没有合适的资源?快使用搜索试试~ 我知道了~
Gartner,TMS/SCM/WMS系统,魔力象限
需积分: 1 1 下载量 133 浏览量
2022-05-05
23:11:03
上传
评论
收藏 413KB PDF 举报
温馨提示
试读
60页
Gartner,TMS/SCM/WMS系统,魔力象限
资源推荐
资源详情
资源评论
Magic Quadrant for Warehouse
Management Systems
Published 30 June 2021 - ID G00733892 - 99 min read
By Simon Tunstall, Dwight Klappich
The WMS market is mature, but competition is growing on
pricing, support for automation, geography, partner networks,
adaptability and cloud services. Supply chain technology
leaders should use this research to understand the current
state of the WMS market.
Market Definition/Description
Gartner defines a warehouse management system (WMS) as “a software
application that helps manage and intelligently execute the operations of a
warehouse or distribution center (DC).” WMS applications offer
capabilities such as:
• Receiving
• Put-away
• Stock locating
• Inventory management
• Cycle counting
• Task interleaving
• Wave planning
• Order allocation
• Order picking
• Replenishment
• Packing
• Shipping
• Labor management
• Automated material handling equipment (MHE) interfaces
These systems natively exploit mobile devices along with bar code and,
possibly, RFID scanning/sensing to form the transactional foundation of a
WMS. This enables efficiencies of directed work activity and the delivery of
accurate information in near real time. Gartner includes integrated
functionality — what we refer to as extended WMS capabilities (see Apply an
Architectural Framework to Stratifying Warehouse Management Systems) —
as components of a WMS evaluation.
These extended WMS capabilities include:
• Workforce/labor management
• Slotting
• Yard management
• Voice picking
• Parcel manifesting
• Value-added services such as light manufacturing/kitting
• Third-party logistics (3PL) billing
We do not consider stand-alone solutions in these areas as part of this
research.
The overall WMS market breaks down into five types of vendors, the first four
of which are covered in this Magic Quadrant:
• Application megasuite vendors: These vendors offer broad portfolios of
applications across most application categories (e.g., back-office
financials, human capital management, customer relationship
management, customer order management, manufacturing, enterprise
resource planning [ERP] and supply chain management [SCM]). While
these vendors might offer a variety of SCM solutions, they do not
necessarily offer an integrated platform. Infor, Oracle and SAP are
considered megasuite vendors with WMS offerings.
• SCM suite vendors: These vendors offer a holistic WMS plus a portfolio
of two or more applications focused primarily on SCM. These can
include aspects of logistics (e.g., warehousing, transportation and
global trade), supply chain planning (SCP), customer service (e.g.,
order management and omnichannel management), or sourcing and
procurement, but not other functional areas such as financials, CRM or
human capital management. While these vendors might offer a variety
of SCM solutions, they do not necessarily offer an integrated platform
(although some do). Vendors in this category include Blue Yonder
(formerly JDA), Körber (formerly HighJump and inconso), Manhattan
Associates and Microlistics (WiseTech Global).
• Specialist WMS suite vendors: These vendors are independent
software vendors (ISVs) that focus primarily, but not necessarily
exclusively, on holistic WMS suites. In addition to WMSs, they might
offer additional, complementary capabilities, but these remain a modest
percentage of their business. Vendors in this category included in this
Magic Quadrant are Ehrhardt Partner Group (EPG), Generix Group,
Made4net, Mantis, Reply, Softeon, Synergy Logistics, Tecsys and
Vinculum.
• Material handling equipment/automation vendors: Most material
handling equipment (MHE) vendors primarily focus on providing the
electromechanical aspects of large-scale, automated warehouses.
However, many of these vendors also offer some WMS capabilities as
part of their portfolio of products. We only cover MHE firms as part of
this research if they can demonstrate that they routinely sell their
packaged WMS application completely independently from their MHE.
This is because these firms do not typically offer their WMSs to the
market independent of their MHE solutions. Vendors in this category
included in this Magic Quadrant are Mecalux Software Solutions and
SSI SCHAEFER IT Solutions.
• Independent WMS component vendors: Not covered in this Magic
Quadrant, these vendors are specialized ISVs that focus exclusively on
offering stand-alone components that can be used to supplement a
WMS; they do not offer a full WMS. Examples of these components
include workforce/labor management, slotting
optimization, multicarrier parcel management, yard management,
dock/appointment scheduling, warehouse control systems (WCSs),
warehouse execution systems (WESs) and other specialized add-on
solutions (see Warehousing and Fulfillment Vendor Guide).
