没有合适的资源?快使用搜索试试~ 我知道了~
4.美赛2020A题原论文1
需积分: 0 0 下载量 113 浏览量
2022-08-03
18:00:27
上传
评论
收藏 2.28MB PDF 举报
温馨提示
试读
31页
Model II: Fish MigrationModel III: Fishing Company Earnings Evaluation Model.For
资源详情
资源评论
资源推荐
Problem Chosen
A
2020
MCM/ICM
Summary Sheet
Team Control Number
2001334
Forecasts for the Ecology and Fisheries Economy of Scottish
herring and mackerel
As the favorable food for Scotch, the herring and mackerel br ing generous profits to fishing
companies. Due to the hotter ocean, more fish move to the north to seek better habitats, laying a
negative impact on the fishing industry. The aim of this report is to build a migratory prediction
model to evaluate the influences on the income of fishing companies. We are expected to provide
some strategies for fishing companies who can adapt to the migration of fish under the constraints of
various objective conditions and prevent themselves from going bankrupt as much as possible. Three
models are established: Model I: Seawater Temperature Prediction Model; Model II: Fish Migration
Prediction Model; Model III: Fishing Company Earnings Evaluation Model.
For Model I, global ocean temperature date monthly from 1960 to 2019 is firstly collected. Then,
based on the analysis of intrinsic trend of the data and the verification of the stationarity, the validation
of using ARIMA model to predict temperature is proved. Next, historical data is used to fit the
parameters of ARIMA, with introduction of k-fold cross validation to identify the final prediction
model as ARIMA(1,1,0). Finally, according to ARIMA(1,1,0), bootstrap method is used to simulate
10000 possible prediction cases, which lays a great foundation to predict the migration of fish.
For Model II, firstly, according to the data of the migration speed and the ocean temperature, it is
determined that the temperature gradient is the main factor affecting the migration speed and direction.
And the corresponding empirical equation is established to determine the impact of temperature on
fish migration. Then based on the 10000 temperature change samples generated by bootstrap method
in Model I, migration situation of each sample is simulated to identify the most likely locations of the
fish. It was finally shown that the fish are mainly distributed in the area between Iceland and the Faroe
Islands 50 years later and the results are shown in figure 9.
For Model III, the profit evaluation equation of fishing companies is deter mined by the economic
principle, and the parameters involved are estimated by introducing the actual management data, the
results are shown in table 4; then based on the 10000 samples of fish migration from Model II, the
profit change of fishing companies is simulated for each sample and the profit trend over time is shown
in figure 10. Finally, it can be seen that the worst case is in 2030, fishing companies will go bankrupt
due to fish migration with a probability of 0.02%, the best case is that they will not go bankr upt in 50
years with a probability of 5.27% and the most likely case is that in 2039, fishing companies will go
bankrupt due to fish migration with a probability of 8.25%.
In addition, this report discusses the effective response to the fish migration for small fishing
companies, together with effective response strategies. Without considering the policies and legal
issues brought by the territorial sea, small fishing companies should transfer their ports to Iceland,
which is closer to the fish. Finally, based on simulation of this strategys effect, 100.00% of companies
can avoid bankruptcy. As for considering the policies and legal issues, small fishing companies should
upgrade their fishing vessels to extend the shelf life of fish. After simulation, 62.68% of companies
can avoid bankruptcy.
Eventually, robustness and sensitivity analysis of the model are tested. When the initial distribu-
tion of the fish is randomly generated from the uniform random distribution, the final convergence
distribution of the model has little difference. As for the factors that affect the model, social profit rate
and fishing boat navigation radius, it is found that the increase of these two factors will significantly
reduce the bankruptcy probability of fishing companies.
Keywords: ARIMA; Fish Migration; Earnings Evaluation; Computer Simulation
Team # 2001334 Page 1 of 27Team # 2001334 Page 1 of 27Team # 2001334 Page 1 of 27
Contents
1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
1.1 Problem Background . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
1.2 Restatement of the Problem . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
1.3 Our Approach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
2 General Assumptions and Model Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
3 Model Preparation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
3.1 Notations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
3.2 The Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
3.2.1 Data Collection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
3.2.2 Data Cleaning . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
3.3 Geographic Coordinate System . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
4 Model I: Seawater Temperature Prediction Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
4.1 Description of Temperature Field . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
4.2 Autoregressive Prediction Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
4.3 Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
4.3.1 Parameter Estimation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
4.3.2 Calaculation Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
5 Model II: Fish Migration Prediction Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
5.1 Kinematics of Migration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
5.2 Kinetics of Migration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
5.3 Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
5.3.1 Estimation of ∇u . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
5.3.2 Estimation of f(∇u, v) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
5.3.3 Migration Simulation Algorithm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
5.3.4 Calaculation Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
6 Model III: Fishing Company Earnings Evaluation Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
6.1 Fishing Company Operating Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
6.1.1 Assessment of Fishing Costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
6.1.2 Assessment of Fishing Income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
6.1.3 Assessment of Fishing Profit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
6.2 Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
6.2.1 Parameter Estimation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
6.2.2 Migration Simulation Algorithm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
6.2.3 Calaculation Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
6.3 Discussion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
6.3.1 The Management Strategies without Consider of Territorial Sea . . . . 14
6.3.2 The Management Strategies with Consider of Territorial Sea . . . . . . 15
7 Test the Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
7.1 Sensitivity Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
7.2 Robustness Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
8 Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
8.1 Summary of Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
8.1.1 Result of Problem 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
8.1.2 Result of Problem 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
8.1.3 Result of Problem 3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
8.1.4 Result of Problem 4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
8.2 Strength . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
8.3 Possible Improvements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
Appendices . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
Appendix A Tools and software . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
Appendix B The Codes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
B.1 ARIMA Model Parameter Estimation and Ordering Code . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
B.2 Bootstrap Simulation Codes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
Team # 2001334 Page 1 of 27Team # 2001334 Page 1 of 27Team # 2001334 Page 1 of 27
1 Introduction
1.1 Problem Background
Global ocean temperatures affect the quality of habitats for certain ocean-dwelling species.
