没有合适的资源?快使用搜索试试~ 我知道了~
佛罗里达州联网车辆(CV)和运输系统管理与运营(TSM&O)项目的绩效评估(英) 佛罗里达国际大学 2022.pdf
1.该资源内容由用户上传,如若侵权请联系客服进行举报
2.虚拟产品一经售出概不退款(资源遇到问题,请及时私信上传者)
2.虚拟产品一经售出概不退款(资源遇到问题,请及时私信上传者)
版权申诉
0 下载量 96 浏览量
2023-03-19
13:50:53
上传
评论
收藏 4.97MB PDF 举报
温馨提示
试读
119页
佛罗里达州联网车辆(CV)和运输系统管理与运营(TSM&O)项目的绩效评估(英) 佛罗里达国际大学 2022.pdf
资源推荐
资源详情
资源评论
Performance Evaluation of Connected Vehicle (CV) and
Transportation Systems Management and Operations (TSM&O)
Projects in Florida
Final Report
FDOT Contract No: BDV29-977-64
Prepared for:
Research Center
Florida Department of Transportation
605 Suwannee Street, MS 30
Tallahassee, FL 32399
Prepared by:
Florida International University
Dept. of Civil & Environmental Engineering
10555 West Flagler Street, EC 3628
Miami, FL 33174
Project Manager: Raj Ponnaluri, Ph.D., P.E., PTOE, PMP
February 2022
ii
DISCLAIMER
The opinions, findings, and conclusions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and
not necessarily those of the State of Florida Department of Transportation.
iii
METRIC CONVERSION TABLE
U.S. UNITS TO SI* (MODERN METRIC) UNITS
LENGTH
SYMBOL
WHEN YOU KNOW
MULTIPLY BY
TO FIND
SYMBOL
in
inches
25.400
millimeters
mm
ft
feet
0.305
meters
m
yd
yards
0.914
meters
m
mi
miles
1.610
kilometers
km
mm
millimeters
0.039
inches
in
m
meters
3.280
feet
ft
m
meters
1.090
yards
yd
km
kilometers
0.621
miles
mi
AREA
SYMBOL
WHEN YOU KNOW
MULTIPLY BY
TO FIND
SYMBOL
in
2
square inches
645.200
square millimeters
mm
2
ft
2
square feet
0.093
square meters
m
2
yd
2
square yard
0.836
square meters
m
2
ac
acres
0.405
hectares
ha
mi
2
square miles
2.590
square kilometers
km
2
mm
2
square millimeters
0.0016
square inches
in
2
m
2
square meters
10.764
square feet
ft
2
m
2
square meters
1.195
square yards
yd
2
ha
hectares
2.470
acres
ac
km
2
square kilometers
0.386
square miles
mi
2
VOLUME
SYMBOL
WHEN YOU KNOW
MULTIPLY BY
TO FIND
SYMBOL
fl oz
fluid ounces
29.570
milliliters
mL
gal
gallons
3.785
liters
L
ft
3
cubic feet
0.028
cubic meters
m
3
yd
3
cubic yards
0.765
cubic meters
m
3
mL
milliliters
0.034
fluid ounces
fl oz
L
liters
0.264
gallons
gal
m
3
cubic meters
35.314
cubic feet
ft
3
m
3
cubic meters
1.307
cubic yards
yd
3
NOTE: volumes greater than 1,000 L shall be shown in m
3
.
*SI is the symbol for the International System of Units. Appropriate rounding should be made to comply
with Section 4 of ASTM E380.
