没有合适的资源?快使用搜索试试~ 我知道了~
温馨提示
试读
19页
我们研究了充气过程中电磁场与充气子场ϕ的动力学耦合f2(ϕ)FμνFμν破坏了麦克斯韦作用的共形不变性时,在充气过程中产生的电磁场。 我们考虑这样一种情况,即耦合函数f(ϕ)在充气过程中随时间减小,结果,能量密度的电分量在磁性分量上占主导地位。 得出了控制比例因子,膨胀子场和电能密度的联合演化的方程组。 当电能密度变得与慢滚动参数ε和膨胀子能量密度ρE〜ερinf的乘积一样大时,就会发生逆反应。 它影响充气子场的演化,并导致尺度不变的电功率谱和磁性谱,对于任何递减的耦合函数,其磁性谱图为nB = 2。 这给出了低于10-22 G的现今磁场观测值的上限。值得强调的是,由于颗粒的有效电荷eeff = e / f被耦合函数所抑制,因此史维杰效应变得重要 仅在充气后期,当充气场接近其潜力的最小值时。 Schwinger效应突然降低了电场值,有助于完成膨胀阶段并进入预热阶段。 它有效地产生带电粒子,甚至在充气机快速振荡之前就实现了Schwinger加热方案。 在Starobinsky充气模型中对幂函数f∝aα和Ratra型f = exp(βϕ / Mp)耦合函数进行了数值分析。
资源推荐
资源详情
资源评论
Influence of backreaction of electric fields and Schwinger effect
on inflationary magnetogenesis
O. O. Sobol,
1,2
E. V. Gorbar,
2,3
M. Kamarpour,
2
and S. I. Vilchinskii
2,4
1
Institute of Physics, Laboratory for Particle Physics and Cosmology,
École Polytechnique F´ed´erale de Lausanne, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
2
Physics Faculty, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, 64/13,
Volodymyrska Street, 01601 Kyiv, Ukraine
3
Bogolyubov Institute for Theoretical Physics, 14-b, Metrologichna Street, 03680 Kyiv, Ukraine
4
D´epartement de Physique Th´eorique, Center for Astroparticle Physics,
Universit´e de Gen`eve, 1211 Gen`eve 4, Switzerland
(Received 2 August 2018; published 26 September 2018)
We study the generation of electromagnetic fields during inflation when the conformal invariance
of Maxwell’s action is broken by the kinetic coupling f
2
ðϕÞF
μν
F
μν
of the electromagnetic field to the
inflaton field ϕ. We consider the case where the coupling function fðϕÞ decreases in time during inflation
and, as a result, the electric component of the energy density dominates over the magnetic one. The system
of equations which governs the joint evolution of the scale factor, inflaton field, and electric energy density
is derived. The backreaction occurs when the electric energy density becomes as large as the product
of the slow-roll parameter ϵ and inflaton energy density, ρ
E
∼ ϵρ
inf
. It affects the inflaton field evolution and
leads to the scale-invariant electric power spectrum and the magnetic one which is blue with the spectral
index n
B
¼ 2 for any decreasing coupling function. This gives an upper limit on the present-day value of
observed magnetic fields below 10
−22
G. It is worth emphasizing that since the effective electric charge
of particles e
eff
¼ e=f is suppressed by the coupling function, the Schwinger effect becomes important
only at the late stages of inflation when the inflaton field is close to the minimum of its potential.
The Schwinger effect abruptly decreases the value of the electric field, helping to finish the inflation
stage and enter the stage of preheating. It effectively produces the charged particles, implementing the
Schwinger reheating scenario even before the fast oscillations of the inflaton. The numerical analysis is
carried out in the Starobinsky model of inflation for the powerlike f ∝ a
α
and Ratra-type f ¼ expðβϕ=M
p
Þ
coupling functions.
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.98.063534
I. INTRODUCTION
One of the important problems of modern cosmology is
the origin of the magnetic fields which are present at all
scales in the Universe [1–8], especially of the magnetic
fields detected in the cosmic voids through the gamma-ray
observations of distant blazars [9–13] with very large
coherence scale λ
B
≳ 1 Mpc. Together with the observations
of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) [8,14–17]
and ultrahigh-energy cosmic rays [18] this implies the
following constraints on the strength of these fields:
10
−18
≲B
0
≲10
−9
G. If the correlation length of the magnetic
field is λ
B
≲ 1 Mpc, the minimal needed magnetic field
strength is larger by the factor ðλ
B
=1 MpcÞ
−1=2
[9,11–13].
