没有合适的资源?快使用搜索试试~ 我知道了~
论文研究 - 利用卫星图像的合理和悖论推理理论对植被,水生和矿物表面进行建模和表征:科特迪瓦V包卢省Toumodi-Yamous...
需积分: 0 0 下载量 132 浏览量
2020-06-01
11:15:22
上传
评论
收藏 1012KB PDF 举报
温馨提示
试读
17页
在本文中,Dezert-Smarandache(DSmT)的合理和反常推理理论被用来考虑通过植被,水生和矿物表面交汇处的反常特征。 为了做到这一点,我们通过使用基于Aster卫星图像的NDVI,MNDWI和NBaBaI光谱指数的PCR5规则,通过使用DSmT理论聚合信息来开发像素分类模型。 在定性方面,该模型针对某些知识(E,V,M)生成了三个简单类,并生成了八个复合类,其中包括两个表征部分无知的并集类({E,V},{M,V})和六个相交类其中三类简单交点(E∩V,M∩V,E∩M)和三类复合交点(E∩{M,V},M∩{E,V},V∩{E,M} ),代表悖论。 对于分类良好的像素,该模型的平均验证率为93.34%,在该领域中实体的符合率为96.37%。 因此,保留的模型1为简单类提供了84.98%,而为复合类提供了15.02%。
资源推荐
资源详情
资源评论
Open Journal of Applied Sciences, 2017, 7, 520-536
http://www.scirp.org/journal/ojapps
ISSN Online: 2165-3925
ISSN Print: 2165-3917
DOI:
10.4236/ojapps.2017.710038 Oct. 26, 2017 520 Open Journal of Applied Sciences
Modeling and Characterization of Vegetation,
Aquatic and Mineral Surfaces Using the Theory
of Plausible and Paradoxical Reasoning from
Satellite Images: Case of the
Toumodi-Yamoussoukro-Tiébissou Zone in V
Baoulé (Côte d’Ivoire)
Jean-Claude Okaingni
1,2
, Sié Ouattara
1,2
, Adles Kouassi
1,2,3
, Wognin J. Vangah
1,2
,
Aubin K. Koffi
1,2
, Alain Clement
4
1
Laboratory of Signals and Electrical Systems (L2SE), Institut National Polytechnique Houphouët Boigny,
Yamoussoukro, Cote D’Ivoire
2
Institut National Polytechnique Houphouët Boigny (INPHB), Yamoussoukro, Cote D’Ivoire
3
Ecole Supérieure des Technologies de l’Information et de la Communication (ESATIC), Abidjan, Cote D’Ivoire
4
Institut Universitaire de Technologie d’Angers (IUT), Angers, France
Abstract
In this paper, the theory of plausible and paradoxical reasoning of Dezert
-
Smarandache (DSmT) is used to take into account the paradoxical character
through the intersections of vegetation, aquatic and mineral surfaces. In order
to do this, we developed a classification model of pixels by aggregating inform
a-
tion using the DSmT theory based on the PCR5 rule using the
NDVI
,
MNDWI
and
NDBaI
spectral indices obtained from the ASTER satellite im
ages. On the
qualitative level, the model produced three simple classes for cer
tain knowledge
(E, V, M) and eight composite classes including two union
classes characterizing
partial ignorance ({E,V}, {M,V}) and six classes of intersection of which three
classes of simple intersection (E∩V, M∩V, E∩M) and three classes of comp
o-
site intersection (E∩{M,V}, M∩{E,V}, V∩{E,M}), which represent paradoxes.
This
model was validated with an average rate of 93.34% for the well-classified pi
x-
els and a compliance rate of the entities in the field of 96.37%.
Thus, the model 1
retained provides 84.98% for the simple classes against
15.02% for the composite
classes.
Keywords
Theory of Plausible and Paradoxical Reasoning, PCR5 Rule, ASTER Satellite
How to cite this paper:
Okaingni, J.-C.,
Ouattara, S
., Kouassi, A., Vangah, W.J.,
Koffi, A
.K. and Clement, A. (2017) Model-
ing and Characterization of Vegetation,
Aquatic and Mineral Surfaces Using the
Theory of Plausible and Paradoxical Re
a-
soning from Satellite Images : Case of the
Toumodi
-Yamoussoukro-Tiébissou Zone
in
V Baoulé (Côte d’Ivoire)
.
Open Journal of
Applied Sciences
,
7
, 520-536.
https:
//doi.org/10.4236/ojapps.2017.710038
Received:
September 21, 2017
Accepted:
October 23, 2017
Published:
October 26, 2017
Copyright © 201
7 by authors and
Scientific
Research Publishing Inc.
This work is licensed under the Creative
Commons Attribution International
License (CC BY 4.0).
J.-C. Okaingni et al.
