美赛2018年评委点评的中文翻译版和英文原版两个pd文件，个人认为参考价值大于优秀论文。
例：
This problem required teams to develop several components—current profile models, historical profile evolution and comparisons across states,determination of a “best” state, and energy forecast models—to suggest policy recommendations. Overall, judges valued well-written papers that carefully followed the contest directions. They highly valued papers that presented a cohesive narrative, where each step of the modeling and analysis process clearly built upon previous modeling/analysis steps.
中文翻译
这个问题要求团队开发几个组件，包括当前的概要模型，历史概要的演变和跨州的比较，确定“最佳”状态以及能源预测模型，以提出政策建议。 总体而言，评委们对精心撰写并遵循比赛指导的论文给予了高度评价。 他们高度评价发表了凝聚力叙事的论文，其中建模和分析过程的每个步骤都清楚地建立在先前的建模/分析步骤之上。