WMS Market Considerations
All solutions in the Magic Quadrant for Warehouse Management Systems
support basic core WMS capabilities. Many also support various levels of
extended WMSs. Core WMS capabilities are the basic functions of receiving,
put-away, storing, counting and picking, packing, and shipping goods.
Extended WMS capabilities are value-added capabilities that supplement core
functions, such as labor management, slotting, yard management and dock
scheduling (see Apply an Architectural Framework to Stratifying Warehouse
Management Systems).
Despite being a very mature market, WMS offerings continue to differ in areas
like usability, adaptability, decision support, scalability both up and down
market, and life cycle costs. Furthermore, customers increasingly favor supply
chain suites that can support end-to-end supply chain and logistics process
orchestration. Gartner refers to these areas as supply chain (SC)
convergence (see Unify End-to-End Supply Chain Processes With Supply
Chain Convergence). Focus on the breadth and depth of WMS offerings
remains valid for the most sophisticated operations while other factors like
simplicity, usability and cost of ownership are more important factors in less
complex environments. However, we continue to see a bifurcation in the WMS
market between the high-performance, complex and sophisticated end of the
market and the mass market where “good enough” functionality is “good
enough.” This is not because companies choose to sacrifice functionality. It’s
because globally the preponderance of warehouse operations are Level 3 or
below in Gartner’s warehouse complexity model, with Level 1 being the most
basic and Levels 4 and 5 being the most complex and automated.
Warehouses at Level 3 and below do not require, nor would they normally
use, the most advanced functionality. See Toolkit: Stratify Your Warehouse
Operations to Determine the Right-Fit Warehouse Management System and
Improvement Strategy for more insight on level setting warehouse operations.
This bifurcation highlights that there is a very clear market for high-end WMS
solutions where feature/function and performance are critical and cost is less
of an issue. This makes for a healthy, although smaller, market for high-end,
functionally robust WMS solutions aimed at complex and sophisticated Level
4 and Level 5 operations. Conversely, there is another market where other
factors dominate such as ease of use, reliability, service and support, “good
enough” features, and lower cost of ownership. This is a very large WMS
market for what Gartner’s stratification model would call Level 2 and Level 3
warehouse environments. These types of companies could be served well
with any good WMS, and they would be satisfied with a megasuite-vendor-
provided WMS or a less functionally robust ISV WMS offering.
Although functionality remains at the top of the list of user evaluation criteria,
there’s near-functional parity for core WMS capabilities across WMS
providers. Given the mature state of the WMS marketplace, a combination of
the following vendor and product topics affects the positioning of vendors in
this year’s Magic Quadrant:
• The vendor’s market understanding and its vision for next-generation
WMSs and supply chain execution (SCE)
• The vendor’s proven track record of commercializing, delivering and
deploying innovations to the market
• Investments to address total cost of ownership (TCO) and customer
time to value
• The WMS’s technical architecture to support adaptability and
extensibility
• The long-term viability of the vendor and product, given the long life
span of WMSs
• Current and projected growth of both revenue and total number of
clients
• Market awareness, name recognition and reputation
• Product or vendor differentiation
• Integration with other applications and support for cross-functional
process orchestration
• Cloud architecture and deployment model options (e.g., dedicated
or multitenant cloud SaaS)
• Ability to translate business goals and objectives into specific WMS
functional requirements
• The ability of the vendor to commercialize new investments to deliver
enhanced business value
• The vendor’s ability to sell, implement and support global deployments
• The vendor’s ability to deliver value through service, support,
consulting and training
• The vendor’s openness to, and support of, an ecosystem of partners
• The vendor’s offering of tools and technologies to facilitate
implementations and support
• Customer experience (from customer references and Gartner customer
interactions)
• SCE convergence strategy (a seamlessly integrated SCE orchestration
platform)
Magic Quadrant
Figure 1: Magic Quadrant for Warehouse Management Systems
Source: Gartner (June 2021)
剩余59页未读,继续阅读
资源评论
sapsap2006
- 粉丝: 0
- 资源: 4
上传资源 快速赚钱
- 我的内容管理 展开
- 我的资源 快来上传第一个资源
- 我的收益 登录查看自己的收益
- 我的积分 登录查看自己的积分
- 我的C币 登录后查看C币余额
- 我的收藏
- 我的下载
- 下载帮助
安全验证
文档复制为VIP权益,开通VIP直接复制
信息提交成功