没有合适的资源?快使用搜索试试~ 我知道了~
数字心理健康的全球治理框架(英).pdf
1.该资源内容由用户上传,如若侵权请联系客服进行举报
2.虚拟产品一经售出概不退款(资源遇到问题,请及时私信上传者)
2.虚拟产品一经售出概不退款(资源遇到问题,请及时私信上传者)
版权申诉
0 下载量 66 浏览量
2022-11-22
16:56:23
上传
评论
收藏 5.34MB PDF 举报
温馨提示
试读
27页
数字心理健康的全球治理框架(英).pdf
资源推荐
资源详情
资源评论
Governance Frameworks
in Digital Mental Health
WHITE PAPER
NOVEMBER 2022
In collaboration with
Deloitte
Contents
Foreword
Executive summary
Introduction
1 Governance frameworks in digital mental health
2 Implementer insights
One Mind PsyberGuide, USA
Mental Health Commission of Canada
Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care
New Zealand Ministry of Health
3 UpLink innovators in youth mental health
Conclusion
Contributors
Endnotes
3
4
5
7
10
11
12
14
16
18
22
23
24
Cover: Deloitte BrandSpace image
Inside: Gettyimages/Klaus Vedfelt; Gettyimages/Alvarez; Gettyimages/Halfpoint Images
Disclaimer
This document is published by the World
Economic Forum as a contribution to a
project, insight area or interaction. The
findings, interpretations and conclusions
expressed herein are a result of a
collaborative process facilitated and
endorsed by the World Economic Forum
but whose results do not necessarily
represent the views of the World Economic
Forum, nor the entirety of its Members,
Partners or other stakeholders.
© 2022 World Economic Forum. All rights
reserved. No part of this publication may
be reproduced or transmitted in any form
or by any means, including photocopying
and recording, or by any information
storage and retrieval system.
Governance Frameworks in Digital Mental Health 2
Foreword
In 2018, the World Economic Forum’s Global Future
Council on Neurotechnologies set out to understand
the potential uses and ethical implications of digital
tools for the treatment of mental ill health. This work
1
surfaced two insights:
– Technology holds the potential to fundamentally
change the way mental well-being is addressed.
– A paucity of frameworks and roadmaps grapple
with their ethical deployment.
Subsequently, the World Economic Forum has
collaborated with Deloitte to identify the gaps in
governance surrounding mental health digital tools.
It was felt that without appropriate regulation,
the potential benefit of these technologies would
not be realized because consumers, funders and
providers lack confidence in their ability to select
safe, high-quality tools.
As the COVID-19 pandemic spread, the need for
governance in this space became more urgent
– rates of depression and anxiety were spiking
around the world, lockdowns were preventing
in-person meetings with providers, and innovative,
digital-first solutions looked more essential than
ever. After analysing nearly 200 examples of novel
technology use in mental health with at least 10,000
users/downloads and interviewing thought leaders
around the world, the Forum published the “Global
Governance Toolkit for Digital Mental Health” in
collaboration with Deloitte in April 2021. The toolkit,
piloted with the New Zealand Ministry of Health,
was designed to equip governments, regulators
and independent assurance bodies with a roadmap
of what “good” looks like in digital mental health
and to “improve the accessibility, quality and
safety of services that support all members of
society to meet their desired emotional, social and
psychological potential”.
Four years after this journey began, the world looks
profoundly different: COVID-19, greater attention
from regulators and an ever-evolving innovation
landscape have altered what we know and what
should be done. Recognizing this, we have returned
to the work to assess these changes and shed
light on the current state of digital mental health
regulation via interviews with those who piloted the
toolkit, those crafting their own policies and mental
health innovators.
Governance Frameworks in Digital Mental Health
November 2022
Stephanie Allen
Leader, Global and Australia
Healthcare Sector, Deloitte,
Australia
Shyam Bishen
Head, Platform for
Shaping the Future of
Health and Healthcare,
World Economic Forum
Governance Frameworks in Digital Mental Health 3
Executive summary
Globally, mental health concerns are both common
and undertreated. Accessing mental health services
is not a simple demand and supply curve. For
individuals who live in areas with mental health
clinicians, barriers to accessing mental health
care remain. These barriers include, but are not
limited to, stigma, cost or access to reimbursement
models, privacy concerns, a preference for dealing
with problems independently and time constraints.
Digital mental health services, such as those
delivered by mobile phone or web-based platforms,
have the promise of delivering more affordable care,
expanding the reach and accessibility of services
and designing new treatment models that meet the
needs of the current and future generations. But
digital mental health is not straightforward, and new
technology is substantially disrupting approaches
to how mental health conditions are identified,
diagnosed, treated and supported.
Telemedicine is offering care whenever and wherever
it is needed through phone, video, email, chatbots
and even gaming. Cognitive artificial intelligence
(AI) is creating supportive digital interaction. Big
data is unearthing a new understanding of the
biopsychosocial factors. And brain–machine
interfaces, which directly connect human
consciousness with computers, are all promising to
push the boundaries of what is possible.
A dramatic increase in the creation of digital
mental health services has occurred in the past 10
years. At the same time, governments, clinicians,
large corporations and consumers have been
expressing concerns about the safety, quality,
efficacy, privacy and application of AI in these
services and the extent to which they are safe.
In 2018, the World Economic Forum’s Global
Future Council on Neurotechnologies set out
to understand the potential uses and ethical
implications of digital tools for the treatment of
mental ill health and collaborated with Deloitte
to design a Global Governance Toolkit for Digital
Mental Health.
