没有合适的资源?快使用搜索试试~ 我知道了~
我们研究IIB型超重力中对超对称AdS 6解决方案的一般要求。 我们采用Killing spinor技术,研究了各种Killing spinor双线性之间的微分和代数关系,以找到解的典范形式。 我们的结果与Apruzzi等人的工作完全吻合。 (JHEP 1411:099,2014),它使用了纯旋转技术。 为了确定问题的几何形状,我们还通过对AdS 6上的IIB型超重力进行了尺寸缩减,从而计算了三维理论。 该有效动作本质上是一个非线性的sigma模型,具有五个标量场参数化SL(3,R)/ SO(2,1),并由标量势修改并耦合到欧几里得签名中的爱因斯坦引力。 我们认为,标量势可以由CSO(1,1,1))SL(3,R)子组以类似于规范超重力的方式来解释。
资源推荐
资源详情
资源评论
Eur. Phys. J. C (2015) 75:484
DOI 10.1140/epjc/s10052-015-3705-1
Regular Article - Theoretical Physics
Supersymmetric AdS
6
solutions of type IIB supergravity
Hyojoong Kim
1,a
, Nakwoo Kim
1,b
, Minwoo Suh
2,c
1
Department of Physics and Research Institute of Basic Science, Kyung Hee University, Seoul 130-701, Korea
2
Department of Physics, Sogang University, Seoul 121-742, Korea
Received: 14 July 2015 / Accepted: 28 September 2015 / Published online: 11 October 2015
© The Author(s) 2015. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com
Abstract We study the general requirement for supersym-
metric AdS
6
solutions in type IIB supergravity. We employ
the Killing spinor technique and study the differential and
algebraic relations among various Killing spinor bilinears to
find the canonical form of the solutions. Our result agrees
precisely with the work of Apruzzi et al. (JHEP 1411:099,
2014), which used the pure spinor technique. Hoping to
identify the geometry of the problem, we also computed
four-dimensional theory through the dimensional reduction
of type IIB supergravity on AdS
6
. This effective action
is essentially a non-linear sigma model with five scalar
fields parametrizing SL(3, R)/SO(2, 1), modified by a scalar
potential and coupled to Einstein gravity in Euclidean signa-
ture. We argue that the scalar potential can be explained by
a subgroup CSO(1,1,1) ⊂ SL(3, R) in a way analogous to
gauged supergravity.
Contents
1 Introduction ..................... 1
2 Supersymmetric AdS
6
solutions ........... 2
2.1 Killing spinor equations ............. 2
2.2 Killing vectors .................. 2
2.3 Supersymmetric solutions ............ 3
2.4 Equations of motion ............... 5
3 Four-dimensional effective action .......... 5
3.1 Non-linear sigma model ............ 5
3.2 Scalar kinetic terms ............... 5
3.3 Scalar potential ................. 6
4 Discussions ...................... 7
Appendix A: Type IIB supergravity ........... 8
Appendix B: Gamma matrices and spinors ....... 8
B.1: Gamma matrices ................ 8
B.2: Spinors ..................... 8
a
e-mail: h.kim@khu.ac.kr
b
e-mail: nkim@khu.ac.kr
c
e-mail: minsuh@usc.edu
Appendix C: Spinor bilinears .............. 9
C.1: Algebraic relations ............... 9
C.2: Differential relations .............. 9
Scalar bilinears ................. 9
Vector bilinears ................. 9
Two-form bilinears ...............10
Normalization of scalar bilinears ........... 10
Appendix D: Fierz identities .............. 10
D.1: Relations of scalar bilinears ........... 10
D.2: Inner products of vector bilinears ........ 11
Appendix E: Killing vectors of five-dimensional target
space ......................... 11
References ........................ 12
1 Introduction
In recent years, there has been renewed interest in super-
symmetric AdS
6
solutions in D = 10 supergravity. Via
the gauge/gravity correspondence [2], such solutions should
be dual to certain D = 5 superconformal field theories.
