没有合适的资源?快使用搜索试试~ 我知道了~
温馨提示
Introduction to Manifolds and Lie Groups; Review of Groups and Group Actions; Manifolds; Construction of Manifolds From Gluing Data; Lie Groups, Lie Algebra, Exponential Map; The Derivative of exp and Dynkin's Formula; Bundles, Riemannian Metrics, Homogeneous Spaces; Differential Forms; Integration on Manifolds; Distributions and the Frobenius Theorem; Connections and Curvature in Vector Bundles; Geodesics on Riemannian Manifolds; Curvature in Riemannian Manifolds; etc.
资源推荐
资源详情
资源评论
Notes on Differential Geometry and Lie Groups
Jean Gallier and Jocelyn Quaintance
Department of Computer and Information Science
University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
e-mail: jean@cis.upenn.edu
c
Jean Gallier
Please, do not reproduce without permission of the authors
November 20, 2017
2
To my daughter Mia, my wife Anne,
my son Philippe, and my daughter Sylvie.
To my parents Howard and Jane.
Preface
The motivations for writing these notes arose while I was coteaching a seminar on Special
Topics in Machine Perception with Kostas Daniilidis in the Spring of 2004. In the Spring
of 2005, I gave a version of my course Advanced Geometric Methods in Computer Science
(CIS610), with the main goal of discussing statistics on diffusion tensors and shape statistics
in medical imaging. This is when I realized that it was necessary to cover some material
on Riemannian geometry but I ran out of time after presenting Lie groups and never got
around to doing it! Then, in the Fall of 2006 I went on a wonderful and very productive
sabbatical year in Nicholas Ayache’s group (ACSEPIOS) at INRIA Sophia Antipolis, where
I learned about the beautiful and exciting work of Vincent Arsigny, Olivier Clatz, Herv´e
Delingette, Pierre Fillard, Gr´egoire Malandin, Xavier Pennec, Maxime Sermesant, and, of
course, Nicholas Ayache, on statistics on manifolds and Lie groups applied to medical imag-
ing. This inspired me to write chapters on differential geometry, and after a few additions
made during Fall 2007 and Spring 2008, notably on left-invariant metrics on Lie groups, my
little set of notes from 2004 had grown into the manuscript found here.
Let me go back to the seminar on Special Topics in Machine Perception given in 2004.
The main theme of the seminar was group-theoretical methods in visual perception. In
particular, Kostas decided to present some exciting results from Christopher Geyer’s Ph.D.
thesis [79] on scene reconstruction using two parabolic catadioptric cameras (Chapters 4
and 5). Catadioptric cameras are devices which use both mirrors (catioptric elements) and
lenses (dioptric elements) to form images. Catadioptric cameras have been used in computer
vision and robotics to obtain a wide field of view, often greater than 180
◦
, unobtainable
from perspective cameras. Applications of such devices include navigation, surveillance and
vizualization, among others. Technically, certain matrices called catadioptric fundamental
matrices come up. Geyer was able to give several equivalent characterizations of these
matrices (Geyer [79], see Chapter 5, Theorem 5.2). To my surprise, the Lorentz group O(3, 1)
(of the theory of special relativity) comes up naturally! The set of fundamental matrices
turns out to form a manifold F, and the question then arises: What is the dimension of this
manifold? Knowing the answer to this question is not only theoretically important but it is
also practically very significant, because it tells us what are the “degrees of freedom” of the
problem.
Chris Geyer found an elegant and beautiful answer using some rather sophisticated con-
cepts from the theory of group actions and Lie groups (Geyer [79], Theorem 5.10): The space
3
4
F is isomorphic to the quotient
O(3, 1) × O(3, 1)/H
F
,
where H
F
is the stabilizer of any element F in F. Now, it is easy to determine the dimension
of H
F
by determining the dimension of its Lie algebra, which is 3. As dim O(3, 1) = 6, we
find that dim F = 2 ·6 − 3 = 9.
