没有合适的资源？快使用搜索试试~ 我知道了~

文库首页开发技术其它Performance characteristics of traditional vms vs docker containers

Performance characteristics of traditional vms vs docker contain...

Docker

DockerCon

4星 · 超过85%的资源需积分: 10 11 下载量 10 浏览量 2014-06-27 11:14:15 上传评论收藏 1.11MB PDF 举报

温馨提示

试读

50页

该文档将传统的VMs和Docker Containers进行了详细的对比。

资源推荐

资源详情

资源评论

Performance Characteristics of

Traditional VMs vs Docker Containers

dockercon14

June 9-10, 2014

San Francisco, CA

Boden Russell (brussell@us.ibm.com)

Motivations: Computer Scientist

6/18/2014 2

Family

Innovation

Creativity

Revenue

Motivations: Enterprise

6/18/2014 3

Revenue

Increasing Revenue: Do More With Less

Reduce Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) and increase Return On Investment (ROI)

6/18/2014 4

Category

Factors

Scope

CAPEX

Hardware costs - VM density (consolidation ratio)

- Soft device integration

- Broad vendor compatibility

- Hypervisor

- Cloud manager

Software licensing costs - Software purchase price

- Support contracts

- Hypervisor

- Cloud manager

OPEX

Disaster recovery - Hypervisor

- Cloud manager

Upgrade / maintenance expenses - Hypervisor

- Cloud manager

Power & cooling costs - Reduced HW footprint - Hypervisor

- Cloud manager

Administration efficiency - Automated operations

- Performance / response time

- Hypervisor

- Cloud manager

Support & training costs - Hypervisor

- Cloud manager

AGILITY

Application delivery time - Workflow complexity

- Toolset costs

- Skillset

- Hypervisor

- Cloud manager

Planned / unplanned downtime - Hypervisor

- Cloud manager

*Not a complete or extensive list

About This Benchmark

 Use case perspective

– As an OpenStack Cloud user I want a Ubuntu based VM with MySQL… Why would I choose

docker LXC vs a traditional hypervisor?

 OpenStack “Cloudy” perspective

– LXC vs. traditional VM from a Cloudy (OpenStack) perspective

– VM operational times (boot, start, stop, snapshot)

– Compute node resource usage (per VM penalty); density factor

 Guest runtime perspective

– CPU, memory, file I/O, MySQL OLTP, etc.

 Why KVM?

– Exceptional performance

DISCLAIMERS

The tests herein are semi-active litmus tests – no in depth tuning,

analysis, etc. More active testing is warranted. These results do not

necessary reflect your workload or exact performance nor are they

guaranteed to be statistically sound.

6/18/2014 5

剩余49页未读，继续阅读

评论收藏

内容反馈

资源评论

资源反馈

评论星级较低，若资源使用遇到问题可联系上传者，3个工作日内问题未解决可申请退款~

netgenius12

2014-12-07

非常好，一直在找

周小璐

粉丝: 95
资源: 197

上传资源快速赚钱

我的内容管理展开

我的资源快来上传第一个资源

我的收益

登录查看自己的收益

我的积分登录查看自己的积分

我的C币登录后查看C币余额

我的收藏

我的下载

下载帮助

前往需求广场，查看用户热搜

Performance characteristics of traditional vms vs docker contain...

Performance of Docker vs VMs Presented

Rest-VMS-Docker

容器、虚拟机和Docker入门（by Preethi Kasireddy）

docker入门教程

vms-and-containers

docker 入门实战

Docker从入门到实践

SAP VMS 01_VMS_Overview&Concepts

毕设数据处理源代码（python）.py

Infrastructure.as.Code.IAC.Cookbook.epub

VMS志愿者管理系统

docker000000000.pdf

SAP_VMS帮助文档

SAP VMS整车管理系统

vms常用命令

Containers > VMs

论文研究-基于改进遗传算法的VMS选址研究与分析.pdf

VMS830A振动仪

SAP汽车行业package配置常用TCODE(VMS部分).

Qt 5实现串口调试助手 （源工程文件、0积分下载）

【SystemVerilog】路科验证V2学习笔记（全600页）.pdf

AutoSAR标准协议4.2.2

光伏-储能并网系统仿真.rar

NPPJSONViewer.zip

GD32替换STM32注意事项.pdf

XCP协议的规范文档

VS2015安装证书，JavaScript_ProjectSystem.msi，JavaScript_LanguageService.msi

CANoe通过CAPL脚本实现自动测试

蓝牙BLE协议中文版.pdf

最新资源

Qt 5实现串口调试助手（源工程文件、0积分下载）