没有合适的资源?快使用搜索试试~ 我知道了~
JP 摩根-美股-建材行业-美国建筑材料行业投资策略分析-321-242页.pdf
需积分: 0 0 下载量 8 浏览量
2023-07-24
17:32:28
上传
评论
收藏 15.27MB PDF 举报
温馨提示
试读
241页
JP 摩根-美股-建材行业-美国建筑材料行业投资策略分析-321-242页.pdf
资源推荐
资源详情
资源评论
www.jpmorganmarkets.com
North America Equity Research
21 March 2019
Equity Ratings and Price Targets
Mkt Cap
Rating
Price Target
Company
Ticker
($ mn)
Price
($)
Cur
Prev
Cur
End
Date
Prev
End
Date
Vulcan Materials
VMC US
15,233.12
115.35
OW
—
135.00
Dec
-
19
— —
Martin Marietta Materials
MLM US
12,324.46
195.76
OW
—
225.00
Dec
-
19
— —
Eagle Materials
EXP US
3,321.16
71.77
N
—
85.00
Dec
-
19
— —
Summit Materials
SUM US
1,964.60
17.07
N
—
19.00
Dec
-
19
— —
Source: Company data, Bloomberg, J.P. Morgan estimates. n/c = no change.All prices as of 20 Mar 19.
US Construction Materials
Initiating Coverage of VMC and MLM with OW on
larger Aggregates exposure; EXP and SUM at N
Americas Construction Materials
Adrian E Huerta
AC*
(52-81) 8152-8720
adrian.huerta@jpmorgan.com
Bloomberg JPMA HUERTA <GO>
Froylan Mendez
(52-55) 5540-9482
froylan.mendez@jpmchase.com
J.P. Morgan Casa de Bolsa, S.A. de C.V.,
J.P. Morgan Grupo Financiero
* Registered/qualified as a research analyst under NYSE/FINRA rules.
See page 237 for analyst certification and important disclosures, including non-US analyst disclosures.
J.P. Morgan does and seeks to do business with companies covered in its research reports. As a result, investors should be aw
are that
the firm may have a conflict o
f interest that could affect the objectivity of this report. Investors should consider this report as only a single
factor in making their investment decision.
We are initiating coverage of the US Construction Materials sector with OW
ratings on VMC and MLM as we like their large aggregates exposure that is more
exposed to infra spending, which is growing more than Res and Non-Res. They
are also more exposed than peers to states with stronger growth fundamentals. We
are also initiating coverage of EXP and SUM with N ratings as they have lower
growth profiles. The sector has performed well this year at +17% on average
(+4pp vs SPX and +5pp vs US MSCI Materials), excluding SUM, which is +42%
and is trading at its average historical EV/EBITDA. This report includes extensive
analysis on prices, volumes, costs and margins but also on market share evolution,
analysis on a per state basis and detailed views on the Residential, Non-Res and
Infra sectors.
Bottom-up views
We see prices and volumes accelerating this year. On aggregates volumes,
while last year our sample grew 3.1% (same as for the industry), for this year we
see it growing 4.9%, outpacing the industry’s expected growth of 2.4%. For
cement vols, last year our sample also performed weaker than the industry at
+1.4%, impacted by adverse weather especially in TX, vs +2.2% for the industry
while for this year we expect it to be 0.5pp above the industry’s +2.2%. On
prices, aggregates were +2.8% last year (below the +4% for the industry), and
we expect +4.8% for this year, and on cement we expect +2.9% this year vs
+2% last year, which was only 0.3pp below the industry.
Margins should improve this year after disappointing in the past two.
Higher energy and distribution costs have impacted margins with EBITDA
margins -1pp in 2018 and in 2017 after posting +2.7pp in 2016, and we expect
consolidated margins to be +1.2pp this year mainly driven by stronger pricing
momentum and lower increases in cash costs (JPM cement energy cost inflation
index could be flattish this year if it remains at current levels as of Feb 2019)
than last year.