The COVID-19 pandemic created a mental health
crisis of unprecedented scale, triggered by social
isolation, widespread unemployment, worries
over contracting the virus, insomnia, social media
exposure and the rising death toll. This accelerated
the move towards the adoption and implementation
of digital tools for mental healthcare. It also created
a renewed urgency to develop and implement
governance and regulatory frameworks to deliver
clinical efficacy, access, privacy and data protection,
as well as fairness, transparency and accountability.
The toolkit, published in 2021, was designed
to outline a way forward and provide
recommendations for policy-makers, funders,
developers, service providers and users. It became
a fundamental resource that countries could lean on
to start building their digital mental health roadmap.
The work on the state of digital mental health
regulation continues today, via interviews with
those who piloted the toolkit, those crafting their
own policies and mental health innovators. This
White Paper sheds light on the current regulation
and highlights four case studies of entities that
are leading the way in regulating the tools. Their
emerging standards provide much-needed
guidance for service developers and providers to
incorporate privacy policies, data transparency and
health information security in digital mental health
frameworks and applications.
This is only the beginning of the digital mental
health journey. The regulatory structures of the
future must be as dynamic and flexible as the
advances they govern.
Governance Frameworks in Digital Mental Health 4
Introduction
11
The life expectancy of individuals living with
mental ill health across the globe is significantly
reduced compared to those living without a
mental ill health condition.
For the estimated 1billion people living with mental
ill health, such as depression, anxiety, personality
disorders, schizophrenia and substance abuse, life
expectancy is 10 to 30 years
2
lower than that of
individuals with typical neurological development
and functioning.
3
This statistic is further
exacerbated by suicide, which the World Health
Organization (WHO) has estimated as taking one life
every 40 seconds.
4
Half of mental illnesses begin by
the age of 14 and 75% by the mid-20s, drastically
impacting early stages of social and emotional
development, health, education and employment.
5
Tragically, these numbers are drawn from pre-
COVID-19 data, which may have pushed the
prevalence of the two most common conditions –
depression and anxiety – up by 25% globally.
6
This
toll is not only personal, but economic: the direct
and indirect costs of mental ill health are estimated
at 4-6% of global GDP (gross domestic product),
more than the combined burden of cancer, diabetes
and respiratory disease. The Lancet Commission
on mental health has estimated that by 2030, the
worldwide cost of mental illness will reach more than
$16 trillion annually as a result of lost or low output.
7
Mental ill health is undoubtedly a global challenge
of our time. Current models of care, care pathways
and supporting systems are inadequate to address
the growing burden. The way mental ill health is
addressed must be radically rethought to ensure
every person in need can access support that
is safe, high quality, affordable and appropriate
to their circumstances. In every society, without
exception, the gaps in access to affordable quality
treatment and care are significant. This ranges from
approximately 10 to 48 mental health professionals
for every 100,000 citizens in high-income countries
to 0.26 to 2 for every 100, 000 citizens in low-income
countries.
8
Despite the disparity, everywhere in the
world today, there simply is insufficient mental health
support available to those in need.
While COVID has undoubtedly had a detrimental
effect on global health and well-being, there have
been some silver linings. These include a global
increase in attention to the importance of mental
health along with an explosion of innovative
solutions backed by an unprecedented level of
funding. Governments took emergency measures
to loosen regulation on the delivery of telemedicine
and e-health, maintaining and increasing access
to mental health support. In addition, governments
and large employers now offer new services
designed to build resilience and protect the well-
being of citizens. Yet these heralded changes
also raise concerns. As the number of digital
tools rapidly increases in an environment without
sound regulation, it has become more difficult for
consumers to know what “good” looks like. In the
current paradigm, low-quality digital tools may
advertise false claims without evidence of clinical
efficacy, or cut corners when it comes to data
protection and privacy. Not only does this create
an unsafe experience for the user, it also damages
the entire ecosystem by undermining trust in
credible solutions.
Governance Frameworks in Digital Mental Health 5
剩余26页未读,继续阅读
资源评论
xiaomaodiaoyu520
- 粉丝: 49
- 资源: 6万+
上传资源 快速赚钱
- 我的内容管理 展开
- 我的资源 快来上传第一个资源
- 我的收益 登录查看自己的收益
- 我的积分 登录查看自己的积分
- 我的C币 登录后查看C币余额
- 我的收藏
- 我的下载
- 下载帮助
最新资源
- 基于Typescript和PHP的编程知识储备库设计源码 - study-php
- Screenshot_2024-05-28-11-40-58-177_com.tencent.mm.jpg
- 基于Dart的Flutter小提琴调音器APP设计源码 - violinhelper
- 基于JavaScript和CSS的随寻订购网页设计源码 - web-order
- 基于MATLAB的声纹识别系统设计源码 - VoiceprintRecognition
- 基于Java的微服务插件集合设计源码 - wsy-plugins
- 基于Vue和微信小程序的监理日志系统设计源码 - supervisionLog
- 基于Java和LCN分布式事务框架的设计源码 - tx-lcn
- 基于Java和JavaScript的茶叶评级管理系统设计源码 - tea
- IMG_5680.JPG
资源上传下载、课程学习等过程中有任何疑问或建议,欢迎提出宝贵意见哦~我们会及时处理!
点击此处反馈
安全验证
文档复制为VIP权益,开通VIP直接复制
信息提交成功