没有合适的资源?快使用搜索试试~ 我知道了~
论文研究 - 达到国家确定的贡献目标:预测肯尼亚的汽车排放量
需积分: 5 1 下载量 196 浏览量
2020-05-19
05:40:52
上传
评论
收藏 735KB PDF 举报
温馨提示
试读
16页
肯尼亚仍然使用纯粹基于价值的机动车征税系统。 没有针对车辆拥有和使用的注重环境的财政政策,但该国二氧化碳排放量的四分之一来自交通运输和能源部门。 为了实现其针对公路运输的国家确定贡献(NDC)目标,应修订当前的车辆税,以通过鼓励更新和混合动力车辆的进口来减少排放。 该研究使用照常情景构建预测来预测肯尼亚的机动车清单,以确定该国的排放量和公共收入。 结果得出结论,车龄与税率成正比,因此可以通过修改现行税收政策来鼓励减少消费汽车的选择并帮助肯尼亚实现其2030年NDC减排目标,从而大幅减少机动车的CO2排放量。
资源详情
资源评论
资源推荐
Low Carbon Economy, 2019, 10, 31-46
http://www.scirp.org/journal/lce
ISSN Online: 2158-7019
ISSN Print: 2158-7000
DOI:
10.4236/lce.2019.102003 Jun. 30, 2019 31
Low Carbon Economy
Meeting Nationally Determined Contribution
Targets: Projecting Kenya’s Motor Vehicle
Emissions
Fahd Mohamed Omar Al-Guthmy
*
, Wanglin Yan
Graduate School of Media and Governance, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan
Abstract
Kenya still uses a purely value-based motor vehicle taxation system. No envi-
ronmentally focused fiscal policies exist for vehicle ownership and usage, yet
up to a quarter of the country’s carbon dioxide emissions originate from the
transport and energy sectors. To achieve its Nationally Determined Contribu-
tion (NDC) objectives for road transport, current vehicle taxes should be re-
vised to reduce emissions through incentivizing newer and hybrid vehicle
imports. The study projects Kenya’s motor vehicle inventory using busi-
ness-as-usual scenario building projections to determine the country’s emis-
sions and public revenue. The results conclude that vehicle age is directly
proportional to the tax rate and therefore motor vehicle CO
2
emissions could
be decreased significantly by amending the current t
ax policies to incentivize
a shift in consumer car choice and help Kenya meet its NDC emissions re-
duction target for 2030.
Keywords
Kenya, CO
2
Emissions, Road Transport, Vehicle Tax
1. Introduction
Kenya is considered a fiscal state. “A fiscal state is one that uses taxation and
similar forms of revenue in order to obtain adequate income for its survival and
development... The Kenyan state can currently be considered as being in a pe-
riod of fiscal expansion” [1]. As one of the fastest growing economies in Africa,
the Kenyan government has been faced with a growing need to meet its national
budget, and one of the major revenue generators is motor vehicle import taxes
which account for up to 12% of the total annual revenue.
How to cite this paper:
Al-
Guthmy,
F
.M.O. and Yan, W.L. (2019) Meeting Na-
tionally Determined Contribution Targets:
Projecting Kenya’s Motor Vehicle
Emis-
sions
.
Low Carbon Economy
,
10
, 31-46.
https://doi.org/10.4236/lce.2019.102003
Received:
March 9, 2019
Accepted:
June 27, 2019
Published:
June 30, 2019
Copyright © 201
9 by author(s) and
Scientific
Research Publishing Inc.
This work is licensed under the Creative
Commons Attribution International
License (CC BY
4.0).
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Open Access
F. M.O. Al-Guthmy, W. L. Yan
DOI:
10.4236/lce.2019.102003 32
Low Carbon Economy
With a growing population of over 46 million people and a vehicle inventory
of about 2.43 million [2], 99% of which are used when purchased while a neglig-
ible number are hybrid vehicles, Kenya has identified its transport system as a
high carbon concern. This is partly due to the country growing rapidly without
accompanying transportation and infrastructure services. “This lack of policy is
made manifest by a transportation system characterized by severe congestion,
high-polluting vehicles, lack of pedestrian and bicycle lanes, lack of accessible,
high-quality public transport options, and deteriorating infrastructure” [3].
