没有合适的资源?快使用搜索试试~ 我知道了~
温馨提示
形状因子的研究有许多现象学上有趣的应用,其中之一是QCD中的希格斯加胶子振幅。 通过有效的场论技术,这些与增加经典尺寸的各种算子的形状因素有关。 在本文中,我们将对由运算符Tr(F 3)产生的第一个有限顶级质量校正的分析,从N $$ \ mathcal {N} $$ = 4个超级Yang-Mills扩展到N $$ \ mathcal {N} $$ <4,对于三个胶子和最多两个循环的情况。 我们证实了我们先前的结果,即关联的Catani余数的最大超越部分是通用的,并且与最大超对称理论中受保护的三线性算子的形状因子相等。 具有较低先验性的项与N $$ \ mathcal {N} $$ = 4的答案存在出乎意料的小项集,例如ζ2,ζ3和对数的简单幂,因此我们提供了明确的表达方式。
资源推荐
资源详情
资源评论
JHEP12(2018)077
Published for SISSA by Springer
Received: April 30, 2018
Revised: November 30, 2018
Accepted: December 1, 2018
Published: December 13, 2018
Tr(F
3
) supersymmetric form factors and maximal
transcendentality. Part II. 0 < N < 4 super
Yang-Mills
Andreas Brandhuber,
a
Martyna Kostaci´nska,
a
Brenda Penante
b
and
Gabriele Travaglini
a
a
Centre for Research in String Theory, School of Physics and Astronomy,
Queen Mary University of London,
Mile End Road, London E1 4NS, U.K.
b
CERN Theory Division,
1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland
E-mail: a.brandhuber@qmul.ac.uk, m.m.kostacinska@qmul.ac.uk,
b.penante@cern.ch, g.travaglini@qmul.ac.uk
Abstract: The study of form factors has many phenomenologically interesting applica-
tions, one of which is Higgs plus gluon amplitudes in QCD. Through effective field theory
techniques these are related to form factors of various operators of increasing classical di-
mension. In this paper we extend our analysis of the first finite top-mass correction, arising
from the operator Tr(F
3
), from N = 4 super Yang-Mills to theories with N < 4, for the
case of three gluons and up to two loops. We confirm our earlier result that the maximally
transcendental part of the associated Catani remainder is universal and equal to that of
the form factor of a protected trilinear operator in the maximally supersymmetric theory.
The terms with lower transcendentality deviate from the N = 4 answer by a surprisingly
small set of terms involving for example ζ
2
, ζ
3
and simple powers of logarithms, for which
we provide explicit expressions.
Keywords: Effective Field Theories, Scattering Amplitudes, Supersymmetric Gauge The-
ory
ArXiv ePrint: 1804.05828
Open Access,
c
The Authors.
Article funded by SCOAP
3
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP12(2018)077
JHEP12(2018)077
Contents
1 Introduction 1
2 Operators and tree-level form factors in N = 1, 2, 4 4
3 One-loop minimal form factors 5
4 Two-loop minimal form factors in N <4 SYM 5
4.1 An effective supersymmetric decomposition 6
4.2 Modifications to the two-particle cut 7
4.3 Modifications to the three-particle cut 8
5 Remainder functions in N < 4 SYM 10
5.1 Catani form factor remainder and renormalisation 10
5.2 N =2 SYM 13
5.2.1 The N =2 SYM form factors 13
5.2.2 The N =2 SYM remainders 15
5.3 N =1 SYM 16
5.3.1 The N =1 SYM form factors 16
5.3.2 The N =1 SYM remainders 16
6 Discussion 17
A One-loop integral functions 19
B Numerators 20
B.1 Two-loop integrand for the O
S
form factor in N = 2 SYM 20
B.2 Two-loop integrand for the O
C
form factor in N = 2 SYM 21
B.3 Two-loop integrand for the O
S
and O
C
form factors in N = 1 SYM 22
C The N = 4 SYM remainder functions 22
1 Introduction
In this paper we extend the study of form factors of the operator Tr(F
3
) initiated in [1, 2] at
two loops with an external state containing three gluons of positive helicity. The importance
of these form factors arises from their connection to the effective theory for Higgs plus many
gluon processes. In this approach, the one-loop gluon-fusion diagram involving a loop of
– 1 –
JHEP12(2018)077
top quarks is replaced by a set of local interactions in an expansion in 1/m
t
where m
t
is
the top mass. This expansion has the form [3, 4]
L
eff
=
ˆ
C
0
O
0
+
1
m
2
t
4
X
i=1
ˆ
C
i
O
i
+ O
1
m
4
t
, (1.1)
where O
i
, i = 1, . . . , 4 are dimension-7 operators made of gluon field strengths and covariant
derivatives, and O
0
:
= H Tr(F
2
).