Of course, a certain amount of machinery is needed in order to understand how the above
results are obtained: group actions, manifolds, Lie groups, homogenous spaces, Lorentz
groups, etc. As most computer science students, even those specialized in computer vision
or robotics, are not familiar with these concepts, we thought that it would be useful to give
a fairly detailed exposition of these theories.
During the seminar, I also used some material from my book, Gallier [76], especially from
Chapters 11, 12 and 14. Readers might find it useful to read some of this material before-
hand or in parallel with these notes, especially Chapter 14, which gives a more elementary
introduction to Lie groups and manifolds. For the reader’s convenience, I have incorporated
a slightly updated version of Chapter 14 from [76] as Chapters 1 and 4 of this manuscript. In
fact, during the seminar, I lectured on most of Chapter 5, but only on the “gentler” versions
of Chapters 7, 9, 16, as in [76], and not at all on Chapter 28, which was written after the
course had ended.
One feature worth pointing out is that we give a complete proof of the surjectivity of
the exponential map exp: so(1, 3) → SO
0
(1, 3), for the Lorentz group SO
0
(3, 1) (see Section
6.2, Theorem 6.17). Although we searched the literature quite thoroughly, we did not find
a proof of this specific fact (the physics books we looked at, even the most reputable ones,
seem to take this fact as obvious, and there are also wrong proofs; see the Remark following
Theorem 6.4).
We are aware of two proofs of the surjectivity of exp: so(1, n) → SO
0
(1, n) in the general
case where where n is arbitrary: One due to Nishikawa [141] (1983), and an earlier one
due to Marcel Riesz [149] (1957). In both cases, the proof is quite involved (40 pages or
so). In the case of SO
0
(1, 3), a much simpler argument can be made using the fact that
ϕ: SL(2, C) → SO
0
(1, 3) is surjective and that its kernel is {I, −I} (see Proposition 6.16).
Actually, a proof of this fact is not easy to find in the literature either (and, beware there are
wrong proofs, again see the Remark following Theorem 6.4). We have made sure to provide
all the steps of the proof of the surjectivity of exp : so(1, 3) → SO
0
(1, 3). For more on this
subject, see the discussion in Section 6.2, after Corollary 6.13.
One of the “revelations” I had while on sabbatical in Nicholas’ group was that many
of the data that radiologists deal with (for instance, “diffusion tensors”) do not live in
Euclidean spaces, which are flat, but instead in more complicated curved spaces (Riemannian
manifolds). As a consequence, even a notion as simple as the average of a set of data does
not make sense in such spaces. Similarly, it is not clear how to define the covariance matrix
of a random vector.
5
Pennec [143], among others, introduced a framework based on Riemannian Geometry for
defining some basic statistical notions on curved spaces and gave some algorithmic methods
to compute these basic notions. Based on work in Vincent Arsigny’s Ph.D. thesis, Arsigny,
Fillard, Pennec and Ayache [9] introduced a new Lie group structure on the space of symmet-
ric positive definite matrices, which allowed them to transfer strandard statistical concepts to
this space (abusively called “tensors.”) One of my goals in writing these notes is to provide
a rather thorough background in differential geometry so that one will then be well prepared
to read the above papers by Arsigny, Fillard, Pennec, Ayache and others, on statistics on
manifolds.
At first, when I was writing these notes, I felt that it was important to supply most proofs.
However, when I reached manifolds and differential geometry concepts, such as connections,
geodesics and curvature, I realized that how formidable a task it was! Since there are lots of
very good book on differential geometry, not without regrets, I decided that it was best to try
to “demystify” concepts rather than fill many pages with proofs. However, when omitting
a proof, I give precise pointers to the literature. In some cases where the proofs are really
beautiful, as in the Theorem of Hopf and Rinow, Myers’ Theorem or the Cartan-Hadamard
Theorem, I could not resist to supply complete proofs!
Experienced differential geometers may be surprised and perhaps even irritated by my
selection of topics. I beg their forgiveness! Primarily, I have included topics that I felt would
be useful for my purposes, and thus, I have omitted some topics found in all respectable
differential geomety book (such as spaces of constant curvature). On the other hand, I have
occasionally included topics because I found them particularly beautiful (such as character-
istic classes), even though they do not seem to be of any use in medical imaging or computer
vision.