Five-dimensional gauge theories are perturbatively non-
renormalizable. Seiberg nonetheless argued that N = 1 super-
symmetric Sp(N ) gauge theories with hypermultiplets of
N
f
< 8 fundamental and one antisymmetric tensor represen-
tation flow in the infinite gauge coupling limit to supercon-
formal theories, and their SO(N
f
) ×U (1) global symmetry
is enhanced to E
N
f
+1
[3–5]. Such fixed point theories have a
string theory construction: in terms of the near-horizon limit
of D4–D8 brane configurations. Based on the AdS
6
/CFT
5
correspondence [6], Brandhuber and Oz identified the grav-
ity dual as a supersymmetric AdS
6
×
w
S
4
solution of massive
type IIA supergravity [7]. More recently this correspondence
was generalized to quiver gauge theories and AdS
6
×
w
S
4
/Z
n
orbifolds in [8].
Thanks to the development of the localization technique
[9] and its generalization to five-dimensional gauge theories
[10,11], some BPS quantities can be calculated exactly. The
123
484 Page 2 of 12 Eur. Phys. J. C (2015) 75 :484
conjectured enhancement of global symmetry to E
N
f
+1
was
verified from the analysis of the superconformal index in
[12]. Furthermore, the S
5
free energy and also the
1
2
-BPS
circular Wilson loop operators are calculated and shown to
agree with the gravity side computations [13–16].
Encouraged by the successful application of localization
technique on the field theory side, it is natural for us to look
for new supersymmetric AdS
6
solutions. In massive type IIA
supergravity, it was proved that the Brandhuber–Oz solution
is the unique one [17]. In type IIB supergravity, the T-dual
version of the Brandhuber–Oz solution has been known for
alongtime[18]. A new solution was obtained more recently
employing the technique of non-Abelian T-dual transforma-
tion in [19]. The dual gauge theory was investigated in [20],
but it is not completely understood yet.
For a thorough study, the authors of [1] investigated the
general form of supersymmetric AdS
6
solutions of type IIB
supergravity, using the pure spinor approach. They found
that the four-dimensional internal space is a fibration of S
2
over a two-dimensional space, and they also showed that the
supersymmetry conditions boil down to two coupled partial
differential equations. Of course, any solution of the PDEs
provides a supersymmetric AdS
6
solution at least locally. In
particular, the two explicit solutions mentioned above can be
reproduced as specific solutions to the PDEs. But otherwise
these non-linear coupled PDEs are so complicated that cur-
rently it looks very hard, if not impossible, to obtain more
AdS
6
solutions by directly solving the PDEs.
The objective of this article is to procure additional insight
into this problem, using alternative methods. In the first part
we use the Killing spinor approach which is probably more
better known and has been successfully applied to many sim-
ilar problems; see e.g. [21–23]. Following the standard pro-
cedure we work out the algebraic and differential constraints
which should be satisfied by various spinor bilinears and
derive the supersymmetric conditions. In the end, we con-
firm that our results are in precise agreement with that of [1].
Secondly, via dimensional reduction of the bosonic sector of
the D = 10 action on AdS
6
, we present a four-dimensional
effective theory action, which turns out to be a non-linear
sigma model of five scalar fields coupled to gravity. The
scalar fields parametrize the coset space SL(3, R)/SO(2, 1).
Also there is a non-trivial scalar potential, which breaks the
global sl (3, R) symmetry to a certain subalgebra. Although
in this paper we do not present new solutions, we believe the
identification of the D = 4 effective action will prove useful
in the construction of explicit solutions and their classifica-
tions.
This paper is organized as follows. Section 2 contains an
analysis on the supersymmetry conditions for AdS
6
solu-
tions. In Sect.3, we study the four-dimensional effective the-
ory from dimensional reduction on AdS
6
. Technical details
are relegated to the appendices.
2 Supersymmetric AdS
6
solutions
2.1 Killing spinor equations
We consider the most general supersymmetric AdS
6
solu-
tions of type IIB supergravity. We take the D = 10 metric as
a warped product of AdS
6
with a four-dimensional Rieman-
nian space M
4
ds
2
= e
2U
ds
2
AdS
6
+ ds
2
M
4
, (2.1)
where U is a warp factor. To respect the symmetry of AdS
6
,
we should set the five-form flux to zero. The complex three-
form flux G is non-vanishing only on M
4
. The warp factor
U , the dilation φ and the axion C, are functions on M
4
and
of course independent of coordinates in AdS
6
.
