没有合适的资源?快使用搜索试试~ 我知道了~
温馨提示
我们讨论了N = 1、2 $$ \ mathcal {N} = 1,2 $$超对称Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev(SUSY SYK)模型的双局部集体理论。 我们构造了一个双局部超空间,并建立了一维SUSY向量模型的双局部集体超场理论。 双局部集体理论为SUSY SYK模型提供了系统的分析。 我们发现,这种双局部集体理论自然会导致在双局部超空间中形成超矩阵。 这种超级矩阵公式极大地简化了SUSY SYK模型的分析。 我们还研究了超矩阵公式中的N = 1 $$ \ mathcal {N} = 1 $$双局部超保形生成器,并找到了超保形Casimir的特征向量。 我们将大氮膨胀下的二次函数对角化。
资源推荐
资源详情
资源评论
JHEP10(2017)172
Published for SISSA by Springer
Received: September 12, 2017
Accepted: October 18, 2017
Published: October 25, 2017
Supersymmetric SYK model: bi-local collective
superfield/supermatrix formulation
Junggi Yoon
International Centre for Theoretical Sciences (ICTS-TIFR),
Shivakote, Hesaraghatta Hobli, Bengaluru 560089, India
E-mail: junggi.yoon@icts.res.in
Abstract: We discuss the bi-local collective theory for the N = 1, 2 supersymmetric
Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev (SUSY SYK) models. We construct a bi-local superspace, and formu-
late the bi-local collective superfield theory of the one-dimensional SUSY vector model.
The bi-local collective theory provides systematic analysis of the SUSY SYK models. We
find that this bi-local collective theory naturally leads to supermatrix formulation in the
bi-local superspace. This supermatrix formulation drastically simplifies the analysis of
the SUSY SYK models. We also study N = 1 bi-local superconformal generators in the
supermatrix formulation, and find the eigenvectors of teh superconformal Casimir. We
diagonalize the quadratic action in large N expansion.
Keywords: 1/N Expansion, Field Theories in Lower Dimensions, Superspaces, Conformal
Field Theory
ArXiv ePrint: 1706.05914
Open Access,
c
The Authors.
Article funded by SCOAP
3
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP10(2017)172
JHEP10(2017)172
Contents
1 Introduction 1
2 N = 1 supersymmetric SYK model 3
2.1 Bi-local superspace, superfield and supermatrix 3
2.2 Calculus of bi-local collective superfield and supermatrix 5
2.3 Bi-local collective superfield theory: Jacobian 6
2.4 Bi-local collective superfield theory for N = 1 SUSY SYK model 8
2.5 Large N classical solution 10
2.6 Large N expansion and quadratic action 12
3 N = 1 bi-local superconformal algebra 14
3.1 Bi-local N = 1 superconformal generators 14
3.2 Eigenfunctions of superconformal Casimir 16
4 Diagonalization of the quadratic action 19
4.1 Eigenfunctions of the quadratic action: bosonic components 19
4.2 Eigenfunctions of the quadratic action: fermionic components 25
5 N = 2 supersymmetric SYK model 26
5.1 Bi-local chira/anti-chiral superspace, superfield and supermatrix 26
5.2 N = 2 bi-local collective superfield theory 29
6 Conclusion 32
A
1
N
corrections in one-dimensional free SUSY vector model 32
B Casimir eigenfunctions 34
B.1 Bosonic eigenfunctions 34
B.2 Fermionic eigenfunctions 35
C Direct diagonalization 36
D N = 1 SUSY SYK model: general q 40
1 Introduction
The Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev (SYK) model was proposed in [1] and recently has been studied
vigorously not only in the context of AdS/CFT [2–5] but also in the context of non-
Fermi liquids [6–8]. The SYK model is a quantum mechanical model of N fermions with
– 1 –
JHEP10(2017)172
disordered interaction. In large N diagrammatics, the dominance of “melonic” diagram
make the model solvable at strong coupling limit [2–5, 9–12]. Also, this model features
emergent reparametrization symmetry in the strict strong coupling limit after disorder
average [3, 4, 9–12]. This reparametrization symmetry is broken spontaneously and ex-
plicitly at strong but finite coupling limit, which leads to Schwarzian effective action for
Pseudo-Nambu-Goldstone modes [3, 4, 9–12]. Due to this mode, the SYK model is maxi-
mally chaotic, and the Lyapunov exponent of out-of-time-ordered correlator saturates chaos
bound [4, 11]. The same feature has been found in unitary quantum mechanical model
of fermi tensors without disorder [13–21]. In tensor models, the “melonic” diagrams also
dominate in large N, which leads to maximal chaos like the SYK model [13–15, 19]. This
maximal chaos [22–24] indicates that both quantum mechanical models could be dual to
gravity theory near horizon limit of extremal black hole, and the dual models have been
proposed to be dilaton gravity [25, 26], Liouville theories [27] and 3D gravity [28]. Be-
cause of these attractive features, the generalizations of the SYK and the tensor models
have been studied in various context (e.g., random matrix behavior [29–34], flavor [35, 36],
lattice generalization in higher dimensions [37–45], Schwarzian effective action [46–49] and
supersymmetry [50, 51], massive field instead of random coupling [52, 53], higher point
function [54] and 1/N corrections [55, 56].)
