没有合适的资源?快使用搜索试试~ 我知道了~
资源推荐
资源详情
资源评论
Bonding Process
2
In this chapter, the details of the wire bonding process are discussed. The bonding
wire configurations used in the electronics industry are listed, and wire parameters
such as wire processing, wire purity, and wire diameter are explained. Since the use
of bare copper wires is a concern owing to the propensity of copper to oxidize,
oxidation prevention technology is needed. The chapter discusses the two oxidation
prevention technologies used in the industry, including cover gas and oxida tion
prevention coating. The wire bonding parameters govern the quality of formed free
air balls (FABs) and subsequent first and second bonds. The effect of elect rical
flame-off current and firing time on formed FABs, and the effect of ultrasonic
energy, bonding force, bonding temperature, and time on wire bond quality, is
explained, and the optimal parameter ranges are listed. The bonding tools for
copper wire bonding are explained and the failures resulting from improper bond-
ing are also listed.
2.1 Bond Wire
Wire purity and the processing undergone by the wire during wire drawing opera-
tion determine the mechanical properties of the bonding wire. The mechanical
properties relevant for wire bonding are elon gation percentage and the breaking
strength. Additionally, the stress state of the wire—residual stress or stress free
(fully annealed)—determines the looping characteristics of the wire. The use of
annealed wire reduces the variation in the bond strength and makes the bonding
process less sensitive to thermal effects. A high-purity wire is desired, which is
melted in a high vacuum to obtain a homogeneous microstructure. The resulting
cast bar is subjected to multiple stages of drawing through a series of dies to reduce
the wire diameter for bonding. The thinner the wire requirement, the more stages of
wire drawing the wire undergoes. Wire processing should ensure that the wire has a
clean surface and smooth finish so that it easily comes out of the spool without
P.S. Chauhan et al., Copper Wire Bonding, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4614-5761-9_2,
#
Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014
11
snagging [5]. Bare Cu wires of varying purity (3–6 N) are used in the industry, and
the wire cost is directly proportional to the wire purity. Also, as the wire purity
increases, the wire becomes softer.
1
Bond wire manufacturers often dope pure Cu wire with additives to enhance the
wire bondability and minimize the Al splash. For the same wire thickness, a Cu
FAB is larger in diameter than the corresponding Au wire. Hence, to achieve the
same FAB diameter, Cu wires are 2.54 μm thinner than Au wire. Bare Cu wires
used in the industry have purities of 3–6 N, with 4 N as the most commonly used
[42, 43]. Srikanth et al. [44] investigated Cu wires of varying purity, including 3, 4,
and 5 N, and 50 μm thickness. They reported that higher purity wires have lower
flow stress than lower purity wires (95.5 MPa for 5 N, 115 MPa for 4 N, and
120 MPa for 3 N), since they have fewer grains. Cu wire of 3 N purity had fine
columnar grains in the initial state, as well as after melting (FAB formation). On
the other hand, wires of 4 and 5 N purity had large grain sizes and few columnar
grains in both the i nitial state and after melting. The grain direction on the FAB
affects the hardness and elastic modulus of the FAB, wherein the lack of direc-
tionality results in softer wires. The low flow stress in 5 N wires was attributed to
the lack of directionality in the grains. Because of the lower flow stress, a lower
bonding force is req uir ed, which result s in a lower Al splash. The high-purity
wires showed high twinning features, which can impai r the deformation processes
during the bonding operation. On the other hand, for 3 and 4 N FABs, the number
of grains in the [ 100] direction was larger than that in the [110] and [111]
directions [44]. The thermomechanical processing that the wire undergoes
determines the residual stress states in the wire and the mechanical properties,
including the hardness and tensile strength. The grain structure of the wire can be
optimized for the individual purity level by the wire processing steps, including
the deformation and annealing steps during wire drawing. Optimization of wire
purity and microstructure can help achieve the desired mechanical properties,
such as wire elongation and tensile strength. Wires with a high elongation strength
have smaller grains and higher tensile strength [45].
Another consideration for the bonding wire is the wire diameter. The choice of
wire diameter depends on the compatibility with the process and the required
current carrying capacity. For consumer electronics, the common wire diameter
range is 18–25 μm, whereas for the power electronics, the common wire
diameter range is 20–50 μm[46].
The use of bare Cu is a concern due to the propensity of Cu to readily oxidize.
The use of oxidation-resistant coatings is one way to address the problem of Cu
oxidation. Al-coated Cu wires for room-temperature wedge–wedge bonding have
been shown to suppress oxidation and have better pull strength, better metallic
contact format ion, and better storage capabilities than bare Cu wires [47]. Al-coated
wire is suited for room-temperature bonding on low-temperature co-fired ceramics
1
The material purity in % or Nines scale is denoted in terms of purity in parts-per-million (ppm).