To preserve some supersymmetry, we require the van-
ishing of supersymmetry transformations of the gravitino
and the dilatino i.e. δψ
M
= 0,δλ= 0. With the gamma
matrix decomposition (B.1) and the spinor ansatz (B.8),
we reduce the ten-dimensional Killing spinor equations to
four-dimensional ones. There are two differential and four
algebraic-type equations:
D
m
ξ
1±
+
1
96
G
npq
(γ
m
γ
npq
+ 2γ
npq
γ
m
)ξ
2±
= 0, (2.2)
¯
D
m
ξ
2±
+
1
96
G
∗
npq
(γ
m
γ
npq
+ 2γ
npq
γ
m
)ξ
1±
= 0, (2.3)
ime
−U
ξ
1∓
+ ∂
n
U γ
n
ξ
1±
−
1
48
G
npq
γ
npq
ξ
2±
= 0, (2.4)
ime
−U
ξ
2∓
+ ∂
n
U γ
n
ξ
2±
−
1
48
G
∗
npq
γ
npq
ξ
1±
= 0, (2.5)
P
n
γ
n
ξ
2±
+
1
24
G
npq
γ
npq
ξ
1±
= 0, (2.6)
P
∗
n
γ
n
ξ
1±
+
1
24
G
∗
npq
γ
npq
ξ
2±
= 0, (2.7)
where
D
m
ξ
1±
=(∇
m
−
i
2
Q
m
)ξ
1±
,
¯
D
m
ξ
2±
= (∇
m
+
i
2
Q
m
)ξ
2±
.
(2.8)
With the assumption that there exists at least one nowhere-
vanishing solution to the equations in the above, we can
construct various spinor bilinears. Then the supersymmetric
condition is translated into various algebraic and differen-
tial relations between the spinor bilinears. We have recorded
them in Appendix C.1 and C.2.
2.2 Killing vectors
We first need to study the isometry of the four-dimensional
Riemannian space M
4
. We note that the following two com-
plex vectors satisfy the Killing equation ∇
(m
K
n)
= 0:
123
Eur. Phys. J. C (2015) 75 :484 Page 3 of 12 484
ξ
1+
γ
n
ξ
1−
+ ξ
2+
γ
n
ξ
2−
, ξ
c
1
+
γ
n
ξ
2−
+ ξ
c
2
+
γ
n
ξ
1−
.
(2.9)
If these vectors are to provide a true symmetry of the full
ten-dimensional solution as well, we need to check if
L
K
U = (d i
K
+ i
K
d) U = K
m
∂
m
U = 0, (2.10)
where L
K
is a Lie derivative along the Killing vector K .
From (C.4) and (C.6), we find that in fact only three of them
satisfy the above condition. Hence, the true Killing vectors
are
K
n
1
≡ Re (ξ
c
1
+
γ
n
ξ
2−
+ ξ
c
2
+
γ
n
ξ
1−
), (2.11)
K
n
2
≡ Im (ξ
c
1
+
γ
n
ξ
2−
+ ξ
c
2
+
γ
n
ξ
1−
), (2.12)
K
n
3
≡ Re (ξ
1+
γ
n
ξ
1−
+ ξ
2+
γ
n
ξ
2−
). (2.13)
Using (2.6) and (2.7), we have P
m
K
m
i
= 0, which implies
that
L
K
i
φ = L
K
i
C = 0, (2.14)
where i = 1, 2, 3. Also we obtain i
K
∗ G = 0from(2.40)
and (2.41), and i
k
d ∗G = 0 using the equation of the motion
for G,
1
thus
L
K
i
∗ G = 0. (2.15)
Hence, we conclude that K
i
describe symmetries of the full
ten-dimensional solutions.
Now let us study the Lie bracket of the Killing vectors.
Using (C.13) and (C.19), the Fierz identities (D.2) and the
normalization (C.28), we show that the three Killing vectors
satisfy an SU(2) algebra,
[K
i
, K
j
]=
ijk
K
k
. (2.16)
This SU(2) isometry of the four-dimensional Riemannian
space corresponds to the SU(2)
R
R-symmetry of dual five-
dimensional field theory. Then we construct a 3 × 3 matrix,
whose elements are the inner products of the Killing vectors
(D.9), and find that this matrix is singular
det (K
i
· K
j
) = 0. (2.17)
This guarantees that K
i
are the Killing vectors of S
2
.The
radius l of the two-sphere is given by
2l
2
= (K
1
)
2
+ (K
2
)
2
+ (K
3
)
2
= 2
1
9m
2
e
2U
− 4(ξ
1+
ξ
2+
)(ξ
2+
ξ
1+
)
. (2.18)
1
The equation of the motion for G is d ∗ G = (−6dU +iQ) ∧∗G +
P ∧∗G
∗
.