We expect stronger EBITDA growth vs last year and led by VMC. EBITDA
growth for the sector has decelerated in the past two years. After increasing 18%
in 2016, it went to +8% in 2017 and only +3% last year, but we expect this year
to be +11%, which means a small margin expansion. We expect VMC and
MLM to lead the growth again.
2
North America
Equity
Research
21 March 2019
Adrian E Huerta
(52-81) 8152-8720
adrian.huerta@jpmorgan.com
FCF conversion rate expected to improve further this year. Last year the
conversion rate was 36% on average vs 29% in 2017, and we expect it to be 41%
for this year. Last year, VMC’s and MLM’s rates increased by 26pp and 18pp,
respectively, reaching 44%, while the rate was flat for EXP and -13pp for SUM.
Top-down views
Top-down views favor VMC and MLM. VMC is highly exposed to our product,
geographic and end-market preferences in the US followed by MLM among pure
US players. Meanwhile, geographic footprints for CX and Argos are the highest
with Tier 1 States while GCC follows VMC with the highest exposure to the
infra/public sector.
We like aggregates over cement and RM for the following reasons: (1) Stronger
LT growth prospects as aggregates players are more exposed to the public sector.
In the last 3 quarters, aggregates volumes were growing 2pp above the growth in
cement vols. (2) More inelastic demand with prices +4% in a 7-year CAGR vs +1%
for volumes, while for cement +4% on prices vs +4.5% on volumes. And (3) higher
margins and operating leverage, on the cost side less exposed to energy prices and
a higher percentage of fix costs driving a 50-60% operating leverage.
Infra (public) sector growth accelerating and has outperformed the rest. After
several years of declines, it was +7% in 2018, and we expect it to grow 3/3.5%
driven mainly by efforts from state and local governments to increase infra
funding. We believe that chances are high for a formal discussion on a new
infrastructure plan to be finally addressed. Our base-case scenario is not based on
the approval of a new infrastructure plan but assumes positive momentum from
project backlog.
Demand from the housing sector has likely reached a peak but likely still
growing at a low-single-digit pace for the next couple of years while the recent
slowdown has mostly been explained by higher interest rates, but there are
downside risks. Cement is more exposed to Res than agg. Non-residential sector
should keep slowing down in 2019 driven by key cement/aggregates intensive
segments, and we see no clear inflection point yet despite Jan’s m/m gains and
we believe y/y growth could remain in the +2-3% range vs +5% last year.
Strong demand in the US “Sunbelt” region with key cement & aggregates
consuming states expected to see +40% population growth by 2040 (~2% per year)
and with cement and aggregates demand still below peak levels. CX, Argos, and
MLM are exposed to the most attractive geographical regions among US-exposed
players given a large exposure to what we classify as tier 1 states (California,
Florida, and Texas).
3
North America
Equity Research
21 March 2019
Adrian E Huerta
(52-81) 8152-8720
adrian.huerta@jpmorgan.com
Table of Contents
Executive Summary ...............................................................................................................6
Bottom-up views ...............................................................................................................................................................7
Top-down views................................................................................................................................................................8
Sector Risks......................................................................................................................................................................9
Key Themes..........................................................................................................................11
Top-down views favor VLM and MLM...........................................................................................................................11
We like aggregates over cement and RM .........................................................................................................................12
Geographic exposure is important; CX, Argos, MLM and VMC more exposed to Tier 1 states.........................................13
Infra could surprise positively, and downside risks limited...............................................................................................15
Margins should improve this year after disappointing in past two years . . . ......................................................................19
. . . driving stronger EBITDA growth vs last year and led by VMC ..................................................................................22
Volumes, larger LT upside on aggregates ........................................................................................................................24
Aggregates prices grow more consistently than cement....................................................................................................27
EXP generates the highest ROIC, explained by its wallboard business, but is declining while for the rest increasing . . . ...30
Growth capex and acquisitions; VMC’s investment yields are 2-3x more than peers’ .......................................................30
Return of cash through buybacks should continue............................................................................................................32
FCF conversion rate expected to improve further this year ...............................................................................................33
Favor Aggregates over Cement and RM ............................................................................37
Aggregates more exposed to Public Construction, our favored end market .......................................................................39
Demand is highly correlated among Cement and Aggregates and both below peak levels .................................................40
Similar pricing trends for Agg and Cement but more defensive for Agg, which allows for higher margins ........................41
Aggregates could grow stronger than Cement as most players at full capacity and imports will play a role........................44
Cement imports’ profitability dependent on four items.....................................................................................................45
Energy costs: RM/Aggregates less exposed to fuel volatility than Cement but key inputs have started to decline...............49