For example, 1 N ¼ 90 %, 2 N ¼ 99 %, 3 N ¼ 99.9 % and so on.
12 2 Bonding Process
with silver and gold metallization. Among the oxidation prevention coatings (Au,
Ag, Pd, and Ni), Pd coating on Cu has shown sufficient potential to replace Au
wire due to its excellent bondability and reliab ility at a relatively low cost [48–53].
Pd is a semi-noble metal with similarities to both Ag and Pt. PdCu is oxidation free,
and Pd has good adhesion to Cu wire and higher tensile strength than bare Cu wire
when bonded on Al pads. Table 2.1 shows a comparison of Au, Cu, and PdCu wires.
Because of the Pd layer on Cu wire, there is always a layer of Pd or a Pd-rich
phase that prot ects the bonded ball from an attack of corrosion. Easing the use of Pd
may also ease the stringent molding compound requirement. Pd prevents the
formation of CuO and can form a bond with N
2
without requiring forming gas.
Figure (2.1a, b) shows a comparison of Cu and PdCu wires bonded on Al. This
comparison of the first bonds of PdCu and Cu wires shows that PdCu-bonded ball
has lower Al pad splash than Cu-bonded ball.
Robustness in the second bond is the most important reason to adopt PdCu wires
[52, 55]. This robustness has led to an improved C
pk
(process capability index). The
stitch pull strength of PdCu wire is more than 50 % higher than bare Cu [51]. PdCu
wire on an aluminum bond pad has also been demonstrated to perform better than
bare Cu in high-humidity conditions, such as in the highly accelerated stress test
(HAST), pressure cooker test (PCT) [50], temperature cycling test (TCT), and high-
temperature storage (HTS) test. Table 2.2 shows a bond strength and defective
second bond ratio comparison of Au, Cu, and PdCu wires. The PdCu wires have a
higher secon d bond strength than bare Cu wires and zero defective second bonds
[48]. PdCu also works better at highe r ultrasonic generator (USG) current levels
than Cu wire. It should be noted, however, that due to the higher hardness and
rigidity of PdCu o ver Cu, a higher bonding force is needed for PdCu wires, which
could increase the risk of Al splash and pad damage [56]. Hence, careful optimiza-
tion of bonding parameters is needed for PdCu wires.
Since PdCu wire has a larger diameter than bare Cu wire, the FAB diameter for
PdCu wire needs to be smaller than for bare Cu wire. Because of the Pd layer on the
Cu wire there is always a layer of Pd or a Pd-rich phase that protects the bonded ball
from an attack of corrosion. Easing the use of Pd may also ease the stringent
molding compound requirement. Pd prevents the formation of CuO and can form
Table 2.1 Bonding wire comparison: Au, Cu, and PdCu [54]
Au Cu PdCu
Cost High Low Low (higher than Cu)
Cover gas No need Forming gas Forming gas or N
2
FAB hardness Compatible to Al ~40 % harder than Au ~10 % harder than Cu
First bond process Good process window Narrower than Au Same or slightly
narrower than Cu
Second bond process Same Same Same
Portability requirement Moderate High High
Reliability Good Good; more stringent
mold compound than
that for Au
Same or slightly better
than Cu
2.1 Bond Wire 13
a bond with N
2
without requiring forming gas. A comparison of N
2
and forming gas
for PdCu wire (15 μm) showed that forming gas is superior to N
2
since it is not
sensitive to changes in electrical flame-off (EFO) (FAB diameter relative standard
deviation: 0.94; ball-to-wire offset: 0.53 μm) [ 57]. Comparisons of bare Cu and
PdCu wire have shown that at a higher EFO current, an FAB with bare Cu wire has
higher hardness caused by having smaller grains. Varying the EFO current in PdCu
wire causes the hardness of the wire to vary due to the different distributions of the
PdCu alloy in the FAB [58].
Although Pd coating prevents the oxidation of Cu, it introduces new challenges
for wire bonding. It is 2.5 times more expensive than bare Cu [59] and has a higher
melting point than Cu [59]. The industry is thus looking to optimize Pd thickness to
reduce costs, decreasing the Pd thickness from 0.2 to 0.1 μm[54]. PdCu is harder
than pure Cu and, hence, increases the risk of pad cracking and damage to the
circuitry under pad (CUP). The Pd distribution can also affect the reliability of Cu
wire-bonded devices, but as of 2013 there was no method to control Pd distribution.