Observed intergalactic magnetic fields can have either
astrophysical or primordial origin, and both magnetogen-
esis scenarios are currently under discussion. Although
astrophysical mechanisms based on a Biermann battery
[19–21] have been proposed to generate the “seed”
magnetic fields and different types of dynamo can enhance
them [22–25], it is problematic to embed the magnetic
fields with a large correlation length into the cosmic voids.
Therefore, the primordial origin of the large-scale magnetic
fields seems to be more realistic. In particular, the phase
transitions in the early Universe may lead to the magnetic
fields of the necessary strength [26–31]. However, their
coherence length is determined by the horizon size at the
moment of phase transition and is much less than Mpc
today. Then the most natural is the inflationary magneto-
genesis, proposed in Refs. [32,33], which can easily attain
very large coherence length.
Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.
Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to
the author(s) and the published article’s title, journal citation,
and DOI. Funded by SCOAP
3
.
PHYSICAL REVIEW D 98, 063534 (2018)
2470-0010=2018=98(6)=063534(19) 063534-1 Published by the American Physical Society
Since Maxwell’s action is conformally invariant, the
fluctuations of the electromagnetic field do not undergo
enhancement in the conformally flat inflationary back-
ground [34]. In order to generate electromagnetic fields we
need to break the conformal invariance. This can be done
by introducing the interaction with scalar or pseudoscalar
inflaton fields or curvature scalar (see, e.g., the pioneer
works [32,33,35,36]). In our study we consider the kinetic
coupling of the electromagnetic field to the scalar inflaton
via the term f
2
ðϕÞF
μν
F
μν
, which was first introduced by
Ratra [33] and has been revisited many times for different
types of coupling functions [37–45].
This model modifies the standard electromagnetic
Lagrangian, multiplying it by the function of the inflaton
field. As it was mentioned in [40], if one rescales the
electromagnetic potential in order to absorb f
2
, electric
charges of particles effectively will depend on f
−1
.
Therefore, to avoid the strong coupling problem during
inflation one needs to require f ≥ 1. Since the inflaton field
and the scale factor change monotonously during inflation
it is natural to assume that the coupling function is a
decreasing function during inflation which attains large
values in the beginning.
For decreasing coupling functions, it is well known that
the electric energy density dominates the magnetic one
[39,40,44] and if we try to generate the magnetic field
strong enough to be in accord with the observations, the
electric field appears to be even stronger and its energy
density exceeds that of the inflaton field. This is known as
the backreaction problem. In previous studies, the authors
tried to avoid this problem, because it does not allow us to
solve the background equations and Maxwell equation
separately [39,40,42,43]. However, it is interesting what
happens when the backreaction becomes important and
whether the amplification really stops in this regime. These
are open questions in the literature.
Since strong electric fields could be generated during
inflation, the pair creation in a strong electric field, which is
known as the Schwinger effect [46], can become important
and affect the magnetogenesis. The Schwinger effect in the
constant and homogeneous background electric field in de
Sitter space-time was investigated by many authors [47–60].
The cases of (1 þ 1)-dimensional [47,50,51],(2 þ 1)-
dimensional [49],and(3 þ 1)-dimensional [48,52,53,57,
58] de Sitter space-time with scalar [47–49,53,57–59] and
spinor charged fields [50–52,57,58], including also an
external magnetic field [56], were investigated. It is impor-
tant to note that constantelectric energy density is considered
rather than the case of a constant comoving electric field.
According to Ref. [61], maintaining this regime would
require the existence of ad hoc currents that could violate
the second law of thermodynamics.
The cosmological Schwinger effect relates the particle
production by an electric field and the exponential expan-
sion of the Universe and contains interesting features which
are absent in its flat-space counterpart, namely (i) the
infrared hyperconductivity in the bosonic case when the
conductivity becomes very large in the limit of small mass
of charged particles and (ii) the negative conductivity in the
weak-field regime eE ≪ H
2
which can, in principle, lead to
the enhancement of the electric field.