iv
TECHNICAL REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE
1. Report No.
2. Government Accession No.
3. Recipient′s Catalog No.
4. Title and Subtitle
Performance Evaluation of Connected Vehicle (CV) and Transportation
Systems Management and Operations (TSM&O) Projects in Florida
5. Report Date February 2022
6. Performing Organization Code
7. Author(s)
Priyanka Alluri, Jimoku H. Salum, Angela E. Kitali, Henrick Haule, and
Michelle Angel
8. Performing Organization Report No.
9. Performing Organization Name and Address
Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering
Florida International University
10555 West Flagler Street, EC 3628 Miami, FL 33174
10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS)
11. Contract or Grant No.
BDV29-977-64
12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address
Florida Department of Transportation
Research Center
605 Suwannee Street, MS 30, Tallahassee, FL 32399
13. Type of Report and Period Covered
Final Report
December 2020 – February
2022
14. Sponsoring Agency Code
15. Supplementary Notes
FDOT Project Manager: Raj Ponnaluri, Ph.D., P.E., PTOE, PMP
16. Abstract
Connected vehicle (CV) technologies and Transportation Systems Management and Operations (TSM&O)
strategies are increasingly being considered by transportation agencies to improve the safety and mobility of the
transportation network. To fully understand the potential benefits of CV and TSM&O initiatives, it is crucial to not
only identify the performance measures used to evaluate the progress of each initiative, but also to estimate the
benefit-to-cost (B/C) ratios to justify the funding requests associated with implementing these technologies and
strategies.
The primary goal of this research was to assist the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) in developing
approaches to evaluate the performance of CV projects and current TSM&O strategies being deployed, including
the Rapid Incident Scene Clearance (RISC) program, the Road Ranger Service Patrol (RRSP) program, and the
Smart Work Zone (SWZ) TSM&O strategies.
A comprehensive review of the existing body of literature was conducted to identify the quantitative and
qualitative performance measures and metrics that are being considered in evaluating the performance of CV
deployments and TSM&O strategies. B/C analyses were conducted to quantify the mobility and safety benefits
associated with implementing the RISC and RRSP programs. Results indicate that for every dollar spent on the
RISC program, $5.78 is returned in secondary crash savings, and $1.20 is returned in incident-related traffic delay
savings. For every dollar spent on the RRSP program, $5.15 is returned in secondary crash savings, and $7.44 is
returned in incident-related traffic delay savings. The study also discussed the potential safety and mobility benefits
of Smart Work Zone (SWZ) technologies.
Performance criteria and evaluation metrics were also developed for the different stages of the CV project
development process (i.e., pre-project phase, planning phase, design-deploy-test phase, and the operations &
maintenance phase). The performance criteria of two CV deployments in Florida (Gainesville Signal Phase and
Timing (SPaT) Project and I-4 Florida’s Regional Advanced Mobility Elements (I-4 FRAME) Project) were also
reviewed. Findings from this research offer guidance in evaluating the effectiveness of CV and TSM&O initiatives.
Evaluation criteria and approaches presented in this report can better prepare FDOT for deployments.
17. Key Word
Connected Vehicle (CV), TSM&O, Performance Measures, Benefit-cost
(B/C).
18. Distribution Statement
19. Security Classif. (of this report)
Unclassified
20. Security Classif. (of this page)
Unclassified
21. No. of Pages
119
22. Price
Form DOT F 1700.7 (8-72) Reproduction of completed page authorized.
v
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This research was funded by the Research Center of the Florida Department of Transportation
(FDOT). The authors would like to thank the Project Manager, Raj Ponnaluri, Ph.D., P.E., PTOE,
PMP, of the FDOT Traffic Engineering and Operations Office, for his guidance and support
throughout the project. Special thanks to the following individuals for providing the necessary data
that was useful in this project:
Jeffery Frost, FDOT – Traffic Incident Management (TIM) and Commercial Vehicle
Operations (CVO) Program Manager
Shawn Kinney, FDOT – TIM Road Ranger Program Manager
Md Omar Faruk, FDOT GEC – CAV and TSM&O Engineer
剩余118页未读,继续阅读
资源评论
T0620514
- 粉丝: 1329
- 资源: 1万+
下载权益
C知道特权
VIP文章
课程特权
开通VIP
上传资源 快速赚钱
- 我的内容管理 展开
- 我的资源 快来上传第一个资源
- 我的收益 登录查看自己的收益
- 我的积分 登录查看自己的积分
- 我的C币 登录后查看C币余额
- 我的收藏
- 我的下载
- 下载帮助
安全验证
文档复制为VIP权益,开通VIP直接复制
信息提交成功