Fig. 2.1 Cu and PdCu wires: Comparison of (a) first and (b) second bonds in [51]
Table 2.2 Bond strength and defective second bond ratio comparison [48]
Au Cu PdCu
First bond strength (N) 0.256 0.215 0.352
Second bond strength (N) 0.053 0.026 0.074
Defective second bond ratio (ppm) 0 7933 0
14 2 Bonding Process
2.2 Oxidation Prevention Technology
FAB formation requires the generation of high voltage across the EFO gap, causing
a high current spark to discharge and melt the tail of the Cu wire to form a spherical
ball. Oxidation must be avoided in order to obtain a symmetr ical FAB without
deviation in size [60]. Cu oxidation during ball formation inhibits the formation of a
spherical ball, which in turn affects the reliability of the first bond. Under high-
temperature and high-humidity environments, copper oxidation at the interface of
the Cu–Al bonding region causes cracks and weakens the Cu–Al bonding. Copper
oxidation typicall y starts at the wire region and then spreads to the upper bonded
area and then to the bonding interface with time. Cu oxidation also causes
corrosion cracks.
Since Cu oxidizes quickly, Cu FABs need to be formed in an inert gas environ-
ment. Oxidation can also occur if the cover (inert) gas flow rate is not sufficiently
high to provide an inert atmosp here for the FAB formation [61]. It has been
reported that the use of single-crystal Cu wires eliminates the need for cover gas
during bonding [62]. Requiring inert gas, such as forming gas, to address the
oxidation probl em adds complications to the bondi ng process and results in a
narrow process window.
The oxidation of Cu is prevented in two ways: use of an inert gas (nitrogen or
forming gas) during bonding, and use of oxidation prevention coating on the Cu
wire [42, 63, 64]. The use of N
2
as the cover/shielding gas has resulted in defective
FABs. Since forming gas contains 5 % H
2
(95 % N
2
,5%H
2
), it has better anti-
oxidation properties than N
2
and is the cover gas for Cu wire bonding. The main
purpose of injecting forming gas (FG) is to form an inert gas shroud around the
copper tail and the FAB to prevent oxidation prior to bonding. The use of H
2
has the
twofold purpose of helping to melt the Cu, as well as acting as a reducing agent to
reduce the copper oxide back to Cu [60].
2.3 Free Air Ball Formation
FAB formation starts with the Cu wire being heated and subsequently melted by the
low-energy plasma discharged. The molten wire turns into a spherical ball under the
effect of surface tension. At the end of discharge, the molten spherical ball starts
cooling and then solidifies to form a FAB [65]. Qin et al. [66] compared Au and Cu
balls on Al pads and found that non-optimized bonding condi tions resulted in over-
bonded balls for Au wire and under-bonded balls for Cu wire. Although Cu wire
bonds showed higher pull strength than Au wire bonds, Cu wire bonds had a larger
standard deviation, which indicates that more process development is required to
optimize the process conditions for Cu wire bonding. Figure 2.2(a, b) shows the
FAB micrographs for Au and Cu wires. Even though the ball diameter of Au wire
(39 μm) was higher than that of Cu wire (37 μm), the volume of the bonded ball was
found to be lower in the case of Au. One possible reason is the softness of Au, which
makes Au able to be more easily squeezed into a capillary during the plastic
2.3 Free Air Ball Formation 15
剩余28页未读,继续阅读
资源评论
jayrain361
- 粉丝: 1
- 资源: 7
上传资源 快速赚钱
- 我的内容管理 展开
- 我的资源 快来上传第一个资源
- 我的收益 登录查看自己的收益
- 我的积分 登录查看自己的积分
- 我的C币 登录后查看C币余额
- 我的收藏
- 我的下载
- 下载帮助
最新资源
- yolov5,SSD 可能使用到的一些代码
- 基于c51单片机+DS1302+DHT11温湿度模块+LCD1602显示的万年历硬件原理图+BOM+软件程源码序+仿真图.zip
- NSGA2的MATLAB代码
- Messagepassingtest_GCN_DGL.py
- Sh,Docker 运维好帮手,一招通过 sh 脚本批量快速启动和重启多个Docker 容器
- PCF2123.pdf
- 打开注册表操作.doc
- Windows 常见运行运行库32+64
- WMJUL8iC.html
- 基于3KW光伏并网单相逆变器设计(TMS320F28035控制板+显示板+STM32F103功率板)硬件(原理图+PCB)工程
资源上传下载、课程学习等过程中有任何疑问或建议,欢迎提出宝贵意见哦~我们会及时处理!
点击此处反馈
安全验证
文档复制为VIP权益,开通VIP直接复制
信息提交成功