The induced current of created particles obtained by
direct averaging of the corresponding current operator
contains ultraviolet divergences, which can be regularized
using adiabatic subtraction [48,52] or the point-splitting
method [53]. Although these techniques remove the diver-
gent parts, the finite part is not uniquely defined and
depends on the applied subtraction scheme. Adiabatic
subtraction to the second order in the adiabaticity parameter
and point-splitting regularization define the minimal sub-
traction scheme which is commonly used. However, in the
massive limit, when the particle’s mass is much greater than
the Hubble parameter, the current and conductivity contain
exponentially unsuppressed terms, which is not consistent
with the standard Bogolyubov calculations. In order to
eliminate this discrepancy the authors of Ref. [57] proposed
a new maximal subtraction scheme, which normalizes the
behavior of the current in the massive case. However, the
main features in the small mass regime remain the same
and the infrared hyperconductivity in the scalar case is
observed [48,53].
In addition, the charged particles show negative con-
ductivity in the weak-field regime, which can lead to an
instability and an avalanchelike enhancement of electric
field up to a certain critical value [52,58]. In the very recent
article [59] Stahl considers a possibility to enhance the
quantum fluctuations of the electromagnetic field even
without interaction with an inflaton. However, the negative
conductivity is rather speculative [57,58] and may be an
artifact of used subtraction schemes.
An attempt to combine the generation of the electro-
magnetic field due to kinetic coupling with the inflaton, the
Schwinger effect and the backreaction into a consistent
picture was made in Ref. [62]. It was shown that the
expressions for the Schwinger current in the time-dependent
electric background in the strong-field regime have the
same functional dependence as in the case of a constant
electric field. However, the backreaction on the background
evolution was calculated perturbatively only in the first
order, which is valid only at the early stages of inflation.
The impact on the generated magnetic field was not
discussed as well.
This paper is organized as follows. We derive a self-
consistent system of equations which describes the joint
evolution of the scale factor, inflaton field, and electric field
energy density in Sec. II, where we take into account the
backreaction of generated fields on the background evo-
lution and the Schwinger effect which is important at the
late stages of inflation. In Sec. III, we study the regime
when the backreaction becomes important and analyze the
SOBOL, GORBAR, KAMARPOUR, and VILCHINSKII PHYS. REV. D 98, 063534 (2018)
063534-2
main features of the electromagnetic field power spectra
generated in this regime. The results of numerical calcu-
lations of the power spectra of generated fields and the
present value of the magnetic field in the Starobinsky
inflation model for two types of coupling functions are
represented in Sec. IV. The summary of the obtained results
is given in Sec. V.
II. SELF-CONSISTENT SYSTEM OF EQUATIONS
We consider a spatially flat Friedmann-Lamaître-
Robertson-Walker Universe with metric tensor
g
μν
¼ diagð1; −a
2
; −a
2
; −a
2
Þ;
ffiffiffiffiffiffi
−g
p
¼ a
3
; ð1Þ
and use the natural system of units where ℏ ¼ c ¼ 1, M
p
¼
ð8πGÞ
−1=2
¼ 2.4 × 10
18
GeV is a reduced Planck mass,
and e ¼
ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
4πα
p
≈ 0.3 is the absolute value of the electron’s
charge.
The action which describes inflaton field ϕ, electromag-
netic field A
μ
, and charged field χ (either bosonic or
fermionic) reads
S ¼
Z
d
4
x
ffiffiffiffiffiffi
−g
p
1
2
g
μν
∂
μ
ϕ∂
ν
ϕ − VðϕÞ
−
1
4
f
2
ðϕÞg
μα
g
νβ
F
μν
F
αβ
þ L
charged
ðA; χÞ
; ð2Þ
where VðϕÞ is the inflaton effective potential; fðϕÞ is the
kinetic coupling function; and L
charged
ðA; χÞ is a gauge-
invariant Lagrangian of the charged field χ interacting with
the electromagnetic field A
μ
.
The corresponding Euler-Lagrange equations have the
form
1
ffiffiffiffiffiffi
−g
p
∂
μ
½
ffiffiffiffiffiffi
−g
p
g
μν
∂
ν
ϕþ
dV
dϕ
¼ −
1
2
ff
0
F
μν
F
μν
; ð3Þ
1
ffiffiffiffiffiffi
−g
p
∂
μ
½
ffiffiffiffiffiffi
−g
p
g
μα
g
νβ
f
2
ðϕÞF
αβ
¼−j
ν
; ð4Þ
where the 4-current is defined as usual
j
μ
¼
∂L
charged
ðA; χÞ
∂A
μ
: ð5Þ
The right-hand side of Eq. (3) describes the backreaction of
created electric fields on the evolution of the inflaton field.