In Kenya’s Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC) report tabled at the
2015 United Nations (UN) Climate Change Convention in Paris, it states 25% of
the country’s emissions come from the transport and energy sectors, the rest be-
ing agricultural outputs. One of the aims of NDC is to achieve a Low carbon and
efficient transportation system. To do this, the target pledged is to reduce emis-
sions by 30% by 2030 relative to the “Business as Usual” (BAU) scenario. How-
ever, there seems to be a disconnection between the NDC target and the current
taxation system because Kenya has always had a value-based, ad valorem
vehicle
import tax, revised in 2005. Older cars would be depreciated by 10% per year
and therefore are subject to significantly lower taxes than newer vehicles.
There are two broad classes of vehicle taxes: Direct and differentiated taxes.
Direct taxes are charged during the ownership of the vehicle whilst differentiated
taxes are those charged in order to own a vehicle. Vehicle import taxes are
therefore differentiated taxes and differ from carbon/emissions taxes. Usually,
carbon taxes rise with the level of emissions of a given motor vehicle whilst
emissions-based differentiated taxes are structured in ways to encourage the
purchase of lower-emitting vehicles thereby increasing a country’s overall motor
vehicle inventory efficiency.
Kenya has had a history of incorporating transport-related policy documents
with one of the more recent ones: the 2010 Integrated National Transport Policy
sessional paper, highlighting transportation as a major challenge that still needs
to be addressed due to inadequate provisions for environmental protection [4].
2. Key Issues of Vehicle Taxation in Kenya
Policy solutions are vital. Understanding the behavioral responses of individuals
to the actions of government will always be of interest to a wide spectrum of so-
ciety [5]. It will inform policy-makers to be confident that the policies they pur-
sue will bring about the desired technological changes at acceptable costs [6]
reaffirming that car owner’s import decisions are heavily influenced by the fiscal
policies, therefore meaning that a shift to newer and hybrid imports is highly
likely following the implementation of an effective tax model targeting emissions
reduction.
Research on a country’s NDC feasibility is limited. The gap lies where vehicle
fiscal policies alone can influence a country’s vehicle inventory to meet emissions
targets. A study conducted in 2004 aimed at predicting impacts associated with
F. M.O. Al-Guthmy, W. L. Yan
DOI:
10.4236/lce.2019.102003 33
Low Carbon Economy
different policies in the automobile industry. The findings observed that increased
regulation penalties can result in cost savings for all parties (consumers, producers
of vehicles and the government). Therefore, a regulatory standard needs to be ap-
plied in order to control the behavior of the consumers concerned [7].
In 2015, the Kenyan government introduced a law that made the excise duty
component a flat percentage rate only for vehicles less than 3 years old. Accord-
ing to the 2015-2016 budget statement, this was done in a bid to raise revenue
for the Kes. 2.1 trillion budget and to “promote environmentally friendly im-
ports”. The law was considered to be a failure because it taxed more expensive
and polluting vehicles considerably less than their counterparts. It was reversed
in June 2016 back to the previously used value-based, ad valorem tax tariff, hav-
ing no emissions reductions incentives. To this date, Kenya still uses a purely
value-based vehicle import taxation system. No environmentally based fiscal
policies exist for passenger vehicle imports and usage, yet up to a quarter of the
county’s emissions originate from vehicle and energy use.
During the short period when the excise tax was flattened, Kenyan media re-
leased some reports about some Kenyans who had identified a legal loophole in
order to circumvent the vehicle taxes by bringing cars through neighboring
Uganda, which shares a custom territory with Kenya. This observation showed
the laws of unintended consequences unfold before the government reversed the
tax. Harrington and McConnell in their paper Motor Vehicles and the Environ-
ment, state that “vehicle taxes are probably too low and often of the wrong form
to reflect the full economic costs to society of vehicle use… There has been
strong reluctance… to use prices to reflect external costs”. They go on to add,
“We observe one of the greatest dilemmas for policymakers—contending with
the unintended consequences that often result if the policy is targeted too nar-
rowly on only one issue” [8].
