没有合适的资源?快使用搜索试试~ 我知道了~
sound and vibration
4星 · 超过85%的资源 需积分: 12 17 下载量 200 浏览量
2014-03-01
18:20:07
上传
评论
收藏 1.41MB PDF 举报
温馨提示
试读
19页
振动与噪声的研究与控制,下载于journal of sound and vibration .
资源推荐
资源详情
资源评论
Free vibration analysis of a cracked shear deformable beam
on a two-parameter elastic foundation using a lattice
spring model
M. Attar
a
, A. Karrech
b,
n
, K. Regenauer-Lieb
c,d
a
School of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia
b
School of Civil and Resource Engineering, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia
c
School of Earth and Environment, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia
d
CSIRO Earth Science and Resource Engineering, Kensington, WA 6151, Australia
article info
Article history:
Received 23 August 2013
Received in revised form
30 October 2013
Accepted 2 November 2013
Handling Editor: L.G. Tham
Available online 5 December 2013
abstract
The free vibration of a shear deformable beam with multiple open edge cracks is studied
using a lattice spring model (LSM). The beam is supported by a so-called two-parameter
elastic foundation, where normal and shear foundation stiffnesses are considered.
Through application of Timoshenko beam theory, the effects of transverse shear
deformation and rotary inertia are taken into account. In the LSM, the beam is discretised
into a one-dimensional assembly of segments interacting via rotational and shear springs.
These springs represent the flexural and shear stiffnesses of the beam. The supporting
action of the elastic foundation is described also by means of normal and shear springs
acting on the centres of the segments. The relationship between stiffnesses of the springs
and the elastic properties of the one-dimensional structure are identified by comparing
the homogenised equations of motion of the discrete system and Timoshenko beam
theory.
The effects of the transverse open cracks are modelled by increasing the flexibility of
the rotational springs in the discrete model at crack locations. In this manner, the cracked
section is modelled by a massless rotational spring combined in series with the rotational
spring that represents the flexural stiffness at that point. Numerical examples are
provided to show the versatility and convergence of the present method, and to
investigate the effects of geometrical and physical parameters on free vibration of a
cracked beam. An analytical approach is also developed based on the transfer matrix
method (TMM) to examine and validate the results obtained by the LSM against the
corresponding analytical solution.
Crown Copyright & 2013 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
The problem of dynamic analysis of a one-dimensional structure supported by a foundation is applicable in several areas
of engineering. It plays a crucial role in specialised disciplines such as offshore, structural, foundation and railway
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
journal h omepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jsvi
Journal of Sound and Vibration
0022-460X/$ - see front matter Crown Copyright & 2013 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2013.11.013
n
Corresponding author. Tel.: þ61 420816454.
E-mail addresses: mostafa@mech.uwa.edu.au, mostafa.attar@gmail.com (M. Attar), ali.karrech@gmail.com, ali.karrech@uwa.edu.au,
ali_karrech@yahoo.fr (A. Karrech), klaus.regenauer-lieb@uwa.edu.au (K. Regenauer-Lieb).
Journal of Sound and Vibration 333 (2014) 2359 – 2377
engineering. There have been a number of attempts in the literature to develop approximate and exact methods for
investigating the dynamic behaviour of beam-like structures (e.g. pipelines or piles) resting on elastic foundations. In order
to achieve this objective, different beam theories (e.g. Euler–Bernoulli, Rayleigh or Timoshenko) and foundation models
have been utilised.
To model elastic support effects, the simplest way is to idealise the foundation by using Winkler linear springs [1]. These
springs are closely spaced longitudinally, and create a supporting reaction proportional to the lateral deflection of the beam.
Over the past few decades, several researchers have considered this type of foundation for beams to perform static and
dynamic analysis (e.g. [2–5]). The disadvantage of the Winkler model is that it considers foundation elements mutually
independent, and overlooks the role of cohesion among the particles of the subgrade medium. To overcome this limitation, a
two-parameter model was proposed by Pasternak [6]. This type of foundation can capture the shear interaction between the
Winkler spring elements as well. Therefore, the foundation shear modulus is introduced as the second stiffness parameter of
the substrate. This is to create a shear force proportional to the curvature of the beam, which is in fact the reaction force of
the support shear layer [7].