Evolution of the Universe is driven by the total energy
density of all fields. It can be calculated as the 00-component
of the stress-energy tensor. The latter is defined as usual as
T
μν
¼
2
ffiffiffiffiffiffi
−g
p
δS
δg
μν
¼ ∂
μ
ϕ∂
ν
ϕ − f
2
ðϕÞg
αβ
F
μα
F
νβ
− g
μν
L
0
þ T
ðchargedÞ
μν
; ð6Þ
where L
0
is the Lagrangian density of the inflaton and
electromagnetic fields which is represented by the first three
terms in the square brackets in Eq. (2).
In the simplest case the inflaton field is spatially
homogeneous. If the coupling function fðϕÞ always
decreases in time, then it is well known [39,40] that the
electric component of the created electromagnetic field
dominates the magnetic one and leads to the backreaction
problem. Therefore, we take into account the presence of
electric field F
0i
¼ aðtÞE
i
ðtÞ and neglect the magnetic
component F
ij
¼ a
2
ε
ijk
B
k
≈ 0. Then the energy density
reads
ρ ¼
1
2
_
ϕ
2
þ VðϕÞ
þ
1
2
f
2
E
2
þ ρ
χ
¼ ρ
inf
þ ρ
E
þ ρ
χ
; ð7Þ
where ρ
χ
is the energy density of the charged particles
produced by the Schwinger effect.
The Friedmann, Klein-Gordon, and Maxwell equations
take the following form:
H
2
¼
_
a
a
2
¼
1
3M
2
p
ðρ
inf
þ ρ
E
þ ρ
χ
Þ; ð8Þ
ϕ þ 3H
_
ϕ þ
dV
dϕ
¼ fðϕÞf
0
ðϕÞE
2
ðtÞ; ð9Þ
∂
t
ða
2
f
2
E
i
Þ¼−aj
i
; ð10Þ
where overdots denote the derivatives with respect to
cosmic time and the prime denotes the derivative with
respect to the inflaton field.
It has to be mentioned that we consider the classical
electric field, which is generated from quantum fluctuations
due to interaction with the inflaton. It is useful to analyze
the mode composition of this field. When the modes are
inside the horizon they oscillate in time and have to be
treated as quantum fluctuations. However, when they cross
the horizon the mode functions start to behave monoton-
ically and can be chosen real. According to Ref. [63], this
corresponds to the quantum-to-classical transition and
these modes can be treated classically. Therefore, the
contribution to the electric field is made only by the
modes, which are outside the horizon. Since their wave-
length is larger than the horizon, i.e., the largest observable
scale, the corresponding electric field can be considered
homogeneous.
INFLUENCE OF BACKREACTION OF ELECTRIC FIELDS … PHYS. REV. D 98, 063534 (2018)
063534-3
A. Equation for electric field energy density
It is convenient to rewrite the Maxwell equation (10) in
terms of electric field energy density ρ
E
¼ f
2
E
2
=2:
_
ρ
E
þ 4Hρ
E
þ 2
_
f
f
ρ
E
¼ −
1
a
ðE · jÞ: ð11Þ
The “classical” part of the electric energy density at a
certain moment of time is determined by the modes, which
crossed the horizon from the beginning of inflation till the
moment under consideration:
ρ
E
ðtÞ¼
Z
k
H
ðtÞ
k
i
dk
dρ
E
dk
ðtÞ;k
H
ðtÞ¼aðtÞHðtÞ; ð12Þ
where k
i
is the momentum of the mode which crosses the
horizon at the beginning of inflation.