Most generalizations of the SYK model share the same feature: bi-local in time space.
This bi-local structure is naturally appears in SYK model because the SYK model is es-
sentially a large N vector model. One of the systematic analysis of such large N models
was introduced as collective field theory in [57], which captures invariant physical degrees
of freedom and provides the effective action thereof. The collective field theory has suc-
cessfully analyzed the large N models in the context of AdS/CFT [58–67]. Especially, a
bi-local collective field theory for three-dimensional U(N)/O(N) vector model gave rich
understanding of higher spin AdS
4
/CFT
3
correspondence [68–78]. However, in collective
field theory, the bi-local structure is not restricted to space-time. In general, one can con-
struct bi-local space of other abstract space in addition to spacetime. For example, in the
bi-local thermofield CFT [77], the bi-local field is given by Ψ(x
1
, a; x
2
, b) where x
1
and x
2
corresponds to spacetime as usual. a, b(= 1, 2) represents labels of two copies of system
in thermofield CFT, which corresponds to CFT lives on the left and right boundary of
eternal black hole. Furthermore, we have also constructed bi-local field Ψ(τ
1
, a; τ
2
, b) from
the time (τ
1
, τ
2
) and replica space (a, b = 1, 2, ··· , n) in the SYK model [10].
In this paper, we will develop the bi-local collective superfield theory
1
for one-
dimensional vector model by constructing bi-local superspace, especially will focus on su-
persymmetric SYK model introduced by [50]. This bi-local collective superfield theory
enable us to analyze the effective action of SUSY SYK model in large N systematically.
Furthermore, in the bi-local collective theory, the matrix structure in the bi-local space
naturally appears so that the bi-local collective theory can be seen as a matrix theory in
the bi-local space. Hence, one can analyze the SUSY SYK model in the supermatrix for-
mulation. This supermatrix formulation drastically simplifies analysis. We find that N = 1
1
Note that the collective theory for large N supermatrix model was already studied in [79–81].
– 2 –
JHEP10(2017)172
superconformal generators becomes simple matrices in the supermatrix formulation. We
also study the large N classical solution and the large N expansion of the collective action
of the N = 1 SUSY SYK model. In particular, the quadratic action in large N expansion
can be easily diagonalized in the supermatrix formulations. Furthermore, the interaction
term in the SUSY SYK model can be understood as the inner product in the supermatrix
formulation. Furthermore, this also help diagonalize the rest of the quadratic action. We
also emphasize that our formulation is not restricted to the SUSY SYK model. We develop
a general framework to analyze large N SUSY vector models as supermatrix theory in the
bi-local superspace. Hence, this can be applied the generalization of the SUSY SYK models
as well as other SUSY vector models.
The outline of the paper is as follows. In section 2, we develop the bi-local collective
superfield theory for one-dimensional N = 1 SUSY vector models, and we systematically
study the collective superfield theory for N = 1 SUSY SYK model. N = 1 bi-local
superconformal generators and eigenfunctions of superconformal Casimir is analyzed in
section 3. In section 4, using these eigenfunctions, we diagonalize the quadratic action of
the collective action for N = 1 SUSY SYK model in large N. In section 5, we also develop
the bi-local collective superfield thoery for N = 2 SUSY vector models and discuss its
application to SYK model. In section 6, we give our conclusion and future work.
Note added: while this draft was under preparation, a related article [82, 83] appeared
in arXiv.
2 N = 1 supersymmetric SYK model
2.1 Bi-local superspace, superfield and supermatrix
Let us start with doubling the superspace (τ, θ) to construct bi-local superspace:
(τ, θ) −→ (τ
1
, θ
1
; τ
2
, θ
2
) (2.1)
In this super bi-local space, superfields A can be expanded as
A(τ
1
, θ
1
; τ
2
, θ
2
) ≡ A
0
(τ
1
, τ
2
) + θ
1
A
1
(τ
1
, τ
2
) − A
2
(τ
1
, τ
2
)θ
2
− θ
1
A
3
(τ
1
, τ
2
)θ
2
(2.2)
where the lowest component A
0
could be either Grassmannian even or odd. This choice
of the signs and the ordering of Grassmann variables will lead to a natural definition of
a supermatrix and its multiplication. Furthermore, it is useful to call the superfield A to
be Grassmannian odd (or, even) if the component A
1
and A
2
are Grassmannian odd (or,
even, respectively). i.e.,
A
∓
(τ
1
, θ
1
; τ
2
, θ
2
) = A
±
0
(τ
1
, τ
2
) + θ
1
A
∓
1
(τ
1
, τ
2
) − A
∓
2
(τ
1
, τ
2
)θ
2
− θ
1
A
±
3
(τ
1
, τ
2
)θ
2
(2.3)
Note that the lowest component of Grassmannian odd superfield is a Grassmannian even
and vice versa. We will see later that this unusual definition is related to the fact that
the star product (matrix multiplication) in the bi-local superspace is a Grassmannian
odd operation.