A thorough understanding of the mechanical behaviour of elastically supported structures can be achieved by the
development of numerical schemes which can properly deal with complex problems. A pioneering numerical approach in
this context has been the finite element technique to address the static and dynamic response of a beam interacting with
various types of two-parameter foundations [8,9]. Employing Hamilton's principle, Matsunaga [10] proposed the method of
power series expansion of displacement components. Chen [11] developed the differential quadrature element method
(DQEM) capable of evaluating the vibration response of non-prismatic beams. A combination of the differential quadrature
and finite element methods was introduced by Malekzadeh and Karami [12] to avoid the possible shear locking
phenomenon which may appear in the conventional shear deformable finite elements. The transfer displacement function
method (TDFM) has been implemented by Ma et al. [13] to conduct a static analysis of an infinite beam supported by a
tensionless (unilateral) Pasternak foundation.
Although a considerable amount of attention has been paid to the dynamic analysis of beam-like mechanical members
on various types of foundations, very little work has been done in the literature that addresses the dynamic behaviour of
damaged structures interacting with elastic supports. Nevertheless, beam-like in-service structures may contain imperfec-
tions such as cracks, so the predictive simulation of their dynamic behaviour is a mandatory step to ensure safety and
reliability. Papadopoulos and Dimarogonas [14] suggested a promising approach for simulating an open non-propagating
surface crack in a beam as a source of local flexibility which can be formulated based on the fundamentals of fracture
mechanics. For the most general loading conditions, the local flexibility can be characterised by means of a 6 6 matrix,
where the matrix components depend on the depth of crack. In the case of bending vibration, the cracked section may be
simulated by a massless rotational spring representing the local stiffness reduction due to the cracked section [15].
Considerable research has been carried out on the prediction of dynamic responses of cracked structural elements by
expressing the influence of cracks in terms of local flexibilities and applying different beam theories [16–22]. In the context
of structural damage detection, a non-destructive analytical algorithm has been presented by Attar [23] in terms of the
changes in the dynamic characteristics of a Euler–Bernoulli beam due to the multiple damages. This method has been
applied to estimate the crack sizes and locations in a stepped beam by employing natural frequencies of the system as
input data.
The eigenvalue problem of a single-cracked Euler–Bernoulli beam resting on a Winkler foundation was first treated by
Hsu [24] using the differential quadrature method (DQM). The same method has been employed by Matbuly et al. [25] to
obtain free vibration frequencies of cracked functionally graded beams on the Pasternak-type foundation based on the
Euler–Bernoulli theory. Yan et al. [26] studied the case of a single-damaged Timoshenko beam made of functionally graded
materials (FGMs) and subjected to a lateral force moving at constant velocity. Limitations to present studies remain
concerning their ability to furnish a numerical model for a beam with shear deformation effect and rotary inertia which is
weakened by multiple cracks and supported by a two-parameter foundation.
The objective of the present paper is to develop a lattice spring model (LSM) for free vibration analysis of the cracked
Timoshenko beam perfectly bonded to a two-parameter (Pasternak-type) elastic support. By employing the LSM, the
distribution of matter is discretised into a number of discrete units connected via springs at a microscale. Thus, elastic
properties of the solid at macroscale are constructed from the interactions between these small units. The LSM, firstly
introduced by Hrennikoff [27] to solve continuum elasticity problems with Poisson's ratio of ν
¼1/3, has recently attracted
substantial attention by many researchers for simulating fracture mechanics problems [28,29]. This model can be easily
implemented to simulate fractured materials by removing the connecting springs of the lattice model.
