没有合适的资源?快使用搜索试试~ 我知道了~
温馨提示
%每一行代表一条支路 %第一列代表支路的编号 %第二列代表支路的首端节点号 %第三列代表支路的末端节点号 %第四列代表支路的电阻,使用直流法时不读这一列 %第五列代表支路的电抗 %第六列代表支路的左侧对地电导 %第七列代表支路的左侧对地电纳(线路的B/2) %第八列代表支路的右侧对地电导 %第九列代表支路的左侧对地电纳(线路的B/2) %第十列代表变压器左侧(左侧视为一次侧)的基准电压 %第十一列代表变压器右侧(右侧视
资源推荐
资源详情
资源评论
IEEE
Transactions
on
Power
Apparatus
and
Systems,
Vol.
PAS-98,
No.6
Nov./Dec.
1979
IEEE
RELIABILITY
TEST
SYSTEM
A
report
prepared
by
the
Reliability
Test
System
Task
Force
of
the
Application
of
Probability
Methods
Subcommittee*
ABSTRACT
This
report
describes
a
load
model,
generation
system,
and
transmission
network
which
can
be
used
to
test
or
compare
methods
for
reliability
analysis
of
power
systems.
The
objective
is
to
define
a
system
sufficiently
broad
to
provide
a
basis
for
reporting
on
analysis
methods
for
combined
generation/transmission
(composite)
reliability.
The
load
model
gives
hourly
loads
for
one
year
on
a
per
unit
basis,
expressed
in
chronological
fashion
so
that
daily,
weekly,
and
seasonal patterns
can
be
modeled.
The
generating
system
contains
32
units,
ranging
from
12
to
400
MW.
Data
is
given
on
both
reliability
and
operating
costs
of
generating
units.
The
transmission
system
contains
24
load/generation
buses
connected
by
38
lines
or
autotransformers
at
two
voltages,
138
and
230
kV.
The
transmission
system
includes
cables,
lines
on
a
common
right
of
way,
and
lines
on
a
common
tower.
Transmission
system
data
includes
line
length,
impedance,
ratings,
and
relia-
bility
data.
INTRODUCTION
There
has
been
a
continuing
and
increasing
inter-
est
in
methods
for
power
system
reliability
evalua-
tion.
In
order
to
provide
a
basis
for
comparison
of
results
obtained
from
different
methods,
it
is
desir-
able
to
have
a
reference
or
"test"
system
which
incor-
porates
the
basic
data
needed
in
reliability
evalua-
tion.
The
purpose
of
this
report
is
to
provide
such
a
"reliability
test
system".
The
report
describes
a
load
model,
generation
system,
and
transmission
network.
The
objective
is
to
define
a
system
sufficiently
broad
to
provide
a
basis
for
reporting
on
analysis
methods
for
combined
gener-
ation/transmission
(composite)
reliability
methods.
It
is
not
practical
to
specify
all
the
parameters
needed
for
every
application.
The
goal
is
to
estab-
lish
a
core
system
which
can
be
supplemented
by
indi-
vidual
authors
with
additional
or
modified
parameters
needed
in
a
particular
application.
For
example,
the
reliability
test
system
as
reported
in
this
paper
does
not
include
data
on
the
following:
-
Substation
configuration
at
load/generation
buses
*
Chairman,
P.F.
Albrecht,
General
Electric;
M.P.
Bhavaraju,
Electric
Power
Research
Institute;
B.E.
Biggerstaff,
Federal
Energy
Regulatory
Commission;
R.
Billinton,
University
of
Saskatchewan;
G.
Elsoe
Jorgensen,
Northeast
Utilities
Service
Company;
N.D.
Reppen,
Power
Technologies,
Inc.;
P.B.
Shortley,
New
England
Power
Planning.
F
79
152-0
A
paper
recommended
and
approved
by
the
IEEE
Power
System
Engineering
Committee
of
the
IEEE
Power
Engineering
Society
for
presentation
at
the
IEEE
PES
Winter
Meeting,
New
York,
NY,
February
4-9,
1979.
Manuscript
submitted
September
14,
1978;
made
available
for
printing
December
14,
1978.
-
Distribution
system
configuration
Interconnections
with
other
systems
-
Protective
relay
configurations
-
Future
expansion,
such
as
load
growth,
future
unit
sizes,
types,
and
reliability.
The
Electric
Power
Research
Institute
(EPRI)
has
recently
reported
data
on
synthetic
electric
utility
systems
[1].