– 3 –
JHEP10(2017)172
Now, we define a star product (matrix multiplication) ~ in the bi-local superspace of
two superfields A and B by
(A~B)(τ
1
, θ
1
; τ
2
, θ
2
) ≡
Z
A(τ
1
, θ
1
; τ
3
, θ
3
)dτ
3
dθ
3
B(τ
3
, θ
3
; τ
2
, θ
2
) (2.4)
where the star product ? of the components fields is the usual matrix multiplication of
the bi-local space (τ
1
, τ
2
). i.e., (A
i
? B
j
)(τ
1
, τ
2
) ≡
R
dτ
3
A
i
(τ
1
, τ
3
)B
j
(τ
3
, τ
2
). Note that we
place the (Grassmannian odd) measure between the two superfields to obtain a consistent
star product ~ for all superfields. For example, the star product of two Grassmannian odd
superfields is
(A
−
~B
−
)(τ
1
, θ
1
; τ
2
, θ
2
) ≡
Z
A
−
(τ
1
, θ
1
; τ
3
, θ
3
)dτ
3
dθ
3
B
−
(τ
3
, θ
3
; τ
2
, θ
2
)
= (A
+
0
? B
−
1
+ A
−
2
? B
+
0
) + θ
1
(A
−
1
? B
−
1
+ A
+
3
? B
+
0
) (2.5)
− (A
+
0
? B
+
3
+ A
−
2
? B
−
2
)θ
2
− θ
1
(A
−
1
? B
+
3
+ A
+
3
? B
−
2
)θ
2
This star product in bi-local superspace simplifies in the supermatrix formulation. We
represent the superfields A as a supermatrix as follow. i.e.,
A
∓
≡
A
∓
1
A
±
3
A
±
0
A
∓
2
!
(2.6)
In this definition of supermatrix, Grassmannian odd (even) superfield corresponds to Grass-
mannian odd (even) supermatrix. e.g.,
A = A
0
|{z}
Grassmannian Odd (Even)
+ θ
1
A
1
|{z}
Grassmannian Even (Odd)
+ ··· ⇐⇒
A
1
A
3
A
0
A
2
!
|
{z }
Grassmannian Even (Odd)
(2.7)
Then, the star product ~ in the bi-local superspace becomes a simple matrix product:
(A~B)(τ
1
, θ
1
; τ
2
, θ
2
) =
A
1
A
3
A
0
A
2
!
~
B
1
B
3
B
0
B
2
!
(2.8)
where the multiplication between component fields is the star product ? in the bi-local
space (τ
1
, τ
2
). One can easily see that the identity supermatrix gives the expected delta
function in the bi-local superspace. i.e.,
I(τ
1
, θ
1
; τ
2
, θ
2
) ≡
δ(τ
1
− τ
2
) 0
0 δ(τ
1
− τ
2
)
!
= (θ
1
− θ
2
)δ(τ
1
− τ
2
) (2.9)
Furthermore, the natural definition of the trace in the bi-local superspace is consistent with
the supertrace of a supermatrix. i.e.,
Z
dτ
1
dθ
1
δ(τ
12
) [A
0
(τ
1
, τ
2
) + θ
1
A
1
(τ
1
, τ
2
) − A
2
(τ
1
, τ
2
)θ
1
] = tr A
1
− (−1)
|A|
tr A
2
= str A
(2.10)
– 4 –
剩余47页未读,继续阅读
资源评论
weixin_38576811
- 粉丝: 6
- 资源: 890
上传资源 快速赚钱
- 我的内容管理 展开
- 我的资源 快来上传第一个资源
- 我的收益 登录查看自己的收益
- 我的积分 登录查看自己的积分
- 我的C币 登录后查看C币余额
- 我的收藏
- 我的下载
- 下载帮助
最新资源
资源上传下载、课程学习等过程中有任何疑问或建议,欢迎提出宝贵意见哦~我们会及时处理!
点击此处反馈
安全验证
文档复制为VIP权益,开通VIP直接复制
信息提交成功