For this study, the LSM fundamentals have been employed to treat the beam-like structure as a chain of cubic discrete
units (segments) interacting through shear and rotational springs which represent shear and bending stiffnesses of the
beam. One major advantage of this method is that the effects of Winkler and Pasternak elastic foundations may be
characterised in terms of normal and shear springs connected to the segments as well. Moreover, the local stiffness
reduction due to the surface damages can be easily modelled by increasing the rotational spring flexibility at cracked
sections. Therefore, the matrix system of equations for the whole model may be derived by Euler–Lagrange's equations and
used for conducting dynamic analysis. The proposed LSM has been checked by comparing the computed results with closed-
form analytical solutions and pre-existing literature. Finally, it must be noted that the application of this study is not only
limited to free vibration analysis of the beam supported by a linear elastic foundation. The developed LSM will hopefully
M. Attar et al. / Journal of Sound and Vibration 333 (2014) 2359–23772360
spur novel applications including variable elastic foundations, tensionless foundations and cracked beams traversed by
moving loads.
The present paper is divided into the following sections. In Section 2, the governing equations of motion are derived.
Section 3 describes the details of the proposed LSM. The cracked beam model used in analytical and numerical simulations
is explained in Section 4. The numerical results are shown and discussed in Section 5, and concluding remarks and
recommendations for future studies are presented in Section 6.
2. Governing equations
Consider a straight homogeneous beam of length L, cross-sectional area A, thickness b and width c. This beam is
supported by a two-parameter elastic foundation (Pasternak-type) and also elastically restrained at both ends, as depicted in
Fig. 1. The beam is securely attached to the foundation, so its supporting reaction can be delineated by the Pasternak-type
equation as pðx; tÞ¼K
W
wK
P
ð∂
2
w=∂x
2
Þ, where p is the foundation reaction per unit length (N/m), w is the transverse
displacement of the beam (m), K
W
is the Winkler modulus (N/m
2
) and K
P
is the Pasternak shear modulus (N) of the elastic
foundation (corresponding to the normal and shear interactions of the beam and foundation). It should be noted that the
numerical values of the Pasternak foundation parameters can be estimated using analytical methods. Girija Vallabhan and
Das [30] proposed an analytical technique to use Young's modulus and Poisson's ratio of the subgrade medium to calculate
two elastic parameters of the foundation (K
W
and K
P
).
Based on the Timoshenko beam theory, displacement field (u
1
,u
2
,u
3
) of the point (x,y,z) on the beam cross section are
defined as
u
1
ðx; y; z; tÞ¼uðx; tÞþzφðx; tÞ
u
2
ðx; y; z; tÞ¼0
u
3
ðx; y; z; tÞ¼wðx; tÞ
8
>
<
>
:
(1)
where u and w are respectively the x- and z-components of displacement vector of the point (x,0,0) on the centroidal axis of
the beam, φ is the angle of rotation (about the y-axis) of the beam cross section and t is time. The x-coordinate is taken along
the length of the beam, the y-coordinate is along the width and the z-coordinate is along the thickness, as shown in Fig. 1.
Hamilton's principle may be used to derive the governing differential equations of motion and corresponding boundary
conditions as
δ
Z
t
1
0
ðT
b
þR
b
Π
b
Þ dt ¼0 (2)
where δ denotes the variation symbol, T
b
is the kinetic energy of the beam, R
b
is the virtual work done by external forces
exerted on the beam in a time interval ½0; t
1
and Π
b
is the total potential energy including the strain energy of the beam and
potential energy of the elastic foundation and elastic end supports.
