没有合适的资源?快使用搜索试试~ 我知道了~
Detecting potential hucksterism in meta-analysis using a follow-...
需积分: 10 1 下载量 24 浏览量
2021-06-29
19:40:28
上传
评论
收藏 395KB PDF 举报
温馨提示
Detecting potential hucksterism in meta-analysis using a follow-up fail-safe test fSyrhO/Ogy in the Schools Volume 29. April 1992 DETECTING POTENTIAL HUCKSTERISM IN META-ANALY SIS USING A FOLLOW-UP FAIL-SAFE TEST JONATHAN R. BROWN State University of New York Meta-analysis is an analysis of analyses. It is a technique widely used by researchers and practitioners to aggregate and summarize statistically reported empirical educa- tional research. In 10 years, meta-analysis appeared mo
资源推荐
资源详情
资源评论
fSyrhO/Ogy
in
the
Schools
Volume
29.
April
1992
DETECTING POTENTIAL HUCKSTERISM
IN
META-ANALY SIS
USING
A FOLLOW-UP FAIL-SAFE TEST
JONATHAN
R.
BROWN
State University
of
New York
Meta-analysis is an analysis
of
analyses. It is a technique widely used by researchers
and practitioners to aggregate and summarize statistically reported empirical educa-
tional research. In
10
years, meta-analysis appeared more than
600
times in research
journals and dissertation abstracts. Although most meta-analyses were reported as
significant, few
of
the findings determined how many unpublished ”no-effect” studies,
if
sampled, would have invalidated significance.
If
significant meta-analysis results
are overrepresented through selective sampling, hucksterism in the form
of
sampling
bias exists. An explanation for using a follow-up test called the fail-safe Nis provided
with tables constructed to assist researchers and practitioners to estimate, without
calculation, the relative stability
of
meta-analysis results. The implication is that fail-
safe
N
should routinely be used and reported in meta-analysis research.
Whenever an educational controversy arises, reported research is sought to sup-
port a particular position. Educators often initiate a futile search for the “perfect” study.
They may also tend to cite only research that supports their personal biases. The old
research and the new, however, often remain isolated and variegated in a data base filled
with conflicting findings (Kavale, 1984). Meta-analysis is a process designed to help pro-
fessionals resolve conflicting research findings. The fail-safe
N
is a follow-up procedure
to assess meta-analysis results to detect possible misrepresentation,
or
hucksterism (selling
or
advertising in an aggressive and questionable way). The purpose of this article is to
describe briefly a way to use the fail-safe
N.
Meta-analysis is a widely used methodological technique to aggregate and summarize
statistically a number of empirical educational research studies analyzed to test a specified
research hypothesis. From 1981 to 1991, meta-analysis appeared more than
600
times
in abstracts of articles cited in Educational, Psychological, and Dissertation Abstracts.
Meta-analysis is important because it helps advance theory and knowledge. This ad-
vancement comes as the result of summarizations, theoretical linking
or
modeling across
a wide variety
of
samples, and suggesting that certain relationships are understood and
additional investigation is warranted. It is a technique that may be used with minimum
technical knowledge about complex statistics to draw meaningful relationships for every-
day applications (Brown
&
Brown, 1987).
The fail-safe Nstatistic is a follow-up test used with meta-analysis results to estimate
the number of new, unpublished,
or
unretrieved nonsignificant (null-result) studies that
would, on the average, change the significance of a meta-analysis study to nonsignificance.
Nonsignificance would result in concluding that the sampled studies were not congruent
with some specified research hypothesis analyzed by meta-analysis (Carson, Schriesheim,
&
Kinicki, 1990). The fail-safe
N
is based on initial work by Rosenthal (1979). Rosen-
thal’s work was later modified by Orwin (1983).
A significant meta-analysis study, Rosenthal(l979) reasoned, could be made non-
significant by adding some number of hypothetical studies that averaged null results.
Correspondence and requests for reprints should be addressed to Jonathan
R.
Brown, State University
of
New
York,
Fredonia,
NY
14063.
179
资源评论
weixin_38731385
- 粉丝: 2
- 资源: 871
上传资源 快速赚钱
- 我的内容管理 展开
- 我的资源 快来上传第一个资源
- 我的收益 登录查看自己的收益
- 我的积分 登录查看自己的积分
- 我的C币 登录后查看C币余额
- 我的收藏
- 我的下载
- 下载帮助
最新资源
- 基于Node.js和WebSocket的音频数据流分析音乐节奏展示设计源码
- 基于Surface框架的CURD和后台页面快速搭建设计源码
- 基于Snowflake算法的分布式唯一ID生成器UidGenerator在SpringBoot中的整合与应用设计源码
- 四轴直交机械手工程图机械结构设计图纸和其它技术资料和技术方案非常好100%好用.zip
- 基于Java语言的RabbitMQ精品课程设计源码
- 四合一测试设备(含bom)sw17可编辑工程图机械结构设计图纸和其它技术资料和技术方案非常好100%好用.zip
- 基于SSM框架和JavaScript的教材管理系统设计源码
- 基于JqueryMobile框架的kLink通讯录应用设计源码
- 基于2024暑假鸿蒙应用师资班培训的TeachObject20240715_01设计源码
- 卧式气动膏体灌装机工程图机械结构设计图纸和其它技术资料和技术方案非常好100%好用.zip
- 基于Vue的JavaScript光雨电子书后台源码
- 基于山东大学经验的转专业学生攻略设计源码
- 基于51单片机的蓝牙循迹小车设计源码
- Teaching Small Language Models to Reason 小模型如何在大模型中生效
- 基于Html和Ruby语言的test项目设计源码
- 线材激光焊接裁断机工程图机械结构设计图纸和其它技术资料和技术方案非常好100%好用.zip
资源上传下载、课程学习等过程中有任何疑问或建议,欢迎提出宝贵意见哦~我们会及时处理!
点击此处反馈
安全验证
文档复制为VIP权益,开通VIP直接复制
信息提交成功