SafireReport_Fortinet_FG1500D.pdf资源-CSDN文库

需积分: 10 180 浏览量 2021-01-16 00:30:36 上传评论收藏 675KB PDF 举报

资源详情

资源评论

资源推荐

FIREWALL PERFORMANCE TEST REPORT

Fortinet: FG-1500D

Test Results Highlights

4240Mbps

Goodput

16424

Sessions

2.55ms

Latency

Error Percentage

0 | 10

Malware Passed

Test Conguration Highlights

Network Topology:

Enterprise Internal Segmentation

Trac Prole:

ENT. Internal Segmentation Mix (L)

Features Enabled on Firewall:

Date: 2020-09-30

Start Time: 2020-09-30 (11:05:44)

End Time: 2020-09-30 (11:19:10)

Duration: 00:13:25

Sare Version: v2.3.3

AntiVirus Application Control IPS/IDS

SSL Certicate Validation

Logging and Reporting

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33

Contents

1. Executive Summary

1.1. Test Methodology

1.2. Test Results Highlights

1.3. Test Conguration Highlights

2. Introduction

3. Test Information

4. Firewall Under Test

5. Network Topology

6. Trac Prole

6.1. User Per Application

6.2. Bandwidth Per Application

6.3. Session Per Application

6.4. Packet Size Per Application

6.5. Table View

7. Test Iterations

8. Test Result

8.1. Goodput and Throughput

8.2. Concurrent Sessions

8.3. Latency

8.4. Error Percentage

8.5. Total Malware Passed

8.6. Firewall CPU Usage

8.7. Firewall Memory Usage

8.8. Total Cost of Ownership Per Mbps

8.9. Summary

9. Contact Information

DISCLAIMER

No part of this publication on may be reproduced, copied/scanned, stored on a retrieval system, e-mailed or otherwise disseminated or transmitted without the express

written consent of Xena Networks. ("us" or "we").

This disclaimer contains important information that binds you. If you do not agree to these conditions, you should not read the rest of this report but should instead return

the report immediately to us. "You" or "your" means the person who accesses this report and any entity on whose behalf he/she has obtained this report.

1. The information in this report is subject to change without notice, and we disclaim any obligation to update it.

2. The information on in this report is believed by us to be accurate and reliable at the time of publication, but is not guaranteed. All use of and reliance on this report

are at your sole risk. We are not liable or responsible for any damages, losses, or expenses of any nature whatsoever arising from any error or omission in this

report.

3. NO WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED ARE GIVEN BY US. ALL IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A

PARTICULAR PURPOSE, AND NON-INFRINGEMENT, ARE HEREBY DISCLAIMED AND EXCLUDED BY US. IN NO EVENT SHALL WE BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT,

CONSEQUENTIAL, INCIDENTAL, PUNITIVE, EXEMPLARY, OR INDIRECT DAMAGES, OR FOR ANY LOSS OF PROFIT, REVENUE, DATA, COMPUTER PROGRAMS, OR

OTHER ASSETS, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY THEREOF.

4. This report does not constitute an endorsement, recommendation, or guarantee of any of the products (hardware or software) tested or the hardware and/or

software used in testing the products. The testing does not guarantee that there are no errors or defects in the products or that the products will meet your

expectations, requirements, needs, or specications, or that they will operate without interruption.

5. This report does not imply any endorsement, sponsorship, aliation, or verication by or with any organizations mentioned in this report.

6. All trademarks, service marks, and trade names used in this report are the trademarks, service marks, and trade names of their respective owners.

2. Introduction

Enterprises are investing in enterprise-class rewalls to counteract the threats posted by the increasing network and

data security breach every year. Firewalls are typically deployed at the edge of or inside enterprises to protect clients

and servers from malwares, exploits, data breach, target attacks, etc. Many security experts such as IT and security

managers, and CSOs believe that they are improving their network security posture by implementing a new security

solution.

However, verifying the performance of rewall and any network security device is essential to the success of the

enterprise network it defends. With various advanced protection features such as application identication, intrusion

prevention, threat detection, logging, etc., your rewall can easily become the performance bottleneck of the network,

degrading the overall performance and user experience. Because of this trade-off, it is vital to test the performance of

your rewall with specic features enabled on the rewall appliance.

Either out-of-box or rmware upgrade, rewall appliances should always be tested and evaluated before deployment in

order to guarantee that new security protections do not adversely impact performance and that security shortcuts are

not taken to maintain or improve the performance. The test case should attempt to replicate the production network as

close as possible, which includes network topology, network trac that traverses through the rewall, features and

policies enabled on the rewall, etc. Firewall appliance should deliver the expected performance under all

circumstances.