Aggregates have high entry barriers.................................................................................................................................54
The 2020 IMO regulation could drive lower cash cement costs while pushing higher imported cement costs ....................57
What are Aggregates, cement and RM? ...........................................................................................................................61
Residential growth slowing after a long recovery... CX, EAG & SUM most exposed ....63
Housing sentiment recovering after a weak 2H18, but not yet shown in permits ...............................................................65
EXP, CX and MLM have the largest exposure to states with housing permits above the national average .........................68
Household formation has been gaining momentum ..........................................................................................................69
Housing inventory well below historical average at ~1.8mn .............................................................................................71
Strong affordability compensates higher mortgage rates...................................................................................................71
Home improvement as a share of consumers’ wallet has been recovering.........................................................................76
Infra starting to recover despite lack of plan… Vulcan, GCC & MLM most exposed.....79
Strong momentum led by aggregates & cement intensive segments within public construction spending...........................80
Vulcan, MLM and GCC with the largest exposure to infrastructure..................................................................................81
Public spending with large room to grow . . . ...................................................................................................................81
. . . and is recovering .......................................................................................................................................................85
Recovery driven by state & local gov’t investments . . . ...................................................................................................88
. . . by solving their infrastructure deficit on their own......................................................................................................90
Federal government programs .........................................................................................................................................93
4
North America
Equity
Research
21 March 2019
Adrian E Huerta
(52-81) 8152-8720
adrian.huerta@jpmorgan.com
Non-residential to keep slowing down in 2019… SUM & MLM the most exposed ........98
All states are different .......................................................................................................105
Demand in most states below peak levels, but “Sunbelt” region with most promising outlook and momentum................105
Mid-term demand outlook favors Sunbelt region............................................................................................................108
Among pure US players: Key exposure to CA and TX drives outperformance in Vulcan and MLM regions vs. the US...110
Valuation.............................................................................................................................118
Summit most shorted name............................................................................................................................................124
Cyclical stocks within a cyclical sector... but some more than others; SUM/EXP are more cyclical than VMC/MLM......125
Vulcan Materials.................................................................................................................128
Well positioned to continue growing EBITDA above peers that warrants its premium valuation; Initiate at OW ............. 128
Investment Thesis .........................................................................................................................................................128
Risks to Rating and Price Target....................................................................................................................................129
Highest exposure to aggregates among peers …............................................................................................................. 130
… while infrastructure sector is its largest end market....................................................................................................130
Key exposure to California, Texas and Georgia where it has integrated RM and Asphalt operations ...............................131
EBITDA growth above peers . . ....................................................................................................................................132
. . . driven by top line but also from margin expansion ...................................................................................................132
Unit profitability on Agg is the highest among peers......................................................................................................134
FCF generation is strong at 37% of EBITDA . . . ...........................................................................................................135
. . . and has large cash returns to shareholders ................................................................................................................136
Disciplined Leverage at only 2x.....................................................................................................................................137
Vulcan businesses .........................................................................................................................................................137
Martin Marietta ...................................................................................................................143
Best geographic mix with room to surprise on market share recovering and pricing; Initiate at OW ................................143
Investment Thesis .........................................................................................................................................................143
Risks to Rating and Price Target....................................................................................................................................144
EBITDA growth at +11% this year . . . ..........................................................................................................................145
. . . driven by higher margins . . .....................................................................................................................................145