ˆ
C
0
,
ˆ
C
i
are the matching coefficients and are proportional
to 1/v, where v is the Higgs field vacuum expectation value. Due to the equations of
motion, in pure Yang-Mills one can eliminate two of the four operators in the sum [4, 5],
and the remaining two operators can be chosen to be H Tr(F
3
) and H Tr
D
µ
F
νρ
D
µ
F
νρ
.
One is then led to the study of the form factors of the two operators
Tr(F
3
) = Tr(F
3
ASD
) + Tr(F
3
SD
) ∝ O
C
+ O
C
, O
M
∝ Tr
D
µ
F
νρ
D
µ
F
νρ
, (1.2)
where ASD stands for the anti-selfdual part of the gluon field strength (which is the only
part contributing at two loops for our external state).
Our main goal is to identify some universal structures in the expressions of such form
factors, in particular across different classes of operators and for various amounts of super-
symmetry. Several hints of this universality have already been found in related investiga-
tions. In particular, in [6] it was found that the form factor remainder for the half-BPS
bilinear scalar operator Tr(X
2
) in N =4 super Yang-Mills (SYM) captures the maximally
transcendental part of the remainder computed in pure Yang-Mills of the operator Tr(F
2
)
with a state of three gluons [7].
1
In turn, these particular form factors compute the leading-
order Higgs plus gluon amplitudes in the 1/m
t
expansion, related to the term O
0
in (1.1).
This surprising coincidence was the motivation for the study begun in [8–10] of form
factors of operators containing three scalar fields in N = 4 SYM. In particular, it was
found in [10] that at two loops, the minimal form factor for the non-protected operator
Tr(X[Y, Z]) has the same maximally transcendental part of the minimal form factor re-
mainder of the protected operator Tr(X
3
). The Tr(X[Y, Z]) operator (or more precisely a
certain admixture of it with a fermion bilinear) is a descendant of the simplest non-protected
operator, namely the Konishi. While the form of universality we alluded to earlier is across
different theories, this new appearance is across different types of operators. Other purely
transcendental terms of decreasing transcendentality three to zero (which we will refer to
as “pure” terms) were found in the remainder for Tr(X[Y, Z]), and unexpected connec-
tions of these terms to certain spin-chain remainder densities in the SU(2) sector [11] were
identified. This was quite surprising since the operator Tr(X[Y, Z]) belongs to a different
sector, namely the SU(2|3) sector [12].
The calculation of [10] was a stepping stone for the computations of the form factors of
the operator O
C
in N =4 SYM in [1]. More precisely, in that paper two different operators
were considered: O
C
and a particular supersymmetric completion thereof denoted by O
S
,
belonging to the Konishi supermultiplet, whose MHV form factors have recently been
computed [13]. It was found in [1] that the maximally transcendental part of these form
1
Here X denotes one of the three complex scalar fields of the N =4 theory.
– 2 –
JHEP12(2018)077
factors with an external state of three gluons is one and the same across theories with
any amount of supersymmetry, including pure Yang-Mills (or QCD), and also identical for
O
S
and O
C
. These form factors in turn describe the first subleading corrections to Higgs
+ many gluons in the 1/m
t
expansion. Unlike the case of the operator Tr(X[Y, Z]), the
remainders for O
S
and O
C
show a new feature in that they are accompanied by “non-pure”
terms, i.e. terms of transcendentality degree ranging from three to zero which are further
multiplied by ratios of kinematic invariants. Interesting relations across terms with varying
degree of transcendentality were observed in [2] as a consequence of requiring the absence
of unphysical singularities in soft/collinear limits.
In this paper we quantify these findings by providing explicit expressions for the re-
mainder functions in N =2, 1 SYM, both for the component operator O
C
and for its super-
symmetric version O
S
, whose form factors can be simply obtained by a truncation [14] of
the result of [13] (we note in passing that we will never need to know the explicit expression
of the operator O
S
, only of its MHV super form factors).
An important disclaimer is in order here. Throughout our calculations we use four-
dimensional expressions of amplitudes and form factors as input in the unitarity cuts. As
mentioned in [2], there are examples in N = 4 SYM where it has explicitly been observed
that four-dimensional cuts are sufficient for computing finite remainders, namely for four-
[15], five- [16] and six-point [17] two-loop remainders of MHV amplitudes. This happens
because of the absence of so-called µ
2
-terms (that can only be detected by performing cuts
in D dimensions) at four points, and because of remarkable cancellations in the five- and
six-point cases which occur thanks to the particular definition of the remainder function. To
the best of our knowledge, no such examples exist with N <4 supersymmetry. We cannot
a priori exclude the presence of such µ
2
-terms, and the potential modifications to the
finite remainder function they could induce, however we do mention that our result passes
several consistency checks. These include reproducing the correct infrared and ultraviolet
divergences, and soft/collinear factorisation at two loops. Furthermore, we observe that the
relevant one-loop form factor used throughout this paper as obtained from four-dimensional
cuts is also correct in D dimensions [18], i.e. its expression has no additional µ
2
-terms. This
quantity plays a twofold rˆole, in that it enters cuts of two-loop form factors, and is also
used in the definition of our two-loop remainders.