This test report is generated by Sare, Xena's innovative enterprise rewall performance tester. Sare automatically

measures and characterizes the performance of a rewall under realistic trac conditions, with the results and key

conclusions automatically being represented in a readable report format. Thus, the IT and network managers can

easily assess the negative performance impact for the multiple rewall security features.

Sare makes it a simple and cost-ecient tool for the use cases below:

Pre-Deployment

Model Migration.

Should you switch from physical rewalls to virtual rewalls for your organization (Virtualization Transition)? Use

Sare to compare the performances and total cost of ownership per Mbps and ensure a smooth transition. Should

you upgrade the host servers for your virtual rewalls (Server Upgrade in Private Cloud)? Sare facilitates data-

driven solution design and optimal hardware selection/conguration. Should you upgrade your virtual rewalls to

have more performance (Model Upgrade)? Use Sare to compare the performances of different virtual rewalls.

Let the result data help you through the process.

Vendor Comparison.

Should you switch vendor and replace the existing rewall with another one (Switching Vendor)? Test with your

trac and use the analysis data to guide your decision. Should you start implementing a new rewall solution for

your organization (Implement New Security Solution)? Compare the performance of different vendors and make

your decision on the analysis data..

Post-Deployment

Firmware Upgrade.

Does the new rmware still deliver the expected performance to your trac (Regression Testing)? Regression

performance testing after rewall rmware upgrade. Does your rewall performance degrade as its rmware

upgrades (Upgrade Maintenance)? Compare the performances of different rmware.

Policy Conguration Change.

Does the policy conguration change have any impact on the performance (Regression Testing)? Regression

performance testing after rewall policy conguration is changed. Does a specic security inspection policy

severely impact the performance (Performance Debugging)? Does decryption result in high CPU usage? Verify

performances of different rewall functions enabled to gain a clear picture of the rewall performance

characteristics.

Trac Pattern Change.

Will the rewall be able to support the trac increase from new servers and teams (LAN Network Expansion)?

Early discovery of potential performance bottleneck before the expansion. Periodically verifying the rewall can

deliver the performance as network trac evolves over time (Periodic Maintenance).

剩余35页未读，继续阅读

评论收藏

内容反馈

Xena_Networks

粉丝: 268
资源: 35

SafireReport_Fortinet_FG1500D.pdf

评论0

最新资源

SafireReport_Fortinet_FG1500D.pdf

评论0

fortigate 固件5.4.9版本

fortinet快速配置手册.pdf

Fortinet NSE4认证 –Network Security Professional学习英文PPT.zip

FGT_40F_3G4G-v7.2.0.F-build1157-FORTINET.out

FGT_200D-HQIP.2.4.0.1024 out刷机包！

FGT VM64-v6-build0231_v6.0.4-FORTINET.out.ovf.zip

信息安全_0.5.王涛.Fortinet.Security.Fabric.V2.pptx

FGT_VM64-v7.0.5-build0304-FORTINET.out.ovf、vmware学习模拟器

[FortiGate]FGT-VM64-v7.4.2.F-build2571-FORTINET.out.ovf.zip

2021年Fortinet.Pre_.NSE4_FGT-6.2 题库.rar

FGT_100E-v7.2.0.F-build1157-FORTINET.out

FGR_60F_3G4G-v7.2.0.F-build1157-FORTINET

FGT_VM64_KVM-v5-build1484-FORTINET.out.kvm.qcow2

FGT-VM64-v7.0.13.M-build0566-FORTINET.out.ovf.zip

Fortinet NSE4认证 学习中文PPT

FGT_VM64-v6-build1579-FORTINET.out.ovf.zip

FGT_100EF-v7.2.0.F-build1157-FORTINET

forticlient_6.0.0.x86_64.rpm

[FortiGate] FGT-VM64-v7.2.6.F-build1575-FORTINET.out.ovf.zip

Fortinet_NSE4_FGT-6.2 2021题库.pdf

FGT_VM64_KVM-v6-build1828-FORTINET.out.kvm.zip

BurpLoaderKeygen.jar.zip

最新版ISO/IEC 27001:2022、ISO 27002:2022中英文合集

Goby红队版-win-x64-2.4.7版本

Chrome Header Editor 插件

ISO SAE 21434-2021 中文版.pdf

OpenVAS GVM 中文翻译补丁

安全认证cisp教材全套

最新资源

Fortinet NSE4认证学习中文PPT