DOI:
10.4236/ojapps.2017.710038 521 Open Journal of Applied Sciences
Images,
NDVI
,
MNDWI
,
NDBaI,
Modeling, Classification
1. Introduction
The surface state of the Earth can be represented in remote sensing by three ent-
ities that are vegetation surfaces, aquatic surfaces and mineral surfaces. Any sur-
face area observed, depending on the size of the area, may be a combination of
these three entities.
Thus, it can be observed vegetation surface, aquatic surface, mineral surface,
vegetation and aquatic surface, vegetation and mineral surface, mineral and aq-
uatic surface, vegetation, mineral and aquatic surface.
The use of satellite images, for mapping purposes, has been the subject of sev-
eral studies ([1] [2] [3] [4]). Researchers have used spectral indices to map vege-
tation surfaces, aquatic surfaces, and surfaces of bare soil and mansions.
These indices were used for image classification. Unfortunately, imperfections
(uncertainties, inaccuracies, etc.) on the information produced by the images
associated with said indices are observed ([5] [6]). Taking into account and good
management of these imperfections are done by the theory of belief functions.
The Dempster-Shafer theory has been used successfully to handle cases of un-
certainty, vagueness and ignorance in the classification of pixels to classes of ve-
getation surface, aquatic surface and mineral surface [4].
In this article, the theory of plausible and paradoxical reasoning of Dezert-
Smarandache (DSmT) is used to take into account the paradoxical character through
the intersections of the elements vegetation surface, aquatic surface and mineral
surface.
The general objective of the study is to develop a model of pixel classification
by aggregating information using the DSmT theory, spectral indices
NDVI
(Nor-
malized Difference Vegetation Index),
MNDWI
(Modification of Normalized Dif-
ference Water Index) and
NDBaI
(Normalized Difference Bare Index) and ASTER
satellite images. It acts specifically first, to model the frameworks of discernment
and reasoning and belief functions, then define the decision criteria and write
algorithms and programming codes under the MATLAB software; finally realize
and evaluate classified image.
The contribution of this study is to give an approach of unsupervised classifi-
cation of mapping that takes into account the plausible and paradoxical charac-
teristics related to the information of ground that is to say without needing to
know the real spatial state of the ground concerned.
This paper, which proposes to report on the work carried out, presents succes-
sively the theory of plausible and paradoxical reasoning of Dézert-Smarandache,
the material used, the methodological approach that guided the work and the re-
sults obtained.
J.-C. Okaingni et al.
DOI:
10.4236/ojapps.2017.710038 522 Open Journal of Applied Sciences
2. Principle and Formalism of DSmT
Dezert-Smarandache theory (DSmT) is interpreted as a generalization of the
theory of Dempster-Shafer (DST) ([7]). Its basic principle and formalism for ag-
gregating information can be characterized by a four-stage structure of modeling,
estimation, combination and decision.
Modeling consists in choosing the representation of the frameworks of dis-
cernment and reasoning and the models of the mass functions to be used.
The discernment framework
{ }
1
,,
θθ
Θ=
N
of DSmT is an exhaustive set of
different hypotheses, not necessarily exclusive assumptions. The reasoning frame-
work
D
Θ
associated, also called hyper-powerset, is the set of all possible proposi-
tions constructed from the elements of Θ, including the empty set (
φ
), with the
operators
∪ and ∩. It is characterized by the following conditions ([8]):
1)
1
,, ,
φθ θ
Θ
∈
N
D
,
2) If
,
Θ
∈
ij
AA D
then
Θ
∩∈
ij
AAD
and
Θ
∈
ij
AAD
,
3) There are no other elements belonging to
D
Θ
, except those obtained using rules
1 or 2.
The construction of the reasoning framework
D
Θ
can be obtained by a matrix
product between the binary matrix of Dedekind and the coding vector of Sma-
randache ([1] [7]). Its cardinal increases according to the cardinal of the discern-
ment framework on which it is based.
In order to fix ideas, it is considered the cardinal of Θ equal to 3. Thus, ac-
cording to Dedekind ([9]), the cardinal of
D
Θ
is equal to 19. Then we get ([1]):
{
}
123
,,
θθθ
Θ=
{
( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
}
1231 22 31 31 2 31 2
2 31 31 2 3 3 1 2 2 1 3
2 1 33 1 21 2 3
13 12 23123
,,,,,,, ,,
,,,,,
,,,
,
φθθθθ θθ θθ θθ θ θθ θ
θθθθθ θθθ θθθ θθ
θ θθθ θθθ θθ
θθ θθ θθθθθ
Θ
= ∪ ∪∪∪∪∩
∩ ∩ ∩∪ ∩∪ ∩∪
∪∩ ∪∩ ∪∩
∩∪∩∪∩ ∩∩
D
In general, we define a generalized mass function
m
of
D
Θ
with values in [0,1]
satisfying the following conditions of Equation (1):
( )
() 1
0
φ
Θ
∈
=
=
∑
AD
mA
m
(1)
where
φ
is the empty set. The value
m
(
A
) quantifies the belief that the class
sought belongs to the subset
A
of
D
Θ
(and to no other subset of
A
). The subsets
A
such that
m
(
A
) > 0 are called focal elements.