Applying Hamilton's principle and replacing the first variation of kinetic energy, virtual work done by external forces and
total potential energy into Eq. (2), the governing equations of motion are derived as
∂Q
∂x
K
W
wþK
P
∂
2
w
∂x
2
þq m
0
∂
2
w
∂t
2
¼0 (3)
∂M
∂x
Q þ
μ m
2
∂
2
φ
∂t
2
¼0 (4)
where m
0
¼
R
A
ρ dA ¼ ρA and m
2
¼
R
A
ρz
2
dA ¼ρI are the inertial terms, I ¼
R
A
z
2
dA is the second moment of the cross-
sectional area about the y-axis, M ¼EI∂φ=∂x is the internal bending moment, Q ¼κ
s
GAðφþ∂w=∂xÞ is the internal shear force,
E is Young's modulus, G is the shear modulus and κ
s
is the Timoshenko shear correction factor. The associated boundary
conditions are also obtained as
Q þ
^
Q K
L1
w ¼0orw ¼w
0
at x ¼0 (5)
Q þ
^
Q þK
L2
w ¼0orw ¼w
L
at x ¼L (6)
M K
R1
φ ¼0orφ ¼φ
0
at x ¼0 (7)
Fig. 1. Sketch of a beam fully supported by a two-parameter elastic foundation and elastically restrained boundary conditions.
M. Attar et al. / Journal of Sound and Vibration 333 (2014) 2359–2377 2361
M þK
R2
φ ¼0orφ ¼φ
L
at x ¼L (8)
It should be noted that
^
Q ¼ K
P
∂w=∂x in Eqs. (5) and (6) is the internal shear force associated with the Pasternak shear layer
[31,8], while Q is the shear force in the beam due to the bending. It means that the total transverse shear force (S) at each
cross section is the resultant (sum) of Q and
^
Q , as it is depicted in Fig. 2. It is worth mentioning that the role of internal shear
force associated with the shear layer has been overlooked in most of previous studies [25,26] for cracked beams perfectly
bonded to the Pasternak-type elastic foundation.
By substituting the internal bending moment and shear force into Eqs. (3) and (4), the governing equations of motion of
the Timoshenko beam on the two-parameter foundation can be derived in terms of displacements as
κ
s
GA
∂φ
∂x
þ
∂
2
w
∂x
2
K
W
wþK
P
∂
2
w
∂x
2
þq ¼m
0
∂
2
w
∂t
2
(9)
EI
∂
2
φ
∂x
2
κ
s
GA φþ
∂w
∂x
þ
μ ¼m
2
∂
2
φ
∂t
2
(10)
3. Lattice spring model
3.1. Discrete equations of motion in the LSM
The LSM is in fact a discrete representation of the continuum matter in which material is discretised into a network of
discrete units interacting via springs. The elastic properties of the springs between the neighbouring units in small scale
define the elastic characteristics of the solid at large scale. Therefore, due to the discrete nature of the LSM, it can be
considered as a mesoscopic model of the media, but the mechanical behaviour of the continuum at large scale can be
accurately reproduced from the resultant response of the lattice network. Depending on the underlying structure of matter,
the type of connecting springs and particles degrees of freedom in the LSM may be different. However, the common feature
of all LSM is describing the continuous elastic medium by a discrete assembly of the particles and constructing a system of
equations in which unknown values are the displacements of the nodes.
In this paper, we take advantage of the LSM principles and divide the continuous Timoshenko beam into a one-
dimensional chain of periodic cubic segments, as illustrated in Fig. 3. By neglecting the axial displacement effects, we only
need shear and rotational springs between segments to model shear and flexural stiffnesses of the beam properly. All
segments are identical with mass m and connected by shear (K
S
) and rotational (K
φ
) springs. The total number of the
Fig. 2. Transverse shear force contributions of the bending theory and foundation shear layer.
Fig. 3. One-dimensional LSM representation of the Timoshenko beam supported by the elastic foundation.
M. Attar et al. / Journal of Sound and Vibration 333 (2014) 2359–23772362
剩余18页未读,继续阅读
资源评论
- 六道2天下2015-07-21这是一篇声音与振动的模块杂志,刚好在学NI的SV模块,顺便学习一下
gaobuliao
- 粉丝: 0
- 资源: 1
上传资源 快速赚钱
- 我的内容管理 展开
- 我的资源 快来上传第一个资源
- 我的收益 登录查看自己的收益
- 我的积分 登录查看自己的积分
- 我的C币 登录后查看C币余额
- 我的收藏
- 我的下载
- 下载帮助
安全验证
文档复制为VIP权益,开通VIP直接复制
信息提交成功