2.3 Supersymmetric solutions
We have showed that once we require the supersymme-
try conditions, then the four-dimensional Riemannian space
should contain S
2
. Now we focus on the remaining two-
dimensional space. We start with two one-forms L
1
n
and L
2
n
from (C.11):
L
1
n
≡ e
U +
1
2
φ
(ξ
1+
ξ
2+
+ ξ
2+
ξ
1+
)∂
n
C − me
−
1
2
φ
L
3
n
=−i ∂
n
e
U −
1
2
φ
(ξ
1+
ξ
2+
− ξ
2+
ξ
1+
)
, (2.19)
L
2
n
≡ Im
ξ
1+
γ
n
ξ
2−
+ ξ
2+
γ
n
ξ
1−
=
1
m
e
−
1
2
φ
∂
n
e
U +
1
2
φ
(ξ
1+
ξ
2+
+ ξ
2+
ξ
1+
)
, (2.20)
where
L
3
n
= Re
ξ
1+
γ
n
ξ
2−
− ξ
2+
γ
n
ξ
1−
. (2.21)
Using the Fierz identities, one can show that the one-forms
L
2
and L
3
are orthogonal to the Killing vectors,
K
i
· L
2
= K
i
· L
3
= 0. (2.22)
Together with L
K
i
C = 0, the one-form L
1
is also orthogonal
to the Killing vectors. Then we introduce coordinates z and
y,
z =−3mi e
U −
1
2
φ
(ξ
1+
ξ
2+
− ξ
2+
ξ
1+
),
y = 3me
U +
1
2
φ
(ξ
1+
ξ
2+
+ ξ
2+
ξ
1+
).
(2.23)
Since L
K
i
z = i
K
i
dz ∼ K
i
· L
1
= 0 and similarly L
K
i
y =
0, the coordinates z and y are independent of the sphere
coordinates. In terms of the coordinates z and y, the one-
forms are
L
1
=
1
3m
ydC − me
−
1
2
φ
L
3
=
1
3m
dz, (2.24)
L
2
=
1
3m
2
e
−
1
2
φ
dy. (2.25)
Then we calculate inner products of the one-forms L
1
and
L
2
, hoping to be able to fix the remaining two-dimensional
metric. However, we cannot immediately calculate the inner
products involving L
1
, because it includes dC. The resolution
is that we consider the one-form L
3
defined in (2.21) instead.
From (C.15) and (C.16), we have
d(e
4U−
1
2
φ
L
2
) = e
4U+
1
2
φ
dC ∧ L
3
, (2.26)
d(e
4U+
1
2
φ
L
3
) = 0. (2.27)
We introduce another coordinate w and write L
3
as
L
3
=
1
3m
2
e
−4U−
1
2
φ
dw. (2.28)
123
剩余11页未读,继续阅读
资源评论
weixin_38607282
- 粉丝: 3
- 资源: 973
上传资源 快速赚钱
- 我的内容管理 展开
- 我的资源 快来上传第一个资源
- 我的收益 登录查看自己的收益
- 我的积分 登录查看自己的积分
- 我的C币 登录后查看C币余额
- 我的收藏
- 我的下载
- 下载帮助
最新资源
- 课程设计-python爬虫-爬取日报,爬取日报文章后存储到本地,附带源代码+课程设计报告
- 软件和信息技术服务行业投资与前景预测.pptx
- 课程设计-基于SpringBoot + Mybatis+python爬虫NBA球员数据爬取可视化+源代码+文档+sql+效果图
- 软件品质管理系列二项目策划规范.doc
- 基于TensorFlow+PyQt+GUI的酒店评论情感分析,支持分析本地数据文件和网络爬取数据分析+源代码+文档说明+安装教程
- 软件定义无线电中的模拟电路测试技术.pptx
- 软件开发协议(作为技术开发合同附件).doc
- 软件开发和咨询行业技术趋势分析.pptx
- 软件测试题详解及答案.doc
- 软件漏洞生命周期管理策略.pptx
资源上传下载、课程学习等过程中有任何疑问或建议,欢迎提出宝贵意见哦~我们会及时处理!
点击此处反馈
安全验证
文档复制为VIP权益,开通VIP直接复制
信息提交成功