These
contain
much
larger
systems
than
the
one
in
this
report.
They
are
designed
primarily
for
use
in
evaluation
of
alternate
technologies.
A
smaller
test
system
was
developed
by
the
CIGRE
Working
group
01
of
Study
Committee
No.
32
[2].
But
that
system
was
judged
too
small
and
incomplete
to
be
applicable
as
a
model
in
reliability
analysis,
espe-
cially
when
considering
composite
systems.
DESCRIPTION
OF
RELIABILITY
TEST
SYSTEM
Load
Model
The
annual
peak
load
for
the
test
system
is
2850
MW.
Table
1
gives
data
on
weekly
peak
loads
in
per
cent
of
the
annual
peak
load.
The
annual
peak
occurs
in
week
51.
The
data
in
Table
1
shows
a
typical
pattern,
with
two
seasonal
peaks.
The
second
peak
is
in
week
23
(90%),
with
valleys
at
about
70%
in
between
each
peak.
If
week
1
is
taken
as
January,
Table
1
describes
a
winter
peaking
system.
If
week
1
is
taken
as
a
summer
month,
a
summer
peaking
system
can
be
described.
Weekly
Peak
Load
Week
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
Table
1
in
Percent
of
Annual
Peak
Peak
Load
Week
Peak
Load
86.2
90.0
87.8
83.4
88.0
84.1
83.2
80.6
74.0
73.7
71.5
72.7
70.4
75.0
72.1
80.0
75.4
83.7
87.0
88.0
85.6
81.1
90.0
88.7
89.6
86.1
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
75.5
81.6
80.1
88.0
72.2
77.6
80.0
72.9
72.6
70.5
78.0
69.5
72.4
72.4
74.3
74.4
80.0
88.1
88.5
90.9
94.0
89.0
94.2
97.0
100.0
95.2
0018-9510/79/1100-2047$00.75
©
1979
IEEE
2047
Authorized licensed use limited to: Fuzhou University. Downloaded on September 24,2020 at 09:55:54 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
2048
Table
2
gives
a
daily
peak
load
cycle,
in
per
cent
of
the
weekly
peak.
The
same
weekly
peak
load
cycle
is
assumed
to
apply
for
all
seasons.
The
data
in
Tables
1
and
2,
together
with
the
annual
peak
load
define
a
daily
peak
load
model
of
52x7
=
364
days,
with
Monday
as
the
first
day
of
the
year.
Table
2
Daily
Peak
Load
in
Percent
of
Weekly
Peak
Day
Monday
Tuesday
Wednesday
Thursday
Friday
Saturday
Sunday
Peak
Load
Combination
of
Tables
1,
2,
and
3
with
the
annual
peak
load
defines
an
hourly
load
model
of
364x24
=
8736
hours.
The
annual
load
factor
for
this
model
can
be
calculated
as
61.4%.
Generating
System
Table
4
gives
a
list
of
the
generating
unit
ratings
and
reliability
data.
In
addition
to
forced
Table
4
Generating
Unit
Reliability
Data
Unit
Number
Size
of
MW
Units
93
100
98
96
94
77
75
Table
3
gives
weekday
and
weekend
hourly
load
models
for
each
of
three
seasons.
A
suggested
inter-
val
of
weeks
is
given
for
each
season.
The
first
two
columns
reflect
a
winter
season
(evening
peak),
while
the
next
two
columns
reflect
a
summer
season
(after-
noon
peak).
The
interval
of
weeks
shown
for
each
season
in
Table
3
represents
application
to
a
winter
peaking
system.
If
Table
1
is
started
with
a
summer
month,
then
the
intervals
for
application
of
each
column
of
the
hourly
load
model
in
Table
3
should
be
modified
accordingly.
12
20
50
76
100
155
197
350
400
Forced
Outage
MTTF(1)
MTTR(2)
Rate(3)
hrs.
hrs.