The results of our investigation can be summarised as follows:
1. The maximally transcendental part of the form factors of the operators O
S
and O
C
is
the same as that of the half-BPS operator Tr(X
3
) in the N = 4 SYM theory, regardless
of the amount of supersymmetry (including N = 0) [1]. The latter statement was
confirmed by a recent explicit computation in [19].
2. The non-pure terms of our remainders are identical to those computed in the maxi-
mally supersymmetric theory.
3. The only differences arise in the pure terms at transcendentality below four, and
are limited to a very restricted type of terms involving ζ
2
, ζ
3
and simple powers
– 3 –
JHEP12(2018)077
of logarithms (after disentangling the mixing). The results of our calculations are
collected in tables 4 and 5.
The rest of the paper is organised as follows. In section 2 we briefly discuss the opera-
tors studied in this paper and their tree-level form factors, while in section 3 we summarise
the one-loop calculation. In section 4 we move on to calculate the two-loop minimal form
factors in theories with less than maximal supersymmetry. In section 5 we compute the
Catani two-loop form factor remainder functions in N =2, 1 SYM. We conclude in section 6
with a discussion of our results, their implications, and a number of consistency checks.
2 Operators and tree-level form factors in N = 1, 2, 4
As explained in detail in [1, 2], a central point of our discussion consists of appropriately
translating the operator O
C
∝ Tr(F
3
ASD
) to a supersymmetric completion O
S
=O
C
+ O(g).
In [1] we have identified O
S
for the case of N = 4 SYM as a Supersymmetric descendant
of the Konishi, generated by acting with tree-level supercharges on the lowest-dimensional
operator in the multiplet. Notably, the Component operator O
C
is contained within O
S
.
The key point to make here is that similar supersymmetric completions of O
C
can be
obtained in N = 2, 1 SYM by an appropriate truncation [14]. We will see shortly that for
the concrete calculations in this paper, we will only need O
S
for N = 2 SYM.
We now review some of the ingredients of the calculations. For both operators, the tree-
level minimal form factor with the external state of three positive-helicity gluons is given by
F
(0)
O
S
,O
C
(1
+
, 2
+
, 3
+
; q) = −[12][23][31] . (2.1)
Next, we recall the tree-level MHV super form factors [20] of the full Konishi multiplet in
N =4 SYM have been constructed and expressed in a compact formula in [13],
h1, 2, . . . , n|K(θ,
¯
θ)|0i
(0)
MHV
=
e
P
n
l=1
[l|
¯
θθ|li+η
l
hθli
h12i · · · hn1i
×
X
i≤j<k≤l
(2−δ
ij
)(2−δ
kl
)
ABCD
ˆη
iA
ˆη
jB
ˆη
kC
ˆη
lD
hjkihlii ,
(2.2)
where ˆη
A
:
= η
A
+ 2[
˜
λ
¯
θ
A
] and η
A
are the usual on-shell superspace coordinates labelling
the external on-shell states. The θ
A
α
and
¯
θ
A ˙α
label the components of the Konishi super-
multiplet. MHV form factors of O
K
are obtained by setting θ =
¯
θ = 0, while the form
factors of O
S
are obtained by setting
¯
θ = 0 and extracting the θ
8
-term:
F
(0)
O
S
,MHV
(1, 2, . . . , n; q) =
1
144
δ
(8)
(
P
n
i=1
η
i
λ
i
)
h12i · · · hn1i
×
X
i≤j<k≤l
(2−δ
ij
)(2−δ
kl
)
ABCD
η
iA
η
jB
η
kC
η
lD
hjkihlii .
(2.3)
More details on the form of the operator O
S
can be found in section 2.2 of [2] and in
particular a number of examples of four-point tree-level form factors relevant to unitarity
cuts below are given in (2.13)-(2.20) of [2], describing the differences between O
S
and O
C
.
– 4 –
剩余26页未读,继续阅读
资源评论
weixin_38596879
- 粉丝: 5
- 资源: 928
上传资源 快速赚钱
- 我的内容管理 展开
- 我的资源 快来上传第一个资源
- 我的收益 登录查看自己的收益
- 我的积分 登录查看自己的积分
- 我的C币 登录后查看C币余额
- 我的收藏
- 我的下载
- 下载帮助
安全验证
文档复制为VIP权益,开通VIP直接复制
信息提交成功