.11ac radio.
802.11ac will have a few effects on existing 802.11a/n deployments, even if the deployment is not upgraded to
802.11ac immediately: (1) the wider channel bandwidths of neighboring APs require updates to radio resource
management, or RRM (and in particular the dynamic channel assignment algorithm), and (2) 802.11a/n wireless
intrusion protection systems (WIPS) can continue to decode most management frames such as beacon and probe
request/response frames (that are invariably sent in 802.11a format) but do not have visibility into data sent in the
new 802.11ac packet format.
One thing not to worry about is compatibility. 802.11ac is designed in a deep way to coexist efficiently with existing
802.11a/n devices, with strong carrier sense, a single new preamble that appears to be a valid 802.11a preamble
to 802.11a/n devices, and extensions to request-to-send/clear-to-send (RTS/CTS) to help avoid collisions with
users operating on slightly different channels.
2. What Is 802.11ac?
First, 802.11ac is an evolution of 802.11n. If you want to learn more about 802.11n, jump to the Appendix. If you
are already familiar with the channel bonding, MIMO, and aggregation introduced by 802.11n, and you don’t need
a refresher, read on.
2.1 Drivers for 802.11ac
802.11ac is an evolutionary improvement to 802.11n. One of the goals of 802.11ac is to deliver higher levels of
performance that are commensurate with Gigabit Ethernet networking:
●
A seemingly “instantaneous” data transfer experience
●
A pipe fat enough that delivering a high quality of experience (QoE) is straightforward
In the consumer space, the target is multiple channels of high-definition (HD) content delivered to all areas of the
house. The enterprise has different challenges:
●
Delivering network with enterprise-class speeds and latencies
●
High-density environments with scores of clients per AP
◦ Which are exacerbated by the BYOD trend, such that one employee might carry two or even three
802.11 devices and have them all consuming network resources at the same time
●
The increased adoption of video streaming
802.11ac is about delivering an outstanding experience to each and every client served by an AP, even under
demanding loads.
Meanwhile, 802.11 is integral to a hugely broad range of devices, and some of them are highly cost, power, or
volume constrained. One antenna is routine for these devices, yet 802.11ac must still deliver peak efficiency.
The one thing that 802.11ac has in its favor is the evolutionary improvement to silicon technology over the past
half-dozen years: channel bandwidths can be wider, constellations can be denser, and APs can integrate more
functionality.
© 2014 Cisco and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. This document is Cisco Public Information. Page 5 of 25
Figure 1. How 802.11ac Accelerates 802.11n
2.2 How Does 802.11ac Go So Fast?
Wireless speed is the product of three factors: channel bandwidth, constellation density, and number of spatial
streams. 802.11ac pushes hard on the boundaries on each of these, as shown in Figure 1.
For the mathematically inclined, the physical layer speed of 802.11ac is calculated according to Table 1. For
instance, an 80-MHz transmission sent at 256QAM with three spatial streams and a short guard interval delivers
234 × 3 × 5/6 × 8 bits/3.6 microseconds = 1300 Mbps.
Table 1. Calculating the Speed of 802.11n and 802.11ac
PHY
Bandwidth (as Number of
Data Subcarriers)
×
Number of Spatial
Streams
×
Data Bits per
Subcarrier
÷
Time per OFDM
Symbol
=
PHY Data
Rate
(bps)
802.11n or
802.11ac
56 (20 MHz)
1 to 4
Up to 5/6 × log
2
(64) =
5
3.6 microseconds
(short guard interval)
108 (40 MHz)
4 microseconds (long
guard interval)
802.11ac
only
234 (80 MHz)
5 to 8
Up to 5/6 × log
2
(256) ≈
6.67
2 × 234 (160 MHz)
Immediately we see that increasing the channel bandwidth to 80 MHz yields 2.16 times faster speeds, and 160
MHz offers a further doubling. Nothing is for free: it does consume more spectrum, and each time we’re splitting
the same transmit power over twice as many subcarriers, so the speed doubles, but the range for that doubled
speed is slightly reduced (for an overall win).
Going from 64QAM to 256QAM also helps, by another 8/6 = 1.33 times faster. Being closer together, the
constellation points are more sensitive to noise, so 256QAM helps most at shorter range where 64QAM is already
reliable. Still, 256QAM doesn’t require more spectrum or more antennas than 64QAM.
The speed is directly proportional to the number of spatial streams. More spatial streams require more antennas,
RF connectors, and RF chains at transmitter and receiver. The antennas should be spaced one-third of a
wavelength (3/4 inch) or more apart, and the additional RF chains consume additional power. This drives many
mobile devices to limit the number of antennas to one, two, or three.
剩余24页未读,继续阅读
资源评论
飞越丛林
- 粉丝: 113
- 资源: 23
上传资源 快速赚钱
- 我的内容管理 展开
- 我的资源 快来上传第一个资源
- 我的收益 登录查看自己的收益
- 我的积分 登录查看自己的积分
- 我的C币 登录后查看C币余额
- 我的收藏
- 我的下载
- 下载帮助
安全验证
文档复制为VIP权益,开通VIP直接复制
信息提交成功