A closer look at the tax structure and trends of vehicle imports in Kenya re-
veals that older vehicles of up to 8 years are the preferred imports possibly due to
their being the lowest taxed. The effects are that “there are too many old vehicles
imported into the country which contribute immensely to the high levels of pol-
lutants than the maximum recommended level by the World Health Organiza-
tion” [9]. The unevenness in age of imported vehicles strongly suggests that tax-
es have a role to play because vehicles across high and low-price ranges are im-
ported as the oldest allowable imports.
However, a landmark journal that investigated air pollution regulations in 18
countries discouraged the use of declining taxes based on vehicle age. At the
time, it concluded, “high taxes on ownership of new vehicles, with declining tax
rates as the vehicle ages, also tend to increase the value of older vehicles and re-
duce their scrappage rate. From an emissions perspective, flat or even increasing
taxes on vehicle ownership as a function of age would be preferable to a declin-
ing tax rate. Even better would be a tax based on vehicle emissions levels” [10].
Import vehicle taxes can also be used as control mechanisms on a country’s
vehicle inventory [11]. Therefore, a recurring environmental (emissions-based)
F. M.O. Al-Guthmy, W. L. Yan
DOI:
10.4236/lce.2019.102003 34
Low Carbon Economy
tax system would be necessary in addition to a new import tax model, primarily to
cover the tax revenue shortfall. The Kenyan Government clearly needed to rethink
its approach when developing the motor vehicle tax model. Failures such as the
recent excise tax bill accounted for several devastating consequences including:
1) Inequity of the excise tax to importers of lower-priced vehicles because the
more expensive luxury cars were taxed less, and lower valued vehicle owners
ended up paying higher taxes relative to the previous tariff. Also, some importers
sought alternatives by leveraging on neighboring country’s friendlier laws.
2) This resulted in reduced imports leading to a ripple effect on complemen-
tary industries.
3) The revenue authority missing its half-year budget from vehicle taxes by a
whopping 20%.
This conundrum poses the obvious question: How will the country be able to
achieve its objectives by 2030 for reducing emissions in the transport sector
without enormous expenditures in infrastructure or administrative costs and
subsequently risking losing its revenues? In order to answer this question, we
must look at the key players involved through the triple bottom perspective. The
three primary stakeholders that are affected by an emissions-based fiscal policy
are connected as follows:
a) The government creates fiscal policies through taxes to earn revenue for the
country’s development.
b) The ownership or import tax model affects people’s car choice criteria such
as the age and types of vehicles imported.
c) This in turn influences climate change advocates/lobbyists interests of the
overall levels of emissions going forward, which in this case is a 30% reduction
relative to the BAU scenario.
Therefore, this study highlights the current trend of emissions and proposes a
shift in fiscal policy which will spur an increase in newer and hybrid vehicle
purchases.
Environment-oriented fiscal reforms have been shown to be successful in
many countries. “Countries such as Germany, Spain, Sweden, UK, Canada, Aus-
tria, Finland, Portugal, USA, South Africa have applied various types of vehicle-
related taxation schemes to control the emissions of greenhouse gases” [12].
We implemented our approach by projecting the country’s emissions, taking
into consideration Kenya’s NDC pledge to reduce emissions by 30% by 2030.
The contributions of this paper are as follows:
1) We identify various issues with both the current and previous tax regimes
including:
a) The failure of both tax tariffs to incorporate an effective environmentally
focused fiscal line item;
b) The reversal of the revised tax regime to the old regime due to a lack of
consumer equity as narrated by the cabinet secretary at the time;
c) The lack of a contingency to recoup potential deficit in public revenue as a
剩余15页未读,继续阅读
weixin_38742421
- 粉丝: 2
- 资源: 954
上传资源 快速赚钱
- 我的内容管理 展开
- 我的资源 快来上传第一个资源
- 我的收益 登录查看自己的收益
- 我的积分 登录查看自己的积分
- 我的C币 登录后查看C币余额
- 我的收藏
- 我的下载
- 下载帮助
安全验证
文档复制为VIP权益,开通VIP直接复制
信息提交成功
评论0