In the past five years, I have also come to realize that Lie groups and homogeneous man-
ifolds, especially naturally reductive ones, are two of the most important topics for their
role in applications. It is remarkable that most familiar spaces, spheres, projective spaces,
Grassmannian and Stiefel manifolds, symmetric positive definite matrices, are naturally re-
ductive manifolds. Remarkably, they all arise from some suitable action of the rotation group
SO(n), a Lie group, who emerges as the master player. The machinery of naturally reductive
manifolds, and of symmetric spaces (which are even nicer!), makes it possible to compute
explicitly in terms of matrices all the notions from differential geometry (Riemannian met-
rics, geodesics, etc.) that are needed to generalize optimization methods to Riemannian
manifolds. The interplay between Lie groups, manifolds, and analysis, yields a particularly
effective tool. I tried to explain in some detail how these theories all come together to yield
such a beautiful and useful tool.
I also hope that readers with a more modest background will not be put off by the level
of abstraction in some of the chapters, and instead will be inspired to read more about these
concepts, including fibre bundles!
I have also included chapters that present material having significant practical applica-
tions. These include
剩余1220页未读,继续阅读
资源评论
alss1923
- 粉丝: 22
- 资源: 66
上传资源 快速赚钱
- 我的内容管理 展开
- 我的资源 快来上传第一个资源
- 我的收益 登录查看自己的收益
- 我的积分 登录查看自己的积分
- 我的C币 登录后查看C币余额
- 我的收藏
- 我的下载
- 下载帮助
最新资源
- RealtopNote 平板笔记文档
- 三菱FX3U三轴标准程序,包含轴点动,回零,相对与绝对定位, 整个项目的模块都有:主控程序,复位程序,手动,生产计数,只要弄明白这个程序,就可以非常了解整个项目的程序如何去编写,从哪里开始下手,可提供
- 基于Python Turtle模块的玫瑰花图形绘制实例
- 三菱M80系统PLC,T型图,系统一切都可以修,可以改 期待你的光临
- 台达Plc程序单轴标准点动,回零,相对,绝对定位控制模版,程序结构清晰明了,是学习与初次接触台达编程的好示例
- 使用Python Matplotlib与Numpy绘制3D动态玫瑰花数据可视化
- OBc车载充电器 3Kw OBC 车载充电器 含原理图、PC B图、C源代码、变压器参数等生产资料 附赠15kwdcdc模块资料 1、这款产品的方案采用的是dsp2803x系列 2、原理图
- Python中利用Matplotlib与Numpy绘制三维多彩玫瑰花模型
- 开关磁阻电机及其控制系统,三相6 4极,好东西不多,24V,100W
- MATLAB数据预测程序 人工智能算法:包括但不限于lstm神经网络,BP神经网络,RBF以及Elman等 传统经济学:ARIMA,GM灰色预测等均有 学习研究均可,具体效果视实验数据好坏二轮
- 各种模糊控制算法案例word+程序+建模过程 Fuzzy controller 自动控制理论 控制理论与应用 基于MATLAB Simulink搭建驾驶员制动意图识别模型,基于踏板位移和踏板速度,利
- 基于STM32F407 STM32H743芯片和SOEM的E therCAT主站源码 提供配套CUBE工程和 可配套正点原子探索者开发板使用,或任何带以太网口的407 H743板子 支持DC同步
- 基于SIFT特征和视觉词包模型的图像分类性能研究与实验 - 在Scene15数据集上的验证
- 细胞类型解卷积的新方法GTM-decon及其在癌症与糖尿病研究中的应用
- arduino 红绿灯代码
- 基于物理信息神经网络的完整结构拓扑优化框架及其应用
资源上传下载、课程学习等过程中有任何疑问或建议,欢迎提出宝贵意见哦~我们会及时处理!
点击此处反馈
安全验证
文档复制为VIP权益,开通VIP直接复制
信息提交成功