没有合适的资源?快使用搜索试试~ 我知道了~
IEEE 802.11af
3星 · 超过75%的资源 需积分: 0 41 下载量 6 浏览量
2013-12-07
22:23:43
上传
评论
收藏 576KB PDF 举报
温馨提示
试读
15页
IEEE 802.11af,IEEE Communications Magazine,可以阅读
资源推荐
资源详情
资源评论
1
IEEE 802.11af: A Standard for TV White Space
Spectrum Sharing
Adriana B. Flores, Ryan E. Guerra and Edward W. Knightly
Electrical and Computer Engineering
Rice University
Houston, TX
{a.flores, war, knightly}@rice.edu
Peter Ecclesine and Santosh Pandey
Corporate Development Technology Group
Cisco Systems
San Jose, CA
{pecclesi, sanpande}@cisco.com
Abstract—Spectrum today is allocated in frequency blocks that serve
either licensed or unlicensed services. This static spectrum allocation
has limited resources to support the exponential increase in wireless
devices. In this article, we present the IEEE 802.11af standard that
defines international specifications for spectrum sharing among
unlicensed white space devices (WSDs) and licensed services in the
TV White Space (TVWS) band. Spectrum sharing is conducted
through the regulation of unlicensed WSDs by a geolocation
database (GDB), whose implementation differs among regulatory
domains. The main difference between regulatory domains is the time
scale with which WSDs are controlled by the GDB, resulting in
different TVWS availability and WSD operating parameters. The
IEEE 802.11af standard provides a common operating architecture
and mechanisms for WSDs to satisfy multiple regulatory domains.
This standard opens a new approach to treat spectrum as a single
entity shared seamlessly by heterogeneous services.
Keywords— IEEE 802.11af, TV white spaces, TV white space
band, Spectrum Sharing, Geolocation Database.
I. INTRODUCTION
White Spaces are unused spectrum resources at specific
times and locations that can be exploited through spectrum
sharing. TV white spaces (TVWS) exist in the broadcast TV
operating frequencies known as the VHF/UHF band,
specifically ranging from 470 MHz - 790 MHz in Europe [1, 2]
and non-continuous 54 MHz - 698 MHz in the United States
[3]. The existence of TVWSs enables spectrum sharing among
unlicensed white space devices (WSDs) and licensed protected
users of the TVWS band. The TVWS band is currently used by
a large variety of licensed protected services, such as
Terrestrial TV broadcast services and Program Making and
Special Event (PMSE) users. Some of the licensed services
have resided in this band for nearly 100 years [4]. Licensing
protects the incumbent users of the TVWS band from
interference within their service area. Therefore, WSDs
operating in the TVWS band are not permitted to interfere with
any protected incumbent user in their specified operating area.
Propagation characteristics of the TVWS band make it a
desirable and convenient spectrum for many wireless
transmission services [5]. First, because this band resides under
the 1 GHz frequency, material obstruction is less harmful than
at higher frequencies, allowing non-line of sight coverage [6].
The difference in signal attenuation between a variety of
materials and frequencies is shown in Table 1 [7], where
differences of up to 50 dB are found between 570 MHz and 5.7
GHz. Second, the TVWS band presents a path-loss advantage
over unlicensed ISM bands (2.4 GHz and 5.7 GHz) due only to
operating frequency. For example, TV channel 2 (54-60 MHz)
has 20 dB less path-loss than TV channel 30 (566-572 MHz),
which itself holds a 20 dB gain over the unlicensed band at 5.7
GHz.
Table 1. Received Signal Magnitude gain in dB (0.0 dB = No attenuation) [7].
The superior propagation factors of the TVWS band are
demonstrated in Fig. 1. The capacity and distance components
are compared for low transmission-power TVWS mobile
devices, 2.4 GHz devices and 5.5 GHz devices, as well as high
power TVWS-fixed devices. Wider channels in the high
frequency bands, such as the 80 MHz channels used in the 5
GHz ISM band, provide higher capacity over a short range, but
require more infrastructure to achieve wide-area coverage. In
contrast, the 6 MHz-wide, 4 Watt white space signal is more
robust and propagates longer distances with a significant
capacity. The calculations for Fig. 1 assume free-space
propagation using the Friis Transmission Equation [8] in order
to demonstrate relative performance with characteristic system
parameters.