However, Eq. (11) does not take into account the fact that
the number of relevant modes with wavelength larger than
the horizon changes in time. In order to deal with this, we
should introduce an additional term which describes the
modes crossing the horizon at a given time t and starting to
contribute to the total energy density of the electric field:
ð
_
ρ
E
Þ
H
¼
dρ
E
dk
k¼k
H
·
dk
H
dt
: ð13Þ
The power spectra of electric and magnetic fields are
expressed through the mode function of the electromag-
netic field Aðk; tÞ in the standard way [39]:
dρ
E
dk
¼
f
2
2π
2
k
2
a
2
∂
∂t
Aðk; tÞ
fðtÞ
2
; ð14Þ
dρ
B
dk
¼
1
2π
2
k
4
a
4
jAðk; tÞj
2
: ð15Þ
This mode function satisfies the following equation (in
the conformal time η):
∂
2
A
k
∂η
2
þ
k
2
−
1
f
∂
2
f
∂η
2
A
k
¼ 0; ð16Þ
and the initial conditions for the modes inside the horizon
have the form of the Bunch-Davies vacuum,
Aðk; tÞ¼
1
ffiffiffiffiffi
2k
p
e
−ikηðtÞ
;kηðtÞ → −∞: ð17Þ
When a certain mode crosses the horizon it changes its
dependence on time from oscillatory to monotonous. We
can assume that at the moment of horizon crossing its
behavior is still approximately described by Eq. (17). Then
∂
∂t
Aðk; tÞ
fðtÞ
2
≈
1
2kf
2
k
2
a
2
þ
_
f
f
2
ð18Þ
and the “boundary” term (13) takes the form
ð
_
ρ
E
Þ
H
¼
f
2
2π
2
k
2
a
2
1
2kf
2
k
2
a
2
þ
_
f
f
2
k¼k
H
×
dk
H
dt
¼
H
3
4π
2
H
2
þ
_
f
f
2
: ð19Þ
Finally, the equation which governs the behavior of
electric field energy density is given by
_
ρ
E
þ 4Hρ
E
þ 2
_
f
f
ρ
E
¼ −
1
a
ðE · jÞþ
H
3
4π
2
H
2
þ
_
f
f
2
:
ð20Þ
It is possible to derive Eq. (20) in an alternative way by
inspecting the time dependence of the electric power
spectrum. In the deeply subhorizon regime k ≫ aH the
mode function takes the value of the Bunch-Davies initial
conditions (17). Far outside the horizon k ≪ aH, the
solution of Eq. (16) is
A
k
f
¼ C
1
þ C
2
Z
t
t
k
dt
0
aðt
0
Þf
2
ðt
0
Þ
;
∂
∂t
A
k
f
¼
C
2
af
2
: ð21Þ
Matching solutions (17) and (21) at the moment of
horizon crossing t
k
when k ¼ aH, we find
C
1
¼
e
−ikη
k
ffiffiffiffiffi
2k
p
f
k
;C
2
¼ −
e
−ikη
k
a
k
f
k
ffiffiffiffiffi
2k
p
iH
k
þ
_
f
k
f
k
; ð22Þ
where all the quantities with subscript k must be taken at
the moment of horizon crossing t
k
. Then, using Eqs. (14)
and (15), we can write the power spectra of generated fields
as follows:
dρ
E
d ln k
¼
1
2π
2
a
4
f
2
k
3
jC
2
ðkÞj
2
¼
k
4
4π
2
a
4
f
2
k
f
2
1 þ
1
H
k
_
f
k
f
k
2
;
ð23Þ
dρ
B
d ln k
¼
1
2π
2
a
4
f
2
k
5
C
1
ðkÞþC
2
ðkÞ
Z
t
t
k
dt
0
aðt
0
Þf
2
ðt
0
Þ
2
¼
k
4
4π
2
a
4
f
2
f
2
k
1 −
i þ
1
H
k
_
f
k
f
k
H
k
Z
t
t
k
a
k
f
2
k
aðt
0
Þf
2
ðt
0
Þ
dt
0
2
:
ð24Þ
Integrating Eq. (23) over modes outside the horizon at a
given moment of time, we obtain the energy density of the
electric field:
SOBOL, GORBAR, KAMARPOUR, and VILCHINSKII PHYS. REV. D 98, 063534 (2018)
063534-4
剩余18页未读,继续阅读
资源评论
weixin_38637764
- 粉丝: 10
- 资源: 953
上传资源 快速赚钱
- 我的内容管理 展开
- 我的资源 快来上传第一个资源
- 我的收益 登录查看自己的收益
- 我的积分 登录查看自己的积分
- 我的C币 登录后查看C币余额
- 我的收藏
- 我的下载
- 下载帮助
安全验证
文档复制为VIP权益,开通VIP直接复制
信息提交成功