. . . and with cement vols +2% and aggregates +6% .......................................................................................................146
Aggregates per ton gross profit +72% (2017 vs 2014) but down last year .......................................................................146
Strong FCF generation reaching 44% of EBITDA in 2018 .............................................................................................149
Large cash returns to shareholders ................................................................................................................................. 149
With room to continue doing M&A ...............................................................................................................................150
A leading aggregates-led company in the US . . . ...........................................................................................................152
. . . looking to grow further in cement . . ........................................................................................................................153
Top 5 markets make 70% of sales with 38% coming from TX........................................................................................153
MLM businesses ...........................................................................................................................................................154
Eagle Materials...................................................................................................................162
Low leverage, ample cash returned to shareholders but limited growth potential; Initiate at N.........................................162
Investment Thesis .........................................................................................................................................................162
Risks to Rating and Price Target....................................................................................................................................163
EXP’s capital structure a strategic positive.....................................................................................................................164
Lean management focused on ROE ...............................................................................................................................165
EBITDA growth has been relatively flat in past two years excluding acquisitions. . . ......................................................166
5
North America
Equity Research
21 March 2019
Adrian E Huerta
(52-81) 8152-8720
adrian.huerta@jpmorgan.com
Cement accounts for 45% of EBITDA . . . .....................................................................................................................167
. . . & wallboard for 40% ...............................................................................................................................................169
Oil & Gas business with large upside but could take time...............................................................................................171
EXP businesses .............................................................................................................................................................172
Summit Materials ...............................................................................................................181
Building an empire has its costs; Initiate at N on high leverage.......................................................................................181
Investment Thesis .........................................................................................................................................................181
Risks to Rating and Price Target.................................................................................................................................... 182
Growth has come from large M&A investments.............................................................................................................183
But should not do acquisitions yet given high leverage. . ...............................................................................................183
. . . and a low value share price ......................................................................................................................................184
Aggregates is 36% of gross profits….............................................................................................................................184
… with large exposure to Texas, Utah, Kansas and Missouri.........................................................................................185
FCF should improve on lower capex and EBITDA growth.............................................................................................189
2018 was weak with EBITDA -7% despite acquisitions. . ..............................................................................................190
. . . but guiding for 6-16% EBITDA growth this year .....................................................................................................191
Summit businesses ........................................................................................................................................................192
Appendix – State details....................................................................................................199
Vulcan Materials.................................................................................................................225
Martin Marietta Materials ...................................................................................................228
Eagle Materials...................................................................................................................231
Summit Materials ...............................................................................................................234
We acknowledge the key contribution to this report from Emilio Bailon of Banco J.P
Morgan S.A.
剩余240页未读,继续阅读
资源评论
2301_76429513
- 粉丝: 9
- 资源: 6730
上传资源 快速赚钱
- 我的内容管理 展开
- 我的资源 快来上传第一个资源
- 我的收益 登录查看自己的收益
- 我的积分 登录查看自己的积分
- 我的C币 登录后查看C币余额
- 我的收藏
- 我的下载
- 下载帮助
最新资源
- C程序语言设计 课程设计-万年历程序
- 基于Vue和CSS的泛康云诊所前端设计源码
- stc15xx-STC8-sch-pcb-library-ver1.0 STC单片机的原理图和PCB库文件资料
- 基于Scala的微服务架构后台服务设计源码 - biBACK
- 基于Java的日志推送appender设计源码 - logback-push-appender
- MedievalV1PathTracingBack00000-1920x1080-7e4d63a5fecdc81444c4cacd46d528da.avif
- 基于Vue的医疗消毒检测管理系统设计源码
- 老公-2405282109.awb
- 老公-2405282044.awb
- 8bccc0032ca49b59886db7a4af668bf8.zip
资源上传下载、课程学习等过程中有任何疑问或建议,欢迎提出宝贵意见哦~我们会及时处理!
点击此处反馈
安全验证
文档复制为VIP权益,开通VIP直接复制
信息提交成功