The excellent propagation characteristics of the TVWS
band coupled with underutilization in many locations presents
desirable potential spectrum sharing opportunities. To achieve
sharing among WSDs and licensed TV broadcasters and PMSE
Materials
0.57 GHz
(dB)
1 GHz
(dB)
2 GHz
(dB)
5.7 GHz
(dB)
0.57 to
5.7GHz
(∆dB)
Brick 89 mm
-1.5 -3.5 -5.4 -15 13.5
Brick 267 mm
-4.8 -7 -10.5 -38 33.2
Composite Brick 90mm/
Concrete Wall 102mm
-12 -14 -18 -42 30
Composite Brick 90mm/
Concrete Wall 203mm
-21.5 -25 -33 -71.5 50
Masonry 203mm
-9.5 -11.5 -11 -12.75 3.25
Masonry 610mm
-26.5 -27.5 -30 -46.5 20
Glass 6mm
-0.4 -0.8 -1.4 -1.1 0.7
Glass 19mm
-2.5 -3.1 -3.9 -0.4 -2.1
Plywood (Dry) 6mm
-0.15 -0.49 -0.9 -0.1 -0.05
Plywood (Dry) 32mm
-0.85 -1.4 -2 -0.9 0.05
Reinforced Concrete
203mm/ 1% steel
-23.5 -27.5 -31 -56.5 33
Reinforced Concrete
203mm/ 2% steel
-27.5 -30 -36.5 -60 32.5
2
Figure 1. Capacity vs. Distance comparison for different wireless systems
calculated with the parameters shown in Table 2.
Parameter
TVWS‐
Fixed
TVWS WLAN‐2.4 WLAN‐5
TXPower(mW)
4000 40 40 40
Frequency(MHz)
192 518 2437 550
Bandwidth(MHz)
5.33 5.33 20 80
MinimumSNR(dB)
8 8 8 8
TXAntGain(dBi)
0 0 0 0
RXAntGain(dBi)
12‐3 0 0
Path‐LossExponent
4 4 4 4
Table 2. Calculation parameters assuming free-space propagation.
users, many challenges must be addressed by a common
standard. One of the main challenges is guaranteeing the
protection of incumbent users of the TVWS band from
interference in their operating region. WSDs are required to
operate in unoccupied spectrum, which can vary in size,
location and time. This means WSDs must support different
channel widths and be able to learn from an approved
geolocation database which channels are available and for what
time duration. Once operating in an available channel, WSDs
are required not to interfere with incumbent devices in
neighboring channels. Finally, WSDs are required to
immediately cease transmissions when the database informs
them to stop.
To address these challenges the IEEE 802.11af standard
provides an international framework that adapts to the different
WSD operating parameters and regulatory domains around the
world. In this article, we present the standard framework
defined by IEEE 802.11af, then we discuss how this framework
can be applied to the two main regulatory approaches. Because
the standard is still in the letter ballot draft process as of March
2013, we focus our discussion on high-level architecture and
applications.
II. S
TANDARD FRAMEWORK
In this section we describe the primitives and main
mechanisms of the IEEE 802.11af standard. We present the key
architecture components, the communication flow and
mechanisms utilized by the standard to satisfy different
international regulations and finally we present the physical
layer operation.
A. Components of the IEEE 802.11af Architecture
In this section we introduce the entities that form an
802.11af network and we present the non-regulatory specific
roles these elements execute.
Geolocation Database (GDB). The primary element and
what mainly differentiates the IEEE 802.11af operation to other
802.11 standards is the GDB. The GDB is a database that
stores by geographic location the permissible frequencies and
operating parameters for WSDs to fulfill regulatory
requirements. The GDBs are authorized and administrated by
regulatory authorities; therefore the GDB's operation depends
on the security and time requirements of the applied regulatory
domain [9].
Registered Location Secure Server (RLSS). The next
architectural element in an IEEE 802.11af network is the
Registered Location Secure Server (RLSS). This entity
operates as a local database that contains the geographic
location and operating parameters for a small number of basic
service sets (BSSs). The RLSS distributes the permitted
operation parameters to the APs and STAs within the BSSs
under the RLSS control [9].
Just as the operation of the GDB depends on the security
and time requirements of regulatory domains, the role the
RLSS plays in the network varies across regulatory domains
and is explained in detail in Section III.
Geolocation Database Dependent (GDD) entities. The
remainder elements in the IEEE 802.11af network are
referenced by the term Geolocation Database Dependent
(GDD), which specifies that their operation is controlled by an
authorized GDB which assures these satisfy regulation
requirements [9].
GDD enabling station. The GDD enabling station is the
equivalent of the entity commonly known as the access point
(AP). However, in the 802.11af standard this entity controls the
operation of the stations (STAs) in its serving BSS. The GDD
enabling STA can securely access the GDB to attain the
operating frequencies and parameters permitted in its coverage
region. With this information the GDD enabling STA has the
authority to enable and control the operation of the STAs under
its service, identified as GDD dependent STAs. Specifically,
the parameters obtained from the GDB are represented through
a white space map (WSM), introduced in Section II-C. The
GDD enabling STA ensures to maintain and distribute a valid
WSM. Additionally, the GDD enabling STA transmits a
contact verification signal (CVS), introduced in Section II-C,
for GDD dependent STAs to check validity of the WSM [9].
GDD dependent station. The GDD dependent station can
be identified as the STAs in the BSS architecture. However, the
802.11af standard specifies that the operation of the STAs is
controlled by the serving GDD enabling STAs. The GDD
dependent STAs obtain the permitted operating frequencies and
parameters in a form of a WSM from either the GDD enabling
3
Figure 2. Example TVWS network including all 802.11af architecture
entities [9].
STA or RLSS. The validity of the WSM is confirmed through
the CVS transmitted by the GDD enabling STA [9].