The following special mass functions are defined ([10]):
a mass function
m
is said to be normal when
m
(
φ
) = 0;
a mass function
m
is said to be categorical when it has a single focal element
A
such that
m
(
A
) = 1. In the case where
A
is a set, knowledge is certain but
imprecise.
When
A
= {
k
}, knowledge is certain and precise;
J.-C. Okaingni et al.
DOI:
10.4236/ojapps.2017.710038 523 Open Journal of Applied Sciences
a mass function
m
is said to be empty (or total ignorance) when the func-
tion
m
is categorical in Θ:
m
(Θ) = 1;
a mass function
m
is said to be Bayesian if all the focal elements are single-
tons of Θ in
Equation (2):
( )
1
θ
θ
∈Θ
=
∑
k
k
m
; (2)
a mass function
m
is said to be dogmatic if
m
(Θ) = 0;
a mass function
m
is said to be consonant if all the focal elements are nested;
a mass function
m
is said to have a simple support when it has 2 focal ele-
ments, one of which is Θ
(Equation (3)):
( )
( )
(
)
1,
0, \
θ
θ
ω
ω
=−∈
Θ=
= ∀∈
mA A D
m
mB B D A
(3)
In this case, the function
m
can also be denoted
A
ω
where
ω
represents the
weight of the ignorance of the mass function
m
.
The estimation consists in determining all the parameters of the mass func-
tions selected at the modeling stage. This is a difficult problem that does not have a
universal solution. The difficulty is further increased if we want to assign masses
to compound hypotheses involving intersections and/or unions ([11]).
The combination is the grouping phase of the information, from the mass func-
tions of the different information sources, using an operator adapted to the for-
malism of the modeling. The DSmT has two types of combination ([12]): the clas-
sic version and the hybrid version. Consider
n
initial mass functions
12
, ,,
n
mm m
representing the respective information of
n
different sources, which can be com-
bined according to the DSmT.
The classic combination of DSmT is (Equation (4)):
( )
( ) ( )
( )
( )
12
11 2 2
1, , ,
θθ
∩ ∩∩ =
= ∗ ∗∗
= ∈ ∀∈
∑
n
nn
AA AC
i
mC m A m A m A
Ai n D C D
(4)
The hybrid combination of DSmT is used in the presence of integrity con-
straints applied to
D
Θ
. An integrity constraint of a set
U
is an impossibility of
considering a mass assignment to this set ([12]). The mass of the set
U
is then
assigned to the empty set
φ
. Thus, the hybrid combination is defined ([13]) by
Equations (5)-(8):
( )
( ) ( ) (
) ( )
123
,
θ
φ
= ∗ + + ∀∈
mA A HAHAHA AD
(5)
( ) (
) ( )
( )
( )
12
1 11 2 2
1, ,
θ
= ∈
∩ ∩∩ =
= ∗ ∗∗
∑
i
nn
Xi n D
X X Xn A
HA mX mX mX
(6)
( ) ( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
11
2 11 2 2
1, ,
)
φ
φ
= =
= ∈
= ∨ ∈∧=Θ
= ∗ ∗∗
∑
i
nn
ii
ii
nn
Xi n
uX A uX A
H A mX mX mX
(7)
剩余16页未读,继续阅读
资源评论
weixin_38624975
- 粉丝: 5
- 资源: 907
上传资源 快速赚钱
- 我的内容管理 展开
- 我的资源 快来上传第一个资源
- 我的收益 登录查看自己的收益
- 我的积分 登录查看自己的积分
- 我的C币 登录后查看C币余额
- 我的收藏
- 我的下载
- 下载帮助
最新资源
- AIS2024 valid
- 最入门的爬虫代码 python.docx
- 爬虫零基础入门-爬取天气预报.pdf
- 最通俗易懂的 MongoDB 非结构化文档存储数据库教程.zip
- 以mongodb为数据库的订单物流小项目.zip
- 腾讯云-mongodb数据库, 项目部署.zip
- 腾讯 APIJSON 的 MongoDB 数据库插件.zip
- 理解非关系型数据库和关系型数据库的区别.zip
- 操作简单的Mongodb网页web管理工具,基于Spring Boot2.0支持mongodb集群.zip
- tms-mongodb-web,提供访问mongodb数据的REST API和可灵活扩展的mongodb web 客户端.zip
资源上传下载、课程学习等过程中有任何疑问或建议,欢迎提出宝贵意见哦~我们会及时处理!
点击此处反馈
安全验证
文档复制为VIP权益,开通VIP直接复制
信息提交成功