5
0.02
4
0.10
6
0.01
4
0.02
3
0.04
4
0.04
3
0.05
1
0.08
2
0.12
2940
450
1980
1960
1200
960
950
1150
1100
60
50
20
40
50
40
50
100
150
Scheduled
Maintenance
wks/year
2
2
2
3
3
4
4
5
6
NOTES:
(1)
MTTF
=
mean
time
to
failure
(2)
MTTR
=
mean
time
to
repair
(3)
Forced
outage
rate
=
MTTR
MTTF
+
MTTR
Table
3
Hourly
Peak
Load
in
Percent
of
Daily
Peak
Winte
Week
1-8
&
44
Hour
Wkdy
W
!r
Summer
Is
Weeks
s-52
18-30
knd
Wkdy
Wknd
78
64
74
72
60
70
68
58
66
66
56
65
64
56
64
65
58
62
66
64
62
70
76
66
80
87
81
88
95
86
90
99
91
91
100
93
90
99
93
88
100
92
87
100
91
87
97
91
91
96
92
100
96
94
99
93
95
97
92
95
94
92
100
92
93
93
87
87
88
81
72
80
Spring/Fall
WeoMks
9-17
&
31-43
Wkdy
Wknd
63
62
60
58
59
65
72
85
95
99
100
99
93
92
90
88
90
92
96
98
96
90
80
70
75
73
69
66
65
65
68
74
83
89
92
94
91
90
90
86
85
88
92
100
97
95
90
85
outage
rate,
the
parameters
needed
in
frequency
and
duration
calculations
are
given
(MTTF
and
MTTR).
Table
4
gives
data
on
full
outages
only.
Generating
units
can
also
experience
partial
outages,
both
forced
and
scheduled.
Partial
outages
can
have
a
significant
effect
on
generation
reliability.
However,
modeling
of
partial
outages
can
be
done
in
many
ways;
and
no
single
approach
has
achieved
widespread
use
over
all
others.
Therefore
the
task
force
elected
to
leave
partial
outage
data
as
a
parameter
to
be
specified
for
a
particular
application.
The
generation
mix
is
as
shown
below:
MW
%
Steam:
Fossil-oil
Fossil-coal
Nuclear
Combustion
Turbine
Hydro
951
1274
800
80
300
3405
Total
28
37
24
2
9
100
Table
5
gives
operating
cost
data
for
the
gener-
ating
units.
For
power
production,
data
is
given
in
terms
of
heat
rate
at
selected
output
levels,
since
fuel
costs'
are
subject
to
considerable
variation
due
to
geographical
location
and
other
factors.
The
following
fuel
costs
are
suggested
for
general
use
(1979
base).
Wkdy
=
Weekday,
Wknd
=
Weekend
#6
oil
#2
oil
coal
nuclear
12-lam
1-2
2-3
3-4
4-5
5-6
6-7
7-8
8-9
9-10
10-11
11-Noon
Noon-lpm
1-2
2-3
3-4
4-5
5-6
6-7
7-8
8-9
9-10
10-11
11-12
67
63
60
59
59
60
74
86
95
96
96
95
95
95
93
94
99,
100
100
96
91
83
73
63
$2.30/MBtu
$3.00/MBtu
$1.20/MBtu
$0.60/MBtu
Authorized licensed use limited to: Fuzhou University. Downloaded on September 24,2020 at 09:55:54 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
剩余7页未读,继续阅读
资源评论
qq_42747476
- 粉丝: 0
- 资源: 9
上传资源 快速赚钱
- 我的内容管理 展开
- 我的资源 快来上传第一个资源
- 我的收益 登录查看自己的收益
- 我的积分 登录查看自己的积分
- 我的C币 登录后查看C币余额
- 我的收藏
- 我的下载
- 下载帮助
最新资源
- 秋招信息获取与处理基础教程
- 程序员面试笔试面经技巧基础教程
- Python实例-21个自动办公源码-数据处理技术+Excel+自动化脚本+资源管理
- 全球前8GDP数据图(python动态柱状图)
- 汽车检测7-YOLO(v5至v9)、COCO、CreateML、Darknet、Paligemma、TFRecord、VOC数据集合集.rar
- 检测高压线电线-YOLO(v5至v9)、COCO、Darknet、VOC数据集合集.rar
- 检测行路中的人脸-YOLO(v5至v9)、COCO、CreateML、Darknet、Paligemma、VOC数据集合集.rar
- Image_17083039753012.jpg
- 检测生锈铁片生锈部分-YOLO(v5至v9)、COCO、CreateML、Darknet、Paligemma、VOC数据集合集.rar
- 检测桌面物体-YOLO(v5至v9)、COCO、CreateML、Darknet、Paligemma、TFRecord、VOC数据集合集.rar
资源上传下载、课程学习等过程中有任何疑问或建议,欢迎提出宝贵意见哦~我们会及时处理!
点击此处反馈
安全验证
文档复制为VIP权益,开通VIP直接复制
信息提交成功