Registered location query protocol (RLQP). The
Registered Location Query Protocol (RLQP) serves as the as
the communication protocol between GDD enabling and GDD
dependent STAs to share WSM and channel utilization [9].
This protocol enables the operation of the main mechanisms;
explain in Section II-C, used in the IEEE 802.11af standard.
Through this communication the STAs can effectively select
spectrum, power and bandwidth allowed by their regulation
domain.
B. Communication Flow Between Entities
The 802.11af standard defines the communication protocol
between the GDD dependent STAs, GDD enabling STAs and
RLSS. However, the communication flow between the GDB
and the high level entities (RLSS and GDD enabling STAs) is
outside the scope of the 802.11af protocol. The standard's
mechanisms are independent of how this communication is
performed, allowing regulators to select the communication
protocol over the Internet’s infrastructure.
Figure 2 illustrates two infrastructure BSSs containing all
the components of the IEEE 802.11af architecture introduced
in Section II-A. As shown in Figure 2, the RLSS and GDD
enabling STAs obtain white space availability through the
Internet
1
. Within the 802.11af scope, the RLSS only
communicates with the GDD enabling STAs through
infrastructure and operates bi-directionally. Finally, the GDD
dependent STAs perform bi-directional, over-the-air
communication with GDD enabling STAs, either within the
TVWS band or other ISM bands.
C. 802.11af Mechanisims
In this section we present the mechanisms defined in the
802.11af standard and logical messages passed between the
architecture entities to satisfy regulatory requirements.
1
Google database of white space availability in the United States appears at
http://www.google.org/spectrum/whitespace/channel/
Channel Availability Query (CAQ). Through the CAQ
procedure, STAs obtain the available radio frequencies that
allow operation in their location, in form of a White Space Map
(WSM). In the CAQ process the RLSS grants the WSM to the
CAQ requesting STA. However in some regulatory domains
the RLSS is required to access the GDB to obtain the channel
availability information. The CAQ request may contain
multiple device locations. The CAQ responding STA must
restrict the WSM validity to either a unique device location or a
bounded area of multiple locations [9].
The GDD dependent STA performs a CAQ request to a
GDD enabling STA in three different cases. First, to remain in
the GDD enable state after enablement times out. Second, the
CAQ is required when a change in channel availability is
indicated by the GDD enabling STA through a CVS. Third, if
the GDD dependent STA has moved beyond the regulatory
permitted distance [9].
Channel Schedule Management (CSM). The GDD
enabling STAs use the Channel Schedule Management (CSM)
procedure to query a RLSS or other GDD enabling STAs to
obtain white space channel schedule information. The channel
schedule indicates a schedule change and consists of the start
and ending times for the requested channels [9].
The GDD dependent STAs do not perform CSM requests.
However, the GDD enabling STAs can transmit a CSM request
to a RLSS or other GDD enabling STA (with GDB or RLSS
access) to query the schedule information for white space
channels in either TV channels or WLAN channels.
Contact Verification Signal (CVS). The Contact
Verification Signal is sent by a GDD enabling STA to serve
two purposes. First, the transmission of the CVS establishes
which GDD dependent STAs are within the reception range of
a GDD enabling STA. Second, the CVS helps the GDD
dependent STAs ensure operation under a valid white space
map (WSM) and that it corresponds to the serving GDD
enabling STA [9].
To validate operation under a correct WSM, the GDD
dependent STAs utilize the Map ID field in the CVS frame. If
the Map ID value in the CVS frame is equal to its existing
WSM, then the GDD dependent STA assumes the operating
WSM is valid and resets its enablement validation timer [9].
However, if the Map ID is different from the existing WSM ID,
the GDD dependent STA transmits a Channel Availability
Query request to obtain the valid WSM in the CAQ response.
If the GDD dependent STA does not obtain the valid WSM, it
stops transmission after the enablement validation timer is
expired [9].
GDD Enablement. The GDD Enablement procedure
allows a GDD enabling STA to form a network, satisfying
regulation requirements under the control of a GDB [9]. A
GDD enabling beacon signal is transmitted on available
channels in the TVWS band by a GDD enabling STA to offer
GDD enablement service. A GDD dependent STA upon
receiving the GDD enabling signal can attempt enablement
with the GDD Enablement Response frame. However, some
regulatory domains require that prior to enablement the GDD
enabling STA identifies with a GDB that the requesting GDD
剩余14页未读,继续阅读
资源评论
- YVONNE_NO12019-09-11还没看,正在研究
- violent742014-07-03这个资料一般,只有比较简单的对信道特性的描述,建议下载drife5.0的规范文档
- haopf2014-06-05标题党,这个一般性介绍,内容太少
bravemanly
- 粉丝: 47
- 资源: 12
上传资源 快速赚钱
- 我的内容管理 展开
- 我的资源 快来上传第一个资源
- 我的收益 登录查看自己的收益
- 我的积分 登录查看自己的积分
- 我的C币 登录后查看C币余额
- 我的收藏
- 我的下载
- 下载帮助
安全验证
文档复制为VIP权益,开通VIP直接复制
信息提交成功