When temperature changes are too great for their continued thriving, these species move to
seek other habitats better suited to their present and future living and reproductive success.
The consortium wants to gain a better understanding of issues related to the potential migra-
tion of Scottish herring and mackerel from their current habitats near Scotland if and when
global ocean temperatures increase. These two fish species represent a signficant economic
contribution to the Scottish fishing industry. Changes in population locations of herring and
mackerel could make it economically impractical for smaller Scotland-based fishing com-
panies, who use fishing vessels without on-board refrigeration, to harvest and deliver fresh
fish to markets in Scotland fishing ports.
(a) Herring (b) Mackerel
Figure 1: Target fish: (a) Scottish herring: Atlantic herring are widely distributed through-
out the north-east Atlantic, ranging from the Arctic ocean in the north to the English Channel
in the south; (b) Scottish mackerel: Each year, the number of mackerel in the sea depends on
the number of young fish which survive from spawning to enter the adult fishery as recruits.
1.2 Restatement of the Problem
• Build a mathematical model to identify the most likely locations for these two fish
species over the next 50 years.
• Based upon how rapidly the ocean water temperature change occurs, use your model
to predict best case, worst case, and most likely elapsed time(s) until these popula-
tions will be too far away for small fishing companies to harvest if the small fishing
companies continue to operate out of their current locations.
• In light of your predictive analysis, should these small fishing companies make changes
to their operations?
• Use your model to address how your proposal is affected if some proportion of the
fisherymoves into the territorial waters (sea) of another country.
1.3 Our Approach
The topic requires us to predict the migration of two kinds of fish in the next 50 years
and discuss the business strategies and prospects of fishing companies according to the mi-
gration of the fish. Our work mainly includes the following:
Team # 2001334 Page 2 of 27Team # 2001334 Page 2 of 27Team # 2001334 Page 2 of 27
• Based on the historical data of ocean temperature, a prediction model of ocean tem-
perature is established;
• The probability distribution of fish migration is given and the influence of randomness
on the model is considered;
• Based on the economic benefit model of fishing companies, this article evaluates the
benefits of various fishing strategies under the background of fish migration and gives
reasonable suggestions for the improvement of them.
2 General Assumptions and Model Overview
To simplify the problem, we make the following basic assumptions, each of which is
properly justified.
• Assumption 1: The migration direction of population is predictable.
→ Justification: Although the swimming direction of each individual does not neces-
sarily follow the law of migration, according to the law of large numbers, the behavior
of the group will exclude the existence of unpredictable accidental factors, so we can
predict the migration direction of fish by predicting the change of ocean temperature.
• Assumption 2: The migration of fish is carried out at the same depth.
→ Justification: We assume that the change of ocean depth is ignored in the process
of fish migration, because in a relatively long time span, the migration range of fish is
far larger than its depth change range, so the depth change in the process of migration
can be ignored.
• Assumption 3: No macro-economic indicators, trade environment and technological
breakthroughs in the research time.
→ Justification: Because the model considers the impact of ocean temperature change
on the migration direction of fish, and then compares and analyzes the fishing strate-
gies adopted by fishing companies before and after the migration of fish. Only when
the external conditions are consistent can such a comparison be meaningful.
• Assumption 4:Assume the research data is accurate.
→ Justification:We assume that the historical ocean surface temperature data, fish-
ing data and financial data of fishing companies do not show obvious measurement
deviation and are believed that they are fake, so we can establish a more reasonable
quantitative model based on it.
Firstly, set the Seawater Temperature Prediction Model. We use historical data of seawa-
ter temperature to predict seawater temperature changes in the target sea area in the next
50 years. Secondly, set the Fish Migration Prediction Model. We describe the correlation
between seawater temperature changes and fish migration directions, and then simulate
fish migration directions based on seawater temperature changes in the target sea area over
the next 50 years. Finally, set the Fishing Company Earnings Evaluation Model. We assess
changes in the profitability of fishing companies based on the migration of fish in the next 50
years, and discuss strategies to deal with such changes subject to some objective conditions.
剩余30页未读,继续阅读
天眼妹
- 粉丝: 21
- 资源: 333
上传资源 快速赚钱
- 我的内容管理 展开
- 我的资源 快来上传第一个资源
- 我的收益 登录查看自己的收益
- 我的积分 登录查看自己的积分
- 我的C币 登录后查看C币余额
- 我的收藏
- 我的下载
- 下载帮助
安全验证
文档复制为VIP权益,开通VIP直接复制
信息提交成功
评论0